ֱ

Picasso painting disappears en route to Granada exhibit

Picasso painting disappears en route to Granada exhibit
A 1919 Pablo Picasso painting has disappeared in transit ahead of its display at a temporary exhibition in the southern Spanish city of Granada, prompting a police investigation, according to the foundation organising the exhibit. (X/@nexta_tv)
Short Url
Updated 26 sec ago

Picasso painting disappears en route to Granada exhibit

Picasso painting disappears en route to Granada exhibit
  • The foundation confirmed on Friday that the painting was insured for an appraised value of $700,000
  • The shipment was delivered to the CajaGranada cultural center on the morning of October 3

MADRID: A 1919 Pablo Picasso painting has disappeared in transit ahead of its display at a temporary exhibition in the southern Spanish city of Granada, prompting a police investigation, according to the foundation organizing the exhibit.
The CajaGranada Foundation said in a statement late on Thursday that the missing piece — a small framed gouache titled “Still life with guitar” — was part of a larger shipment of artworks moved from Madrid to the Andalusian city for the exhibition “Still life. The eternity of the inert.” 

The foundation confirmed on Friday that the painting, owned by a private collector and measuring 13 x 10 centimeters (5 x 4 inches), was insured for an appraised value of 600,000 euros ($700,000).
The shipment was delivered to the CajaGranada cultural center on the morning of October 3, a Friday.
The loss was not discovered until the following Monday, when the exhibit’s curator and the foundation’s head of exhibitions began unpacking the crates.
“As not all packages were properly numbered, it was not possible to carry out a thorough check without unpacking them,” the foundation added.
The CajaGranada Foundation said it had reviewed the security footage from that weekend and confirmed “no incident occurred” during that time.
After discovering the painting was missing, the foundation filed a complaint with Spain’s national police.
The organization said it has made all its resources available to investigators and expressed confidence in the authorities’ ability to resolve the case.


King Charles III’s visit to Vatican marks a historic step in path of unity between two churches

Updated 4 sec ago

King Charles III’s visit to Vatican marks a historic step in path of unity between two churches

King Charles III’s visit to Vatican marks a historic step in path of unity between two churches
Charles, who is titular head of the Church of England, strongly wanted to visit the Vatican during the 2025 Holy Year
During the visit, Charles will be given a formal new title and recognition at a pontifical basilica

VATICAN CITY: The Catholic Church and Church of England, divided for centuries over issues that now include the ordination of female priests, will take a historic step on the path to unity next week when Britain’s King Charles III and Pope Leo XIV pray together in the Sistine Chapel, officials said Friday.
The Oct. 23 ecumenical prayer service, drawing on the shared concern for care of God’s creation, marks the first time since the Reformation that the heads of the two Christian churches pray together.
Buckingham Palace and Vatican officials on Friday announced details of the two-day trip that Charles and Queen Camilla will undertake on Oct. 22-23, a visit that was scheduled for April but was postponed after Pope Francis’ final illness, shortly before his death.
Charles, who is titular head of the Church of England, strongly wanted to visit the Vatican during the 2025 Holy Year, a once-every-quarter century celebration of Christianity. In doing so, he is following in the footsteps of his late mother, Queen Elizabeth II, who visited during the 2000 Jubilee, said Monsignor Flavio Pace, secretary of the Vatican’s office for promoting Christian unity.
During the visit, Charles will be given a formal new title and recognition at a pontifical basilica that has strong, traditional ties to the Church of England, St. Paul’s Outside the Walls. The title “Royal Confrater,” is a sign of spiritual fellowship and will be given to Charles along with a special chair decorated with his coat of arms that will remain in the basilica for Charles and his heirs to use, officials said.
Anglicans split from the Catholic Church in 1534 when English King Henry VIII was refused a marriage annulment. While popes for decades have forged warm relations with the Church of England and the broader Anglican Communion on a path toward greater unity, the two churches remain divided over issues such as the ordination of female priests, which the Catholic Church prohibits.
Significantly, the Archbishop of Canterbury-designate, Sarah Mullally, will not join the king and queen since she hasn’t been formally installed as the Church of England’s spiritual leader. She is the first woman to hold the position, which is considered the first among equals in the broader Anglican Communion, which has more than 85 million members spread across 165 countries.
In her place, the archbishop of York will preside with Leo in the Sistine Chapel service, which will feature hymns sung by members of the royal choirs alongside the Sistine Chapel choir, Pace said.
Pace dodged a question about whether the Sistine Chapel service would have gone ahead as planned had Mullally been installed in time and joined the king and queen on the visit. He noted past joint statements of the Catholic and Anglican churches acknowledging their differences over women’s ordination but insisting that such obstacles shouldn’t prevent theological dialogue from continuing.
Charles and Camilla’s trip was originally scheduled for April as part of a joint Vatican-Italy state visit. After Francis got sick, the king and queen went ahead with the planned four-day leg in Italy, and briefly greeted Francis at the Vatican just a few weeks before he died.

