ֱ

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis

Analysis How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis
Many Afghans felt forced to leave after seeing others deported, said Babar Baloch. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 11 August 2025

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis
  • Few Afghans are heading back to their crisis-wracked homeland by choice or with a destination in mind
  • Women and children face particular risks, with restricted rights, food insecurity, and a lack of documentation

DUBAI: Afghan refugees are returning in their thousands — few of them by choice or with a destination in mind. Many of the youngest have never set foot in Afghanistan before. Others are returning to find their homes and livelihoods no longer exist.

What were once considered places of refuge from the unrelenting turmoil back home, neighboring states are now expelling Afghans in waves of forced returns that are pushing crisis-wracked Afghanistan to the brink.

According to Babar Baloch, global spokesperson for the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone, including 1.6 million from Iran and more than 352,000 from Pakistan.

Sami Fakhouri, head of delegation for Afghanistan at the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, witnessed the impact first-hand.

“We are anticipating that an additional 1 million people, possibly more, may return from Iran to Afghanistan by the end of this year,” he told a briefing in Geneva. “The majority didn’t have a say in coming back. They were put on buses and driven to the border.”

Fakhouri said he had seen busloads of families being dropped off at the Islam Qala border in Herat province in recent days, many with no idea where to go. He also sounded the alarm over a critical funding shortfall.




On July 4 alone, more than 50,000 people crossed into Afghanistan from Iran — a dramatic increase from the daily average of 5,000 between January and June. (AFP/File)

The IFRC’s $31.4 million appeal to support returnees is only 10 percent funded. “Whether we can maintain support at this pace is a real concern,” he said.

At the same time, Afghanistan is in no position to absorb the influx of people after four decades of war, occupation, civil unrest and economic crisis have left the country extremely fragile.

The US military withdrawal and the return of the Taliban government in 2021 led to Afghanistan’s global isolation, a freeze on foreign aid and assets, and the near-collapse of public services.

Compounding these challenges is one of the worst droughts Afghanistan has seen in decades, which has devastated crops, depleted water sources, and crippled rural livelihoods.

With more than half the population reliant on agriculture, many returnees have little to go back to in their home villages — forcing them to remain in transit areas or drift toward overcrowded cities.

Aid agencies warn that without climate-resilient recovery plans, the drought will deepen food insecurity and drive even more internal displacement.

UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone

Baloch described the expulsions as “a broader, worrying regional trend,” adding that “refugee-hosting countries have issued return orders with deadlines for Afghans to depart, or face deportation.”

Since those announcements, the situation for Afghans in both Iran and Pakistan has deteriorated rapidly.

These mass returns follow a shift in regional policy, beginning in March when Iran issued a deadline for undocumented Afghans to leave or face arrest.

In June, Pakistan launched its second phase of deportations targeting unregistered Afghans. Both countries cited national security concerns and internal pressure to expel large refugee populations.

Pakistan has defended its forced expulsions, with Talal Chaudhry, an adviser to Islamabad’s Interior Ministry, stating in April that the policy targets only “illegal foreigners.”




The situation for Afghans in both Iran and Pakistan has deteriorated rapidly. (AFP/File)

In February, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan rejected claims that Afghan nationals were being mistreated during the repatriation process.

“In this connection, we also extensively engaged the Afghan side to ensure the smooth repatriation of Afghan nationals,” he told Voice of America.

Iran, meanwhile, has justified its expulsions as a response to national security and economic pressures, particularly following its recent conflict with Israel. Rhetoric on social media has increasingly blamed Afghans for shortages and social issues.

Abdul Rahman Rashid, the Taliban government’s deputy minister for refugees and repatriation, has rebuked host countries for the mass expulsions. And described the removal of Afghans as a “serious violation of international norms, humanitarian principles, and Islamic values.”

“The scale and manner in which Afghan refugees have been forced to return to their homeland is something Afghanistan has never before experienced in its history,” Rashid said in Kabul on July 31.

For the hundreds of thousands now crossing back into Afghanistan each month, the journey does not end at the border. Many are stepping into a future marked by uncertainty, deprivation and loss, without hope, safety or dignity.

Even so, the pace of returns has surged in recent weeks.

