ֱ

Prince Harry makes surprise visit to Ukraine in support of wounded troops

Prince Harry makes surprise visit to Ukraine in support of wounded troops
Above, Prince Harry arrives on central railway station in Kyiv region, Ukraine on Sept. 12, 2025. (Railway of Ukraine Ukrzaliznytsia via AP)
Short Url
Updated 12 September 2025

Prince Harry makes surprise visit to Ukraine in support of wounded troops

Prince Harry makes surprise visit to Ukraine in support of wounded troops
  • This is the second time Harry has visited Ukraine since the start of Russia’s full scale invasion in 2022
  • Prince Harry’s last trip to Ukraine included a visit to the Superhumans Center, an orthopedic clinic in Lviv

LONDON: Britain’s Prince Harry has arrived in Ukraine for a surprise visit in support of wounded service members.

Harry’s representatives confirmed they were in the capital, Kyiv, on Friday, though they declined to discuss the prince’s schedule for security reasons.

This is the second time Harry has visited Ukraine since the start of Russia’s full scale invasion in 2022. He made a trip to the western city of Lviv in April.

“We cannot stop the war but what we can do is do everything we can to help the recovery process,” Harry told the Guardian newspaper while on an overnight train to Kyiv.

Harry, a British Army veteran who served in Afghanistan, is the founder of the Invictus Games, a Paralympic-style event designed to inspire military veterans around the world as they work to overcome battlefield injuries. Ukraine is bidding to host the games in 2029.

The Archewell foundation set up by Harry and his wife Meghan announced this week that it had donated $500,000 to projects supporting injured children from Gaza and Ukraine. The money will be used to help the World Health Organization with medical evacuations and to fund work developing prosthetics for seriously injured young people.

The Guardian said that Harry will visit the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War, spend time with 200 veterans and meet Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko.

His visit coincided with a trip to Ukraine by British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper, who announced a new set of UK sanctions targeting Russia’s oil revenues and military supplies.

Cooper said the visit is a show of solidarity with Ukrainians facing intensified assault from Russia – including 6,500 drones and missiles in July, 10 times the level of a year ago.

Harry’s appearance in Ukraine follows a four-day trip to the UK, where he met his father, King Charles III, for the first time in 19 months. The meeting was seen as a first step in repairing frigid relations between Harry and other members of the royal family, which deteriorated after he and his wife, the former Meghan Markle, gave up royal duties and moved to California in 2020.

Harry and his father last met in February 2024, when the prince flew to London after receiving news that Charles had been diagnosed with cancer. Harry spent about 45 minutes with Charles before the king flew to his Sandringham country estate to recuperate from his treatment.

Prince Harry’s last trip to Ukraine included a visit to the Superhumans Center, an orthopedic clinic in Lviv that treats wounded military personnel and civilians. The center provides prosthetic limbs, reconstructive surgery and psychological help free of charge.

Harry’s visit Friday come as Russia escalates its war against Ukraine.

It is less than a week after Russia’s largest aerial attack on Ukraine since its all-out invasion began more than three years ago – an attack in which the main Ukrainian government building was hit. It also comes just days after numerous Russian drones entered the airspace of NATO member Poland – the country Harry traveled through to reach Ukraine.


Secret report raises questions over UK justification for banning Palestine Action as more protests planned at Labour conference

Secret report raises questions over UK justification for banning Palestine Action as more protests planned at Labour conference
Updated 12 September 2025

Secret report raises questions over UK justification for banning Palestine Action as more protests planned at Labour conference

Secret report raises questions over UK justification for banning Palestine Action as more protests planned at Labour conference
  • The Labour government outlawed the group in July under the Terrorism Act
  • Report concluded “majority of the group’s activity would not constitute an act of terrorism”

LONDON: The British government’s decision to ban the pro-Palestinian activist group Palestine Action under terrorism laws is facing scrutiny after a secret intelligence assessment found most of the group’s activity “would not be classified as terrorism,” .

The Labour government outlawed the group in July under the Terrorism Act, putting it on the same footing as around 80 other organizations, including Al-Qaeda and Daesh.

