ֱ

Russia, US agree to work toward ending Ukraine war, improving ties in landmark Riyadh talks

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, second left, meets with Saudi FM Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud, center left, Saudi National Security Advisor Mosaad bin Mohammad Al-Aiban, center right, Russian FM Sergey Lavrov,(R), and Russian policy advisor Yuri Ushakov, second right. Also in meeting are US National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. (SPA)
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, second left, meets with Saudi FM Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud, center left, Saudi National Security Advisor Mosaad bin Mohammad Al-Aiban, center right, Russian FM Sergey Lavrov,(R), and Russian policy advisor Yuri Ushakov, second right. Also in meeting are US National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. (SPA)
Short Url
Updated 21 February 2025

Russia, US agree to work toward ending Ukraine war, improving ties in landmark Riyadh talks

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, second left, meets with Saudi FM Prince Faisal bin Farhan, center left.
  • ֱ hosted the talks between Russia and the US as part of the Kingdom’s efforts to enhance security and peace in the world

RIYADH: Russia and the US have agreed to start working toward ending the war in Ukraine and improving their diplomatic and economic ties, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Tuesday. 

Rubio said that the two sides agreed broadly to pursue three goals: to restore staffing at their respective embassies in Washington and Moscow, to create a high-level team to support Ukraine peace talks, and to explore closer relations and economic cooperation.
He stressed, however, that the talks — which were hosted by ֱ and also attended by his Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov — marked the beginning of a conversation, and more work needs to be done down the road.
No Ukrainian officials were present at the meeting, which came as the beleaguered country is slowly but steadily losing ground against more numerous Russian troops in a grinding war that began nearly three years ago.
Improving Russian-US relations
Ties between Russia and the US have fallen to their lowest level in decades during the war. Both embassies have been hit hard by expulsions of large numbers of diplomats over the course of several years, and the US, along with European nations, imposed a raft of sanctions on Russia. The allies have repeatedly expanded the measures to damage Moscow’s economy.
“Should this conflict come to an acceptable end, the incredible opportunities that exist to partner with the Russians geopolitically on issues of common interest and frankly, economically on issues that hopefully will be good for the world and also improve our relations in the long term,” Rubio said.
His comments were further evidence of the remarkable US reversal on Russia after years in which Trump’s predecessor, Joe Biden, led international efforts to isolate Moscow.
Tuesday’s meeting was meant to pave the way for a summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. After the talks wrapped, Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, told Russia’s Channel One that no date has been set yet for that summit but that it was “unlikely” to take place next week.
Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Lavrov said that in his view, “the conversation was very useful.” He mentioned the same three goals as Rubio and said that Washington and Moscow agreed to appoint representatives to carry out “regular consultations” on Ukraine.
“We not only listened, but also heard each other,” Lavrov. “And I have reason to believe that the American side has started to better understand our position, which we have once again outlined in detail, using specific examples, based on President Putin’s repeated speeches.”
The meeting marked the most extensive contact between the two countries since Moscow’s Feb. 24, 2022, invasion. Lavrov and then-US Secretary of State Antony Blinken talked briefly on the sidelines of a G-20 meeting in India nearly two years ago, but tensions remained high.

ֱ hosted the talks on Ukraine between Russia and the US as part of its efforts to enhance global peace and security, the Kingdom’s foreign ministry announced earlier on Tuesday.

A statement released by the Kingdom’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that under the directive of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman: “ֱ hosts today, Tuesday, in the city of Riyadh, talks between the Russian Federation and the United States of America, as part of the Kingdom’s efforts to enhance security and peace in the world.”

The meeting was attended by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the presence of Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan and Saudi Minister of State and National Security advisor Musaed Al-Aiban.

The talks between US and Russian officials in Riyadh were the most significant to date between the two former Cold War foes on ending Moscow’s war in Ukraine.

The conversation could pave the way for a summit between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.

But the talks in the Saudi capital underscored the rapid pace of US efforts to halt the conflict, less than a month after Trump took office and six days after he spoke by phone to Russian President Vladimir Putin.




Russian foreign ministry officials said NATO must abandon plans for Ukraine to join the alliance. (X.com/RFM)

Lavrov said Russia told the United States it opposed any NATO member sending troops to Ukraine as part of a ceasefire, whether under a national flag or that of the European Union.
“This is unacceptable to us, of course,” Lavrov added.
The two sides also agreed to ensure the “prompt appointment” of ambassadors to each other’s countries, the foreign minister said.
Russian President Vladimir Putin relieved his former ambassador to Washington, Anatoly Antonov, last year but did not name a replacement.
His US counterpart Donald Trump is yet to appoint his ambassador for Moscow.
Lavrov also said the United States expressed an interest in lifting sanctions on Moscow.
“There was strong interest in removing artificial barriers to the development of mutually beneficial economic cooperation,” he said.
The two sides agreed on a process for starting negotiations on ending the fighting in Ukraine, Lavrov added.
“The United States side will announce who will represent Washington, and as soon as we know the name and position of the appropriate representative, we will, as President Putin told President Trump, immediately designate our participant in this process.”

