ֱ

Bosnia’s Serb statelet calls referendum on verdict against leader

Bosnia’s Serb statelet calls referendum on verdict against leader
The regional leader, who has been in his post for seven years, has vowed to block elections in the Republika Srpska and to hold a series of referendums. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 23 August 2025

Bosnia’s Serb statelet calls referendum on verdict against leader

Bosnia’s Serb statelet calls referendum on verdict against leader
  • Bosnia’s Serb statelet, whose President Milorad Dodik is defying a ban on him holding office, will stage a referendum on October 25 on the federal court verdict against him

SARAJEVO: Bosnia’s Serb statelet, whose President Milorad Dodik is defying a ban on him holding office, will stage a referendum on October 25 on the federal court verdict against him.
Lawmakers in the Republika Srpska’s (RS) regional parliament late Friday voted for the referendum as the political crisis around Dodik worsened, with his prime minister resigning on Monday, triggering a government reshuffle.
Dodik, 66, was convicted in February by a Bosnian federal court of undermining the fragile functioning of the Balkan country by flouting decisions by the international envoy enforcing a peace deal that ended Bosnia’s 1992-1995 war.
Dodik avoided a one-year prison sentence by paying a 19,000-euro ($22,000) fine, but an appeals court upheld a ruling that he be removed from the RS presidency and banned from political office for six years.
The regional leader, who has been in his post for seven years, has vowed to block elections in the Republika Srpska and to hold a series of referendums.
The one voted for late Friday was the first of those.
The question to appear on the October ballot, Bosnian Serb lawmakers decided, was: “Do you accept the decisions of the unelected foreigner (international envoy Christian Schmidt) and the unconstitutional verdict of the Bosnia-Herzegovina Court against the President of the RS, as well as the decision of the Bosnian Electoral Commission to revoke the mandate of the President of the RS, Milorad Dodik?“
Of the 65 lawmakers present in the RS parliament, 50 voted in favor. Opposition lawmakers in the chamber refused to cast a vote.
“I won’t get in your way... but you’re walking on a minefield,” warned one opposition member of parliament, Nebojsa Vukanovic, a fierce critic of Dodik.
Dodik has said he expects the Serbian population of the Republika Srpska to massively vote “no” to the referendum question. He has also threatened to hold a later referendum on independence for the Serbian entity.
The nationalist Bosnian Serb leader has been in power since 2006. He blames Schmidt, a former German minister who has been the international envoy for Bosnia since 2021, for his ordered ouster.
The RS parliament late Friday also adopted a number of “conclusions,” including one rejecting Schmidt’s authority, another demanding that Dodik continue as the statelet’s president, and one rejecting elections to choose a successor to him.
With the federal ban on Dodik holding office, Bosnia’s electoral commission is expected to call early elections for the RS presidency, which must be held within 90 days.
The outgoing RS prime minister, Radovan Viskovic, did not explain why he was resigning, in a Monday press conference held in the regional capital, Banja Luka.
He stated only that a new government would be formed, and that “I leave my successor a stable Republika Srpska.”
Viskovic was accused along with Dodik of undermining Bosnia’s constitutional order after the RS parliament voted to bar federal police and the judiciary from operating in the Serb entity.
Both have also been sanctioned by the United States for threatening the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement and undermining Bosnia and Herzegovina’s sovereignty.
Bosnia has been split between Serbian and Bosnian-Croat political units since the end of the 1990s war, in which tens of thousands died. The country is held together by weak central institutions.


Dutch court dismisses appeal seeking to halt weapons exports to Israel

Dutch court dismisses appeal seeking to halt weapons exports to Israel
Updated 53 min 53 sec ago

Dutch court dismisses appeal seeking to halt weapons exports to Israel

Dutch court dismisses appeal seeking to halt weapons exports to Israel
  • The group of 10 NGOs were hoping the lawsuit would force the Dutch to stop sending weapons and trained police dogs to Israel
  • The Dutch government denied it is in violation of the 1948 Genocide Convention

THE HAGUE: A Dutch appeals court on Thursday dismissed an appeal by a group of human rights organizations that filed a lawsuit arguing the Netherlands was violating international law by continuing to sell weapons to Israel.
The Hague Court of Appeal found that although “there is a serious risk that Israel will commit genocide against the Palestinian population in Gaza,” the Dutch government has “considerable discretion” to determine foreign policy and issues of national security.
The group of 10 NGOs were hoping the lawsuit would force the Dutch to stop sending weapons and trained police dogs to Israel and cut economic ties with businesses operating in occupied Palestinian territory.
The activist groups pointed to several emergency orders from another court, the International Court of Justice, that they say confirmed the obligation to stop weapons sales. In January, the top UN court said it was plausible Palestinians were being deprived of some rights protected under the Genocide Convention.
A lower court ruled last year that there were sufficient checks already in place to comply with international law. In Thursday’s decision, the court noted that the government had already taken a number of measures, including stopping the exports of some products.
The Dutch government denied it is in violation of the 1948 Genocide Convention, drawn up following World War II. “Every cooperation is cautiously weighed,” government lawyer Reimer Veldhuis said during a hearing last year.
That hearing was held the day after another judicial institution in The Hague, the International Criminal Court, issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense chief for alleged war crimes in Gaza.
Netanyahu strongly denies the accusation.
Judges had postponed Thursday’s decision until after the Dutch Supreme Court ruled in a separate case on the export of fighter jet parts to Israel.
Human rights groups filed suit in 2023 to halt the export of F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel, citing a clear risk of violations of international law if they are used in strikes on Gaza.
Last month the Supreme Court ordered the Dutch government to reevaluate its currently suspended license. Foreign Minister David van Weel said at the time that it was unlikely that exports would resume “given the current situation” in Gaza.
A fragile US-brokered ceasefire aims to wind down the war that was triggered by the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel that killed about 1,200 people and saw 251 taken hostage on Oct. 7, 2023.
Israel responded with a sweeping military offensive that has killed more than 68,800 Palestinians in Gaza, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. The ministry, part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals, maintains detailed records viewed as generally reliable by independent experts.