șŁœÇֱȄ

Growing calls for UK govt to help students in Gaza admitted to British universities

Growing calls for UK govt to help students in Gaza admitted to British universities
University College London is among the institutions where Palestinians have full scholarships to study that they cannot at present take up because of government red tape. (Wikimedia Commons)
Short Url
Updated 23 July 2025

Growing calls for UK govt to help students in Gaza admitted to British universities

Growing calls for UK govt to help students in Gaza admitted to British universities
  • 40 Palestinian students offered scholarships but cannot travel without biometric data
  • Gaza’s only UK-licensed biometrics center closed in October 2023

LONDON: Government ministers in the UK are facing renewed pressure to help 40 students in Gaza who were offered full scholarships to study at British universities, The Guardian reported.

The students, however, are unable to take their university places set to begin in September because of government bureaucracy.

The UK Home Office on Tuesday reportedly held a high-level meeting on the issue after MPs and campaigners demanded urgent action to help the students.

They demanded that the government take immediate steps to secure the students’ safe passage to Britain, following warnings that some Palestinians students had been killed while waiting for British university spots.

Others are also in constant danger amid Israel’s military campaign in the enclave.

A key hindrance affecting the students is a Home Office requirement to use biometric data for visa applications, campaigners have said.

The only UK-authorized biometrics center in Gaza closed in October 2023 and the students cannot travel to similar centers in neighboring countries.

Campaigners and MPs are calling on the government to issue a biometrics deferral and help the students navigate a safe route to a third country to complete their visa applications and travel onward to Britain.

Ireland, France, Belgium, Germany and Italy have already helped evacuate students with university positions in their countries, said Dr. Nora Parr, a Birmingham University researcher campaigning for the students.

“The students who studied, took TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language) tests, wrote admissions essays and did virtual campus interviews under the most horrendous conditions imaginable — many from tent homes and makeshift Wi-Fi hubs — now must wait for a government decision,” she added.

“To not act is to decide to leave them without these hard-earned educational opportunities.”

Any response is also likely to be shaped by a government immigration white paper released earlier this year that signaled an intention to reduce international student numbers at British universities, Parr said.

“This, combined with the government’s tough stance on immigration, and absence of direct support for Palestine, has left these students in the most dire limbo.”

Among the campaigning group is the University and College Union, which represents 125,000 education workers.

Its general secretary, Jo Grady, urged the home secretary in a letter to “expedite the process” of evacuating the Palestinian students and ensuring “all these young Palestinians make it to our seminar rooms and lecture halls for the start of the academic year.”

The Palestinians students have secured spots at universities including Oxford, Cambridge, St Andrews, Edinburgh and University College London.

They are enrolled in subjects including dental public health, data science and genomic medicine.

One student, Soha, a 31-year-old, is hoping to complete a doctorate in nursing and health research at the University of Ulster.

“As a midwife living and working in Gaza, I have witnessed the unimaginable: mothers giving birth under fire, newborns taking their first breath in shelters, and health professionals struggling to provide care with little more than courage and commitment.”

She told The Guardian: “We need them (the British government) to be faster making the decisions that we are waiting for.

“Give us the biometric waiver that we want and facilitate our safe passage. We are running out of time. I carry with me the hopes of countless women and colleagues back in Gaza. When I return, I plan to lead maternal health research in Palestine.”

A government spokesperson told The Guardian: “We are aware of the students and are considering the request for support.”


