ֱ

Trump threatens $1 billion action as BBC apologises for speech edit

 Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesman told reporters the organization “has a vital role in an age of disinformation.” (AFP/File)
Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesman told reporters the organization “has a vital role in an age of disinformation.” (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 6 min 35 sec ago

Trump threatens $1 billion action as BBC apologises for speech edit

Trump threatens $1 billion action as BBC apologises for speech edit
  • Trump’s lawyers say broadcaster must retract documentary or face action
  • BBC apologizes for ‘error of judgment,’ chair Shah rejects institutional bias

LONDON: US President Donald Trump has threatened the BBC with a billion-dollar lawsuit, US sources said, as the broadcaster apologized Monday for editing a speech that gave the impression he urged “violent action” just before the 2021 assault on the US Capitol.
Trump could seek $1 billion in damages from the BBC, a source close to his legal team said, amid a growing furor that prompted the resignations Sunday of two of the broadcaster’s top brass.
The source said the British broadcaster has been given until Friday to retract the 2024 documentary and apologize for the documentary broadcast just before the 2024 US presidential election.
Trump has been accused of launching lawsuits to stifle US media. But the latest controversy has reignited a debate over the British broadcaster, cherished by many but which has faced long-standing accusations of bias, from both ends of the political spectrum.
A spokesman for Trump’s private legal team confirmed that a letter had been sent to the BBC but did not give details.
“The BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally and deceitfully editing its documentary in order to try and interfere in the presidential election,” the spokesman said in a statement to AFP.
“President Trump will continue to hold accountable those who traffic in lies, deception, and fake news.”
A BBC spokesperson said: “We will review the letter and respond directly in due course.”

‘Vital role’ 

In a letter sent to MPs, BBC chairman Samir Shah said the broadcaster accepted that the editing of Trump’s speech for the documentary “did give the impression of a direct call for violent action.”
“The BBC would like to apologize for that error of judgment,” he added, vowing to reform oversight within the broadcaster.
Director general Tim Davie and BBC News CEO Deborah Turness stepped down over the escalating backlash on Sunday.
Trump promptly celebrated, accusing BBC journalists of being “corrupt” and “dishonest.” His press secretary called the broadcaster “100-percent fake news.”
However, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesman told reporters the organization “has a vital role in an age of disinformation.”
“It’s important that the BBC acts swiftly to maintain trust and correct mistakes quickly when they occur,” he added.
The government is preparing a review of the BBC’s charter, which outlines the corporation’s governance and funding framework. The current charter ends in 2027.
The broadcaster, which has cut hundreds of jobs amid stretched finances, is funded by a license fee paid by anyone who watches live TV in Britain.
Some have welcomed the resignations as a timely reckoning for the BBC, while others fear the influence of right-wing detractors, including in the United States.
Ed Davey, leader of the centrist Liberal Democrats, urged Starmer to tell Trump to “keep his hands off” the BBC.
Former BBC journalist Karen Fowler-Watt, head of the journalism department at City St. George’s University in London, told AFP the institution was “now really in a situation of crisis.”
She noted it was “very difficult not to see this as a right-wing attack, given the media ecosystem in which we all now live.”

Controversies

In London, Britons were both critical and sympathetic.
Jimmy, who works in construction and declined to give his surname, told AFP the BBC’s reputation had been “tarnished” and it had “shown that they’re not impartial.”
But 78-year-old writer Jennifer Kavanagh said it has “always been attacked from the right and from the left.”
“They can never get it right,” she added.
Its latest crisis intensified after the right-wing Daily Telegraph newspaper reported last week that a former external standards adviser’s warnings of serious and widespread failings of impartiality and systemic bias had been ignored.
That included the editing of sections of Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech ahead of the mob attack on the US Capitol following the 2020 US presidential election.
It appeared he had told supporters he was going to walk there with them and “fight like hell,” whereas the president also told the audience in the intervening period “we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.”
Earlier this year, the BBC apologized for “serious flaws” in the making of another documentary, about the Gaza war, which the UK’s media watchdog deemed “materially misleading.”
It also faced criticism for failing to pull a livestream of punk-rap duo Bob Vylan during this year’s Glastonbury festival after its frontman made anti-Israel comments.