On July 4 alone, more than 50,000 people crossed into Afghanistan from Iran — a dramatic increase from the daily average of 5,000 between January and June.

From July 10 to 16, the average was more than 29,000 per day. Inevitably, the scale of arrivals has overwhelmed aid operations at border crossings.

“Our teams are at the borders, receiving and assisting streams of exhausted, hungry, and scared people every day,” Baloch told Arab News.




Afghanistan “is not a safe country for returnees, given the constantly deteriorating human rights situation since the Taliban seized control,” said Richard Bennett. (AFP/File)

“Staff and structures are absolutely inundated,” he said, adding that the UN agency has deployed additional personnel and is distributing essential relief items, hot meals, and emergency financial assistance to meet immediate needs.

“But amid funding constraints, and given the scale and pace of returns, we will not be able to sustain support for more than a few weeks,” said Baloch.

In addition to the operational burden, the nature of these returns has raised serious concerns. Many of those arriving say they had little choice.

Baloch described the situation as “a complex protection crisis,” noting that returns are taking place under difficult and often involuntary conditions.

He said many Afghans felt forced to leave after seeing others deported, and “returnees who arrived in the country in recent months have been sharing concerning stories of increased restrictions, harassment and discrimination.”

Once back, many find themselves in provinces that lack even the most basic services, forcing thousands into temporary transit sites, informal settlements, or already strained households. Many arrive without identity papers, making access to support even more difficult.

“Immense challenges lie ahead for returnees — from accessing documentation, housing, healthcare and education, to rebuilding their lives in a country they do not know,” said Baloch.

Those challenges are already visible. Shelter is scarce, and schools and clinics are either closed or inaccessible to women and girls. Meanwhile, job opportunities are limited — especially for those who have spent years or decades abroad.




UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone. (AFP/File)

“For women and girls in particular, life in Afghanistan brings extreme restrictions,” said Baloch.

Under the Taliban government, most secondary schools and universities remain closed to girls. Women are banned from most forms of employment, including in the nongovernmental organization sector. For many returnee women, it means a life of near-total invisibility.

Even female aid workers have been forced into the shadows. One Afghan humanitarian worker, speaking anonymously to a UN publication, described living in fear while continuing to serve her community.

“I feel depressed,” she said. “As an aid worker, I don’t feel safe, and I am afraid for my life… I am worried that I might be targeted because of my job.”

She described being stopped at checkpoints, harassed for not having a male guardian, and being unable to access work or support systems freely.

“It is so unfair to be deprived of your rights because of your gender. Working is not only my dream or a human right, it is also the way I support my family. Women are half of a country … Let us work, let us learn, let us live.”

Aid workers have also reported a growing number of unaccompanied or separated children among recent returnees — some born abroad and unable to navigate legal systems or school enrolment.

Data for June published by UNICEF, the UN children’s fund, indicates that more than 5,000 unaccompanied or separated Afghan children returned from Iran, many arriving without guardians or legal identity.

The lack of functioning child protection mechanisms places these vulnerable children at risk of exploitation, statelessness, and abuse at a critical stage in their lives.

Human rights experts have also warned of broader risks facing returnees.

Richard Bennett, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in Afghanistan, has said the nation “is not a safe country for returnees, given the constantly deteriorating human rights situation since the Taliban seized control.”

Rights groups have documented cases in which returnees — particularly those with foreign residency or links to international organizations — have faced interrogation or detention upon arrival, fueling fears of surveillance and reprisals.

Despite urgent warnings from aid agencies, the international response has fallen short. The UNHCR has appealed for $71 million to support returnees in the region over a nine-month period.

The IFRC and other aid actors have made separate appeals for immediate assistance at border crossings and for longer-term reintegration support. But donor interest remains weak, with many countries reducing their funding to Afghanistan over governance concerns and competing global crises.

Roza Otunbayeva, the UN secretary-general’s special representative for Afghanistan, called the mass returns “a test of our collective humanity,” warning of further displacement, famine, and instability without urgent action.




Neighboring states are now expelling Afghans in waves of forced returns that are pushing crisis-wracked Afghanistan to the brink. (AFP/File)

She called for an “integrated approach” that combines emergency aid with long-term support for return areas, and stressed that regional dialogue with Iran, Pakistan, and Central Asian states is essential to ensure returns remain voluntary, safe, and dignified.

