șŁœÇֱȄ

Saudi media minister, SRMG CEO discuss plans for Saudi sports coverage

The meeting is part of a broader series of discussions between the ministry, SRMG, and other media institutions. (SPA/File)
The meeting is part of a broader series of discussions between the ministry, SRMG, and other media institutions. (SPA/File)
Short Url
Updated 28 July 2025

Saudi media minister, SRMG CEO discuss plans for Saudi sports coverage

Saudi media minister, SRMG CEO discuss plans for Saudi sports coverage
  • SRMG subsidiary Thmanyah secured exclusive regional broadcast rights to Saudi Pro League beginning with 2025–26 season
  • Saudi Minister of Media Salman Al-Dossary said ministry is fully mobilized to support coverage of all Saudi sports competitions

LONDON: Saudi Minister of Media Salman Al-Dossary met with Joumana Rashed Al-Rashed, CEO of the Saudi Research and Media Group, on Sunday to discuss upcoming developments in the broadcast coverage of Saudi sports, the Saudi Press Agency reported.

The meeting came after SRMG subsidiary Thmanyah Company for Publishing and Distribution was awarded the broadcasting rights for domestic sports competitions. Arab News is also part of SRMG.

Thmanyah CEO Abdulrahman Abumalih also attended the meeting, where officials reviewed the readiness of digital and television broadcasting for Saudi sports events. Discussions included progress on studio infrastructure, deployment of innovative technology, content strategy, publishing platforms, and the timeline for channel launches.

Thmanyah, acquired by SRMG in 2021, has grown from producing in-house podcasts like “Fnjan” into one of the region’s most influential platforms, encompassing podcasts, radio, and editorial content.

In a significant development last month, Thmanyah secured exclusive regional broadcast rights to the Saudi Pro League beginning with the 2025–26 season. The deal also covers the King Cup, the Saudi Super Cup, and the First Division League through the 2030–31 season.

Al-Dossary said the Ministry of Media is fully mobilized to support the coverage of all Saudi sports competitions, aiming to strengthen the Kingdom’s presence in global sports and meet the aspirations of fans.

The meeting is part of a broader series of discussions between the ministry, SRMG, and other media institutions. These engagements aim to align media efforts, enhance content quality, and support Vision 2030’s objective of building a strong, influential national media sector.


White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office
Updated 01 November 2025

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office
  • Journalists are now barred if they do not have prior approval to access the area known as Upper Press, near the president's office
  • he policy comes amid wider restrictions on journalists by the Trump administration, including new rules at the Pentagon 

WEST PALM BEACH: US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday barred reporters from accessing part of the White House press office without an appointment, citing the need to protect “sensitive material.”
Journalists are now barred if they do not have prior approval to access the area known as Upper Press — which is where Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s office is located and is near the Oval Office.
Reporters have until now been able to freely visit the area, often wandering up to try to speak to Leavitt or senior press officers to seek information or confirm stories.
Media are still allowed to access the area known as “Lower Press,” next to the famed White House briefing room, where more junior press officers have their desks, the memo said.
The policy comes amid wider restrictions on journalists by the Trump administration, including new rules at the Pentagon that major outlets including AFP refused to sign earlier this month.
The change at the White House was announced by the National Security Council in a memorandum titled “protecting sensitive material from unauthorized disclosure in Upper Press.”
“This memorandum directs the prohibition of press passholders from accessing... ‘Upper Press,’ which is situated adjacent to the Oval Office, without an appointment,” said the memo, addressed to Leavitt and White house Communications Director Steven Cheung.
“This policy will ensure adherence to best practices pertaining to access to sensitive material.”
It said the change was necessary because White House press officers were now routinely dealing with sensitive materials following “recent structural changes to the National Security Council.”
Trump has gutted the once powerful NSC, putting it under the control of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, after former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz was reassigned in May following a scandal over the use of the Signal app to plan strikes on Yemen.
Trump’s administration has made a major shake-up to access rules for journalists since his return to power in January.
Many mainstream outlets have seen their access to areas like the Oval Office and Air Force One reduced, while right-wing, Trump-friendly outlets have been given more prominence.
The White House also banned the Associated Press news agency from key areas where Trump speaks after it refused to recognize his order changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.
 


