ֱ

Ukraine destroyed one Oreshnik missile in Russia in summer 2023, SBU says

Ukraine destroyed one Oreshnik missile in Russia in summer 2023, SBU says
Ukraine destroyed one of Russia's intermediate-range Oreshnik missiles in a special operation in summer 2023, the head of the SBU security service said on Friday. (X/@nexta_tv)
Short Url
Updated 29 sec ago

Ukraine destroyed one Oreshnik missile in Russia in summer 2023, SBU says

Ukraine destroyed one Oreshnik missile in Russia in summer 2023, SBU says
  • Russia first used the Oreshnik missile against Ukraine in November 2024
  • “We can say briefly and concisely that one of the three Oreshniks was successfully destroyed” Maliuk said

KYIV: Ukraine destroyed one of Russia’s intermediate-range Oreshnik missiles in a special operation in summer 2023, the head of the SBU security service said on Friday.
Vasyl Maliuk told reporters the operation was carried out jointly by SBU, GUR military intelligence, and foreign intelligence, adding that it was “100 percent successful.”
Reuters was unable to independently verify the report.
Russia first used the Oreshnik — hazel tree in Russian — missile against Ukraine in November 2024, targeting a defense enterprise in Dnipro, more than a year after Kyiv’s purported destruction of one of the missiles.
“We can say briefly and concisely that one of the three Oreshniks was successfully destroyed on their (Russian) territory at Kapustin Yar...,” Maliuk said during a briefing chaired by President Volodymyr Zelensky and also attended by Ukraine’s foreign minister, the head of foreign intelligence and other officials.
Maliuk gave no details of how the operation was conducted.
Ukraine’s intelligence officials said Russia produced three Oreshniks this year and planned to double annual production to six.
Zelensky said 25 companies were involved in Oreshnik production and urged Ukraine’s Western partners to impose sanctions on them.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said the Oreshnik is impossible to intercept and has destructive power comparable to a nuclear weapon, though Western experts have questioned these assertions. Putin said in June Russia was stepping up production but gave no details.
Oreshnik missiles featured in joint Russian-Belarusian military exercises last month.
This week Belarus, a key ally of Russia, confirmed it would deploy the Oreshnik missile system on its territory, which borders Ukraine, in December.


France’s call for Goma airport to reopen ‘inopportune’: M23 group

France’s call for Goma airport to reopen ‘inopportune’: M23 group
Updated 6 sec ago

France’s call for Goma airport to reopen ‘inopportune’: M23 group

France’s call for Goma airport to reopen ‘inopportune’: M23 group
President Emmanuel Macron said the key airport would open “in the coming weeks” for humanitarian flights
Goma airport was the scene of fierce fighting during the city’s capture in January and has since remained closed

GOMA, DR Congo: The M23 armed group, which controls large parts of eastern DR Congo, on Friday described a call by the French president to reopen Goma airport as “inopportune.”
President Emmanuel Macron said the key airport would open “in the coming weeks” for humanitarian flights, during an international conference on Thursday on the crisis in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.
The region — bordering Rwanda with abundant natural resources but plagued by non-state armed groups — has suffered extreme violence for more than three decades.
The crisis intensified with the 2021 resurgence of the M23 — a Rwandan-backed armed group fighting the Kinshasa authorities — and came to a head early this year when the militia seized the key cities of Goma and Bukavu.
Goma airport was the scene of fierce fighting during the city’s capture in January and has since remained closed.
The M23, which was not invited to the Paris conference on supporting peace and prosperity in the Great Lakes region, “considers inopportune France’s call for the reopening” of Goma airport, spokesman Lawrence Kanyuka said in a statement.
“Such an initiative must only be undertaken within the framework of negotiations currently under way in Doha under Qatari mediation,” he added.
The Congolese government and the M23 signed a declaration of principles on July 19 in Qatar that included a “permanent ceasefire” aimed at halting the conflict.
It followed a separate US-brokered peace deal between the Congolese and Rwandan governments signed in Washington in June.
However, efforts to end the conflict have proved slow to take effect on the ground.
Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe has also expressed doubts.
“Paris cannot reopen an airport, as the primary stakeholders are absent,” he said on Thursday, referring to the M23 group.
Humanitarian officials have voiced doubts, too, about a possible reopening and underlined that the land route remains essential for delivering aid to areas under M23 control.
The M23 said in its statement that there was “no longer a humanitarian emergency” in areas under its control.
After seizing Goma, the M23 ordered displaced people living on the outskirts of the city to return home and in a few days emptied makeshift camps where hundreds of thousands had been living in dire conditions.
The Paris conference raised more than 1.5 billion euros ($1.7 billion) in international aid for the region, Macron announced.