Baloch echoed those concerns. “We are in touch with the authorities in Iran and Pakistan. UNHCR urges countries in the region to ensure protection for Afghans and that returns to Afghanistan are voluntary, safe, and dignified.”

“We are also calling on the international community to urgently and substantially increase funding — to meet both critical needs at the border upon arrival, and provide longer-term assistance to help returnees settle in Afghanistan,” he said.


Gunman in truck smashes into Michigan church and opens fire, killing at least 4 and injuring 8

Gunman in truck smashes into Michigan church and opens fire, killing at least 4 and injuring 8
Updated 6 sec ago

Gunman in truck smashes into Michigan church and opens fire, killing at least 4 and injuring 8

Gunman in truck smashes into Michigan church and opens fire, killing at least 4 and injuring 8
  • Police said Thomas Jacob Sanford, 40, drove a pickup truck through the doors of a Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints chapel in Michigan while mass was going on
  • Sanford thengot out of the vehicle, started shooting people andset the church ablaze before leaving. He was killed in a shootout by pursuing police officers

GRAND BLANC TOWNSHIP, Michigan: At least four people were killed and eight injured when a gunman in a pickup truck smashed through the doors of a Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints chapel in Michigan during a Sunday service attended by hundreds, opened fire and set the building ablaze. Police shot and killed the suspect, authorities said.
The attack occurred at about 10:25 a.m. The gunman got out of the four-door pickup with two American flags in the truck and started shooting, Police Chief William Renye told reporters. He apparently used gas to start the fire and also had explosive devices but it wasn’t clear if he used them, said James Dier of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
Authorities identified the shooter as Thomas Jacob Sanford, 40, of the neighboring small town of Burton. The FBI is leading the investigation and considered it an “act of targeted violence,” said Ruben Coleman, a special agent in charge for the bureau.
Officers responding to a 911 call were at the church within 30 seconds and killed the shooter about eight minutes later, Renye said. After the suspect left the church, two officers pursued him and “engaged in gunfire,” the chief said.
Renye said people inside the church during the attack were “shielding children” and “moving them to safety.”
Flames and smoke could be seen pouring from the large church for hours before the blaze was put out. The bodies of two of the victims were found as authorities searched the debris, Renye said.

He said authorities had yet to make it though the entire church and that more victims could be found. One of the wounded people was in critical condition Sunday evening and the seven others were stable.
Renye said “some” people were unaccounted for, but he didn’t have an exact number.
Michigan State Police Lt. Kim Vetter said bomb threats were made at other churches in the area after officers shot and killed Sanford. No bombs were found and police were investigating the threats.
The motive not yet clear
Investigators were searching Sanford’s residence but authorities did not say what they found or provide any additional details about him, including whether he was a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, widely known as the Mormon church.
Sanford served in the Marines from June 2004 through June 2008, working as an automotive mechanic and vehicle recovery operator, according to military records obtained by The Detroit News. He was deployed to Iraq from August 2007 through March 2008 and had the rank of sergeant.
It was the latest of many shooting attacks on houses of worship in the US over the past 20 years, including one in August that killed two children during Mass at the Church of the Annunciation in Minneapolis.
It also was the second mass shooting in the US in less than 24 hours. On Saturday night, a man in a boat opened fire on a crowd in Southport, North Carolina, killing three and injuring five,
President Donald Trump said in a social media post that he was briefed on the Michigan shooting and applauded the FBI for its response. Local authorities said the FBI was sending 100 agents to Grand Blanc Township, a community of roughly 40,000 people outside Flint.
“PRAY for the victims, and their families. THIS EPIDEMIC OF VIOLENCE IN OUR COUNTRY MUST END, IMMEDIATELY!” Trump wrote.
The church building, circled by a parking lot and a large lawn, is near residential areas and a Jehovah’s Witness church.
Brad Schneemann, whose home is about 400 yards (365 meters) from the church, told The Associated Press that he and his daughter heard “two rounds of four to five shots” around 10:30 a.m. “Then, we really didn’t hear anything for a while” before they left their home to see what was going on.
Tight-knit church community
Timothy Jones, 48, said his family is part of another Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints congregation, or ward, about 15 minutes away, but that his children were at the Grand Blanc Township ward Saturday night for a youth fall festival. He and his family moved to Flint two years ago in large part because of how strong the faith’s community is in the area, he said.
As people in his congregation got word of the shooting from texts and phone calls during their Sunday service, his ward went into lockdown and police came as a precaution, he said. His children were “frantically, just trying to get word that people were OK.”
Sundays are “supposed to be a time of peace and a time of reflection and worship,” Jones said. Yet in the wake of violence at other houses of worship, a shooting “feels inevitable, and all the more tragic because of that,” he added.
The shooting occurred the morning after Russell M. Nelson, the oldest-ever president of the Utah-based faith, died at 101. The next president is expected to be Dallin H. Oaks, per church protocol.
“The church is in communication with local law enforcement as the investigation continues and as we receive updates on the condition of those affected,” spokesperson Doug Anderson said.
“Places of worship are meant to be sanctuaries of peacemaking, prayer and connection. We pray for peace and healing for all involved.”
 

