º£½ÇÖ±²¥

Despite controversy, Indonesia honors military ruler Suharto as national hero

Special Indonesia’s President Prabowo Subianto gives a plaque to Siti Hardijanti Rukmana, daughter of the former Indonesian president Suharto, as Suharto receives the title of a national hero during National Heroes’ Day at the State Palace in Jakarta, Indonesia on Nov. 10, 2025. (Reuters)
Indonesia’s President Prabowo Subianto gives a plaque to Siti Hardijanti Rukmana, daughter of the former Indonesian president Suharto, as Suharto receives the title of a national hero during National Heroes’ Day at the State Palace in Jakarta, Indonesia on Nov. 10, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 15 sec ago

Despite controversy, Indonesia honors military ruler Suharto as national hero

Indonesia’s President Prabowo Subianto gives plaque to Siti Hardijanti Rukmana, daughter of former Indonesian president Suharto.
  • Govt also recognizes late President Abdurrahman Wahid and prominent labor activist Marsinah
  • Suharto, who died in 2008, was current President Prabowo Subianto’s father-in-law

JAKARTA: Indonesia has declared the late President Suharto a national hero which activists say is an attempt at whitewashing a long history of human rights abuses and corruption that took place during his three-decade military rule.

Suharto was forced out of office in 1998 by violent protests that took place amid an economic crisis.

His departure marked the end of the New Order regime, which was characterized by rapid economic growth, kleptocracy and rights violations, including the anti-communist purges in the 1960s, which claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people.

Subianto was one of 10 people awarded the national hero title by President Prabowo Subianto on Monday, in the annual observance of National Heroes’ Day, to honor those who have made significant contributions to the country.

“Indonesia’s second president is known as the Father of Development because of his Repelita (Five-Year Development Plan) program that helped Indonesia to achieve significant development,†the Cabinet Secretariat said in a statement.

Former President Abdurrahman Wahid, Indonesia’s first democratically elected leader who revoked many of Suharto’s repressive laws, and Marsinah, a prominent labor activist who was killed during Suharto’s dictatorship, were also among those who received the national hero title this year.

Suharto, who died in 2008 and was Prabowo’s father-in-law, had been proposed twice to receive the national hero title under previous presidents Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Joko Widodo, but was never approved.

His 2025 nomination had earlier sparked protests among many Indonesian activists, who demanded that the government remove Suharto from the list of candidates.

Many highlighted his alleged involvement in the killings of 1965-1966, a series of countrywide political purges targeting members of the Communist Party of Indonesia and its alleged sympathizers. Between 500,000 and 1 million people were killed at the time.

The current government’s decision to make Suharto a national hero drew sharp and swift criticism from human rights activists.

“For more than three decades, Suharto’s regime was responsible for various crimes against humanity and gross human rights violations … Millions of victims and their families have yet to receive the truth, justice or even reparations until now,†Usman Hamid, executive director of Amnesty International Indonesia, told Arab News on Tuesday.

“The act of awarding this national hero title cannot be separated from the systematic effort to rewrite Indonesian history by removing state violence … It’s a blatant perversion of history and whitewashing of historic crime.â€

Under Suharto’s military rule, the government tolerated no criticism and crushed opposition, while his family was accused of enriching themselves with billions of dollars through kickbacks.

“The whole point of the national hero award is to create role models,†said constitutional law expert Bivitri Susanti. “Suharto was known for committing human rights abuses and corruption.â€

The move also poses a threat to Indonesia’s reform movement — also known as reformasi — which was the basis of the country’s path to democracy after Suharto fell from power, Susanti told Arab News. 

“I think what we need to be concerned about is how this charts a path to reverse everything back to how it was before reformasi,†she said. “It’s a complete setback.â€


UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report
Updated 7 sec ago

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report
  • Current definition of terrorism ‘creates uncertainty,’ should be tightened: Commission
  • Legislation used to ban Palestine Action requires far more parliamentary scrutiny

LONDON: Laws used in the UK to ban the group Palestine Action have been applied “too broadly,†a review into counterterrorism legislation has found.

The review, led by former Judge Declan Morgan, has determined that the UK definition of terrorism creates “uncertainty and overreach in its application†and needs to be tightened.

The 15-person Independent Commission on UK Counter-Terrorism Law, Policy and Practice added that cases related to property damage should only include “serious risk to life, national security, or public safety, or involving arson, explosives, or firearms.â€

Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organization in the UK on July 5 after several incidents, including a break-in at a Royal Air Force base that saw two military aircraft sprayed with paint.

The ban, which is being challenged in the High Court, makes supporting the group a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

But the review said proscription of any group should only occur where a risk to the public from acts of terrorism exists, and that if not renewed, bans should lapse after five years.

“The commission heard evidence that, without careful calibration, counter-terrorism powers risk being applied too broadly — capturing behaviour that is harmful but not terrorist,†it said.

“When a group is proscribed, individuals can face prosecution for membership, inviting or expressing support, or wearing associated symbols or uniforms,†the report added.

“Providing funding or handling property linked to a proscribed organisation may constitute a criminal offence, and any act carried out for the benefit of a proscribed group can be treated as an act of terrorism.

“These far-reaching implications can create confusion, deter lawful civic engagement, and strain relations with communities connected to affected organisations — particularly where banned groups also pursue political objectives.â€

Proscription, the report said, should be subject to far more parliamentary scrutiny in future.

The banning of Palestine Action has led to a series of protests across the UK featuring people holding placards stating: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.â€

Almost 2,000 people have been arrested for taking part in the protests under the Terrorism Act.

The report said going forward, people should only be charged under sections 12 and 13 of the act “where there is clear intent to commit the offence.â€

That could impact cases such as that of Kneecap rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who was charged under section 13 for allegedly holding up a flag of the banned Lebanese group Hezbollah at a gig earlier this year. The case against him was dismissed due to a technical error in September.