American e-waste is causing a ‘hidden tsunami’ in Southeast Asia, report says

Updated 5 sec ago

American e-waste is causing a ‘hidden tsunami’ in Southeast Asia, report says

American e-waste is causing a ‘hidden tsunami’ in Southeast Asia, report says
HANOI: Millions of tons of discarded electronics from the United States are being shipped overseas, much of it to developing countries in Southeast Asia unprepared to safely handle hazardous waste, according to a new report released Wednesday by an environmental watchdog.
The Seattle-based Basel Action Network, or BAN, said a two-year investigation found at least 10 US companies exporting used electronics to Asia and the Middle East, in what it says is a “hidden tsunami” of electronic waste.
“This new, almost invisible tsunami of e-waste, is taking place ... padding already lucrative profit margins of the electronics recycling sector while allowing a major portion of the American public’s and corporate IT equipment to be surreptitiously exported to and processed under harmful conditions in Southeast Asia,” the report said.
Growing e-waste
Electronic waste, or e-waste, includes discarded devices like phones and computers containing both valuable materials and toxic metals like lead, cadmium and mercury. As gadgets are replaced faster, global e-waste is growing five times quicker than it’s formally recycled.
The world produced a record 62 million metric tons in 2022. That’s expected to climb to 82 million by 2030, according to the United Nations’ International Telecommunication Union and its research arm, UNITAR.
Toxic chemicals
That American e-waste adds to the burden for Asia, which already produces nearly half the world’s total. Much of it is dumped in landfills, leaching toxic chemicals into the environment. Some ends up in informal scrapyards, where workers burn or dismantle devices by hand, often without protection, releasing toxic fumes and scrap.
About 2,000 containers — roughly 33,000 metric tons (36,376 US tons) — of used electronics leave US ports every month, according to the report. It said the companies behind the shipments, described as “e-waste brokers,” typically don’t recycle the waste themselves but send it to companies in developing countries.
Response to the report
The companies identified in the report include Attan Recycling, Corporate eWaste Solutions or CEWS, Creative Metals Group, EDM, First America Metal Corp., GEM Iron and Metal Inc., Greenland Resource, IQA Metals, PPM Recycling and Semsotai.
Six of the companies didn’t immediately respond to emailed requests for comment.
Semsotai told The Associated Press that it doesn’t export scrap, only working components for reuse. It accused BAN of bias.
PPM Recycling told The Associated Press that its warehouses in California and Texas ship only aluminum and other non-iron metals to Malaysia. It said BAN had exaggerated shipment volumes, adding that it used accurate trade codes and followed US and international rules.
Greenland Resource told The Associated Press it took the allegations seriously and was reviewing the matter internally and couldn’t comment further without seeing the report.
CEWS said it follows strict environmental standards, but some aspects of where and how recycled materials are handled are industrial secrets.
Value of more than $1 billion
The report estimated that between January 2023 and February 2025, the 10 companies exported more than 10,000 containers of potential e-waste valued at over $1 billion, the report said. Industrywide, such trade could top $200 million a month.
Eight of the 10 identified companies hold R2V3 certifications — an industry standard meant to ensure electronics are recycled safely and responsibly, raising questions about the value of such a certification, the report said.
Several companies operate out of California, despite the state’s strict e-waste laws requiring full reporting and proper downstream handling of electronic and universal waste.
International treaty
Many e-waste containers go to countries that have banned such imports under the Basel Convention, which is an international treaty that bars hazardous waste trade from non-signatories like the US, the only industrialized nation yet to ratify it.
The nonprofit said its review of government and private trade records from ships and customs officials showed shipments were often declared under trade codes that did not match those for electronic waste, such as “commodity materials” like raw metals or other recyclable goods to evade detection. Such classifications were “highly unlikely” given how the companies publicly describe their operations, the report said.
Landfills and pollution
Tony R. Walker, who studies global waste trade at the Dalhousie University’s School for Resource and Environmental Studies in Halifax in Canada, said he wasn’t surprised that e-waste continues to evade regulation. While some devices can be legally traded if functional, most such exports to developing nations are broken or obsolete and mislabeled, bound for landfills that pollute the environment and have little market value, he said.
He pointed to Malaysia — a Basel Convention signatory identified in the report as the primary destination for US e-waste — saying the country would be overwhelmed by that volume, in addition to waste from other wealthy nations.
“It simply means the country is being overwhelmed with what is essentially pollution transfer from other nations,” he said.
‘Makkah of junk’
The report estimates that US e-waste shipments may have made up about 6 percent of all US exports to the country from 2023 to 2025. After China banned imports of foreign waste in 2017, many Chinese businesses shifted their operations to Southeast Asia, using family and business ties to secure permits.
“Malaysia suddenly became this mecca of junk,” said Jim Puckett of the Basel Action Network.
Containers were also sent to Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines and the UAE, despite bans under the Basel Convention and national laws, the report added.
In countries receiving this US e-waste, “undocumented workers desperate for jobs” toil in makeshift facilities, inhaling toxic fumes as they strip wires, melt plastics and dismantle devices without protection, the report said.
Efforts to control illegal imports
Authorities in Thailand and Malaysia have stepped up efforts to curb illegal imports of US e-waste.
In May, Thai authorities seized 238 tons of US e-waste at Bangkok’s port seized 238 tons of US scrap at Bangkok’s port while Malaysian authorities confiscated e-waste worth $118 million in nationwide raids in June.
Most of the facilities in Malaysia were illegal and lacked environmental safeguards, said SiPeng Wong, of Malaysia’s Center to Combat Corruption & Cronyism.
Exporting e-waste from rich nations to developing nations strains local facilities, overwhelms efforts to manage domestic waste and is a form of “waste colonialism,” she said.