Sky News team confronted by Israeli troops during West Bank reportage

Sky News team confronted by Israeli troops during West Bank reportage
Updated 31 October 2025

Sky News team confronted by Israeli troops during West Bank reportage

Sky News team confronted by Israeli troops during West Bank reportage
  • Adam Parsons and his crew were filming at an olive grove that was the site of a recent attack by Israeli settlers when soldiers approached
  • The reportage highlighted Palestinians’ abandonment of the annual olive harvest, a consequence of the deteriorating security situation

LONDON: A Sky News reporting team was confronted by Israeli troops during a recent assignment in the West Bank, the network disclosed on Friday.

Adam Parsons, Sky News Middle East correspondent, recounted that the Israeli military approached as his crew was filming a segment focused on the olive harvest season in Palestine.

“As we film, an Israeli military vehicle comes along a track and stops in a cloud of dust,” he wrote in the reportage titled “Defiance in the West Bank — despite encroaching threat from ‘unwanted neighbours.’”

Parsons continued: “The soldiers emerge and tell us we have to leave for our own protection, claiming that this olive grove is, in fact, a closed military zone.”

The correspondent, who was visiting the site of a recent attack by Israeli settlers on a Palestinian woman, said the military did not clarify what threat necessitated their departure.

Instead, they showed him and his crew a WhatsApp image of a basic map marked by a rectangle, describing it as a military order.

“We’re then told we can’t leave, and that the police are on the way to arrest us. We discuss the law. And then, as suddenly as it started, it’s over — we’re free to go. It’s just another flare-up on the West Bank.”

In a statement to Sky News, the Israel Defense Forces said troops had been deployed “to thwart terrorism.”

The army also stated it “strongly condemns violence of any kind” and announced a review into the attacks reported by the network.

Violence targeting Palestinians in the West Bank has surged dramatically in recent years.

A growing number of settlers, supported by the government and shielded by military protection, have established makeshift outposts in the territory, often with little accountability.

Incidents of intimidation, harassment, violence, and even killings have become a daily occurrence, preventing Palestinians from accessing essential services and their own land, including olive groves.

Faced with worsening conditions, many Palestinians have abandoned the annual olive harvest, a centuries-old tradition typically observed in October and November. 

Israeli settlements in the West Bank are considered illegal under both international and Israeli laws.

Human rights organizations and UN experts described Israel’s actions in the West Bank as one of “total apartheid.”


Watchdogs call for journalist protection amid El-Fasher blackout

This image grab shows RSF fighters holding weapons and celebrating in the streets of El-Fasher in Sudan’s Darfur. (AFP)
This image grab shows RSF fighters holding weapons and celebrating in the streets of El-Fasher in Sudan’s Darfur. (AFP)
Updated 30 October 2025

Watchdogs call for journalist protection amid El-Fasher blackout

This image grab shows RSF fighters holding weapons and celebrating in the streets of El-Fasher in Sudan’s Darfur. (AFP)
  • As many as 11 journalists have gone missing since the Sudanese city was captured by the RSF, reports the CPJ
  • An estimated 260,000 civilians remained trapped in the North Darfur capital, with blackout severely limiting external communication

LONDON: Human rights and media organizations are calling for the protection of journalists amid a near-total communications blackout in El-Fasher following the city’s fall to the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.

A limited and scattered stream of reports have emerged of the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in the North Darfur capital city, with the Sudanese government accusing the RSF of killing over 2,000 civilians during the past weekend.

The Committee to Protect Journalists reported that as many as 11 journalists have gone missing in El-Fasher, including freelance reporter Muhammad Ibrahim. Ibrahim appeared in a video circulated by the RSF on Sunday, showing him being captured while trying to leave the city.

In a statement on Thursday, the CPJ confirmed it had verified the whereabouts of three of the missing, all of whom have fled the city. The remaining journalists remain incommunicado amid ongoing hostilities and the blackout that severely limits external communication.