People attend a prayer vigil held against violence, following a shooting that took place at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in Burton, Michigan, on Sept. 28, 2025. (REUTERS)

The impact of the shooting spread throughout the area
When striking nurses at nearby Henry Ford Genesys Hospital heard about the shooting, some left the picket line and ran the short distance to the church to help first responders, Teamsters Local 332 President Dan Glass said.
“Human lives matter more than our labor dispute,” Glass said.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said in a statement that her heart was breaking for the community. “Violence anywhere, especially in a place of worship, is unacceptable,” she said.
The impact spread quickly to neighboring communities, including the small city that shares a name with the township.
“Although we are two separate governmental units, we are a very cohesive community,” said city of Grand Blanc Mayor John Creasey. “This sort of thing is painful for our entire community.”
About 100 people gathered for a prayer service Sunday evening at The River Church in Grand Blanc, a nondenominational Christian church about 5 miles (8 kilometers) from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Many bowed their heads, some cried softly. A few spoke their prayers aloud, asking for healing for the victims, the victims’ families and first responders.
“We live in days that are difficult and troubled, days that are weary and tiring,” said Pastor Chuck Lindsey, leading the congregation in prayer. “We’re exhausted by the evil, we’re exhausted by these things. But Lord, you are our refuge.”
 


Return of sanctions must not be end of diplomacy with Iran: EU’s top diplomat

Return of sanctions must not be end of diplomacy with Iran: EU’s top diplomat
Updated 29 September 2025

Return of sanctions must not be end of diplomacy with Iran: EU’s top diplomat

Return of sanctions must not be end of diplomacy with Iran: EU’s top diplomat
  • Sustainable solution to nuclear issue can only be achieved through talks: Kallas

BRUSSELS/TEHRAN: The return of widespread sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program “must not be the end of diplomacy” with the country, the EU’s top diplomat said on Sunday.

While the bloc will follow the UN in reimposing sanctions, “a sustainable solution to the Iranian nuclear issue can only be achieved through negotiations,” Kaja Kallas said.

The British, French and German foreign ministers said in a joint statement they would continue to seek “a new diplomatic solution to ensure Iran never gets a nuclear weapon.”

Iran condemned as “unjustifiable” the reinstatement of sanctions. 

“The reactivation of annulled resolutions is legally baseless and unjustifiable ... all countries must refrain from recognizing this illegal situation,” the Iranian Foreign Ministry said.

Iran “will firmly defend its national rights and interests, and any action aimed at undermining the rights and interests of its people will face a firm and appropriate response,” it added.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged Iran to “accept direct talks, held in good faith.”

He also called on UN member states to “immediately” implement sanctions to “pressure Iran’s leaders to do what is right for their nation, and best for the safety of the world.”

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian rejected any nuclear negotiations that would cause “new problems.”


Frankly Speaking: Does anyone still trust ‘Brand UN’?

Frankly Speaking: Does anyone still trust ‘Brand UN’?
Updated 29 September 2025

Frankly Speaking: Does anyone still trust ‘Brand UN’?

Frankly Speaking: Does anyone still trust ‘Brand UN’?
  • Stephane Dujarric admits the Security Council has harmed the UN’s credibility, weakening global confidence and underscoring need for reform
  • Secretary-general’s spokesperson stresses the UN is not a single centralized body, which is why Guterres cannot declare Gaza war a genocide

RIYADH: The UN’s credibility has been battered by paralysis at the Security Council, the war in Gaza, and accusations of inaction.

Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, admits the body’s failures have damaged “Brand UN.” While he insists reforms are on the agenda, he stresses that the world organization is not a single monolith.

Appearing on the Arab News current affairs program “Frankly Speaking,” during the UN General Assembly’s High-level Week in New York City, Dujarric acknowledged the perception of dysfunction.

“The credibility of the Security Council has taken a lot of hits recently,” he told “Frankly Speaking” host Katie Jensen.

“We’ve seen a lack of unity on the part of the Security Council, not just on Gaza, but on Ukraine, on Syria when the Assad regime was in power, on Sudan. And that does hurt the UN brand in that sense, you are correct.”

Appearing on the Arab News current affairs program “Frankly Speaking,” during the UN General Assembly’s High-level Week in New York City, Dujarric acknowledged the perception of dysfunction. (AN Photo)

Yet, he cautioned against treating the UN as a single actor. “It is not an organization under a unified command,” he said. “If the United Nations could speak with one voice, it would not be the United Nations we have today.”

The question of Gaza and whether Israel’s military campaign constitutes genocide has brought these contradictions into sharp relief. A UN Commission of Inquiry issued a landmark report on September 16 using the term, but Guterres has himself avoided using it.

Dujarric explained why. “The secretary-general himself does not have the authority to declare something a genocide or not,” he said. “That is, as far as we are concerned, and not just for Antonio Guterres, for every secretary-general, up to a judicial body.”

“We should not be focused on semantics and on words. We are focused on the situation on the ground, regardless of whether or not you call it a genocide, what we do know is that civilians continue to be targeted and killed every day.

“People are under the state of famine in parts of Gaza and not enough aid is getting in. That’s the reality.”

Pressed on whether words matter, especially when Jewish scholars of the Holocaust are using the term, Dujarric rejected the idea that silence equates to complicity. “I mean, anyone who calls the secretary-general silent on Gaza, frankly, hasn’t been listening,” he said.

He noted that Guterres has paid a price for his language already. “You’re talking about a man who has been declared persona non grata in Israel because of the words he’s been using to describe the situation in Gaza,” he said.

“I think he has been a highly vocal advocate in terms of what is going on in Gaza. And he has been a very strong leader in ensuring that the men and women of the UN stay in Gaza to help the people.”

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres waits for a press photo opportunity. (AFP via Getty)

Another flashpoint is the wave of states now announcing formal recognition of the State of Palestine, including the UK and France. Some critics, including US President Donald Trump, say doing so rewards Hamas for the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel.

Dujarric dismissed the idea. “I don’t really understand that argument, frankly, because Hamas’ goal is not a two-state solution. I don’t see that in the Hamas Charter or in the rhetoric from Hamas,” he said.

“So again, it’s not a gift to Hamas. On the contrary, it is recognizing the rights of the Palestinian people to have their state just as the Israelis have a right to have their state. And in fact, recognizing the two-state solution is a statement against extremists.”

Outrage over Israel’s conduct in Gaza has revived prospects for the two-state solution, with ֱ and France arranging a UN summit pledging time-bound steps for an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel with no role for Hamas in its leadership.

While Israel and the US remain opposed, most world leaders now see two states as the only path to peace and regional stability after the Gaza war.

Dujarric was unequivocal that statehood is a Palestinian right. “Let’s put it frankly, it’s not a gift to the Palestinian people, but the right that they have to have a state, just like the Israelis have a right to have a state,” he said.

While diplomatic wrangling at the Security Council dominates, Dujarric said the daily humanitarian work that UN staff continue to undertake in Gaza and the West Bank remains critical.

“Even if there’s a deadlock in the Security Council, it doesn’t mean that our own people are not in Gaza trying to exploit the little humanitarian space they’re being given to try to help the people of Gaza,” he said.

Dujarric said the UN Relief and Works Agency remains at the forefront of that response, despite attacks on its reputation and a squeeze on its funds after Israel accused members of its staff in Gaza of participating in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack.

“We have UNRWA who is helping and supporting the Palestinian Authority. We will continue to do whatever we can,” he said.

