ֱ

European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin meeting

European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
A combination photo of Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelensky, American President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 3 sec ago

European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin meeting

European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
  • Saturday’s statement by top European leaders came after the White House confirmed the US president was willing to grant Putin the one on one meeting Russia has long pushed for

KYIV: European nations rallied behind Ukraine, saying peace in the war-torn nation can’t be resolved without Kyiv, ahead of a planned meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russia’s Vladimir Putin.
Trump had said Friday’s meeting in Alaska with his Russian counterpart was to discuss ending the more than three-year war.
Zelensky responded by thanking European allies and wrote on X on Sunday: “The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people.”
Trump-Putin meeting spikes worries
Saturday’s statement by top European leaders came after the White House confirmed the US president was willing to grant Putin the one-on-one meeting Russia has long pushed for, and suggestions from Trump that a peace deal could include “some swapping of territories.” That raised fears that Kyiv may be pressured into giving up land or accepting other curbs on its sovereignty.
A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they aren’t allowed to speak publicly, told The Associated Press that Trump remained open to a trilateral summit with both the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, but for now, he will have a bilateral meeting requested by Putin.
Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance met Saturday with top European and Ukrainian officials at the British Foreign Secretary’s weekend residence to discuss how to end the war.
Trump had earlier said he would meet with Putin even if the Russian leader would not meet with Zelensky.
The Trump-Putin meeting may prove pivotal in a war that began when Russia invaded its western neighbor and has led to tens of thousands of deaths, although there’s no guarantee it will stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace.
The statement
Saturday’s statement, signed by the president of the European Union and leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the UK, stressed the need for a “just and lasting peace” for Kyiv, including “robust and credible” security guarantees.
“Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities,” the statement said.
“The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force,” the Europeans added.
A fruitless push toward a truce
A monthlong US-led push to achieve a truce in Ukraine has so far proved fruitless, with Kyiv agreeing in principle while the Kremlin has held out for terms more to its liking.
Trump had also moved up an ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement. The deadline was Friday. The White House did not answer questions Saturday about possible sanctions.
The Kremlin earlier this week reiterated demands that Ukraine give up territory, abandon its bid to join NATO, and accept limits on its military, in exchange for a withdrawal of Russian troops from the rest of the country.
Zelensky said Saturday that Ukraine “will not give Russia any awards for what it has done” and that “Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.”
Ukrainian officials previously told the AP privately that Kyiv would be amenable to a peace deal that would de facto recognize Ukraine’s inability to regain lost territories militarily. But Zelensky on Saturday insisted that formally ceding land was out of the question.


India braces for economic, geopolitical impact of Trump’s new tariffs

India braces for economic, geopolitical impact of Trump’s new tariffs
Updated 10 August 2025

India braces for economic, geopolitical impact of Trump’s new tariffs

India braces for economic, geopolitical impact of Trump’s new tariffs
  • Modi set to meet China’s Xi, invites Vladimir Putin to visit India in the wake US tensions
  • Trump doubled US tariffs on India to 50 percent over New Delhi’s purchases of Russian oil

New Delhi: India is bracing for the impact of new US tariffs, with experts warning of the economic and political consequences of an unprecedented duty on exports, marking one of the highest tariffs the US has ever imposed on a major trading partner.

In an unexpected move last week, US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods, citing New Delhi’s purchases of Russian oil. His Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said the oil imports amounted to “financing” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The move increased the total duty on Indian exports to 50 percent. While India’s Ministry of External Affairs vowed to “take all actions necessary to protect its national interests,” experts do not see much room for negotiations, as the tariff regime is set to take effect next month.

“It will have economic repercussions if things are not changed. Fifty percent is a lot, and it will affect us. Right now, there is an exemption for pharmaceuticals, but in other areas, there will be an impact,” Manoj Joshi, distinguished fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, told Arab News.

“We don’t have much leverage. We don’t have many options. The US is the one taking these actions, so unless and until the US withdraws these taxes, there is not much India can do.”

The US and India have been in tariff talks since the beginning of the year, in the wake of the US ongoing global tariff campaign. Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a personal visit to Washington, D.C., in February to meet Trump and discuss strengthening bilateral ties, trade relations, and the procurement of new US weapons and aircraft.

