ֱ

Texas Senate approves redistricting bill, sending it to governor to sign

Texas Senate approves redistricting bill, sending it to governor to sign
A screen displays information as HB 4, a bill that would redraw Texas’s 38 Congressional Districts, passes at the Texas State Capitol in Austin on Aug. 23, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 7 sec ago

Texas Senate approves redistricting bill, sending it to governor to sign

Texas Senate approves redistricting bill, sending it to governor to sign
  • The measure goes to Republican Governor Greg Abbott to be signed into law amid a nationwide redistricting battle

The Texas Senate approved a bill early on Saturday to redraw the state’s congressional maps at the behest of President Donald Trump in an effort to flip five seats held by Democrats to Republicans.
The approval comes after the state House passed it on Wednesday, US media reported. The measure goes to Governor Greg Abbott, like Trump a Republican, to be signed into law amid a nationwide redistricting battle.
State Senator Carol Alvarado, a Democrat, said on social media on Friday that she planned to delay the measure by speaking continuously about it in the legislature, a move known as a filibuster. In 2021, Alvarado delayed passage of Texas’ district map by speaking for 15 hours straight.
But a rare procedural motion by Senate Republicans just after midnight ended the debate and killed the filibuster, moving the chamber straight to the final vote, the Texas Tribune reported.
The Senate adopted the bill on a party-line vote, 18 to 11, after more than eight hours of debate, the report said.
Republicans have acknowledged they believe winning more congressional seats in Texas will help the party maintain its slim majority in the US House of Representatives in next year’s midterm elections, despite polls showing headwinds for the party. More states controlled by Republicans are considering similar action.
California and other states where Democrats hold power vow to counter such moves. The California legislature on Thursday approved a redistricting plan aimed at giving Democrats five more congressional seats.
The California plan must be approved by voters in November. The Texas plan does not need voter approval, but Democrats have indicated they will challenge it in court.
The Texas bill was delayed for two weeks after more than 50 Democratic state House members staged a walkout that denied Republicans the legislative quorum needed. They have returned.
During debate on Friday, some lawmakers echoed criticism that Democrats raised in the House, that the new Texas map violates federal law by diluting Hispanic and Black voting power and discriminating on the basis of race.
Senator Royce West, a Democrat, predicted the new map would reduce the number of African Americans representing Texas in Washington from four to two.
“I call that retrogression,” West said.
Texas Senator Phil King, a Republican who sponsored the bill, said repeatedly he had not considered race and that lawyers had assured him the bill meets all legal requirements.
“From my perspective, why would I use racial data?” he told his fellow senators. “Voting history is just much more accurate and is well established as a legal way to draw maps.”
Most Americans believe redrawing congressional lines for the sake of maximizing political gain, known as gerrymandering, is bad for democracy, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found this week.


India to develop fighter jet engines with French company after Pakistan standoff

India to develop fighter jet engines with French company after Pakistan standoff
Updated 20 sec ago

India to develop fighter jet engines with French company after Pakistan standoff

India to develop fighter jet engines with French company after Pakistan standoff
  • New Delhi, one of the world’s largest arms importers, has made the modernization of its forces a top priority
  • India had engaged with its neighbor Pakistan in a four-day conflict in May, their worst standoff since 1999

NEW DELHI: India is working with a French company to develop and manufacture fighter jet engines in the country, New Delhi’s defense minister said.

Defense Minister Rajnath Singh in May approved the prototype of a 5th generation Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), calling it a “significant push toward enhancing India’s indigenous defense capabilities.”

Singh, in a speech at a conference in New Delhi on Friday, gave more details about developing fighter jet aircraft engines in the country.

“We are moving forward to manufacture aircraft engines in India itself,” Singh said, in comments broadcast by Indian media.

“We are collaborating with a French company to start engine production in India.”

Singh did not name the company, but Indian media widely reported the company to be Safran, which has been working in India for decades in the aviation and defense sectors.

There was no immediate confirmation.

India, one of the world’s largest arms importers, has made the modernization of its forces a top priority, and made repeated pushes to boost local arms production.

The world’s most populous nation has deepened defense cooperation with Western countries in recent years, including the Quad alliance with the United States, Japan and Australia.

India signed in April a multi-billion-dollar deal to purchase 26 Rafale fighter jets from France’s Dassault Aviation.

They would join 36 Rafale fighters already acquired, and replace the Russian MiG-29K jets.

Singh has also promised at least $100 billion in fresh domestic military hardware contracts by 2033 to spur local arms production.

This decade India has opened an expansive new helicopter factory, launched its first domestically made aircraft carrier, warships and submarines, and conducted a successful long-range hypersonic missile test.