Trump heads to Asia aiming to make deals with Xi

Trump heads to Asia aiming to make deals with Xi
Updated 29 min 54 sec ago

Trump heads to Asia aiming to make deals with Xi

Trump heads to Asia aiming to make deals with Xi
  • US President Donald Trump is set to embark on a major trip to Asia this week with all eyes on an expected meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping that has huge implications for the global economy

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump is set to embark on a major trip to Asia this week with all eyes on an expected meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping that has huge implications for the global economy.
Trump said on Wednesday he was making a “big trip” to Malaysia, Japan and South Korea, his first visit to the region since he returned to the White House in a blaze of tariffs and geopolitical brinkmanship.
Much of the trip remains shrouded in uncertainty. The White House has given almost no details, and Trump has warned that his anticipated sit-down with Xi in South Korea may not even happen amid ongoing tensions.
But Trump has made it clear he hopes to seal a “good” deal with China and end a bitter trade war between the world’s two largest economies that has caused global shockwaves.
The host nations are meanwhile set to roll out the red carpet to ensure they stay on the right side of the unpredictable 79-year-old, and win the best deals they can on tariffs and security assistance.
Malaysia and Japan
His first stop is expected to be Malaysia for the October 26-28 summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) — a grouping Trump skipped several times in his first term.
Trump is set to ink a trade deal with Malaysia — but more importantly to oversee the signing of a peace accord between Thailand and Cambodia, as he continues his quest for a Nobel Peace Prize.
“President Trump is keen to see the more positive results of the peace negotiations between Thailand and Cambodia,” Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said on Wednesday.
The US leader may also meet Brazilian counterpart Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on the sidelines of the summit to improve ties after months of bad blood, officials from both countries told AFP.
Trump’s next stop is expected to be Tokyo where he will be able to meet conservative Sanae Takaichi, named this week as Japan’s first woman prime minister.
Japan has escaped the worst of the tariffs Trump slapped on countries around the world to end what he calls unfair trade balances that are “ripping off the United States.”
At the same time, Trump wants Japan to halt Russian energy imports and has also urged Tokyo to follow Western allies in increasing defense spending.
Xi in South Korea?
But the climax of the trip is expected to be in South Korea, where Trump is due to arrive on October 29 for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit — and potentially meet Xi.
The first meeting between the two leaders since Trump’s return to office could smooth over the trade war between Washington and Beijing — but Beijing’s rare earth curbs have also infuriated Trump.
Trump initially threatened to cancel the meeting and imposed fresh tariffs, before saying he would go ahead after all. But he added on Tuesday that still “maybe it won’t happen.”
He said on Wednesday that he hoped to make a deal with Xi on “everything” and also hoped the Chinese leader could have a “big influence” on getting Russia’s Vladimir Putin to end the Ukraine war.
Analysts warned not to expect any breakthroughs.
“The meeting will be a data point along an existing continuum rather than an inflection point in the relationship,” said Ryan Hass, a senior fellow at Brookings Institution.
South Korea, seeking its own trade deal, is reportedly considering the rare step of awarding Trump the Grand Order of Mugunghwa — the country’s highest decoration — during his visit.
North Korea will also be on the agenda. The country fired multiple ballistic missiles on Wednesday, just days before Trump was due to visit.
Trump has said he hopes to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong Un following several meetings during the US president’s first term, but there has been no confirmation of reports that the White House was looking at a new meeting this time.


Dutch general election focuses on migration and housing crisis as Wilders seeks another win

Dutch general election focuses on migration and housing crisis as Wilders seeks another win
Updated 54 min 5 sec ago

Dutch general election focuses on migration and housing crisis as Wilders seeks another win

Dutch general election focuses on migration and housing crisis as Wilders seeks another win
  • Wilders’ party leads polls as the voting day nears, but even if he manages to win again, he is unlikely to manage to piece together a coalition, because many other mainstream parties have ruled out working with him