The move criminalized membership, support and financing of the group, and hundreds of protesters have since been arrested for showing solidarity.

Minister of State for Security Dan Jarvis defended the designation, citing “clear advice and intelligence” after what he called an “escalating campaign involving intimidation and sustained criminal damage.”

Palestine Action, founded in 2020, has carried out break-ins and vandalism at facilities linked to Israel’s weapons manufacturer Elbit Systems, and in June activists damaged aircraft during a raid on Britain’s largest air base.

But a declassified March 7 report seen by the NYT, from the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre which is part of MI5, painted a more cautious picture.

It noted that activists had caused serious damage, including one case where a protester attacked police officers with a sledgehammer. It also found the group’s underground manual encouraged sabotage.

However, it concluded “a majority of the group’s activity would not constitute an act of terrorism,” with common tactics being graffiti, sit-ins, and minor vandalism. The assessment also said it doubted the group would encourage attacks on people, something typical of other proscribed groups.

The report identified three incidents that could meet the terrorism threshold, all involving property damage at Elbit-linked sites.

One, a high-profile break-in at a Glasgow factory, was later prosecuted only as a “breach of the peace.” Scottish police records cited by The Times newspaper said the activity “has not been close to meeting the statutory definition of terrorism.”

Former officials and legal experts say the case highlighted how broadly terrorism laws were now being applied.

Alan Greene of Birmingham Law School told the NYT the Palestine Action ban “marks a radical departure from what came before” by relying on property destruction rather than threats to life.

UN human rights chief Volker Turk urged Britain to reverse the measure, warning it expanded terrorism “beyond clear boundaries.”

Home secretary Yvette Cooper, who advanced the ban, told Parliament the Glasgow raid had caused more than £1 million ($1.35 million) in damage to submarine parts, though court evidence put the figure at about £190,000 with the remainder attributed to lost revenue.

British politicians were also forced to vote on Palestine Action’s designation alongside two violent white-supremacist groups, which critics said made opposing the measure politically unfeasible.

Palestine Action formally dissolved after the ban, but supporters continue to campaign against its proscription, which the group is challenging in London’s High Court, with a hearing set for September 25.

The report’s findings were released as campaigners opposing the government’s decision to ban the group said they were preparing a week of demonstrations, beginning at the Labour Party conference in Liverpool later this month and ending with a mass rally in London’s Parliament Square on Oct. 4.

The protest wave was announced on Friday by Defend Our Juries, a group that has led opposition to the proscription, .

It comes a week after 857 people were arrested under the Terrorism Act outside Parliament, where demonstrators displayed signs reading “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.”

Organizers described the next phase as a “major escalation” that would pose an “unprecedented challenge” for police, claiming more than 1,100 people have already pledged to risk arrest.

“The blame lies squarely with the government for pursuing this authoritarian ban, plunging an overstretched police force, courts and prisons into further chaos,” a spokesperson said. They urged Cooper to heed MPs, peers, UN experts and party members calling for the measure to be lifted.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer was accused of “grotesque double standards” for meeting Israeli president Isaac Herzog this week while activists faced arrest for displaying cardboard placards. Organizers vowed to target Labour’s conference, beginning Sept. 28, in defiance.

Defend Our Juries has also encouraged nationwide acts of solidarity, asking supporters to place signs in their windows. The move followed a viral video of former Labour councillor Keith Hackett being told by police he could legally display a Palestine Action poster at home but not in public.

Since the ban came into force, more than 1,600 people have been arrested, including religious officials, doctors, veterans and elderly activists. The figure already exceeds arrests made in the UK during the entire post-2001 “War on Terror.” Most detainees have not been charged, though seven alleged organizers appeared in court last week.

The Trades Union Congress this week unanimously passed a motion demanding the ban’s repeal, calling it a “significant abuse of counterterrorist powers and a direct attack on our right to protest against the genocidal Israeli regime.”