Israeli soldiers speak of ‘shooting without restraint’ in Gaza in documentary testimony

Israeli soldiers speak of ‘shooting without restraint’ in Gaza in documentary testimony
Updated 2 min 30 sec ago

Israeli soldiers speak of ‘shooting without restraint’ in Gaza in documentary testimony

Israeli soldiers speak of ‘shooting without restraint’ in Gaza in documentary testimony
  • ‘Life and death isn’t determined by procedure, but it’s up to the conscience of the commander on the ground,’ said one of the soldiers featured in ‘Breaking Ranks: Inside Israel’s War’
  • Film reveals Israeli army’s complete disregard for laws of war, including use of human shields and opening fire unprovoked on civilians at aid centers

LONDON: Israeli soldiers have revealed that they were allowed to shoot freely at their own discretion in Gaza, exposing a disregard for the laws of war in a new documentary set to air on UK public television Monday night.

The film, “Breaking Ranks: Inside Israel’s War,” offers rare firsthand testimonies from Israel Defense Forces soldiers who describe lawless combat during the Gaza conflict.

“If you want to shoot without restraint, you can,” Daniel, the commander of an IDF tank unit, reportedly said in the film.

Soldiers, some identified only by first names, also confirmed the IDF’s routine use of human shields, known informally as the “mosquito protocol,” contradicting official denials, and also described Israeli troops opening fire unprovoked on civilians rushing to food aid distribution points run by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.

“Life and death isn’t determined by procedures or opening fire regulations. It’s the conscience of the commander on the ground that decides,” said one soldier.

The soldier detailed how recognizing the enemy on the ground became arbitrary: “If they’re walking too fast, they’re suspicious. If they’re walking too slow, they’re suspicious. They’re plotting something. If three men are walking and one of them lags behind, it’s a two-to-one infantry formation; it’s a military formation,” he said.

One incident involved a senior officer ordering a tank to demolish a building marked safe for civilians, after seeing a man hanging laundry on the roof. The strike reportedly killed several people.

According to the Gaza health authority, considered reliable by the UN, over 69,000 Palestinians have died since Oct. 7, 2023, the vast majority civilians, though many fear the actual toll is higher.

Some soldiers said they were influenced by Israeli politicians and religious leaders who framed all Palestinians as legitimate targets following Hamas’ attacks two years ago.

Daniel said claims such as those by Israeli President Isaac Herzog, who declared “an entire nation out there that is responsible” for the Oct. 7 attacks, seeped into soldiers’ minds. “You hear that all the time, so you start to believe it.”

Maj. Neta Caspin, another officer, revealed military rabbis propagated genocidal mindsets, giving religious justification for mass demolitions.

“One time, the brigade rabbi sat down next to me and spent half an hour explaining why we must be just like they were on Oct. 7,” he said.

One of the most striking claims is the use of human shields forced to navigate Hamas tunnels wearing vests with smartphones transmitting GPS data to Israeli units above — a tactic dubbed the “mosquito protocol.”

Daniel explained, “You send the human shield underground. As he walks down the tunnel, he maps it all for you. The commanders saw how it works. And the practice spread like wildfire. After about a week, every company was operating its own mosquito.”

The New York Times reported in October 2024 that while IDF troops often used drones and sniffer dogs to scout Hamas tunnels and booby-trapped buildings, at times they used detainees — referred to as “wasps” or “mosquitoes” depending on origin — to aid reconnaissance.

The IDF has denied using human shields, opening internal investigations into such allegations.

The documentary also features a contractor from the GHF food distribution sites who witnessed the IDF shooting unarmed civilians. He recounted seeing soldiers fire on two young men running for aid, shooting them dead on the spot.

In response to the documentary, the IDF stated in writing that it “remains committed to the rule of law” and that allegations of misconduct are “thoroughly examined,” noting ongoing investigations by the Military Police Criminal Investigation Division.