HAARLEM: Palwasha Hamzad wants the Dutch election to be not about migration, but about tackling the chronic housing shortages in the Netherlands.
For DaniĂ«lle Vergauwen, it’s about putting “our own people” first.
Their opposing views sum up two of the key issues in campaigning for the Oct. 29 election for all 150 seats in the Dutch parliament’s legislative House of Representatives. They also echo debates about migration across Europe as right-wing politics gain support.
Wilders’ stunning victory
Far-right, anti-Islam lawmaker Geert Wilders ‘ Party for Freedom, known by its Dutch acronym PVV, swept to a shock victory in 2023 on a pledge to drastically rein in migration. He triggered the downfall of the subsequent four-party coalition government in June by withdrawing his lawmakers from the Cabinet in a dispute over implementing his crackdown.
This time around, Wilders’ campaign pledge is a “total halt” to asylum-seekers. An analysis of parties’ election manifestos by the Dutch Order of Lawyers said that such a policy would be a breach of international treaties.
“We have too many foreigners, too many asylum-seekers, too much Islam and far too many asylum-seeker centers,” Wilders’ manifesto says. What he casts as the ”open-borders policy” of his political rivals “is totally destroying our country.”
Wilders’ party leads polls as the voting day nears, but even if he manages to win again, he is unlikely to manage to piece together a coalition, because many other mainstream parties have ruled out working with him. Other more mainstream parties also have included moves to cut migration in their manifestos as the issue cuts across political fault lines.
Violent protests against new asylum-seeker centers have broken out in recent months in towns and villages across the Netherlands, with protesters lighting flares and sometimes waving a tricolor flag that was adopted by Dutch Nazi sympathizers around World War II. Wilders says he’s opposed to violence.
Afghan-born educator
Hamzad is a beneficiary of long-standing Dutch hospitality to asylum-seekers that has taken a hit in recent years. She fled the Afghan capital, Kabul, as a child and eventually settled in this historic city close to Amsterdam. In near fluent Dutch, she identifies herself now as a proud resident of Haarlem, where she works in elementary education and is a municipal representative for the Green Left, the party that has joined forces with the Labour Party to present a united center-left bloc at the election.
Hamzad argues that people being forced to sleep in cars, and families having to wait for years for social housing are far more pressing issues than reining in migration. She says the housing crisis isn’t caused by “new Netherlanders,” but instead by years of right-leaning ruling coalitions.
“We see that the free market has had too much influence, and social provisions have been more and more eroded,” she said.
Wilders’ heartland
Vergauwen was born and raised in the rural village of Sint Willebrord, where nearly three out of every four votes went to Wilders’ party at the 2023 election.
“We’re more for our own people,” she said outside the clothing store she owns and runs in Sint Willebrord’s main street. “Of course, we grant them more than we grant the foreigners who come in.”
Wilders conflates the issues of housing shortages that sees people wait for years for a subsidized apartment or priced out of overheated housing markets. He argues that waiting lists are so long because refugees get preferential treatment.
Vergauwen agrees.
“You increasingly see people coming to the Netherlands because things are getting worse in their own country,” she said. “But then you’ll end up with your own children no longer being able to have a home. And I would find that very sad.”
The official Dutch government statistics office says that overall migration last year was down by 19,000 from the previous year to 316,000 in this nation of 18 million, including people whose asylum applications were accepted. Around 40 percent came from Europe and almost half from the rest of the world. About one in 10 were Dutch nationals returning from overseas.
The government says that municipalities have other options for housing refugees, not just social accommodation. The Dutch refugee council rejects Wilders’ argument that people granted a protection visa to live in the Netherlands are the cause of the housing crisis, saying there are simply not enough houses being built.
‘Politicizing immigration’
LĂ©onie de Jonge, Professor of Far-Right Extremism at the University of TĂŒbingen in Germany, says Wilders “has been super successful in politicizing immigration as a cultural threat to the homogeneity of the Netherlands.”
Keeping the issue high on the political agenda “really helps to explain why the PVV is so successful,” she added.
De Jonge said that while support for Wilders remains high, voters could still punish him at the ballot box for failing to deliver on his promises after the 2023 election.
Hamzad says she is optimistic the election will bring a change of political direction and will be remaining in her adopted homeland regardless of the outcome.
“It’s my life and my future,” she said. “My commitment is here in the Netherlands.”


Judge to rule in 1972 Bloody Sunday murder case against former British soldier

Judge to rule in 1972 Bloody Sunday murder case against former British soldier
Updated 23 October 2025

Judge to rule in 1972 Bloody Sunday murder case against former British soldier

Judge to rule in 1972 Bloody Sunday murder case against former British soldier
  • Prosecutors said the lance corporal, who has not been named to protect him from retaliation, killed two people and tried to kill five others when he and other troops fired at fleeing unarmed civilians on Jan. 20, 1972, in Londonderry, also known as Derry