Western pressure to hit Asian buying of Russian oil from December, sources say

Western pressure to hit Asian buying of Russian oil from December, sources say
Updated 37 min 16 sec ago

Western pressure to hit Asian buying of Russian oil from December, sources say

Western pressure to hit Asian buying of Russian oil from December, sources say
  • Washington is exerting pressure on China, India and Japan through trade talks to reduce their purchases of Russian oil
  • China and India’s seaborne imports of key Russian crude grades are expected to rebound

NEW DELHI/SINGAPORE/TOKYO: US and European pressure on Asian buyers of Russian energy could restrict India’s oil imports from December, leading to cheaper supplies for China, while Japan is unlikely to halt its Sakhalin liquefied natural gas shipments for now, trade sources and analysts said.
Washington is exerting pressure on China, India and Japan through trade talks to reduce their purchases of Russian oil and LNG, while Britain has just imposed sanctions on Chinese and Indian entities. More sanctions from the European Union could follow. Western nations say Moscow is using its energy revenues to fund the Ukraine war.
The moves come after Russia ramped up crude exports this month as Ukrainian drone attacks on its refineries have reduced oil processing. China and India’s seaborne imports of key Russian crude grades are expected to rebound to about 3.1 million barrels per day in October, the highest volume since June, data from analytics firm Kpler showed.
These imports are expected to remain high through November given the sharp rise in exports from Russia, Kpler’s senior oil analyst Muyu Xu said.
“However, the sudden UK sanctions on Chinese and Indian refineries — and the possibility of more measures from the EU or even the US — could prompt buyers to take a more cautious approach when placing new orders until further clarification emerges,” she added.

INDIA CUTS NOT YET VISIBLE
A White House official said on Thursday that Indian refiners are already cutting Russian oil imports by 50 percent. Indian sources said the cut was not visible yet, though it could be reflected in import numbers for December or January. Refiners had already placed orders for November loading that included some cargoes for December arrival as well, multiple sources said.
“We do not think India can stop Russian crude purchases overnight, even if it has agreed to do so, as at least 700,000 bpd of India imports of Russian crude are on a term basis,” consultancy FGE said in a note.
“Therefore, the maximum volume of Russian crude flows to India we see as potentially being at risk in the short term is the 0.8-1 million bpd of spot volumes that Indian refiners take,” FGE analysts said. China could pick up some of the volumes backed out of India as Russian crude discounts will widen further, they added.
Meanwhile, Indian refiners have bought rare Guyanese crude as they diversify purchases that would mitigate the impact on their operations if Russian supply was cut.

SANCTIONS ON NAYARA, YULONG
Britain slapped sanctions on India’s Nayara refinery, which is already reeling from EU sanctions, and on Chinese refiner Yulong Petrochemical which operates a 400,000 barrels per day refinery in China’s eastern Shandong province.
The UK government has given Yulong until November 13 to complete outstanding transactions, allowing the refiner to handle its upcoming Middle Eastern imports, Kpler’s Xu said.
It’s unclear if Yulong can establish a new supply chain to circumvent the sanctions, she added.
“The move has undoubtedly sounded an alarm for other Russian oil buyers who may have previously overlooked sanctions from non-US authorities,” Xu said.
June Goh, a senior oil market analyst at Sparta Commodities, said the UK sanctions are unlikely to significantly impact Yulong, but the refiner will find it hard to maintain operations if the EU and the US follow suit.
Meanwhile, Taiwan’s Russian naphtha imports are set to fall after a group of non-governmental organizations criticized the island’s continued business with Russia.
However, Ukrainian attacks on Russian energy infrastructure, as well as a partial ban imposed by Moscow on Russian exports of gasoline and diesel, have already been capping Russian refined product shipments, traders said.

