ֱ

Activists report spike in mass civilian deaths after Sudan’s army ups airstrikes

Activists report spike in mass civilian deaths after Sudan’s army ups airstrikes
Rights activists and local responders said scores of civilians had been killed at sites across Sudan in the past week as the army escalates air strikes nearly 18 months into its war with the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 10 October 2024

Activists report spike in mass civilian deaths after Sudan’s army ups airstrikes

Activists report spike in mass civilian deaths after Sudan’s army ups airstrikes
  • Emergency Lawyers, a Sudanese human rights group, said hundreds of people had been killed in such strikes across the country
  • It did not state the period of time for that casualty toll but said it demonstrated “the armed forces’ indifference to protecting defenseless civilians“

CAIRO: Rights activists and local responders said scores of civilians had been killed at sites across Sudan in the past week as the army escalates air strikes nearly 18 months into its war with the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.
While the RSF controls almost half of the country, the army has recently deployed its superior air power to help it regain some territory in the capital Khartoum, and to pound other areas occupied by its rivals.
Sudan’s war, which erupted from a power struggle between the army and the RSF ahead of a planned transition to civilian rule and free elections, has already created the world’s largest displacement crisis and caused famine.
Emergency Lawyers, a Sudanese human rights group, said hundreds of people had been killed in such strikes across the country. It did not state the period of time for that casualty toll but said it demonstrated “the armed forces’ indifference to protecting defenseless civilians.”
In Hasaheisa, a town in El Gezira state south of Khartoum where the RSF has stationed many fighters, airstrikes killed or injured over 100 people on Monday, Emergency Lawyers said.
An activist from the area said at least 38 people were killed, mostly children. He shared video with Reuters of the aftermath of the strike appearing to show a residential area.
In the North Kordofan town of Humrat Alsheikh, west of Khartoum, an airstrike on Oct. 5 killed 30 people and injured more than 100, Emergency Lawyers said, posting a video that appeared to show a market that had been hit.
Reuters could not independently verify the footage in either video.
A day earlier, a strike that hit another market in Al-Koma in North Darfur killed 61 people, according to the local emergency response room. Those killed included 13 children, UN agency UNICEF said.
The army, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment, has accused the RSF of occupying civilian homes and launching attacks from civilian areas. The RSF denies using civilians as human shields.
FIGHTING LIKELY TO INTENSIFY
Yale Humanitarian Lab, which monitors the war in Sudan, said the army had also carried out a significant campaign of bombardment in RSF-controlled areas of Al-Fashir, a North Darfur city that the paramilitary has besieged for months.
The army’s advance in the capital, which began in late September, has also led to reported casualties. Radhouane Nouicer, Sudan expert for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, expressed alarm at reports, some of which circulated on social media, of the summary execution of 70 young men by forces allied to the army in Bahri, part of the greater capital region.
Fighting is expected to intensify with the end of rains that had halted the RSF’s advance in southeast Sudan. The RSF’s leader called on troops to report to their units and said they were prepared to fight on for years.
Overall death tolls from the war are highly uncertain due to the collapse of health and government services, and lack of access for aid workers. Both sides have received material support from external supporters.
“The uptick in fighting and reported civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure are all happening while more weapons are finding their way to the warring parties,” said Mohamed Osman of Human Rights Watch.


Thirst drives Gaza families to drink water that makes them sick

Thirst drives Gaza families to drink water that makes them sick
Updated 15 August 2025

Thirst drives Gaza families to drink water that makes them sick

Thirst drives Gaza families to drink water that makes them sick
  • Limits on fuel imports and electricity have hampered the operation of desalination plants

DEIR AL-BALAH: After waking early to stand in line for an hour under the August heat, Rana Odeh returns to her tent with her jug of murky water. She wipes the sweat from her brow and strategizes how much to portion out to her two small children. From its color alone, she knows full well it’s likely contaminated.