‘Hundreds dead’ in Tanzania post-election violence, says opposition

‘Hundreds dead’ in Tanzania post-election violence, says opposition
Updated 19 min 18 sec ago

‘Hundreds dead’ in Tanzania post-election violence, says opposition

‘Hundreds dead’ in Tanzania post-election violence, says opposition
  • The main opposition party, Chadema, said clashes continued between protesters and security forces in the commercial hub on Friday
  • “As we speak the figure for deaths in Dar (es Salaam) is around 350 and for Mwanza it is 200-plus,” Chadema spokesman said

NAIROBI: Around 700 people have been killed in three days of election protests in Tanzania, the main opposition party said Friday, with protesters still on the streets in the midst of an Internet blackout.
President Samia Suluhu Hassan had sought to cement her position and silence critics in her party with an emphatic win in Wednesday’s election, in which her main challengers were either jailed or barred from standing.
But the vote descended into chaos as crowds took to the streets of Dar es Salaam and other cities, tearing down her posters and attacking police and polling stations, leading to an Internet shutdown and curfew.
With foreign journalists largely banned from covering the election and a communications blackout entering its third day, information from the ground has been scarce.
The main opposition party, Chadema, said clashes continued between protesters and security forces in the commercial hub on Friday.
“As we speak the figure for deaths in Dar (es Salaam) is around 350 and for Mwanza it is 200-plus. Added to figures from other places around the country, the overall figure is around 700,” Chadema spokesman John Kitoka told AFP.
“The death toll could be much higher,” he warned, saying killings could be happening during the nighttime curfew.
A security source told AFP they were hearing reports of more than 500 dead, “maybe 700-800 in the whole country.”
“We are talking hundreds of deaths,” a diplomatic source told AFP.
The United Nations said “credible reports” indicated 10 dead, in the first information released by an international body, while Amnesty International said it had information of at least 100 killed.
Multiple hospitals and health clinics were too afraid to talk directly to AFP.
Hassan had yet to comment on the unrest and local news sites had not been updated since Wednesday.
The only official statement came from army chief Jacob Mkunda late Thursday who called the protesters “criminals.”
In Zanzibar, a tourist hotspot with its own semi-autonomous government, a spokesman for Hassan’s Revolution Party (Chama Cha Mapinduzi: CCM) said the Internet would return when the situation calmed.
“The government knows why they have shut the Internet. There are people who have tried creating tension in Dar es Salaam and they have destroyed a lot of things,” spokesman Hamis Mbeto told reporters.

- Zanzibar ‘robbed’ -

In Zanzibar, the CCM had already been declared winner of the local vote on Thursday.
The opposition party, ACT-Wazalendo, rejected the result, saying: “They have robbed the people of Zanzibar of their voice... The only solution to deliver justice is through a fresh election.”
A senior party official told AFP that ballot boxes had been stuffed, people allowed to vote multiple times without ID and their election observers kicked out of counting rooms.
At a meeting place for opposition supporters on Zanzibar, there was dismay and fear.
“There has never been a credible election since 1995,” said a 70-year-old man, referring to Tanzania’s first multi-party vote.
None of those interviewed gave their names.
“We are afraid of speaking because they might come to our houses and pick us up,” said one.

- Crackdown -

Hassan has faced opposition from parts of the army and allies of her iron-fisted predecessor, John Magufuli, since she took over upon his death in 2021, analysts say.
They said she wanted an emphatic victory to cement her position, and the authorities banned the main opposition party, Chadema, and put its leader on trial for treason.
In the run-up to the vote, rights groups condemned a “wave of terror” in the east African nation, including a string of high-profile abductions that escalated in the final days.
Much public anger has been directed at Hassan’s son, Abdul Halim Hafidh Ameir, accused of overseeing the crackdown.
ACT-Wazalendo was allowed to contest the local election in Zanzibar, but its candidate was barred from competing against Hassan on the mainland.