JAPAN LNG IMPORTS
The US has also called on Japan to halt Russian energy imports, ahead of US President Donald Trump’s expected visit to Asia later this month.
Tokyo has agreed with other G7 countries to phase out Russian oil imports in response to Moscow’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, but it has exemptions to continue importing LNG from the Sakhalin-2 project under long-term contracts.
An early termination of these contracts would result in various penalties, said Yuriy Humber, CEO of Tokyo-based consultancy Yuri Group. Also, securing an additional 6 million metric tons of LNG annually on the spot market to replace Russian supply would not be easy and is “massively expensive,” he said.
Russian LNG, which accounts for about 9 percent of Japanese imports, is an important stable supply source for Japan, Kingo Hayashi, chairman of Japan’s Federation of Electric Power Companies, told reporters on Friday, adding that Japanese utilities want to continue using it.
Anne-Sophie Corbeau, a researcher at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy, said the US needs to have a consistent and coherent policy on Russian LNG.
“On the one side, they are pressuring their allies to stop importing Russian gas or LNG. But they are not implementing their own sanctions on Arctic LNG 2,” she said, referring to Russia’s large-scale LNG project in northern Siberia which is still delivering LNG to China despite being under US sanctions.


EU supports Trump-Putin meet in Budapest if serves peace

EU supports Trump-Putin meet in Budapest if serves peace
Updated 51 min 25 sec ago

EU supports Trump-Putin meet in Budapest if serves peace

EU supports Trump-Putin meet in Budapest if serves peace
  • Spokespeople said that the EU had to be pragmatic and back any steps that might lead to peace
  • EU foreign affairs spokeswoman Anitta Hipper said that individual member states can issue derogations to allow travel over their national airspace

BRUSSELS: The European Commission said Friday it welcomes a meeting in Budapest between US President Donald Trump and Russia’s Vladimir Putin if it can help end the Ukraine war.
Spokespeople said that the EU had to be pragmatic and back any steps that might lead to peace in Ukraine — even though Putin is wanted under an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for alleged war crimes.
“We live in the real world,” commission spokesman Olof Gill told reporters.
“Meetings don’t always happen in the precise order or format that we would like them to, but if meetings... move us toward a just and lasting peace for Ukraine, then we should welcome them.”
Hungary, though a member of the EU, is in the process of withdrawing from the ICC under a decision by its prime minister, Viktor Orban, who maintains warm relations with Putin.
In a phone call on Thursday, Putin and Trump floated the idea of meeting in Budapest at a near date to be decided.
Yet for Putin to fly to Budapest he would have to cross the airspace of either Ukraine or other EU countries where the ICC warrant applies.
EU foreign affairs spokeswoman Anitta Hipper said that individual member states can issue derogations to allow travel over their national airspace.
She added that, while Putin was subject to an asset freeze under EU sanctions, he was “not specifically under travel ban.”
The warrant against Putin is for the abduction of Ukrainian children since Russia’s invasion began in February 2022.
Hungary’s withdrawal from the ICC is to take effect in June 2026, and the country technically remains party to the court until then.
Another commission spokesman, Anouar El Anouni, when asked about the weight of the ICC warrant on the mooted Budapest summit, said the EU remains “strongly committed to international criminal justice.”
He noted that, while an ICC withdrawal process was under way, “it has no effect on a state’s duty of cooperation in relation to investigations and proceedings that started prior to that date.”
Orban’s government in April hosted a visit by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is also the target of an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.


Polish court blocks the extradition to Germany of a Ukrainian man suspected in pipeline attack

Polish court blocks the extradition to Germany of a Ukrainian man suspected in pipeline attack
Updated 56 min 43 sec ago

Polish court blocks the extradition to Germany of a Ukrainian man suspected in pipeline attack

Polish court blocks the extradition to Germany of a Ukrainian man suspected in pipeline attack
  • German prosecutors have described him as a trained diver and allege that he was part of a group that placed explosives on the pipelines
  • The Warsaw District Court rejected his extradition on Friday and ordered his immediate release