New Delhi eyes threats from multiple nations, especially Pakistan. India was engaged with its neighbor in a four-day conflict in May, their worst standoff since 1999.


Taiwan votes on recalling opposition lawmakers, reviving nuclear power

Taiwan votes on recalling opposition lawmakers, reviving nuclear power
Updated 23 August 2025

Taiwan votes on recalling opposition lawmakers, reviving nuclear power

Taiwan votes on recalling opposition lawmakers, reviving nuclear power
  • The recall votes, the second in a month, are an attempt to restore ruling party control of the legislature

TAIPEI: Voters in Taiwan are deciding Saturday whether to dismiss seven opposition members from the legislature and on a return to nuclear power five months after the last operating reactor shut down.
The recall votes, the second in a month, are an attempt to restore ruling party control of the legislature after the Democratic Progressive Party lost its majority in a 2024 election.
The prospects for doing so appear dim after 24 members of the opposition Nationalist Party all survived a first round of recall votes on July 26.
The Democratic Progressive Party won the presidency in 2024 but neither party took a majority in the 113-seat legislature. The Nationalists, also known as the Kuomintang or KMT, won 52 seats, one more than the DPP.
The Nationalists have teamed up with a third party, the Taiwan People’s Party, to pass legislation, much to the consternation of the ruling DPP.
The referendum on nuclear power
The DPP has been phasing out nuclear power, which once provided about 20 percent of Taiwan’s electricity. The last operating reactor at the self-governing island’s three nuclear plants was shut in May after 40 years in service.
But the same month, the legislature approved a proposal from the Taiwan People’s Party to hold a referendum on extending nuclear power, with the support of the Nationalists.
The referendum asks voters if the most recently shut nuclear plant should continue operating, assuming regulators agree it is safe to do so. The Maanshan plant, commonly called the third nuclear power plant, is near Taiwan’s southern tip.
Backers of nuclear power have said it would reduce electricity bills and help meet the growing demand for power from artificial intelligence applications.
Jensen Huang, the Taiwan-born founder of American chip giant Nvidia, backed nuclear power when asked about the issue after arriving at the airport Friday in the capital, Taipei.
Citing AI’s need for energy, he told reporters he hopes that all options will be explored. “There’s excellent technologies for sustainable energy – solar and wind,” he said. “And nuclear is an excellent option.”
In May, Nvidia announced it would team up with Taiwan electronics manufacturer Foxconn to build an AI supercomputer for the island’s researchers and companies.


Lyle Menendez denied parole after 35 years in prison for parents’ shotgun murders

Lyle Menendez denied parole after 35 years in prison for parents’ shotgun murders
Updated 23 August 2025

Lyle Menendez denied parole after 35 years in prison for parents’ shotgun murders

Lyle Menendez denied parole after 35 years in prison for parents’ shotgun murders
  • Ruling announced by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
  • His younger brother Erik was likewise denied parole following a similar 10-hour session on Thursday

LOS ANGELES: Lyle Menendez, imprisoned 35 years with his brother Erik for the 1989 shotgun murders of their parents at their Beverly Hills home, was denied parole on Friday, a day after the same decision was rendered against his younger sibling.
The ruling was announced by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the parent agency of the state Board of Parole Hearings, at the end of an 11-hour-plus proceeding.
Parole commissioners assigned to the case concluded there were still signs that Menendez, 57, would pose a risk to the public if released from custody, according to details of the hearing provided to news outlets, including Reuters, through a media pool reporter.
Menendez, dressed in blue prison garb, appeared by video from a San Diego lockup where he is currently incarcerated.
His younger brother, Erik Menendez, 54, was likewise denied parole following a similar 10-hour session on Thursday. The two siblings may apply for parole again in three years.


Seoul says fired warning shots after North Korean troops crossed border

Seoul says fired warning shots after North Korean troops crossed border
Updated 23 August 2025

Seoul says fired warning shots after North Korean troops crossed border

Seoul says fired warning shots after North Korean troops crossed border
  • South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff calls event a ‘premeditated and deliberate provocation’
  • The last border confrontation between the arch-rivals was in early April