In April, the Trump administration imposed a 25 percent reciprocal tariff on Indian goods in response to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil and to rectify trade imbalances. A new deal was expected in July, but Trump did not approve it, leading to a breakdown in talks.

The US threatened to increase tariffs on India if it were not given broader access to several key sectors, including automobiles, steel, aluminum, and dairy products — a concession New Delhi resisted.

“India is not going to compromise on agriculture and dairy products. India will find it very difficult to stop buying Russian oil. There is not much room for any kind of concessions from India’s side,” Joshi said.

The US is India’s largest export market, accounting for 18 percent of its exports and 2.2 percent of its gross domestic product. The latest estimates by Indian economists suggest that the new tariff could reduce GDP by 0.2 to 0.8 percentage points.

It could also have an impact on India’s global standing.

After emerging as a new superpower when it hosted the G20 Summit in 2023 and over the past few years betting everything on its strategic partnership with the US, India may now be forced to recalibrate its relations, including with its rival China.

India is a member of the QUAD — Quadrilateral Security Dialogue — a forum that also includes the US, Japan, and Australia and focuses on regional security and cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region.

India’s engagement with the bloc has increased in recent years, shifting from its earlier engagement with BRICS — a grouping that includes also Brazil, Russia, China, and Indonesia, and is the most powerful geopolitical forum outside of the Western world, accounting for 45 percent of the world’s population and 35 percent of its economy.

In the wake of tensions with the US, Modi is expected to visit China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organization and meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in late August. This will be his first official trip to China in over six years. The last visit took place before the 2020 Galwan Valley border clashes, which significantly strained India-China ties.

Modi’s office said on Saturday that he had invited Vladimir Putin to visit Delhi by the year’s end. It would be the Russian president’s first trip to India since December 2021.

“Consequences would be there so long as Trump is there. But the whole episode has exposed the leadership of India,” said Mohan Guruswamy, policy analyst specializing in economic and security issues.

“India has been ignoring its traditional allies. It has been pursuing QUAD and trying to appease the US, forgetting China and Russia. It has been pursuing the US and calling them strategic allies, and now the US has given it a shock.”


Amnesty International slams ‘deeply concerning’ UK arrests of Palestine Action protesters

Amnesty International slams ‘deeply concerning’ UK arrests of Palestine Action protesters
Updated 10 August 2025

Amnesty International slams ‘deeply concerning’ UK arrests of Palestine Action protesters

Amnesty International slams ‘deeply concerning’ UK arrests of Palestine Action protesters
  • Met Police detain 474 people at peaceful demonstration in central London
  • Woman arrested in Belfast for wearing Palestine Action T-shirt at anti-racism protest

LONDON: Amnesty International has branded reports that police in the UK arrested 474 people at a Palestine Action protest “deeply concerning.”

It comes after a demonstration was held in Parliament Square in central London in support of the group, which was banned by the UK government earlier this year as a terrorist organization.

The Metropolitan Police said it was the largest spate of arrests it had made at a single event in over a decade, and that 466 people at the protest were arrested under the Terrorism Act.

Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International’s UK chief executive, said: “The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate to the point of absurdity to be treating them as terrorists.

“Instead of criminalizing peaceful demonstrators, the government should be focusing on taking immediate and unequivocal action to put a stop to Israel’s genocide and ending any risk of UK complicity in it.”

Those arrested included healthcare professionals, a blind wheelchair user, and former Guantanamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg.

Many of the protesters were silently holding placards stating: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.”

The group behind the protest, Defend Our Juries, said around 700 people attended the event and that they posed “no danger to the public at large.”

Elsewhere, a woman was arrested in Belfast, Northern Ireland, for wearing a T-shirt supporting Palestine Action. The woman was detained while attending an anti-racism protest, where she was filmed being taken by police officers on suspicion of “possessing an article, namely a sign or T-shirt, that indicates support for Palestine Action.”