However, he did stress that illegal Israeli settlement expansion, including the government’s approval for the new E1 settlement east of Jerusalem that will effectively bisect the West Bank, was creating new “facts on the ground” that would undermine hope of a Palestinian state.

The dysfunction of the Security Council, dominated by the veto power of its five permanent members, China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US, has prompted renewed calls for reform. Dujarric agreed that the system no longer reflects today’s realities.

The dysfunction of the Security Council, dominated by the veto power of its five permanent members, China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US, has prompted renewed calls for reform. (Reuters/File Photo)

“We need a reform of the Security Council because … the Security Council is the beating heart of the UN in terms of peace and security,” he said. “It remains a reflection of the world of 1945. The fact that it continues that way keeps hurting the UN brand globally.”

While he admitted reform remains distant, he said momentum is building. “The membership is much more engaged in it now than it was from where I stood more than 10 years ago. So there is movement,” he said.

“The secretary-general has been advocating very strongly for an African seat. The fact that Africa is the only continent that is not represented on the Security Council is abhorrent.”

“Some critics suggest that Guterres, frustrated by repeated US vetoes on Gaza ceasefire resolutions, should resign in protest. Dujarric dismissed this outright.

“I think resigning, for the secretary-general to resign, would be a gift for those people who find him a little too annoying. So he has absolutely no plans to resign. He’s determined not to give up,” he said.

Instead, Guterres will continue to push on every possible diplomatic front, including quiet back-channel talks.

“He has been very much in contact with the Qataris, the mediators. He stays in contact with the Egyptians. We’ve been using a lot of back channels and we will continue to push for a ceasefire to get humanitarian aid in, to see an end to the conflict and to see the hostages released,” he said.

Asked if the UN has become powerless, unable to fulfill its founding promise after the Second World War of “never again,” Dujarric acknowledged failings, but defended Guterres’ resolve.

“I think the Security Council has not lived up to its promises in terms of being the focus of stopping wars and of peace and security,” he said.

“We have to keep the promise of an end to conflict alive. The secretary-general will continue to advocate for it and not only advocate for it but to work for it through different means. And he will do so until the very last day of his mandate.”

For Dujarric, the UN’s future credibility depends not only on the secretary-general’s persistence, but on whether member states are willing to modernize the system they created.

“Member states need to find a way to adapt their own organization, the UN, the one they created, to make it more effective, to make it more credible and to make it more representative of the world of 2025.”

 

 


Netanyahu to meet Trump as Israel faces isolation over Gaza war

Netanyahu to meet Trump as Israel faces isolation over Gaza war
Updated 28 September 2025

Netanyahu to meet Trump as Israel faces isolation over Gaza war

Netanyahu to meet Trump as Israel faces isolation over Gaza war
  • Israel’s international isolation has deepened in recent days, with countries including the UK, France, Canada and Australia officially recognizing Palestinian statehood

