ֱ

X says it is closing Brazilian operations ‘effective immediately’

Social media platform X, formerly Twitter, will shut down its local operations in Brazil, owner Elon Musk (pictured) said on August 17, 2024, although the service will remain available to Brazilian users. (AFP/File Photo)
Social media platform X, formerly Twitter, will shut down its local operations in Brazil, owner Elon Musk (pictured) said on August 17, 2024, although the service will remain available to Brazilian users. (AFP/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 17 August 2024

X says it is closing Brazilian operations ‘effective immediately’

X says it is closing Brazilian operations ‘effective immediately’
  • X claims a judge secretly threatened one of its legal representatives

SAO PAULO: Media platform X said on Saturday it would close its operations in Brazil “effective immediately” due to what it called “censorship orders” from Brazilian judge Alexandre de Moraes.
X claims Moraes secretly threatened one of its legal representatives in the South American country with arrest if it did not comply with legal orders to take down some content from its platform. Brazil’s Supreme Court, where Moraes has a seat, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The X service remains available to the people of Brazil, billionaire Elon Musk’s platform said on Saturday.
Earlier this year, Moraes ordered X to block certain accounts, as he investigates so-called “digital militias” that have been accused of spreading fake news and hate messages during the government of far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro.
Moraes opened an inquiry earlier this year into the billionaire after Musk said he would reactivate accounts on X that the judge had ordered blocked. Musk has called the Moraes’ decisions regarding X “unconstitutional.”
After Musk’s challenges, X representatives reversed course and told Brazil’s Supreme Court that the social media giant would comply with the legal rulings.
Lawyers representing X in Brazil in April told the Supreme Court that “operational faults” have allowed users who were ordered blocked to stay active on the social media platform, after Moraes had asked X to explain why it allegedly had not fully complied with his decision.


‘He was our eyes’: Global outcry over killing of Al Jazeera journalist by Israeli forces

‘He was our eyes’: Global outcry over killing of Al Jazeera journalist by Israeli forces
Updated 11 August 2025

‘He was our eyes’: Global outcry over killing of Al Jazeera journalist by Israeli forces

‘He was our eyes’: Global outcry over killing of Al Jazeera journalist by Israeli forces
  • Anas Al-Sharif killed by Israel on Sunday with colleagues Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, Moamen Aliwa and Mohammed Al-Khaldi
  • Former Human Rights Watch official says silencing coverage of atrocities is a ‘despicable rationale’ for killing journalists

LONDON: Condemnation is mounting worldwide after Israeli forces killed prominent Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif and four of his colleagues in Gaza, with fellow reporters, rights groups and officials accusing Israel of deliberately targeting the reporter for his coverage.

Al-Sharif was killed alongside reporter Mohammed Qreiqeh and camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa when an Israeli strike hit their tent in Gaza on Sunday.

Gaza’s civil defense agency said the strike also killed a Palestinian freelance journalist, Mohammed Al-Khaldi, who had succumbed to his wounds, bringing the total to six.

The IDF has admitted to carrying out the attack, and justified it by alleging Al-Sharif was a “terrorist.”

Reporters Without Borders condemned what it called the “acknowledged murder” of one of Al Jazeera’s most prominent correspondents in Gaza, noting that the Israeli Defence Forces openly targeted him and others.

The Committee to Protect Journalists said it was “appalled” by the killing, stressing that Israeli claims of Al- Sharif’s Hamas membership lacked evidence.

“Israel’s pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,” said Sara Qudah, the CPJ’s director for the Middle East and North Africa.

The office of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk issued a similar condemnation on Monday, saying Israel’s targeted killing of six journalists in Gaza was a “grave breach of international humanitarian law.”

Al-Sharif’s death came weeks after the CPJ and other organizations had warned of threats against him, following a post by IDF spokesperson Avichai Adraee on X accusing him of belonging to Hamas’ military wing.

The UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression Irene Khan at the time called the claim “unsubstantiated” and “a blatant assault on journalists.”

On Sunday night, the IDF repeated its allegations, claiming Al-Sharif was “head of a Hamas terrorist cell” and had orchestrated rocket attacks on Israeli civilians and troops while “posing as an Al Jazeera journalist.”