“The RSF’s claims that it is solely targeting ‘terrorists’ and not civilians replicate a familiar play-book — first denial of civilian harm, then shifting of blame, and then active suppression of journalists attempting to document the truth,” said Sara Qudah, CPJ regional director.

Fighting has escalated since April 2023, when internal conflicts within Sudan’s military regime erupted into open clashes in Khartoum, quickly spreading across the country.

Over the past weekend, the RSF took control of the last Darfur regional capital following an 18-month siege, expanding its influence across the west and southwest of Sudan.

A comprehensive communications blackout appears to be in effect across large areas of North Darfur, severely restricting external access, impeding independent verification and deepening the isolation of journalists and affected communities.

Multiple sources report that as the RSF advanced it seized journalists, killed a significant number of civilians, and broadcast footage of their operations on social media — a “chilling escalation” in the targeted repression of both the press and the public, according to the CPJ.

An estimated 260,000 civilians are still trapped in the city, half of them children.

“This cycle fosters impunity, stifles independent reporting and erodes accountability,” Qudah said.

“We urge all parties — and the international community — to act immediately to protect journalists, restore communications and ensure accountability for these grave violations.”

On Wednesday, the Sudan Media Forum condemned the attacks, saying they demonstrated “a complete disregard for international law and human dignity.”

The group called on the international community to “exert maximum pressure” on the RSF to allow essential supplies — including food, medicine and aid — to reach the city and to halt what it termed “summary executions” and “ethnically motivated killings.”

The CPJ also urged the imposition of targeted sanctions and accountability measures against RSF leaders, stating: “The world can no longer afford to wait to act in defense of the public’s right to know and for the safety of journalists in El-Fasher.”

Since the war between the RSF and the Sudanese Armed Forces began on April 15, 2023, the RSF has killed at least 14 journalists with dozens more detained, assaulted, raped or disappeared, according to the CPJ’s research.


US jails two men for 25 years over plot to kill Iranian-American reporter

US jails two men for 25 years over plot to kill Iranian-American reporter
Updated 30 October 2025

US jails two men for 25 years over plot to kill Iranian-American reporter

US jails two men for 25 years over plot to kill Iranian-American reporter
  • Rafat Amirov and Polad Omarov, both members of an eastern European criminal gang, orchestrated a failed plot to assassinate campaigning reporter Alinejad
  • US has accused Iran of seeking to assassinate US officials in retaliation for Washington’s killing of Revolutionary Guards commander Qasem Soleimani in 2020

NEW YORK: A US judge jailed two men for 25 years each Wednesday for a plot allegedly hatched by Tehran to kill Iranian-American journalist Masih Alinejad, her team confirmed to AFP.
Rafat Amirov and Polad Omarov, both members of an eastern European criminal gang, orchestrated a failed plot to assassinate campaigning reporter Alinejad.
“They wanted to see me dead on my porch in Brooklyn and thanks to the law enforcement agencies, I am alive and Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader (of Iran), is humiliated,” Alinejad said outside a Manhattan courthouse following the sentencing, brandishing a sunflower.
“I was nervous but at the same time very empowered to speak the truth,” she added before dancing and singing in Farsi.
Amirov and Omarov were both jailed for 25 years, a spokesman for Alinejad said following the hearing, after prosecutors had sought 55-year terms for each, according to court filings.
According to the Justice Department, the jailed men, members of the eastern European crime network, were “contracted” by Ruhollah Bazghandi — identified as a brigadier general in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards — and other members of his network to murder Alinejad.
In July 2022, a man hired to carry out the assassination was arrested near Alinejad’s New York home with a loaded AK-47 assault rifle, the court heard over the two week trial.
The 49-year-old Alinejad, one of the most prominent dissident campaigners against Iranian authorities, for years has pushed for the abolition of the obligatory headscarf in Iran under the banner of “MyStealthyFreedom.”
She left Iran in 2009.
Charges were unsealed in October 2024 against Bazghandi, a former intelligence officer.
Three other Iranians with “connections to the government of Iran” — Hajj Taher, Hossein Sedighi and Seyed Mohammad Forouzan — were indicted over the affair.
The three are not in US custody and are believed to be in Iran. They face charges of conspiracy to commit murder-for-hire and money laundering.
Tehran has routinely rejected similar US accusations about alleged plots to kill American officials or politicians in the past.
The United States has also accused Iran of seeking to assassinate US officials in retaliation for Washington’s killing of Revolutionary Guards commander Qasem Soleimani in 2020.
The State Department previously announced a $20 million reward for information leading to the arrest of the alleged Iranian mastermind behind a plot to assassinate former White House official John Bolton.