Thirst supersedes the fear of illness.
She fills small bottles for her son and daughter and pours a sip into a teacup for herself. What’s left she adds to a jerrycan for later.
“We are forced to give it to our children because we have no alternative,” Odeh, who was driven from her home in Khan Younis, said of the water. “It causes diseases for us and our children.”
Such scenes have become the grim routine in Muwasi, a sprawling displacement camp in central Gaza where hundreds of thousands endure scorching summer heat.
Sweat-soaked and dust-covered, parents and children chase down water trucks that come every two or three days, filling bottles, canisters and buckets and then hauling them home, sometimes on donkey-drawn carts.
Each drop is rationed for drinking, cooking, cleaning, or washing. 
Some reuse what they can and save a couple of cloudy inches in their jerrycans for whatever tomorrow brings — or does not.
When water fails to arrive, Odeh said, she and her son fill bottles from the sea.
Over the 22 months since Israel launched its offensive, Gaza’s water access has been progressively strained. Limits on fuel imports and electricity have hindered the operation of desalination plants, while infrastructure bottlenecks and pipeline damage have restricted delivery to a trickle. Gaza’s aquifers became polluted by sewage and the wreckage of bombed buildings. Wells are mostly inaccessible or destroyed, aid groups and the local utility say.
Meanwhile, the water crisis has helped fuel the rampant spread of disease, on top of Gaza’s rising starvation. 
UNRWA — the UN agency for Palestinian refugees — said that its health centers now see an average of 10,300 patients a week with infectious diseases, mostly diarrhea from contaminated water.
Efforts to ease the water shortage are underway, but for many, the prospect remains overshadowed by the risk of what may unfold before a new supply arrives.
And the thirst is only growing as a heat wave bears down, with humidity and temperatures in Gaza soaring on Friday to 35 degrees Celsius (95 degrees Fahrenheit).
Mahmoud Al-Dibs, a father displaced from Gaza City to Muwasi, dumped water over his head from a flimsy plastic bag — one of the vessels used to carry water in the camps.
“Outside the tents, it is hot, and inside the tents, it is hot, so we are forced to drink this water wherever we go,” he said.

Al-Dibs was among many who said they knowingly drink non-potable water.

The few people still possessing rooftop tanks cannot muster enough water to clean them, so what flows from their taps is yellow and unsafe, said Bushra Khalidi, an official with Oxfam, an aid group working in Gaza.

Before the war, the coastal enclave’s more than 2 million residents got their water from a patchwork of sources. Some was piped in by Mekorot, Israel’s national water utility. 

Some came from desalination plants. Some was pulled from high-saline wells, and some was imported in bottles.

Palestinians are relying more heavily on groundwater, which now accounts for more than half of Gaza’s water supply. 

The well water has historically been brackish, but still serviceable for cleaning, bathing, or farming, according to Palestinian water officials and aid groups.

The effects of drinking unclean water don’t always appear right away, said Mark Zeitoun, director general of the Geneva Water Hub, a policy institute.

“Untreated sewage mixes with drinking water, and you drink that or wash your food with it, then you’re drinking microbes and can get dysentery,” Zeitoun said. “If you’re forced to drink salty, brackish water, it just does your kidneys in, and then you’re on dialysis for decades.”

Deliveries average less than three liters per person per day — a fraction of the 15 liters that humanitarian groups say is needed for drinking, cooking, and basic hygiene.

In February, acute watery diarrhea accounted for less than 20 percent of reported illnesses in Gaza. By July, it had surged to 44 percent, raising the risk of severe dehydration, according to UNICEF, the UN children’s agency.

Early in the war, residents said deliveries from Israel’s water company Mekorot were curtailed — a claim that Israel has denied. 

Airstrikes destroyed some of the transmission pipelines as well as one of Gaza’s three desalination plants.

Bombardment and advancing troops damaged or cut off wells to the point that today only 137 of Gaza’s 392 wells are accessible, according to UNICEF. 

Water quality from some wells has deteriorated, fouled by sewage, the rubble of shattered buildings and the residue of spent munitions.

Fuel shortages have strained the system, slowing pumps at wells and the trucks that carry water. 

The remaining two desalination plants have operated far below capacity or ground to a halt at times, aid groups and officials say.

In recent weeks, Israel has taken some steps to reverse the damage. It delivers water via two of Mekorot’s three pipelines into Gaza and reconnected one of the desalination plants to Israel’s electricity grid, Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel told The Associated Press.

Still, the plants put out far less than before the war, said Monther Shoblaq, head of Gaza’s Coastal Municipalities Water Utility. That has forced him to make impossible choices.