Advocates allege ‘inhumane’ conditions at Chicago-area ICE facility in new lawsuit

Advocates allege ‘inhumane’ conditions at Chicago-area ICE facility in new lawsuit
Updated 31 October 2025

Advocates allege ‘inhumane’ conditions at Chicago-area ICE facility in new lawsuit

Advocates allege ‘inhumane’ conditions at Chicago-area ICE facility in new lawsuit
  • Agents have also allegedly coerced people held at the processing center to sign paperwork they don’t understand
  • Lawyers and relatives of people held at the facility have called it a de facto detention center

CHICAGO: Illinois advocates sued federal authorities Friday over alleged “inhumane and torturous” conditions at a Chicago-area federal immigration facility.
Attorneys with the ACLU of Illinois and the MacArthur Justice Center say US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have denied people being held at the Broadview facility private calls with attorneys and have blocked members of Congress, faith leaders and journalists from entering the building, creating a “black box” they say has allowed authorities to act “with impunity.”
Agents have also allegedly coerced people held at the processing center to sign paperwork they don’t understand, leading them to unknowingly relinquish their rights and face deportation, according to the lawsuit.
Representatives of ICE and The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment Friday.
Alexa Van Brunt, director of the MacArthur Justice Center’s Illinois office and lead attorney for the lawsuit, said community members are “being kidnapped off the streets, packed in hold cells, denied food, medical care, and basic necessities, and forced to sign away their legal rights.”
“Everyone, no matter their legal status, has the right to access counsel and to not be subject to horrific and inhumane conditions,” she said.
Attorneys accuse ICE, DHS and US Customs and Border Protection of violating detainees’ Fifth Amendment right to due process and First Amendment right to legal counsel, and have asked the court to force the agencies to improve the facility’s conditions.
Advocates have for months raised concerns about conditions at the facility, which has drawn scrutiny from members of Congress, political candidates and activist groups.
Lawyers and relatives of people held at the facility have called it a de facto detention center, where up to 200 people have been held at a time without access to legal counsel.
DHS previously dismissed the claims, saying those held at the facility have proper meals, medical treatment and access to communication with family members and lawyers.
The Broadview center has also drawn demonstrations, which have led to the arrests of numerous protesters. The protests are at the center of a separate lawsuit from a coalition of news outlets and protesters who claim federal agents violated their First Amendment rights by repeatedly using tear gas and other weapons on them.
US District Judge Sara Ellis sided with the coalition earlier this month, requiring federal agents in the Chicago area to wear badges and banning them from using certain riot control techniques against peaceful protesters and journalists. Later, Ellis also required body cameras for agents who have them after raising concerns about her initial order not being followed.


‘Gap closing’ between online Islamophobia, real-life hate crimes in UK: Government partner

‘Gap closing’ between online Islamophobia, real-life hate crimes in UK: Government partner
Updated 31 October 2025

‘Gap closing’ between online Islamophobia, real-life hate crimes in UK: Government partner

‘Gap closing’ between online Islamophobia, real-life hate crimes in UK: Government partner
  • British Muslim Trust launches hotline for reporting hate crimes
  • CEO: Anti-Muslim hatred in real life ‘underreported and unrecognized’

LONDON: The “gap is closing” between online Islamophobia and real-life hate incidents in the UK, the CEO of the government’s new Muslim community partner group has warned. 

It comes amid growing concerns over a rise in Islamophobia in the country, and as the British Muslim Trust launches a government-supported hotline for reporting hate crimes, The Guardian reported on Friday.

Anti-Muslim hatred in real life is “underreported and unrecognized,” Akeela Ahmed warned. Incidents can occur in day-to-day life, she said, highlighting one case where she was refused service in a shop while wearing a hijab.

She added: “It’s something I experienced myself ... People around me were being served but I wasn’t served.

“First you feel helpless, and then you second guess yourself … sort of gaslight yourself into thinking that it must have been something that you did wrong. (But) basically there wasn’t anybody else who looked like me in the shop.”