Google, Amazon agree to Israel’s ‘wink’ demand to signal foreign data access, investigation reveals

Google, Amazon agree to Israel’s ‘wink’ demand to signal foreign data access, investigation reveals
Updated 30 October 2025

Google, Amazon agree to Israel’s ‘wink’ demand to signal foreign data access, investigation reveals

Google, Amazon agree to Israel’s ‘wink’ demand to signal foreign data access, investigation reveals
  • Leaked documents show agreement is part of a $1.2bn cloud-computing deal, Project Nimbus, signed in 2021

DUBAI: Tech giants Google and Amazon agreed to use a secret code to warn their client, the Israeli government, if their data was being handed over to foreign law enforcement, according to a joint investigation by The Guardian, Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine, and Hebrew-language outlet Local Call.

The agreement was part of a $1.2 billion cloud-computing deal inked in 2021, known as Project Nimbus. It stemmed from Israel’s concerns that the data it stores on these tech companies’ cloud platforms could end up in the hands of foreign law enforcement authorities.

Tech companies must comply with requests from law enforcement and security agencies to hand over customer data for investigative purposes. Moreover, they are often prohibited from informing the customer that their data has been disclosed.

Therefore, Israeli officials developed the so-called “winking” mechanism, under which Google and Amazon would send secret signals, hidden in payments, to the Israeli government, revealing the identity of the country to which they had been compelled to hand over Israeli data.

According to leaked documents from Israel’s Finance Ministry, which include a finalized version of the Nimbus agreement, payments must be made “within 24 hours of the information being transferred” and correspond to the telephone dialing code of the foreign country, amounting to sums between 1,000 ($308) and 9,999 shekels.

For example, if either firm provided information to authorities in the US, where the dialing code is +1, they would have to send the Israeli government 1,000 shekels.

If they share Israeli data with authorities in Italy, where the dialing code is +39, they would have to send 3,900 shekels.

In cases where the companies concluded they were under a gag order preventing them from indicating which country had received the data, they must pay 100,000 shekels to the Israeli government.

The agreement also includes measures that prohibit the US companies from restricting how the Israeli government and its branches, including the military and security services, use their cloud services.

Both companies’ standard “acceptable use” policies state that their cloud platforms should not be used to violate the legal rights of others, nor to engage in or encourage activities that cause “serious harm” to people.

However, according to an Israeli official familiar with the Nimbus project, there can be “no restrictions” on the kind of information stored in Google and Amazon’s cloud platforms.

The leaked documents state that Israel is “entitled to migrate to the cloud or generate in the cloud any content data they wish.”

Legal experts said the agreement is extremely unusual and risky, as the coded messages could violate legal obligations in the US, where Google and Amazon are headquartered.

“It seems awfully cute and something that if the US government or, more to the point, a court were to understand, I don’t think they would be particularly sympathetic,” a former US government lawyer told The Guardian.

Both Google and Amazon’s cloud businesses have denied evading any legal obligations. Neither responded to The Guardian’s questions about whether they had used the “wink.”

An Amazon spokesperson said that the company has a “rigorous global process for responding to lawful and binding orders for requests related to customer data,” adding that there are no “processes in place to circumvent our confidentiality obligations on lawfully binding orders.”

Google declined to comment on which of Israel’s demands it had accepted in the Nimbus deal, but said it was “false” to “imply that we somehow were involved in illegal activity, which is absurd.”

A spokesperson for Israel’s Finance Ministry said: “The article’s insinuation that Israel compels companies to breach the law is baseless.”

Google and Amazon are “bound by stringent contractual obligations that safeguard Israel’s vital interests,” and “we will not legitimize the article’s claims by disclosing private commercial terms,” the spokesperson added.