JERUSALEM: Facing increasing isolation abroad and mounting pressure at home, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will defend his intention to “finish the job” in Gaza when he meets US President Donald Trump on Monday.
The meeting comes days after Trump unveiled a 21-point plan aimed at ending the war in the Palestinian territory during discussions with Arab and Muslim leaders on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.
On Sunday, Trump hinted at “something special” to come in Middle East talks, adding in a post on his Truth Social platform: “WE WILL GET IT DONE!!!“
On Friday, Trump had told reporters in Washington “I think we have a deal” on Gaza, even as Netanyahu, speaking at the UN, vowed to “finish the job” in Israel’s war against Hamas.
But experts told AFP that Netanyahu appeared to be cornered, facing growing international and domestic calls to end the war.
“He has no other choice but to accept” Trump’s plan for a ceasefire, said Eytan Gilboa, an expert on US-Israel relations at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University.
“Simply because the United States and Trump have remained almost his only ally in the international community.”
“Comprehensive agreement”
In Israel, tens of thousands of protesters have pressured Netanyahu to agree to a ceasefire, and on Saturday they urged Trump to use his influence.
“The only thing that can stop the slide into the abyss is a full, comprehensive agreement that ends the war and brings all the hostages and the soldiers home,” said Lishay Miran-Lavi, wife of Omri Miran, who remains captive in Gaza.
Directly addressing Trump, she urged: “Use your influence with Prime Minister Netanyahu.”
Israel’s international isolation has deepened in recent days, with countries including the UK, France, Canada and Australia officially recognizing Palestinian statehood, breaking with longstanding US-led diplomatic protocols.
Trump’s 21-point plan, according to a diplomatic source, envisions a permanent ceasefire, the release of hostages, an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a major influx of humanitarian aid.
Hamas political bureau member Hossam Badran said Sunday evening that the group “had not received any official proposal from Qatari or Egyptian mediators.”
Arab and Muslim leaders have welcomed the proposal, but have also called for an immediate halt to Israel’s military operations and any occupation of Gaza.
Some elements of the plan will prove hard for Netanyahu to swallow, and could even lead to the collapse of his right-wing government coalition.
Among the most controversial is the involvement of the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority (PA) in the future governance of Gaza.
The PA ruled the territory until Hamas seized control in 2007, and its potential restoration represents a red line for Netanyahu’s hard-line coalition partners.
While the US proposal conditions the PA’s return on implementing reform programs, these changes “could take years” to materialize, Gilboa warned.
“Broad consensus”
Several far-right ministers in Netanyahu’s coalition have threatened to collapse the government if he agrees to the PA’s return, or if he ends the war without defeating Hamas.
However, opposition leader Yair Lapid has offered a parliamentary “safety net,” promising his centrist Yesh Atid party would support a ceasefire and hostage-release deal — but it is not clear whether other opposition parties would follow suit.
“This kind of broad plan would need a broad consensus,” said Ksenia Svetlova, a former Knesset member who now heads the regional cooperation NGO ROPES.
Svetlova predicted Netanyahu would only accept parts of the deal, while trying to negotiate or postpone decisions on other elements “seem difficult in this moment.”
Another contentious point in the US proposal is who would guarantee security in the Gaza Strip once the Israeli army pulls out and Hamas is disarmed.
The proposal envisions an international security force comprising Palestinian personnel alongside troops from Arab and Muslim nations.
However, critical details about command structure and operational control remain unclear.
“This plan is internationalizing the Gaza conflict in an unprecedented way,” Svetlova said, “but without a clear plan on who will be the guiding star, what the end goals are, who will see it through.”
“The unpredictability factor runs wild here, really.”


Vietnam to evacuate 250,000 from coast ahead of Typhoon Bualoi

Vietnam to evacuate 250,000 from coast ahead of Typhoon Bualoi
Updated 28 September 2025

Vietnam to evacuate 250,000 from coast ahead of Typhoon Bualoi

Vietnam to evacuate 250,000 from coast ahead of Typhoon Bualoi
  • ‘This is a fast-moving storm with very strong intensity and a wide area of impact’

HANOI: Vietnam plans to evacuate more than 250,000 residents from coastal areas on Sunday ahead of the arrival of Typhoon Bualoi, which is expected to lash the country’s steel-producing central belt.

The storm — the 10th to affect Vietnam this year — is currently at sea generating winds of 130 kilometers per hour and is expected to make landfall at 7:00 p.m. (12:00 GMT), according to the meteorology agency.

Central Vietnam’s largest city Danang plans evacuate more than 210,000 residents, state media reported, while more than 32,000 residents of Hue living near coastal areas are also set to be moved to safer areas.

More than 15,000 residents in Ha Tinh — known as a key steel production hub — have been slated for evacuation to schools and medical centers converted into temporary shelters, authorities said.

Nearly 117,000 military personnel have been mobilized. Four domestic airports were shut and all fishing boats in the typhoon’s path have been called back to harbor.

“I feel a bit anxious but still hopeful that everything will be fine in the aftermath. We were all safe after the recent typhoon Kajiki. I hope this one will be the same or less severe,” Nguyen Cuong, 29, a resident of Ha Tinh City, told AFP.

The typhoon is expected to pack winds of around 133 kph as it makes landfall on Sunday evening, Vietnam’s National Center for Hydro-Meteorological Forecasting said on its website.

“This is a fast-moving storm with very strong intensity and a wide area of impact, capable of causing a combination of various types of natural disasters such as strong winds, heavy rain, floods, landslides, and coastal inundation,” state media quoted center director Mai Van Khiem.