It cited “intelligence and documents from Gaza” — including rosters, training lists, and salary records — none of which Arab News could independently verify.

Israel has often been accused of making similar claims without substantiation, a pattern critics say is reinforced by the inability of independent foreign journalists to enter Gaza.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans on Sunday to allow some foreign reporters into the enclave, but only under military escort — a condition that press freedom groups warn would compromise journalistic independence.

Since the start of Israel’s 22-month siege of Gaza, Tel Aviv has killed nearly 200 journalists, with rights groups documenting cases of what they describe as direct, intentional strikes that could amount to war crimes.

Tributes to Al-Sharif, Qreiqeh, Zaher, Noufal and Aliwa have poured in, with many demanding accountability.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Ken Roth, the former executive director of Human Rights Watch, said silencing coverage of atrocities is a “despicable rationale” for killing journalists.

“This was a targeted killing,” Roth said. Israel’s “unsubstantiated, unilateral accusations” that Al-Sharif led a unit of Hamas “are worthless.”

“And when you couple that with the pattern of harassment against him, the efforts to silence him, it’s clear what’s going on,” Roth added.

Barry Malone, a former Al Jazeera editor and Reuters correspondent, described Al-Sharif as “our eyes” in Gaza, bringing “special emotion and depth” to his reporting.

Pulitzer Prize–winning Palestinian poet and former Israeli detainee Mosab Abu Toha accused Western media of a “deafening silence.” He said “not one of them voiced concern for the safety of Anas, or for the lives of the journalists systematically targeted and killed.”

“This silence is not neutrality. It is complicity,” he added in a post on X.

US Representative Pramila Jayapal also condemned the killing, urging Washington to halt arms supplies to Israel.

Al-Sharif’s final message, written on April 6 and published posthumously, was addressed to his wife, Umm Salah (Bayan), his son, Salah, and his loved ones. In the message he urged for the liberation of Palestine.

“This is my will and my final message. If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice.

“I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification.

“Do not forget Gaza … And do not forget me in your sincere prayers for forgiveness and acceptance.”


UK’s Starmer ‘gravely concerned’ about targeting of journalists in Gaza

Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif prays next to the body of his colleague Al Jazeera reporter Ismail Al-Ghoul.
Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif prays next to the body of his colleague Al Jazeera reporter Ismail Al-Ghoul.
Updated 11 August 2025

UK’s Starmer ‘gravely concerned’ about targeting of journalists in Gaza

Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif prays next to the body of his colleague Al Jazeera reporter Ismail Al-Ghoul.
  • Al Jazeera, which is funded by the Qatari government, rejected the allegation, and before his death, Al Sharif had also rejected such claims by Israel

LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is “gravely concerned” about the repeated targeting of journalists in Gaza, his spokesperson said on Monday, after five reporters were killed in an Israeli airstrike.
Israel’s military said it targeted and killed prominent Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif, alleging he had headed a Hamas militant cell and was involved in rocket attacks on Israel.
Al Jazeera, which is funded by the Qatari government, rejected the assertion, and before his death, Al Sharif had also rejected such claims by Israel.
“We are gravely concerned by the repeated targeting of journalists in Gaza,” Starmer’s spokesperson told reporters.
“Reporters covering conflicts are afforded protection under international humanitarian law, and journalists must be able to report independently, without fear, and Israel must ensure journalists can carry out their work safely.”
Asked about the claim that one of the journalists was linked to Hamas, Starmer’s spokesperson said: “That should be investigated thoroughly and independently, but we are gravely concerned by the repeated targeting of journalists.”


Five Al Jazeera journalists killed in Israeli strike in Gaza

Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif. (X @AnasAlSharif0)
Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif. (X @AnasAlSharif0)
Updated 11 August 2025

Five Al Jazeera journalists killed in Israeli strike in Gaza

Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif. (X @AnasAlSharif0)
  • Israeli military admits to Anas Al-Sharif, whom it labelled as a ‘terrorist’ affiliated with Hamas

GAZA CITY, Palestinian Territories: Al Jazeera said two of its correspondents, including a prominent reporter, and three cameramen were killed in an Israeli strike on their tent in Gaza City on Sunday.

