ֱ

Russian forces advance and take first village in Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region, state media say

Russian forces advance and take first village in Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region, state media say
A soldier from the 81st Separate Slobozhanska Airmobile Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces loads ammunition during military exercises at a training ground near a front line in Donetsk region, Ukraine. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 30 June 2025

Russian forces advance and take first village in Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region, state media say

Russian forces advance and take first village in Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region, state media say

MOSCOW: Russian forces have taken control of the first village in the east-central Ukrainian region of Dnipropetrovsk, Russian state media and war bloggers said on Monday, after Russia took 950 square km of territory in two months.
There was no immediate confirmation from Ukrainian sources or from the Russian Defense Ministry.
As Moscow and Kyiv talk of possible peace, the war has intensified with Russian forces carving out a 200 square kilometer (77.22 square miles) chunk of Ukraine’s Sumy region and entering the Dnipropetrovsk region last month.
The authoritative Ukrainian Deep State map shows that Russia now controls 113,588 square km of Ukrainian territory, up 943 square km over the two months to June 28.
Russia’s state RIA news agency quoted a pro-Russian official, Vladimir Rogov, as saying that Russian forces had taken control of the village of Dachnoye just inside the Dnipropetrovsk region.
Russia has said it is willing to make peace but that Ukraine must withdraw from the entirety of four regions which Russia mostly controls and which President Vladimir Putin says are now legally part of Russia.
Ukraine and its European backers say those terms are tantamount to capitulation and that Russia is not interested in peace and that they will never accept Russian control of a fifth of Ukraine.
The areas under Russian control include Crimea, more than 99 percent of the Luhansk region, over 70 percent of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, all in the east or southeast, and fragments of the Kharkiv, Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk regions.


Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy

Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy
Updated 14 sec ago

Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy

Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy
  • Russia owned a lease to a plot of land that is about 300 meters from Parliament House in Canberra
  • The Russian government secured a 99-year lease for diplomatic use of the site in 2008

SYDNEY: Australia’s highest court on Wednesday blocked Russia from building a new embassy in the nation’s capital, unanimously upholding a law that canceled its lease on national security grounds.

Russia owned a lease to a plot of land that is about 300 meters (984 feet) from Parliament House in Canberra and intended to build a new embassy building there to replace an older building elsewhere in the capital.

But in 2023, the Australian government introduced a law to cancel the lease after receiving “very clear security advice as to the risk presented by a new Russian presence so close to Parliament House,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said at the time.

Russia challenged the law in front of the High Court of Australia, arguing parliament was not authorized under the constitution to pass such a law.

On Wednesday, the court ruled unanimously that the Home Affairs Act 2023 validly invoked parliament’s constitutional power to seize land on “just terms,” though it said Moscow was entitled to compensation.

The Russian government secured a 99-year lease for diplomatic use of the site in 2008, paying A$2.75 million ($1.79 million).

Construction on the new site kicked off but was never completed. Russia’s existing embassy is in Griffith, a suburb.

Australia’s government argued that the lease’s cancelation was supported by parliament’s power to make laws for the nation’s territories, including the Australian Capital Territory, where Canberra is located.

It added that it did not need to pay Russia “just terms” because the constitution only required compensation in cases where property was acquired for a specific use case, which it said did not exist in this instance.

It also argued that compensation should not extend to paying a foreign state as it would be “incongruous” with the Home Affairs Act.

The court said the absence of a proposed use or application for the land was “irrelevant” and compensation “is what the constitution requires.”

Australian Attorney-General Michelle Rowland welcomed the High Court’s decision.

“Australia will always stand up for our values and we will stand up for our national security,” she said in a statement.

“The government will closely consider the next steps in light of the court’s decision.”

The Russian embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.