ֱ

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report
Laws used in the UK to ban the group Palestine Action have been applied ‘too broadly,’ a review into counterterrorism legislation has found. (Getty Images)
Short Url
Updated 46 sec ago

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report
  • Current definition of terrorism ‘creates uncertainty,’ should be tightened: Commission
  • Legislation used to ban Palestine Action requires far more parliamentary scrutiny

LONDON: Laws used in the UK to ban the group Palestine Action have been applied “too broadly,” a review into counterterrorism legislation has found.

The review, led by former Judge Declan Morgan, has determined that the UK definition of terrorism creates “uncertainty and overreach in its application” and needs to be tightened.

The 15-person Independent Commission on UK Counter-Terrorism Law, Policy and Practice added that cases related to property damage should only include “serious risk to life, national security, or public safety, or involving arson, explosives, or firearms.”

Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organization in the UK on July 5 after several incidents, including a break-in at a Royal Air Force base that saw two military aircraft sprayed with paint.

The ban, which is being challenged in the High Court, makes supporting the group a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

But the review said proscription of any group should only occur where a risk to the public from acts of terrorism exists, and that if not renewed, bans should lapse after five years.

“The commission heard evidence that, without careful calibration, counter-terrorism powers risk being applied too broadly — capturing behaviour that is harmful but not terrorist,” it said.

“When a group is proscribed, individuals can face prosecution for membership, inviting or expressing support, or wearing associated symbols or uniforms,” the report added.

“Providing funding or handling property linked to a proscribed organisation may constitute a criminal offence, and any act carried out for the benefit of a proscribed group can be treated as an act of terrorism.

“These far-reaching implications can create confusion, deter lawful civic engagement, and strain relations with communities connected to affected organisations — particularly where banned groups also pursue political objectives.”

Proscription, the report said, should be subject to far more parliamentary scrutiny in future.

The banning of Palestine Action has led to a series of protests across the UK featuring people holding placards stating: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”

Almost 2,000 people have been arrested for taking part in the protests under the Terrorism Act.

The report said going forward, people should only be charged under sections 12 and 13 of the act “where there is clear intent to commit the offence.”

That could impact cases such as that of Kneecap rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who was charged under section 13 for allegedly holding up a flag of the banned Lebanese group Hezbollah at a gig earlier this year. The case against him was dismissed due to a technical error in September.


Modi inaugurates giant India-funded hydropower project in Bhutan

Modi inaugurates giant India-funded hydropower project in Bhutan
Updated 7 sec ago

Modi inaugurates giant India-funded hydropower project in Bhutan

Modi inaugurates giant India-funded hydropower project in Bhutan
  • Punatsangchhu II Hydroelectric Project is currently Bhutan’s largest, with 1,020 MW generation capacity
  • Nearly all electricity generation in the Himalayan kingdom comes from renewable sources, mainly hydropower

NEW DELHI: India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, together with Bhutan’s King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, inaugurated on Tuesday the Punatsangchhu II Hydroelectric Project, a giant Indian-funded hydropower plant.

The project, situated along the Punatsangchhu River, has a generation capacity of 1,020 MW and is currently the largest fully operational hydropower plant in the Himalayan kingdom, where electricity is the primary export commodity and a major source of revenue.

Bhutan is one of the few countries where nearly all electricity generation comes from renewable sources — 99 percent of which is hydropower. Almost all of it is exported to India.

“Taking this progress forward, another major step is being taken today. A new hydroelectric project of over 1,000 MW is being launched, which will increase Bhutan’s hydropower capacity by nearly 40 percent,” Modi said during a reception with the Bhutanese king and Prime Minister Tshering Tobgay.

With an area of 34,400 sq. km and a population of less than 800,000, Bhutan is landlocked between India to the south, east and west, and China to the north.

India is its largest investor and trading partner, with bilateral duty-free transit for goods accounting for nearly 80 percent of its trade.

“And our partnership isn’t limited to hydroelectricity. We are now taking major steps together in solar energy. Important agreements related to this have also been made today,” Modi said.

“The progress and prosperity of India and Bhutan are closely linked. In this spirit, last year the government of India announced a contribution of 10,000 crore rupees ($1.2 billion) to support Bhutan’s Five-Year Plan. These funds are being utilized across all sectors.”

The financing of the Punatsangchhu II Hydroelectric Project is structured as a 30 percent grant and 70 loan arrangement from the Indian government.

The construction of a bigger one, also Indian-funded — the 1,200 MW Punatsangchhu-I Hydroelectric Project — is still underway.

In September, India announced another infrastructure mega-project in Bhutan; a cross-border railway slated to connect the mountainous neighbor with its nearly 70,000-km railway network in four years.

The $454 million project will link the eastern Indian states of Assam and West Bengal to two towns in Bhutan. Together, the lines will cover a total distance of 89 km.