The Israeli military admitted in a statement to targeting Anas Al-Sharif, the reporter it labelled as a “terrorist” affiliated with Hamas.

The attack was the latest to see journalists targeted in the 22-month war in Gaza, with around 200 media workers killed over the course of the conflict, according to media watchdogs.

“Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif has been killed alongside four colleagues in a targeted Israeli attack on a tent housing journalists in Gaza City,” the Qatar-based broadcaster said.

“Al-Sharif, 28, was killed on Sunday after a tent for journalists outside the main gate of the hospital was hit. The well-known Al Jazeera Arabic correspondent reportedly extensively from northern Gaza.”

The channel said that five of its staff members were killed during the strike on a tent in Gaza City, listing the others as Mohammed Qreiqeh along with camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa.

The Israeli military confirmed that it had carried out the attack, saying it had struck Al Jazeera’s Al-Sharif and calling him a “terrorist” who “posed as a journalist.”

“A short while ago, in Gaza City, the IDF struck the terrorist Anas Al-Sharif, who posed as a journalist for the Al Jazeera network,” it said on Telegram, using an acronym for the military.

“Anas Al-Sharif served as the head of a terrorist cell in the Hamas terrorist organization and was responsible for advancing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF troops,” it added.

Al-Sharif was one of the channel’s most recognizable faces working on the ground in Gaza, providing daily reports in regular coverage.

Following a press conference by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday, where the premier defended approving a new offensive in Gaza, Al-Sharif posted messages on X describing “intense, concentrated Israeli bombardment” on Gaza City.

One of his final messages included a short video showing nearby Israeli strikes hitting Gaza City.

In July, the Committee to Protect Journalists issued a statement calling for his protection as it accused the Israeli military’s Arabic-language spokesperson Avichay Adraee of stepping up online attacks on the reporter by alleging that he was a Hamas terrorist.

Following the attack, the CPJ said it was “appalled” to learn of the journalists’ deaths.

“Israel’s pattern of labelling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,” said CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah.

“Journalists are civilians and must never be targeted. Those responsible for these killings must be held accountable.”

The Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate condemned what it described as a “bloody crime” of assassination.

Israel and Al Jazeera have had a contentious relationship for years, with Israeli authorities banning the channel in the country and raiding its offices following the latest war in Gaza.

Qatar, which partly funds Al Jazeera, has hosted an office for the Hamas political leadership for years and been a frequent venue for indirect talks between Israel and the militant group.

With Gaza sealed off, many media groups around the world, including AFP, depend on photo, video and text coverage of the conflict provided by Palestinian reporters.

Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said in early July that more than 200 journalists had been killed in Gaza since the war began, including several Al Jazeera journalists.

International criticism is growing over the plight of the more than two million Palestinian civilians in Gaza, with UN agencies and rights groups warning that a famine is unfolding in the territory.

The targeted strike comes as Israel announced plans to expand its military operations on the ground in Gaza, with Netanyahu saying on Sunday that the new offensive was set to target the remaining Hamas strongholds there.

He also announced a plan to allow more foreign journalists to report inside Gaza with the military, as he laid out his vision for victory in the territory.

A UN official warned the Security Council that Israel’s plans to control Gaza City risked “another calamity” with far-reaching consequences.

“If these plans are implemented, they will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza, reverberating across the region and causing further forced displacement, killings, and destruction,” UN Assistant Secretary General Miroslav Jenca told the Security Council.


Netanyahu announces plan to allow foreign reporters into Gaza

Netanyahu announces plan to allow foreign reporters into Gaza
Updated 10 August 2025

Netanyahu announces plan to allow foreign reporters into Gaza

Netanyahu announces plan to allow foreign reporters into Gaza
  • Access to Gaza has been tightly controlled over the course of 22 months of war against Hamas

JERUSALEM: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Sunday a plan to allow more foreign journalists to report inside Gaza with the military, as he laid out his vision for victory in the territory during a rare press conference.

Access to Gaza has been tightly controlled over the course of 22 months of war against Hamas.

Israel has blocked most foreign correspondents from independently accessing the territory since it launched its campaign there following the Palestinian militant group’s unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack, with officials often citing security as a reason.