While the US and Russians were meeting in ֱ, Turkiye’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan met with Volodymyr Zelensky in Ankara.
Zelensky flew into the Turkish capital from the United Arab Emirates late on Monday, saying on Telegram he would discuss prisoner exchanges and other issues with Erdogan.
The talks at Erdogan’s presidential palace, which began around 11:15 GMT, came several hours after the meeting in ֱ.




Zelensky arrived in Turkiye late on Monday. (AFP)

Zelensky last visited Turkiye in March 2024.
Top Erdogan aide Fahrettin Altun on Monday said the pair would discuss how to “further strengthen cooperation” between their two nations.
NATO member Turkey has sought to maintain good relations with its warring Black Sea neighbours, with Erdogan pitching himself as a key go-between and possible peacemaker between the two.
Ankara has provided drones for Ukraine but shied away from Western-led sanctions on Moscow.
Alongside ֱ and the UAE, Turkiye has played a role in brokering several prisoner swap deals between Russia and Ukraine which have seen hundreds of prisoners returning home despite the ongoing conflict.

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

(With agencies)


Former British officer sues Ministry of Defense over handling of Afghan data breach

Former British officer sues Ministry of Defense over handling of Afghan data breach
Updated 5 sec ago

Former British officer sues Ministry of Defense over handling of Afghan data breach

Former British officer sues Ministry of Defense over handling of Afghan data breach
  • Individual worked on Afghan cases for under two years before his role ended unexpectedly after he threatened to become a whistleblower
  • He is suing the MoD and his third-party recruiter, and the case is set to be heard next year

LONDON: A former British military officer is suing the Ministry of Defense for constructive dismissal after speaking out about the handling of a data leak that exposed the personal details of thousands of Afghans seeking relocation to the UK.

The Times reported that an unnamed individual was contracted to assist with Operation Rubific, a secret mission addressing the fallout from a massive data breach.

The former officer worked on Afghan cases for under two years before his role ended unexpectedly after he threatened to become a whistleblower. He was then reassigned to another area in a position for which he was overqualified.

“He complained they are letting in people they shouldn’t and not letting in those he should,” a source close to the former officer suing the MoD told The Times.

He also raised concerns that the government was not prioritizing those most at risk among the tens of thousands of Afghans identified for resettlement in Britain. He assisted four Afghan individuals in relocating to Britain after their details were revealed on the leaked list.

The MoD is facing scrutiny over a superinjunction that blocked public and parliamentary oversight after a spreadsheet leaked containing the names, telephone numbers and email addresses of Afghans seeking relocation to Britain.

The former officer allegedly threatened to alert other departments about the superinjunction and was subsequently “managed out,” according to the source.

The individual is suing the MoD and his third-party recruiter, for whom he worked as a contractor after leaving the military. The case is set to be heard next year.

Officials argued that the data breach should remain secret for nearly two years, claiming it put 100,000 Afghans at risk of Taliban retribution, including death and torture. However, the superinjunction was lifted in July after a government review deemed it “highly unlikely” that Afghans on the leaked spreadsheet were at risk.

Ministers reduced the number of Afghans brought to Britain from 42,500 to 24,000, including family members, based on their presence in the country or prior invitations. Concerns have also been raised about the motive behind the secrecy order, questioning if it aims to protect the MoD’s reputation and prepare for potential mass applications from affected Afghans, The Times reported.

Adnan Malik, the head of data protection at Barings Law, is now representing 1,400 individuals from the leaked list; a number that continues to grow daily.

He told The Times that the MoD’s “attempt to silence one of their own whistleblowers is another shameful development” after tens of thousands of Afghans had their data breached without their knowledge.

A source from the MoD said that the individual’s contract had concluded.


Indian politicians demand action against Israeli envoy after attack on Priyanka Gandhi

Indian politicians demand action against Israeli envoy after attack on Priyanka Gandhi
Updated 13 August 2025

Indian politicians demand action against Israeli envoy after attack on Priyanka Gandhi

Indian politicians demand action against Israeli envoy after attack on Priyanka Gandhi
  • Israeli ambassador posted disparaging remarks against Gandhi after her comments on Gaza
  • Congress party demands official apology for his ‘public attempt to intimidate’ the MP

NEW DELHI: Indian politicians are demanding action against the Israeli ambassador in Delhi following his verbal attack on Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi.

Gandhi, a lawmaker from the opposition Congress party, who is the daughter of former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and sister of Rahul Gandhi — leader of the opposition — wrote on social media on Tuesday that “the Israeli state is committing genocide” in Gaza.

