șŁœÇֱȄ

5 killed in Afghan-Pakistan border fire despite peace talks

Update 5 killed in Afghan-Pakistan border fire despite peace talks
Afghan Taliban fighters patrol near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak, Kandahar Province, following exchanges of fire between Pakistani and Afghan forces, Oct. 15, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 51 sec ago

5 killed in Afghan-Pakistan border fire despite peace talks

5 killed in Afghan-Pakistan border fire despite peace talks
  • Violence likely to complicate ceasefire negotiations in Turkiye
  • Countries quickly blamed each other for initiating the fire

KABUL: Five people were killed and six were wounded in brief cross-border fire between Afghanistan and Pakistan on Thursday, a hospital official on the Afghan side told AFP, in an incident both countries blamed on each other.
The violence was likely to complicate ceasefire negotiations underway in Turkiye, which intended to finalize a truce aimed at ending deadly clashes between the South Asian neighbors.
Security issues are at the heart of their dispute, with Islamabad accusing Kabul of harboring militant groups, particularly the Pakistani Taliban (TTP), that launch attacks in Pakistan. The Taliban government denies these allegations.
According to the anonymous official at the Spin Boldak district hospital in Afghanistan’s southern Kandahar province, “five people died in today’s incident — four women and one man — and six were wounded.”
There was no immediate report of victims from the Pakistani side.
The two countries quickly blamed each other for initiating the fire.
“While the third round of negotiations with the Pakistani side has begun in Istanbul, unfortunately, this afternoon Pakistani forces once again opened fire on Spin Boldak,” Taliban government spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said.
“The Islamic Emirate’s forces, out of respect for the negotiation team and to prevent civilian casualties, have so far shown no reaction,” the official added on X.
Pakistan denied the accusation and put the blame on Afghanistan.
“We strongly reject claims circulated by the Afghan side,” Pakistan’s Information Ministry said on X. “Firing was initiated from the Afghan side, to which our security forces responded immediately in a measured and responsible manner.”

Talks at an impasse 

Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesman for the Taliban authorities, said “we don’t know the reason” for the Pakistani fire, telling AFP that talks in Turkiye were ongoing.
“Pakistan used light and heavy weapons and targeted civilian areas,” said an Afghan military source who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Ali Mohammed Haqmal, head of Kandahar’s information department said the firing was brief. Residents told AFP it lasted 10-15 minutes.
Pakistan confirmed that calm had been restored.
“The situation was brought under control due to responsible action by Pakistani forces and the ceasefire remains intact,” the information ministry said. “Pakistan remains committed to ongoing dialogue and expects reciprocity from Afghan authorities.”
Negotiations in Istanbul reached an impasse last week when it came to finalizing ceasefire details, with each side accusing the other of not being willing to cooperate.
Both sides also warned of a resumption of hostilities in case of failure.
Host Turkiye said at the conclusion of last week’s talks that the parties had agreed to establish a monitoring and verification mechanism to maintain peace and penalize violators.
Fifty civilians were killed and 447 others wounded on the Afghan side of the border during a week of clashes in October, according to the United Nations. At least five people died in explosions in Kabul.
The Pakistani army reported 23 of its soldiers were killed and 29 others wounded, without mentioning civilian casualties.
The Taliban government wants Afghanistan’s territorial sovereignty respected.
Islamabad also accuses the Afghan government of acting with the support of India, its historical enemy, amid closer ties between these two countries.


UK sees surge in referrals of right-wing extremism to counterterrorism program

UK sees surge in referrals of right-wing extremism to counterterrorism program
Updated 7 sec ago

UK sees surge in referrals of right-wing extremism to counterterrorism program

UK sees surge in referrals of right-wing extremism to counterterrorism program
  • Cases linked to violent far-right ideology increase by almost 40% and are now more than double the number related to Islamist extremism
  • Home Office figures show sharp rise in overall referrals to the Prevent scheme, amid growing concerns about ‘no ideology’ radicalization

LONDON: The number of people referred to Britain’s counterterrorism program over concerns about right-wing extremism surged by nearly 40 per cent in the space of a year.

Of a total of 8,778 people flagged to the Prevent scheme in the year to March 2025, nearly 1,800 related to violent, far-right ideology, Home Office figures show. That compares with 1,314 in the previous 12 months.

The number of referrals for far-right extremism was more than double the number for cases of Islamist extremism, which fell by 13 percent to 870 in the same period.

The shift comes amid an overall sharp increase in the number of cases referred to Prevent, and a big jump in the number of referrals labeled as “no identified ideology.” The 27 percent rise in referrals to the program has been linked to the July 2024 attack on a children’s dance class in northern England in which three girls were killed, and the subsequent trial.

Prevent faced criticism in a review for prematurely closing its case on the attacker, 17-year-old Axel Rudakubana, who had been referred to the scheme three times between 2019 and 2021. The review said too much emphasis was placed on the observation that he did not have a distinct ideology.

The latest figures reveal that more than half of the referrals to Prevent involved individuals judged to have no identified ideology, 21 percent were due to concerns about extreme right-wing views, 10 percent related to Islamist ideology, and 5 percent were the result of concerns about “fascination with extreme violence or mass casualty attacks” where no other ideology had been identified.

Of the individuals referred to the scheme, 89 percent were male, 65 percent white, 19 percent Asian, and 8 percent black.

The program has faced extensive criticism from human-rights groups for disproportionately targeting the Muslim community. Amnesty International said the latest figures showed Prevent was failing to tackle rising extremism.

“It is an ineffective, discriminatory program which is not compliant with international human rights law,” said Alba Kapoor, Amnesty’s racial justice lead.

Prevent was established in 2003 and expanded after the July 7, 2005, terrorist attacks on London’s transport system. Schools, police, local authorities and members of the public can refer to the scheme people they fear might be susceptible to radicalization. After an initial assessment, cases can be passed a “Channel” panel that determines the severity of the risk and what action should be taken.

The latest figures show 1,727 individuals were discussed by one of these panels in the year to March and 1,472 were adopted for further support.