NATO to beef up defense of Europe’s eastern flank after Poland shoots down drones

NATO to beef up defense of Europe’s eastern flank after Poland shoots down drones
Updated 12 September 2025

NATO to beef up defense of Europe’s eastern flank after Poland shoots down drones

NATO to beef up defense of Europe’s eastern flank after Poland shoots down drones
  • Warsaw has portrayed the drone incursions as an attempt by Russia to test the capabilities of Poland and NATO to respond
  • “It’s reckless and unacceptable. We can’t have Russian drones entering allied air space,” NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said

BRUSSELS/WARSAW: NATO announced plans to beef up the defense of Europe’s eastern flank on Friday, two days after Poland shot down drones that had violated its airspace in the first known action of its kind by a member of the Western alliance during Russia’s war in Ukraine.
Warsaw has portrayed the drone incursions as an attempt by Russia to test the capabilities of Poland and NATO to respond.
Earlier on Friday, it rejected Donald Trump’s suggestion that the incursions could have been a mistake, a rare contradiction of the US president from one of Washington’s closest allies.
Russia said its forces had been attacking Ukraine at the time of the drone incursions and that it had not intended to hit any targets in Poland.
“It’s reckless and unacceptable. We can’t have Russian drones entering allied air space,” NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte told a press conference, announcing operation “Eastern Sentry.”

NUMBER OF ALLIES TO JOIN MISSION
The mission, which begins on Friday evening, will involve a range of assets integrating air and ground bases.
Allies, including Denmark, France, Britain and Germany have so far committed to the mission with others set to join, Rutte added.
NATO’s top military official, Supreme Allied Commander Europe Alexus Grynkewich, who is a US Air Force general, said the alliance would defend every inch of its territory.
“Poland and citizens from across the alliance should be assured by our rapid response earlier this week and our significant announcement here today,” Grynkewich told the same press conference at NATO headquarters in Brussels.
The United Nations Security Council was set to meet on Friday at Poland’s request to discuss the incident.
Responding to Trump’s comment on Thursday that the incursion could have been an accident, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk responded on X: “We would also wish that the drone attack on Poland was a mistake. But it wasn’t. And we know it.”
Trump said in an interview with Fox News on Friday that his patience with Russian President Vladimir Putin was “sort of running out and running out fast,” but stopped short of threatening new sanctions over the war.
After strong condemnation of Russia by European leaders over the incident, Germany said it had extended air policing over Poland and summoned the Russian ambassador on Friday.


Finnish prosecutors seek prison for crew accused of Baltic cable cuts

Finnish prosecutors seek prison for crew accused of Baltic cable cuts
Updated 12 September 2025

Finnish prosecutors seek prison for crew accused of Baltic cable cuts

Finnish prosecutors seek prison for crew accused of Baltic cable cuts
  • The Eagle S is believed to belong to Russia’s shadow fleet
  • The three men have been charged with “aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with communications“

HELSINKI: Prosecutors in Finland called for two-and-a-half year prison sentences for the captain and two senior officers of a ship suspected of cutting Baltic Sea cables in 2024, as their trial ended Friday.
The three crew members of the Cook Islands-registered oil tanker Eagle S are accused of dragging the ship’s anchor on the seabed for around 90 kilometers (56 miles), damaging five undersea cables in the Gulf of Finland on December 25, 2024.
The Eagle S is believed to belong to Russia’s shadow fleet.
The three men have been charged with “aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with communications.”
During the trial, prosecutors argued the trio neglected their duties intentionally, after leaving the Russian port of Ust-Luga on Christmas Day.
“We ask for a minimum of two years and six months of unconditional imprisonment,” prosecutor Heidi Nummela told the Helsinki district court.
The suspects should have noticed and inspected the anchors when the tanker’s speed dropped, which “clearly indicated that the ship was dragging something,” prosecutor Krista Mannerhovi told AFP during a break in Friday’s proceedings.
The ship’s captain, Davit Vadatchkoria of Georgia, and senior officers Robert Egizaryan of Georgia and Santosh Kumar Chaurasia of India, have denied the charges.
They insisted the incident was an accident, and claimed the ship had slowed down due to an engine problem and rough weather conditions.
Vadatchkoria testified last week that there was no indication the anchor had fallen from the ship.
“There was no reason to doubt that it was not in order,” he told the court.
The EstLink 2 power cable and four telecommunications cables connecting Finland and Estonia were damaged in the incident.
The cuts threatened Finland’s energy supply and critical infrastructure, according to prosecutors.
Several undersea cables in the Baltic were damaged last year, with many experts calling it part of a “hybrid war” carried out by Russia against Western countries.
Moscow is accused of using its clandestine “shadow fleet” to dodge sanctions imposed by Western allies over Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
The court on Friday revoked the suspects’ travel bans in place since December 2024, rejecting the prosecution’s request for an extension.
The verdict is expected October 3.