In July, the BMT was picked as a recipient of the government’s “combating hate against Muslims fund.”

In the months since, Ahmed has toured Muslim communities across Britain, encountering “fatigue” and feelings of “disconnection from central government.”

Part of the BMT’s mission is to research the impact of Islamophobic discourse on Muslims in the UK.

The group will “call on ministers if research showed social media companies are not being held to account” under existing legislation, Ahmed said.

“We’re not even just talking about content that could be racist or anti-Muslim in nature. We’re talking about content that is inciting violence, that is actually breaking the law.

“We would not be asking for any special favours or special measures just for Muslim communities. This is literally about upholding the law as it is and enacting it.”

Ahmed added: “I think Muslims are an easy target because they are visible. People like me who wear a hijab. Pretty much everywhere that we visited, people described feeling like they were experiencing levels of hate that their parents had experienced in the 70s and the 80s.

“And they expressed how they felt that whereas the older generations might have just been like ‘we’re going keep our heads down, we’re going to prove our worth, get on with our lives, not make a fuss’ — they felt that they were a different generation and they were doing all the right things.”

The UK government is considering a new legal definition of Islamophobia that is expected to “protect the freedom to criticize Islam” while combating surging anti-Muslim hate incidents.


India, US sign 10-year defense pact to boost intelligence, tech cooperation

India, US sign 10-year defense pact to boost intelligence, tech cooperation
Updated 31 October 2025

India, US sign 10-year defense pact to boost intelligence, tech cooperation

India, US sign 10-year defense pact to boost intelligence, tech cooperation
  • Partnership ‘critical’ to ensure free and open Indo-Pacific, Indian defense chief says
  • New accord highlights India, US common concern over China, according to experts

NEW DELHI: Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh and US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed on Friday a 10-year defense framework to expand cooperation, marking a “new era” in bilateral ties amid tensions over Washington’s tariff war.

The defense chiefs signed the framework for the US-India Major Defense Partnership, which is expected to provide policy direction for their ties, on the sidelines of a ministerial meeting organized by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Kuala Lumpur.

“This will usher in a new era in our already strong defense partnership … It is a signal of our growing strategic convergence and will herald a new decade of partnership,” Singh said in a statement on X.

“Defense will remain as a major pillar of our bilateral relations. Our partnership is critical for ensuring a free, open and rules-based Indo-Pacific region.”

The agreement comes as the two countries are working on closing a trade deal amid tense ties after US President Donald Trump slapped 50 percent tariffs on India, including a 25 percent penalty for importing Russian oil.

Hegseth wrote on X that the framework was a “cornerstone for regional stability and deterrence” and will increase India-US intelligence and tech collaboration.

“We’re enhancing our coordination, info sharing, and tech cooperation. Our defense ties have never been stronger,” he said.

The pact signed on Friday is an extension of a similar agreement inked in 2015, which had covered joint technology development, defense trade and military exchanges.

Plans for the extension were announced in February, when India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Trump in Washington.

They pledged during their meeting “to elevate military cooperation across all domains — air, land, sea, space, and cyberspace — through enhanced training, exercises, and operations, incorporating the latest technologies,” according to a joint statement.

“India-US strategic relationship, particularly defense relationship, is on track and so that shows the common concern of both the countries, which is basically driven by the Chinese threat,” Laxman Kumar Behera, a research fellow at the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, told Arab News.

“This comes at a very difficult time (because of trade tensions), and unlike in the last time, when the relationship was quite good … but nonetheless this agreement shows that the strategic relationship is still intact, despite the economic relation is in little trouble.”

The new pact is likely to benefit both Washington and Delhi in terms of more support to counter Chinese growth and influence over the Indo-Pacific region, said Bharat Karnad, an emeritus professor for national security studies at the Center for Policy Research in New Delhi.

“Considering how fast the Chinese Navy is growing, it is the largest navy in the world right now … Everybody needs help. The Americans need our help because we are locationally right there. We are a principal player in the Indo (Pacific) ocean basin,” he told Arab News.

“While we require the help in terms of, you know, their satellite intelligence … They have enormous satellite constellations that can pick up Chinese naval movements and so on, much farther than our own satellite constellation can pick up those kinds of things. So, you know, it is very helpful.”