The utility prioritizes delivering water to hospitals and to the public. However, that means sometimes withholding water needed for sewage treatment, which can lead to neighborhood backups and increase health risks.

Water hasn’t sparked the same global outrage as limits on food entering Gaza. But Shoblaq warned of a direct line between the crisis and potential loss of life.

“It’s obvious that you can survive for some days without food, but not without water,” he said.

Water access is steadying after Israel’s steps. Aid workers have grown hopeful that the situation will not worsen and could improve.

Southern Gaza could get more relief from a desalination plant just across the border in Egypt. 

The plant wouldn’t depend on Israel for power, but since Israel holds the crossings, it will control the entry of water into Gaza for the foreseeable future.

But aid groups warn that access to water and other aid could be disrupted again by Israel’s plans to launch a new offensive on some of the last areas outside its military control. Those areas include Gaza City and Muwasi, where a significant portion of Gaza’s population is now concentrated.

In Muwasi’s tent camps, people line up for the sporadic arrivals of water trucks.

Hosni Shaheen, whose family was also displaced from Khan Younis, already sees the water he drinks as a last resort.

“It causes stomach cramps for adults and children, without exception,” he said. 

“You don’t feel safe when your children drink it.”

 


UN says at least 1,760 killed seeking aid in Gaza

UN says at least 1,760 killed seeking aid in Gaza
Updated 59 min 1 sec ago

UN says at least 1,760 killed seeking aid in Gaza

UN says at least 1,760 killed seeking aid in Gaza
  • Nearly 1,000 have been killed in the vicinity of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation sites and 766 along routes of supply convoys
  • At least 31 people were killed by Israeli fire on Friday, including 12 who were waiting for humanitarian aid

JERUSALEM: The UN human rights office said Friday that at least 1,760 Palestinians had been killed while seeking aid in Gaza since late May, a jump of several hundred since its last published figure at the beginning of August.
“Since 27 May, and as of 13 August, we have recorded that at least 1,760 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid; 994 in the vicinity of GHF (Gaza Humanitarian Foundation) sites and 766 along the routes of supply convoys. Most of these killings were committed by the Israeli military,” the agency’s office for the Palestinian territories said in a statement.
That compares with a figure of 1,373 killed the office reported on August 1.
The update came as Gaza’s civil defense agency said at least 31 people were killed by Israeli fire on Friday, including 12 who were waiting for humanitarian aid.
The Israeli military said its troops were working to “dismantle Hamas military capabilities,” adding its forces were taking precautions “to mitigate civilian harm.”
Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing swathes of the territory mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defense agency and the Israeli military.
On Wednesday, the chief of staff of the Israeli military said plans had been approved for a new offensive in Gaza, aimed at defeating Hamas and freeing all the remaining hostages.
The military intends to take control of Gaza City and nearby refugee camps, some of the most densely populated parts of the territory, which has been devastated by more than 22 months of war.
In recent days, Gaza City residents have told AFP of more frequent air strikes targeting residential areas, while earlier this week Hamas denounced “aggressive” Israeli ground incursions in the area.
The Israeli government’s plans to expand the war have sparked an international outcry as well as domestic opposition.
UN-backed experts have warned of widespread famine unfolding in the territory, where Israel has drastically curtailed the amount of humanitarian aid it allows in.
Hamas’s October 2023 attack which triggered the war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Israel’s offensive has killed at least 61,827 Palestinians, according to figures from the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza which the United Nations considers reliable.


UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law

UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law
Updated 15 August 2025

UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law

UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law
  • Agency says plans would put nearby Palestinians at risk of forced eviction, which it described as a war crime
  • Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has vowed to press on with a long-delayed settlement project to “bury” idea of a Palestinian state

The UN human rights office said on Friday an Israeli plan to build to build thousands of new homes between an Israeli settlement in the West Bank and near East Jerusalem was illegal under international law, and would put nearby Palestinians at risk of forced eviction, which it described as a war crime.
Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Thursday vowed to press on a long-delayed settlement project, saying the move would “bury” the idea of a Palestinian state.
The UN rights office spokesperson said the plan would break the West Bank into isolated enclaves and that it was “a war crime for an occupying power to transfer its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”
About 700,000 Israeli settlers live among 2.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, a move not recognized by most countries, but has not formally extended sovereignty over the West Bank.
Most world powers say settlement expansion erodes the viability of a two-state solution by breaking up territory the Palestinians seek as part of a future independent state.
The two-state plan envisages a Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, existing side by side with Israel, which captured all three territories in the 1967 Middle East war.
Israel cites historical and biblical ties to the area and says the settlements provide strategic depth and security and that the West Bank is “disputed” not “occupied.”