“It has murdered over 60,000 people, 18,430 of whom were children. It has starved hundreds to death including many children and is threatening to starve millions,” she said, calling out the Indian government over its inaction.

“Enabling these crimes by silence and inaction is a crime in itself. It is shameful that the Indian Government stands silent as Israel unleashes this devastation on the people of Palestine.”

The post was almost immediately responded to by Reuven Azar, Israel’s ambassador to India, who told Gandhi: “What is shameful is your deceit.”

The post triggered outrage among Congress members, with the party’s spokesperson Supriya Shrinate demanding that the Indian government act over the envoy’s “casting aspersions” on Gandhi.

“He should be officially made to apologize. She is a member of parliament, she is an elected representative, and how dare the Israeli ambassador talk to her in that tone. The government should take this up in no uncertain terms,” Shrinate told Arab News.

“We seek an unconditional apology for the use of tone and words that the Israeli ambassador has used, and the reality is that the world is watching what Israel is doing in Gaza.”

Priyanka Chaturvedi, an MP and spokesperson of the Shiv Sena (UBT) party, said inaction from the Ministry of External Affairs would only embolden foreign diplomats “to speak to Indian parliamentarians in this tone and tenor in their own country.

“This is unacceptable,” she wrote on X. “Hope Ministry of External Affairs reprimands this Hon. Ambassador.”

For Gaurav Gogoi, a Congress lawmaker from Assam, “the disparaging comments made by a foreign Ambassador against a Member of Parliament of India is a serious breach of privilege,” he said in an X post, urging Parliament to take action if the government does not respond.

The government in New Delhi has largely remained quiet since Israel launched its deadly assault on Gaza in October 2023.

But India’s civil society and the opposition are increasingly speaking up against Israeli war crimes.

Pawan Khera, chairman of the Congress party’s publicity department, called on External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar to address the Israeli ambassador’s “public attempt to intimidate” Gandhi.

“That the ambassador of a state accused of genocide worldwide would target a sitting Member of the Indian Parliament is both unprecedented and intolerable. It is a direct affront to the dignity of Indian democracy,” he wrote on X.

Khera also addressed the envoy directly: “No amount of deflection or whitewashing can obscure the facts. The international community is witnessing, in real time, the killing of civilians in Gaza — including those queuing for aid. The world sees the heartbreaking images emerging from Gaza every day. It will neither forget nor forgive.”


Senior figures in UK’s ruling party sound alarm over Palestine Action ban

Senior figures in UK’s ruling party sound alarm over Palestine Action ban
Updated 13 August 2025

Senior figures in UK’s ruling party sound alarm over Palestine Action ban

Senior figures in UK’s ruling party sound alarm over Palestine Action ban
  • Ex-minister: ‘You devalue the charge of terrorism by equating it with the protests we have seen’
  • Civil liberties campaigner: ‘Spraying paint on airplanes is not the same as being the IRA or Al-Qaeda’

LONDON: Senior figures in the UK’s ruling Labour Party are sounding the alarm over the government’s banning of the group Palestine Action.

It comes after hundreds of people were arrested in London last weekend under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act.

The protesters had held signs demonstrating support for Palestine Action, which was proscribed as a terrorist organization in July.

Former Minister Peter Hain said the issue “will end in tears for the government,” The Guardian reported on Wednesday.

The former anti-apartheid activist added: “We are seeing retired magistrates, retired and serving doctors and all sorts of people being arrested and now effectively being equated with terrorists such as Al-Qaeda, which is absolutely wrong.”

If the ban is contested through a legal challenge and overturned, it “would be a mercy to all concerned, including the government,” he said.

Hain was one of three Labour peers in the House of Lords who voted against the ban last month.

“It’s going to get worse (for the government) because I don’t see people from that ‘middle Britain’ background who have joined these protests in such large numbers to suddenly decide that all is OK,” he said.

“In fact, I think more are going to come out and face arrest because the approach to Palestine Action is contrary to every form of peaceful protest in British history, whether that’s the chartists and suffragettes, or anti-apartheid and anti-fascist protesters.”

The government has faced mounting pressure over the ban after it emerged that of the 532 arrested under the Terrorism Act on the weekend, half were aged 60 or older.

Hain served as secretary of state for Northern Ireland, a role that gave him great insight into the realities of terrorism.

“There is a battery of other crimes that could be applied to Palestine Action but terrorism is not one of them, while you also devalue the charge of terrorism by equating it with the protests we have seen,” he said.

“I … worked with the intelligence services and others to stop dissident IRA (Irish Republican Army) groups from killing. I have signed warrants to stop other real terrorists, Islamist terrorists, bombing London. So, I am not soft on terrorism. But I am a strong believer that you have to know what it looks like.”