LONDON: The only British soldier ever charged in the 1972 Bloody Sunday massacre will learn his fate Friday in a Northern Ireland courtroom.
Judge Patrick Lynch is due to deliver his verdict in Belfast Crown Court on whether the former paratrooper identified only as Soldier F committed murder and attempted murder in the deadliest shooting of the three decades of sectarian violence known as “The Troubles.”
Prosecutors said the lance corporal, who has not been named to protect him from retaliation, killed two people and tried to kill five others when he and other troops fired at fleeing unarmed civilians on Jan. 20, 1972, in Londonderry, also known as Derry.
Thirteen people were killed and 15 were wounded in the event that has come to symbolize the conflict between mainly Catholic supporters of a united Ireland and predominantly Protestant forces that wanted to remain part of the United Kingdom.
While the violence largely ended with the 1998 Good Friday peace accord, tensions remain. Families of civilians killed continue to press for justice, while supporters of army veterans complain that their losses have been downplayed and that they have been unfairly targeted in investigations.
Soldier F, who was shrouded from view in court by a curtain, did not testify in his defense and his lawyer presented no evidence. The soldier told police during a 2016 interview that he had no “reliable recollection” of the events that day but was sure he had properly discharged his duties as a soldier.
Defense lawyer Mark Mulholland attacked the prosecution’s case as “fundamentally flawed and weak” for relying on soldiers he dubbed “fabricators and liars,” and the fading memories of survivors who scrambled to avoid live gunfire that some mistakenly thought were rounds of rubber bullets.
Surviving witnesses spoke of the confusion, chaos and terror as soldiers opened fire and bodies began falling after a large civil rights march through the city.
The prosecution relied on statements by two of Soldier F’s comrades — Soldier G, who is dead, and Soldier H, who refused to testify. The defense tried unsuccessfully to exclude the hearsay statements because they could not be cross-examined.
Prosecutor Louis Mably argued that the soldiers, without justification, had all opened fire, intending to kill, and thus shared responsibility for the casualties.
The killings were a source of shame for a British government that had initially claimed that members of a parachute regiment fired in self-defense after being attacked by gunmen and people hurling fuel bombs.
A formal inquiry cleared the troops of responsibility, but a subsequent and lengthier review in 2010 found soldiers shot unarmed civilians fleeing and then lied in a cover-up that lasted decades.
Then-Prime Minister David Cameron apologized and said the killings were “unjustified and unjustifiable.”
The 2010 findings cleared the way for the eventual prosecution of Soldier F, though delays and setbacks kept it from coming to trial until last month.
Soldier F has pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder for the deaths of James Wray, 22, and William McKinney, 27, and five counts of attempted murder for the shootings of Joseph Friel, Michael Quinn, Joe Mahon, Patrick O’Donnell, and for opening fire at unarmed civilians.


Massive strike in New Zealand as 100,000 demand better pay and conditions

Massive strike in New Zealand as 100,000 demand better pay and conditions
Updated 23 October 2025

Massive strike in New Zealand as 100,000 demand better pay and conditions

Massive strike in New Zealand as 100,000 demand better pay and conditions
  • Since coming to power in 2023, the conservative government has reduced new public spending as it tries to return the government’s accounts to surplus
  • It dismissed the protests as a union-orchestrated political stunt, even as the demonstrations highlight growing public unease over the administration’s direction

WELLINGTON: More than 100,000 New Zealand teachers, nurses, doctors, firefighters and support staff walked off the job on Thursday demanding more money and resources for the public sector in a sign of growing discontent with the country’s center-right government.
Public servants marched with placards and banners in towns across New Zealand, chanting and listening to speeches. Protests in Wellington and Christchurch had to be canceled because of dangerous weather conditions.
The unions in a joint statement last week billed the strike as the largest in decades with more than 100,000 public servants taking part.
Middlemore Hospital emergency doctor and Association of Salaried Medical Specialists Vice President Sylvia Boys told the crowd at Aotea Square in Auckland the government had been elected on promises to reduce the cost of living while maintaining frontline services and it was “fair to say these are the issues on which they are failing dismally.”
“The cost of living has worsened, and in health and education we have seen cuts across the sector. We are losing more talent than ever before,” she added in her speech, which was published on Facebook by the ASMS union.
The government has dismissed the protests as a union-orchestrated political stunt, even as the demonstrations highlight growing public unease over the administration’s direction. Recent opinion polls indicate support for the ruling coalition has slipped, though the opposition has yet to open a clear lead.
Since coming to power in 2023, the conservative government has reduced new public spending as it tries to return the government’s accounts to surplus. It has said the cuts would be in back office operations and would keep interest rates low and ensure New Zealand continues to be seen as a good place to invest.
However, the economy has struggled, contracting in three of the last five quarters, and historically high numbers of New Zealanders are leaving the country. While inflation is off its peak, it has ticked higher in the past couple of quarters.
Public Service Minister Judith Collins said in a statement on Wednesday that the proposed strike was unfair, unproductive and unnecessary.
“It is a stunt targeting the Government but the people paying the price are the thousands of patients who have had appointments and surgeries canceled, and the hundreds of thousands of kids who will miss another day at school,” she said. The government said that it was ready to negotiate.