Israeli far-right minister Ben Gvir threatens prominent Palestinian inmate Marwan Barghouti

Israeli far-right minister Ben Gvir threatens prominent Palestinian inmate Marwan Barghouti
Updated 15 August 2025

Israeli far-right minister Ben Gvir threatens prominent Palestinian inmate Marwan Barghouti

Israeli far-right minister Ben Gvir threatens prominent Palestinian inmate Marwan Barghouti
  • Marwan Barghouti, a leading member of the Palestinian Fatah party, has spent more than 20 years behind bars
  • Israel considers him a ‘terrorist’ and convicted him over his role in the second intifada, or uprising, from 2000-2005

JERUSALEM: Israel’s far-right national security minister Itamar Ben Gvir published a video on Friday in which he confronts the most high-profile Palestinian detainee in Israeli custody in his prison cell.

Marwan Barghouti, a leading member of the Palestinian Fatah party, has spent more than 20 years behind bars after being sentenced for his role in anti-Israeli attacks in the early 2000s.

In the clip published by Ben Gvir on X, the minister and two other individuals, including a prison guard, surround Barghouti in a corner of his cell.

“You will not defeat us. Whoever harms the people of Israel, whoever kills children, whoever kills women... we will erase them,” Ben Gvir says in Hebrew.

Barghouti tries to respond but is interrupted by Ben Gvir, who says: “No, you know this. And it’s been the case throughout history.”

The video does not specify where Barghouti is currently being held.

Contacted by AFP, sources close to Ben Gvir said the meeting took place “by chance” in Ganot prison in southern Israel during an inspection visit by the minister, but they would not say when the footage was filmed.

“This morning I read that various ‘senior officials’ in the Palestinian Authority didn’t quite like what I said to arch-terrorist Marwan Barghouti – may his name be erased,” Ben Gvir said in the post accompanying the video on Friday morning.

“So I will repeat it again and again, without apology: whoever messes with the people of Israel, whoever murders our children, whoever murders our women – we will wipe them out. With God’s help.”

Barghouti, who is now in his sixties, was arrested in 2002 by Israel and sentenced to life in 2004 on murder charges.

Israel considers him a “terrorist” and convicted him over his role in the second intifada, or uprising, from 2000-2005.

He often tops opinion polls of popular Palestinian leaders and is sometimes described by his supporters as the “Palestinian Mandela.”

In a statement released by the official Palestinian news agency Wafa, the Palestinian Authority’s foreign ministry denounced “an unprecedented provocation” and described the confrontation as “organized state terrorism.”


Hezbollah chief’s remarks stir backlash amid heightened tensions in Lebanon

Hezbollah chief’s remarks stir backlash amid heightened tensions in Lebanon
Updated 15 August 2025

Hezbollah chief’s remarks stir backlash amid heightened tensions in Lebanon

Hezbollah chief’s remarks stir backlash amid heightened tensions in Lebanon
  • Justice minister accuses Sheikh Naim Qassem of wanting to take country down ‘destructive path’
  • Qassem warns disarmament of Hezbollah ‘unacceptable’ step that could ‘lead to civil war’

BEIRUT: Lebanese Justice Minister Adel Nassar accused Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem of contradicting himself following a speech in which the latter threatened escalation if the government attempted to confront or disarm the Iran-backed group.

Nassar said Qassem had previously accepted the ceasefire agreement with Israel and endorsed the ministerial statement affirming the Lebanese state’s exclusive control over arms.

However, in a speech on Friday at a religious ceremony in Baalbek, Qassem openly rejected the disarmament of Hezbollah, calling it “unacceptable” and accusing the government of implementing an “American-Israeli order to eliminate the resistance, even if that leads to civil war and internal strife.”

Speaking to Arab News, Nassar said: “Qassem says he doesn’t want a civil war, but he’s threatening to take to the streets to defend his weapons and holding the state responsible for any clash with the army.”