WARSAW: A Polish court on Friday blocked the extradition to Germany of a Ukrainian man suspected of involvement in the 2022 attack on the Nord Stream gas pipelines, a ruling that was welcomed by Poland’s prime minister.
The 46-year-old suspect, who has been identified only as Volodymyr Z. in line with local privacy rules, was arrested near Warsaw Sept. 30 on a German warrant.
German prosecutors have described him as a trained diver and allege that he was part of a group that placed explosives on the pipelines near the Danish island of Bornholm three years ago.
The Warsaw District Court rejected his extradition on Friday and ordered his immediate release.
The man’s lawyer, Tymoteusz Paprocki, said ahead of the hearing that “my client doesn’t admit guilt, he didn’t commit any crime against Germany and he doesn’t understand why these charges were made by the German side.” He said he also would argue that no Ukrainian should be charged with any action directed against Russia.
Judge points to a “just war”
Judge Dariusz Lubowski said as he announced his ruling that the attack on the pipelines should be understood as a military action in a “just war,” and therefore not subject to criminal responsibility on the part of an individual. He also questioned German jurisdiction for various reasons, including the fact that the explosions occurred in international waters.
Poland, whose successive governments have been staunchly anti-Russian, has a history of opposition to the pipelines. Prime Minister Donald Tusk has said it would not be in Poland’s interest to hand over the suspect.
Tusk noted in a post on X Friday that the court had rejected extradition, “and rightly so.” He added that “the case is closed.”
Pipelines drew regional opposition
Undersea explosions on Sept. 26, 2022, severely damaged the pipelines. The damage added to tensions over the war in Ukraine as European countries moved to wean themselves off Russian energy sources, following the Kremlin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
The explosions ruptured the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, which was inaugurated in 2011 and carried Russian natural gas to Germany under the Baltic Sea until Russia cut off supplies at the end of August 2022.
They also damaged the parallel Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which never entered service because Germany suspended its certification process shortly before Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
Germany had previously pushed ahead with the Nord Stream 2 project despite opposition from central and eastern European countries and the US, which argued it would increase Europe’s dependence on Russian gas and give Russia the possibility of using gas as a geopolitical weapon.
Tusk said earlier this month that “the problem of Europe, the problem of Ukraine, the problem of Lithuania and Poland is not that Nord Stream 2 was blown up, but that it was built.” He said that “the only people who should be ashamed of and quiet about Nord Stream 2 are those who decided to build it.”
German prosecutors also seeking an extradition from Italy
At the time of his arrest, Volodymyr Z. was a resident of Poland, where he lived with his wife and children, Polish prosecutors say. His wife has told Polish media her husband is innocent and that they were together in Poland at the time the pipelines were blown up.
He is one of two Ukrainians whose extradition German judicial authorities have been trying to secure in the case.
A man suspected to have been one of the coordinators of the attack was arrested in Italy in August. This week, Italy’s top court annulled a lower court’s decision to order his extradition and called for another panel of judges to reassess the case, his lawyer said.
The German government has declined to comment on Tusk’s remarks this month.
Asked about the case ahead of Friday’s ruling, spokesperson Steffen Meyer said that “of course it’s important to us that things be cleared up” but wouldn’t comment beyond that, noting that the ongoing proceedings are in prosecutors’ hands.


UK loses bid to block challenge to Palestine Action ban under anti-terrorism laws

UK loses bid to block challenge to Palestine Action ban under anti-terrorism laws
Updated 17 October 2025

UK loses bid to block challenge to Palestine Action ban under anti-terrorism laws

UK loses bid to block challenge to Palestine Action ban under anti-terrorism laws
  • Huda Ammori, who helped found Palestine Action in 2020, was given permission to challenge the group’s proscription, with her case due to be heard next month

LONDON, Oct 17 : The British government on Friday lost its bid to block the co-founder of pro-Palestinian campaign group Palestine Action bringing a legal challenge over the banning of the group under anti-terrorism laws.
Huda Ammori, who helped found Palestine Action in 2020, was given permission to challenge the group’s proscription, with her case due to be heard next month.
Britain’s Home Office (interior ministry) asked the Court of Appeal to overturn that decision and rule that any challenge to proscription should be heard by a specialist tribunal.
Judge Sue Carr rejected the Home Office’s appeal, saying Ammori’s case could proceed in the High Court.
Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organization by the government in July, making it a crime to be a member, which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
More than 1,000 people have since been arrested for holding signs in support of the group, with over 100 charged.
Before it was banned, Palestine Action had increasingly targeted Israel-linked companies in Britain, often spraying red paint, blocking entrances or damaging equipment. It accused Britain’s government of complicity in what it said were Israeli war crimes in Gaza.
The group had particularly focused on Israeli defense firm Elbit Systems and Britain’s government cited a raid at an Elbit site last year when it decided to proscribe the group.
Palestine Action was banned a month after some of its members broke into the RAF Brize Norton air base and damaged two planes, for which four members have been charged. (Reporting by Sam Tobin, editing by William James)