SEOUL: South Korea fired warning shots at North Korean soldiers that briefly crossed the heavily fortified border earlier this week, Seoul said Saturday after Pyongyang accused it of risking “uncontrollable” tensions.
South Korea’s new leader Lee Jae Myung has sought warmer ties with the nuclear-armed North and vowed to build “military trust,” but Pyongyang has said it has no interest in improving relations with Seoul.
Seoul’s military said several North Korean soldiers crossed the border Tuesday while working in the heavily mined Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) separating the two Koreas.
The incursion prompted “our military to fire warning shots,” Seoul’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a statement, adding “the North Korean soldiers then moved north” of the de facto border.
Pyongyang’s state media said earlier Saturday that the incident occurred as North Korean soldiers worked to permanently seal the frontier dividing the peninsula, citing a statement by Army Lt. Gen. Ko Jong Chol.
Calling the event a “premeditated and deliberate provocation,” Ko said Seoul’s military used a machine gun to fire more than 10 warning shots toward the North’s troops, according to the official Korean Central News Agency.
“This is a very serious prelude that would inevitably drive the situation in the southern border area where a huge number of forces are stationing in confrontation with each other to the uncontrollable phase,” Ko said.
The last border confrontation between the arch-rivals was in early April when South Korea’s military fired warning shots after around 10 North Korean soldiers briefly crossed the frontier.
North Korea’s military announced last October it was moving to totally shut off the southern border, saying it had sent a message to US forces to “prevent any misjudgment and accidental conflict.”
Shortly after, it blew up sections of the unused but deeply symbolic roads and railroad tracks that connect the North to the South.
Ko warned that North Korea’s army would retaliate against any interference with its efforts to permanently seal the border.
“If the act of restraining or obstructing the project unrelated to the military character persists, our army will regard it as deliberate military provocation and take corresponding countermeasure,” he said.
Under Lee’s more hawkish predecessor, relations between the two Koreas had sunk to one of their lowest points in years.
After Lee’s election in June, he pledged to pursue dialogue with the nuclear-armed North without preconditions, saying last week his government “will take consistent measures to substantially reduce tensions and restore trust.”
Even so, South Korea and the United States began annual joint exercises on Monday aimed at preparing for potential threats from the North.
Lee described the drills as “defensive” and said they were “not intended to heighten tensions.”
North Korea – which attacked its neighbor in 1950, triggering the Korean War – has long been infuriated by such exercises between the US and the South, decrying them as rehearsals for invasion.
Hong Min, a senior analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification, said Pyongyang was again accusing Seoul of pursuing a “dual approach” with its latest outburst – calling for dialogue while in its view raising military tensions.
Pyongyang’s leader Kim called earlier this week for the “rapid expansion” of the North’s nuclear weapons capability, citing the ongoing US-South Korean military exercises that he claimed could “ignite a war.”
His powerful sister has since said Seoul “cannot be a diplomatic partner” of the North, and that Lee “is not the sort of man who will change the course of history.”


Judge blocks Trump from cutting funding from 34 cities and counties over ‘sanctuary’ policies

Judge blocks Trump from cutting funding from 34 cities and counties over ‘sanctuary’ policies
Updated 23 August 2025

Judge blocks Trump from cutting funding from 34 cities and counties over ‘sanctuary’ policies

Judge blocks Trump from cutting funding from 34 cities and counties over ‘sanctuary’ policies
  • The Trump administration has been trying to remove millions of people in the country illegally
  • District Judge William Orrick said Trump's “executive actions” were an unconstitutional “coercive threat”

A judge ruled late Friday the Trump administration cannot deny funding to Boston, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles and 30 other cities and counties because of policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration efforts.
US District Judge William Orrick in San Francisco extended a preliminary injunction blocking the administration from cutting off or conditioning the use of federal funds for so-called “sanctuary” jurisdictions. His earlier order protected more than a dozen other cities and counties, including San Francisco, Portland and Seattle.
An email to the White House late Friday was not immediately returned. In his ruling, Orrick said the administration had offered no opposition to an extended injunction except to say the first injunction was wrong. It has appealed the first order.
Orrick also blocked the administration from imposing immigration-related conditions on two particular grant programs.
The Trump administration has ratcheted up pressure on sanctuary communities as it seeks to make good on President Donald Trump’s campaign promise to remove millions of people in the country illegally.
One executive order issued by Trump directs Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to withhold federal money from sanctuary jurisdictions. Another order directs every federal agency to ensure that payments to state and local governments do not “abet so-called ‘sanctuary’ policies that seek to shield illegal aliens from deportation.”
The cities and counties that sued said billions of dollars were at risk.
Orrick, who was nominated by President Barack Obama, said the executive orders and the “executive actions that have parroted them” were an unconstitutional “coercive threat.”
In May, the Department of Homeland Security published a list of more than 500 “sanctuary jurisdictions,” saying each one would receive formal notification that the government had deemed them noncompliant. It also said it would inform them if they were believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes.
The list was later removed from the department’s website after critics noted it included localities that have actively supported the administration’s tough immigration policies.
The Justice Department has also sued New York, Los Angeles and other cities over their sanctuary policies.
There is no strict definition for sanctuary cities, but the terms generally describe places that limit cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE enforces immigration laws nationwide but seeks help from state and local authorities to identify immigrants wanted for deportation and hold them for federal officers.