The justice minister stressed that “the party outside the legitimacy that refuses to surrender its weapons to the state bears responsibility for this.”

Nassar said that either all parties in Lebanon build the state together and stand in solidarity, or engage in a destructive military confrontations. “Hezbollah wants to take us down to a destructive path,” he warned.

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

The minister reiterated that Qassem’s speech clashed with the interests of the Lebanese state, which wants to control arms in the country in line with a US-backed plan following Israel’s military campaign against Hezbollah.

The Lebanese Cabinet last week tasked the military with confining weapons only to state security forces, a move that has outraged Hezbollah.

Nassar condemned Qassem’s statements as “totally rejected,” noting that such inflammatory speech from an armed group raised concerns within the Lebanese Armed Forces.

“This is one of the most important reasons that prompted the government to take the decision to restrict the possession of weapons. Attempting to monopolize decision-making and plunge Lebanon into wars is a logic that does not align with the logic of the state,” Nassar said.

Iranian official Ali Larijani visited Lebanon earlier this week and said Tehran does not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, but supports resistance movements.

Nassar criticized the statements as a threat to Lebanon’s security.

In his speech, Qassem thanked Iran for “supporting us with money, weapons, capabilities, and media and political positions.”

He said Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, its Shia Muslim ally, had decided to delay any street protests while there was still scope for talks.

“There is still room for discussion, for adjustments, and for a political resolution before the situation escalates to a confrontation no one wants,” Qassem said.

“But if it is imposed on us, we are ready, and we have no other choice ... At that point, there will be a protest in the street, all across Lebanon, that will reach the American Embassy.”

He held “the Lebanese government fully responsible for any internal strife that might occur,” adding that “we do not want it, but there are those who work for it.”

Qassem said there would be “no life” in Lebanon if the government sought to confront or eliminate the group.

“This is our nation together. We live in dignity together, and we build its sovereignty together — or Lebanon will have no life if you stand on the other side and try to confront us and eliminate us,” he said in his speech.

“Lebanon cannot be built except with all its components.”

A government source told Arab News that Qassem’s “escalating rhetoric” does not concern Lebanon, but rather represents a dialogue between Iran and the US through Hezbollah.

“The Iranians feel that they are no longer part of any settlement in the region they used to control and are now being completely ignored,” the source said.

Qassem’s remarks drew widespread backlash from ministers, lawmakers, and political leaders.

Industry Minister Joe Issa Khoury said: “The decision to go to war is not written in the ink of a sect, but rather signed by the entire nation. The national charter protects it from becoming a tool of one sect over the others. Whoever turns it into a tool of blackmail empties it of its meaning.”

MP George Okais stressed that the ceasefire agreement with Israel was approved by the entire Cabinet, including ministers from Hezbollah and Amal.

“Decisions that affect all Lebanese cannot be made without their consultation, nor imposed under any form of duress,” he added.

MP Raji Al-Saad warned against Qassem’s threat of internal strife, saying his statements represent “a dangerous turning point and constitute a rejection of the establishment of the state and an insistence on keeping Lebanon an arena for Iranian projects.”

MP Ghiath Yazbek said Qassem is “verbally fighting Israel and practically destroying Lebanon after the war paralyzed his party, rendered it ineffective, and turned it into a mere vocal phenomenon.”

He pleaded with the group’s leader to have “mercy on Lebanon.”

Former minister and MP Ashraf Rifi warned Hezbollah against repeating threats of civil war. In a statement, he said the only solution was the state, telling Qassem: “Return to your homeland and end your subservience to Iran, which has begun to collapse in every arena it has entered, based on a historical illusion that has long since passed.”

Beirut MP Ibrahim Mneimneh questioned whether Qassem was being honest with his base. “Does Naim Qassem dare to tell his supporters that disarmament is already underway, and that Hezbollah itself no longer denies it? Enough with gambling with the country and its people,” he said.

Beirut MP Waddah Al-Sadig said: “Civil peace is not a matter of blackmail or sectarian tension, and the lives of the Lebanese are not in the hands of any party, faction, or sect.”

He stressed that moving forward, Lebanon’s lives, security, and prosperity are in the hands of the state. “Civil peace is a national will to protect the people, the army, and the state,” he said.