Many Labour MPs and peers are now doubting the decision to ban Palestine Action, Hain added.

The government has justified the proscription by describing the group as a “violent organization” that was planning to carry out extensive attacks.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said court restrictions have prevented the British public from discovering the “full nature of this organization.”

However, Labour peer Shami Chakrabarti warned that the ban could result in an “I am Spartacus” moment, The Independent reported on Wednesday.

She was referring to the 1960 film “Spartacus,” and a situation in which a group of people claim to be one person in an act of solidarity against an authority.

The civil liberties campaigner urged the government to “think again” over the ban, saying her worries are “greater now even than they were before” after last weekend’s mass arrests.

Chakrabarti told BBC Radio 4’s “Today” program: “There are blurred lines now … some people are, as always, protesting about the horrific events they’re watching unfold in Gaza, but others think they’re standing up for civil liberties because this ban was disproportionate.”

She added that a distinction must be made between criminal damage and terrorism, and that “spraying paint on airplanes,” as Palestine Action members did, “is not the same as being the IRA or Al-Qaeda.”

Saturday’s mass arrest of protesters is believed to be the largest of its kind by London’s Metropolitan Police since the poll tax riot of 1990.

Rights groups including Amnesty International and Liberty warned that the arrests were “disproportionate to the point of absurdity,” and that the Terrorism Act is threatening freedom of expression.

Chakrabarti said: “And so we've got more people taking to the streets, a bigger headache for the police. Frankly, I’m very sympathetic to the police on this issue. I think it may be time to think again.”


Bangladeshi officials testify against former British minister Siddiq in corruption trial

Bangladeshi officials testify against former British minister Siddiq in corruption trial
Updated 13 August 2025

Bangladeshi officials testify against former British minister Siddiq in corruption trial

Bangladeshi officials testify against former British minister Siddiq in corruption trial

DHAKA: Bangladeshi anti-corruption officials testified in court on Wednesday against former British anti-corruption minister Tulip Siddiq, accusing of using a family connection to deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to obtain state-owned land in the South Asian country.
Siddiq, who is Hasina’s niece, resigned from her post in Prime Minister Keir Starmer ‘s government in January following reports that she lived in London properties linked to her aunt and was named in an anti-corruption investigation in Bangladesh.
She is being tried together with her mother, Sheikh Rehana, brother Radwan Mujib and sister Azmina. Siddiq has been charged with facilitating their receipt of state land in a township project near the capital, Dhaka. They are out of the country and being tried in absentia.
Siddiq’s lawyers have called the charges baseless and politically motivated.
Muhammad Tariqul Islam, a public prosecutor, disputed a claim by Siddiq that she is not Bangladeshi, saying the anti-corruption watchdog through investigations found that she is a citizen.
The prosecutor said if Siddiq is convicted she could be sentenced to three to 10 years in prison.
Siddiq in an interview with the British newspaper The Guardian recently referred to Bangladesh as “a foreign country” and called the charges against her “completely absurd.”
She asserted to The Guardian she was “collateral damage” in the longstanding feud between her aunt and Bangladesh’s interim leader Muhammad Yunus. Hasina had a frosty relation with Yunus, and during her rule Yunus faced a number of cases including for graft allegations. Courts overturned those charges before he took over as interim leader days after Hasina’s ouster last year in a student-led uprising.
Separately, the anti-corruption investigation has alleged that Siddiq’s family was involved in brokering a 2013 deal with Russia for a nuclear power plant in Bangladesh in which large sums of money were said to have been embezzled.


Musk’s bid to dismiss OpenAI’s harassment claims denied in court

Musk’s bid to dismiss OpenAI’s harassment claims denied in court
Updated 13 August 2025

Musk’s bid to dismiss OpenAI’s harassment claims denied in court

Musk’s bid to dismiss OpenAI’s harassment claims denied in court

A federal judge on Tuesday denied Elon Musk’s bid to dismiss OpenAI’s claims of a “years-long harassment campaign” by the Tesla CEO against the company he co-founded in 2015 and later abandoned before ChatGPT became a global phenomenon.
In the latest turn in a court battle that kicked off last year, US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Musk must face OpenAI’s claims that the billionaire, through press statements, social media posts, legal claims and “a sham bid for OpenAI’s assets” had attempted to harm the AI startup.
Musk sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman last year over the company’s transition to a for-profit model, accusing the company of straying from its founding mission of developing AI for the good of humanity, not profit.
OpenAI countersued Musk in April, accusing the billionaire of engaging in fraudulent business practices under California law. Musk then asked for OpenAI’s counterclaims to be dismissed or delayed until a later stage in the case.
OpenAI argued in May its countersuit should not be put on hold, and the judge on Tuesday concluded that the company’s allegations were legally sufficient to proceed.
A jury trial has been scheduled for spring 2026.