Patrick Corrigan, Northern Ireland director of Amnesty International UK, said: “Many people are justifiably angered by the ongoing genocide in Gaza and are concerned about UK complicity. Under international human rights law, they have every right to voice their concerns.

“The individual who joined a Refugees Welcome rally in Belfast was not promoting violence, and it is wholly disproportionate for the PSNI to treat her as a terrorist.

“UK terrorism laws pose a serious risk to free expression. Rather than targeting peaceful protesters, the government should be taking swift and decisive measures to end Israel’s genocide.”

Under UK terrorism legislation, membership of or support for a proscribed group is a criminal offense carrying a prison sentence of up to 14 years.

Palestine Action was banned following a series of break-ins at secure facilities in the UK, including one in which activists caused criminal damage to military aircraft at a Royal Air Force base in the town of Brize Norton.


Policeman, three militants killed in Iranian province bordering Pakistan

Policeman, three militants killed in Iranian province bordering Pakistan
Updated 10 August 2025

Policeman, three militants killed in Iranian province bordering Pakistan

Policeman, three militants killed in Iranian province bordering Pakistan
  • Sistan-Baluchistan has been the site of frequent clashes between security forces and insurgents or smugglers
  • On July 26, gunmen had stormed a courthouse in the province’s capital Zahedan, killing at least six people

TEHRAN: Militants killed one policeman in Iran’s restive southeastern province of Sistan-Baluchistan, Iranian media reported Sunday, adding that three assailants also died.

“A policeman from Saravan was killed while terrorists were trying to enter the police station” in that area of Sistan-Baluchistan, the Tasnim news agency said.

The agency said the attackers were members of Jaish Al-Adl (Arabic for ‘Army of Justice’) Baloch militant group, which operates from the borderlands between Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan, mainly the Sistan-Baluchestan triangle, but active inside Iran.

“Three terrorists were killed and two were arrested,” Tasnim said.

Sistan-Baluchistan, which shares a long border with Pakistan and Afghanistan, has been the site of frequent clashes between security forces and insurgents or smugglers.

The province hosts a significant population from the Baloch ethnic minority, which practices Sunni Islam in Shiite-majority Iran.

On July 26, gunmen stormed a courthouse in the province’s capital Zahedan, killing at least six people, in an attack that was later claimed by Jaish Al-Adl.

In one of the deadliest attacks in the province, 10 police officers were killed in October.


Australian government condemned for not ending export of weapons parts to Israel

Australian government condemned for not ending export of weapons parts to Israel
Updated 10 August 2025

Australian government condemned for not ending export of weapons parts to Israel

Australian government condemned for not ending export of weapons parts to Israel
  • Greens say Labor stance ‘hollow’ as world watches ‘genocide in real time’
  • Defense minister refuses to stop export of F-35 parts, claims Australia not selling weapons to Israel

LONDON: The Australian government has been criticized by opposition politicians and human rights experts for continuing to export components to Israel used to make weapons.

The Australian Greens condemned the Labor government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, with its foreign affairs spokesperson David Shoebridge stating: “The Australian public knows that the Albanese government is permitting the export of armored steel, F-35 weapons parts and other critical materials to Israel and wants it to stop.”

Shoebridge added: “Two years of hollow talking points from the Albanese government aren’t washing with the public anymore as we watch a genocide in real time.”

It comes after the country’s Defense Minister Richard Marles said Australia did not send weapons to Israel but would continue to manufacture and export parts for the Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jet, which is used by the Israeli military.

“We’re an F-35 country and we have been that for a couple of decades,” Marles said.

“That is a multi-lateral arrangement with supply chains that are organized by Lockheed Martin in the United States and have multiple suppliers in respect of all of those supply chains.”

He was speaking after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz took the unprecedented step of stopping exports of military equipment to Israel after an announcement by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Israel would expand operations in Gaza.

Marles said there had been “misinformation” about Australia’s arms exports to Israel, adding there was “no step” the country could take that would have any material impact on the war.

But Shoebridge said: “Australia is a key part of the F-35 fighter jet program. We are the only place in the world that makes parts like the bomb bay doors (mechanism), and we operate as one of the few regional distribution hubs.”