Freed Belarus dissident missing after refusing to leave country

Freed Belarus dissident missing after refusing to leave country
Updated 12 September 2025

Freed Belarus dissident missing after refusing to leave country

Freed Belarus dissident missing after refusing to leave country
  • The 69-year-old was among 52 political prisoners freed on Thursday in a deal brokered by the US
  • “We are very worried about the fate of Mikola Statkevich, who refused to leave Belarus,” opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya said

WARSAW: A Belarusian dissident who refused to leave his home country after being released from prison there earlier this week has gone missing, Belarus’s exiled opposition leader said Friday.
Mikola Statkevich, who ran against Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko in 2010 presidential elections, had been in jail for five years.
The 69-year-old was among 52 political prisoners freed on Thursday in a deal brokered by the United States, but unlike the other prisoners, he chose to remain in Belarus after his release, rights groups reported.
“We are very worried about the fate of Mikola Statkevich, who refused to leave Belarus,” opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya said at a press conference in Vilnius with some of the other freed prisoners.
She said his whereabouts were now “unknown,” without elaborating.
Tikhanovskaya thanked the United States for brokering the release but noted it did not mean “real freedom” for the prisoners, calling it a “forced deportation.”
Everyone who is released should have “the right to choose, either to stay or to leave. And I spoke about this yesterday with our American partners, and we are pushing on that,” she added.
Some of the prisoners who attended Friday appeared to have had their heads shaven.
Many were detained during a brutal crackdown on opposition in the wake of Lukashenko’s 2020 re-election and prosecuted on what rights groups have denounced as politically motivated charges.
Also freed was a staff member with the EU delegation in Minsk and nine journalists and bloggers, including a reporter for US-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
“There is no reason why journalists and voices of political dissent should be silenced,” RFE/RL president Stephen Capus said in Vilnius.
“We appreciate your bravery and your dedication, and the struggle continues,” he told the released prisoners.
Rights groups estimate that around 1,000 political prisoners remain behind bars in Belarus.


German prosecutors take over probe into suspected Islamist stabbing that left 2 injured

German prosecutors take over probe into suspected Islamist stabbing that left 2 injured
Updated 12 September 2025

German prosecutors take over probe into suspected Islamist stabbing that left 2 injured

German prosecutors take over probe into suspected Islamist stabbing that left 2 injured
  • The suspect, a Kosovar national named only as Erjon S to protect his privacy, is accused of attempting to kill a teacher
  • “The accused acted out of a radical Islamist conviction directed against Germany’s liberal society,” the statement said

BERLIN: German federal prosecutors said on Friday that they had taken over an investigation into a suspected Islamist attempt to murder two people in the city of Essen last week.
The suspect, a Kosovar national named only as Erjon S to protect his privacy, is accused of attempting to kill a teacher he was acquainted with in a vocational college on Sept 5 before stabbing a bystander on the street in the back.
The “criminally responsible youth” then allegedly walked to the Old Synagogue in Essen looking for further victims, which he failed to encounter, prosecutors said in a statement.
Both victims were seriously injured in the attack, and the suspect sustained a gunshot wound during his arrest.
“The accused acted out of a radical Islamist conviction directed against Germany’s liberal society,” the statement said, adding that his attack had undermined security in the country.
The federal prosecutor’s office assumes jurisdiction over cases when there is a suspected Islamist or national security component.