The Israeli military has taken journalists on occasional embeds that are tightly controlled by security officials.

“We have decided and have ordered, directed the military to bring in foreign journalists, more foreign journalists, a lot,” Netanyahu said during Sunday’s press conference.

“There’s a problem with assuring security, but I think it can be done in a way that is responsible and careful to preserve your own safety.”

The premier, however, did not provide specifics on the plan.

Global press outlets have long relied on local journalists on the ground in Gaza to provide reporting and footage from the war.


‘I don’t create suffering, I document it:’ Gaza photographer hits back at Bild over accusation of staging scenes

‘I don’t create suffering, I document it:’ Gaza photographer hits back at Bild over accusation of staging scenes
Updated 08 August 2025

‘I don’t create suffering, I document it:’ Gaza photographer hits back at Bild over accusation of staging scenes

‘I don’t create suffering, I document it:’ Gaza photographer hits back at Bild over accusation of staging scenes
  • Photojournalist Anas Zayed Fteiha came under fire after Bild published an article alleging his photos were manipulated to amplify narratives of Israeli-inflicted suffering
  • Episode fueled broader debate on the challenges of reporting from conflict zones such as Gaza, with expert saying “guiding” photos does not invalidate the reality being portrayed

LONDON: Gaza-based photojournalist Anas Zayed Fteiha has rejected accusations by the German tabloid Bild that some of his widely circulated images — depicting hunger and humanitarian suffering — were staged rather than taken at aid distribution sites.

Fteiha, who works with Turkiye’s Anadolu Agency, described the claims as “false” and “a desperate attempt to distort the truth.”

“The siege, starvation, bombing, and destruction that the people of Gaza live through do not need to be fabricated or acted out,” Fteiha said in a statement published on social media. “My photos reflect the bitter reality that more than two million people live through, most of whom are women and children.”

The controversy erupted after Bild published an article on Tuesday alleging that Fteiha’s photos were manipulated to amplify narratives of Israeli-inflicted suffering — particularly hunger — and citing content from his personal social media accounts to suggest political bias.

The German daily Suddeutsche Zeitung also questioned the authenticity of certain images from Gaza, though without naming Fteiha directly.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Bild claimed the emotionally charged imagery served as “Hamas propaganda,” a charge Fteiha rejected as “ridiculous” and a “criminalization of journalism itself.”

“It is easy to write your reports based on your ideologies, but it is difficult to obscure the truth conveyed by the lens of a photographer who lived the suffering among the people, heard the children’s cries, photographed the rubble, and carried the pain of mothers,” Fteiha said.

Fteiha also accused Bild of repeated breaches of journalistic ethics, citing previous criticism and formal complaints against the paper for publishing misinformation.

The episode has fueled a broader debate on the challenges of reporting from conflict zones such as Gaza, where foreign press access is restricted and local journalists are often the only source of visual documentation.

Following Bild’s allegations, several news agencies, including AFP and the German Press Agency, severed ties with Fteiha. However, Reuters declined to do so, stating that his images met the agency’s standards for “accuracy, independence, and impartiality.”

“These aren’t outright fakes, but they do tap into visual memory and change how people see things,” said photography scholar Gerhard Paul in an interview with Israeli media.

Christopher Resch, of Reporters Without Borders, said that while photographers sometimes “guide” subjects to tell a visual story, that does not invalidate the reality being portrayed.

“The picture should have had more context, but that doesn’t mean the suffering isn’t real,” he said, cautioning media outlets against labeling photojournalists as “propaganda agents,” which he warned could endanger their safety.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar also weighed in, using his official X account to describe one of the accused images — used on the cover of Time magazine — as an example of “Pallywood” — a portmanteau of “Palestine” and “Hollywood” — to sway global opinion.

However, the credibility of Bild’s report has itself come under scrutiny. Israeli fact-checking group Fake Reporter posted a series of rebuttals on X, disputing several claims.

The group pointed out that the Time magazine cover image often linked to Fteiha was taken by a different photographer, and argued that claims the children in the photograph were not at an aid site were “inaccurate.”

“From our examination, one can see, in the same place, an abundance of documentation of food being distributed and prepared,” the group wrote.