He added that if Australia refused to export F-35 components, it would hinder Israel’s ability to operate in Gaza. “The fact Albanese is choosing not to do that makes us complicit (in genocide),” Shoebridge said.

Donald Rothwell, professor of international law at the Australian National University, told The Guardian that the complexity of manufacturing supply chains meant that parts made for civilian use and then exported could be appropriated for weapons, making export bans difficult.

“The clearer position that Australia could take is that if it diplomatically, legally and politically objects to Israel’s occupation of Gaza, then all exports could be suspended for the time being. That would be the clearest way of ensuring that no Australian exports contribute to the Israeli military effort in Gaza,” he said.

In November, The Guardian reported that at least 16 Australian export permits to Israel for components used in arms manufacturing had lapsed or been amended. A spokesperson for the Australian government said all had been approved prior to Oct. 7, 2023.

In April, ABC found that an Australian-built counter-drone system was being tested by the Israeli military.

Albanese has previously stated that Australia has an appropriate set of sanctions in place against several Israeli government figures owing to their actions in relation to the war in Gaza.

“What we need to do here is to have very clear statements and actions by the Australian government that make a difference, rather than respond to a slogan on a protest,” Albanese said during a visit to New Zealand.

On Sunday, Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong signed a joint statement with her German, Italian, New Zealand and UK counterparts warning that Israel’s plan to expand operations in Gaza risked breaking international law.


Taliban investigating death threats against United Nations’ Afghan female staff, report says

Taliban investigating death threats against United Nations’ Afghan female staff, report says
Updated 10 August 2025

Taliban investigating death threats against United Nations’ Afghan female staff, report says

Taliban investigating death threats against United Nations’ Afghan female staff, report says
  • The UN report is the first official confirmation of death threats against Afghan women working in the sector
  • The report also highlighted other areas affecting women’s personal freedoms and safety

ISLAMABAD: The Taliban are investigating explicit death threats against dozens of Afghan women working for the United Nations, according to a report published Sunday.
In its latest update on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, the UN mission to the country said that dozens of female national staff were subjected to explicit death threats in May.
The threats came from unidentified individuals related to their work with the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, or UNAMA, other agencies, funds, and programs, “requiring the UN to implement interim measures to protect their safety,” according to the report.
It said that the Taliban told the UN mission that their personnel were not responsible for the threats. An Interior Ministry investigation is underway, the report said.
Afghan authorities, including the Interior Ministry, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the report or the investigation.
The Taliban barred Afghan women from working at domestic and foreign nongovernmental organizations in December 2022, extending this ban to the UN six months later, and then threatening to shut down agencies and groups still employing women.
Humanitarian agencies say the Taliban have hampered or interfered with their operations, allegations denied by authorities.
The UN report is the first official confirmation of death threats against Afghan women working in the sector. The report also highlighted other areas affecting women’s personal freedoms and safety.
In Herat, inspectors from the Vice and Virtue Ministry began requiring women to wear a chador, a full-body cloak covering the head. Dozens of women deemed “not in compliance” were barred from entering markets or using public transportation. Several women were detained until relatives brought them a chador, the report said.
In Uruzgan, women were arrested for wearing a headscarf, a hijab, rather than a burqa.
Women have also been denied access to public areas, in line with laws banning them from such spaces. In Ghor province, police forced several families to leave a recreational area. They warned the families against visiting outdoor picnic sites with women.
In Herat, Vice and Virtue inspectors stopped family groups with women and girls from accessing an open recreational area, only allowing all-male groups.
Nobody from the Vice and Virtue Ministry was immediately available to comment on the Ghor, Herat and Uruzgan incidents, which the UN said happened in May.
In Kandahar, the Public Health Department instructed female health care workers to be accompanied to work by male guardians with an identification card proving that they were related to the woman by blood or marriage.
It wasn’t immediately clear if the card is specific to Kandahar or will be rolled out across Afghanistan.
“The process to apply for a mahram (male guardian) identification card is reportedly cumbersome and can take up to several weeks as it requires the de facto Department for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice and a member of the local community (e.g. malik, imam or village elder) to verify the relationship,” the UN report said.