ֱ

BBC defends Gaza coverage after White House criticism over aid site reporting

Palestinian flags are waved outside the BBC Scotland building as people take part in a demonstration to show solidarity with the Palestinian People, in Glasgow on October 14, 2023, in support of
Palestinian flags are waved outside the BBC Scotland building as people take part in a demonstration to show solidarity with the Palestinian People, in Glasgow on October 14, 2023, in support of "their right to resistance". (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 04 June 2025

BBC defends Gaza coverage after White House criticism over aid site reporting

BBC defends Gaza coverage after White House criticism over aid site reporting
  • White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt accused the BBC of taking “the word of Hamas with total truth,” claimed the corporation had retracted a story about aid distribution center incident in Rafah on Sunday
  • BBC rejected accusations as “completely wrong,” saying figures were attributed and updated throughout the day based on information from a range of sources

LONDON: The BBC has strongly defended its reporting of a deadly incident near a US-backed aid distribution site in Gaza, rejecting criticism from the White House as “incorrect” and denying claims that it had taken down a story.

The row erupted after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, during a press briefing on Tuesday, accused the BBC of relying on information from Hamas in its initial reporting of a shooting near an aid distribution center in Rafah on Sunday.

Leavitt also claimed the BBC had retracted a story — a claim the broadcaster called “completely wrong.”

“The claim the BBC took down a story after reviewing footage is completely wrong. We did not remove any story and we stand by our journalism,” the BBC said in a statement.

Leavitt’s remarks came in response to questions about reports that Israeli forces had opened fire near the aid site. Holding printed screenshots from the BBC website, she accused the broadcaster of changing casualty figures in multiple headlines and said it had “corrected and taken down” its report.

“The administration is aware of those reports and we are currently looking into the veracity of them because, unfortunately, unlike some in the media, we don’t take the word of Hamas with total truth,” she said.




Leavitt’s remarks came in response to questions about reports that Israeli forces had opened fire near the aid site. AP/File

Leavitt listed a series of changing headlines: “We like to look into it when they speak, unlike the BBC, who had multiple headlines, they wrote, ‘Israeli tank kills 26’, ‘Israeli tank kills 21’, ‘Israeli gunfire kills 31’, ‘Red Cross says, 21 people were killed in an aid incident.’”

“And then, oh, wait, they had to correct and take down their entire story, saying: ‘We reviewed the footage and couldn’t find any evidence of anything,’” she said.

The BBC issued a swift rebuttal, emphasizing that all casualty figures were clearly attributed and updated throughout the day based on information from a range of sources — standard practice in any fast-moving situation, especially during conflict.

According to Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry, at least 31 people were killed in the gunfire. The International Committee of the Red Cross later confirmed that 21 people had died. Initial reports from local medics cited 15 dead.

The numbers were “always clearly attributed, from the first figure of 15 from medics, through the 31 killed from the Hamas-run health ministry to the final Red Cross statement of ‘at least 21’ at their field hospital,” the BBC statement said.

“Our news stories and headlines about Sunday’s aid distribution center incident were updated throughout the day with the latest fatality figures as they came in from various sources … This is totally normal practice on any fast-moving news story.

“Completely separately, a BBC Verify online report on Monday reported a viral video posted on social media was not linked to the aid distribution center it claimed to show.

“This video did not run on BBC news channels and had not informed our reporting. Conflating these two stories is simply misleading,” it added.

Witnesses, NGOs and local health officials said that civilians had been shot at while waiting for food at the Rafah aid point. The Israeli military denied these claims and said its forces had not fired at civilians. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US- and Israeli-backed private group overseeing aid distribution, dismissed the reports as “outright fabrications.”

On Wednesday, GHF announced a temporary suspension of its operations in Gaza, citing security concerns. The Israeli army warned that roads leading to aid centers were now considered “combat zones.”

The closure follows a string of deadly incidents that UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has condemned as “unacceptable” and potentially “war crimes.”

The information war surrounding the conflict — now in its 21st month — has intensified, with both Israel and Hamas battling to control the narrative.

Independent reporting from Gaza remains limited. Israel continues to bar international media, including the BBC, from entering the territory, forcing news organizations to rely on local journalists, social media and unofficial channels.

Many local reporters are working under extreme physical and psychological pressure and are themselves frequent targets of Israeli airstrikes.

The BBC reiterated its call for unimpeded media access and urged the White House to support that demand.

“It’s important that accurate journalism is respected,” said Jonathan Munro, deputy director of BBC News. “And that governments call for free access to Gaza.”


Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author
Updated 04 November 2025

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author
  • Brutality rose significantly in last 2 years, says Nasser Abu Srour

DUBAI: Palestinian author Nasser Abu Srour, who was released last month after 32 years in captivity, said torture and brutality inside Israeli prisons had intensified in the past two years, turning detention centers into “another front” of the conflict in Gaza.

Abu Srour was among more than 150 Palestinians serving life sentences who were freed under a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire deal. He was exiled to Egypt, where he was placed in a five-star hotel in Cairo — a jarring contrast, he said, to the conditions he endured during imprisonment.

After Oct. 7, 2023, beatings and deprivation of food and warmth increased in prisons. Even the guards’ uniforms were replaced with ones bearing tags that read “fighters” or “warriors,” he said.

Abu Srour added: “They started acting like they were in a war, and this was another front, and they started beating, torturing, killing like warriors.”

He described how areas without security cameras became “places for brutality,” where guards would tie prisoners’ hands behind their heads, throw them to the ground, and trample on them.

“All cultural life in the prison ended in the last two years,” he said, as all reading and writing materials were confiscated. Daily rations were minimal, and prisoners were only given one set of thin clothes.

He recalled that prisoners were always hungry, and because their bodies were weak they “couldn’t handle even a medium temperature.”

He added: “Whenever someone was leaving prison, everyone would try to become their friends so they would get their T-shirt or underwear, or anything.”

Abu Srour took part in the First Intifada, the Palestinian uprising between 1987 and 1993, when he was charged as an accomplice in the death of an Israeli Shin Bet security officer.

He was sentenced to life in prison without parole in 1993, based on a confession extracted under torture.

In his more than three decades behind bars, Abu Srour completed a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in political science and turned to writing. He began composing poetry and other works that were smuggled out of prison.

His memoir “The Tale of a Wall: Reflections on Hope and Freedom,” dictated to a relative through phone calls over two years, has been translated into seven languages and is a finalist for the Arab Literature Prize.

After years of torture and unheeded appeals, Abu Srour struggled to believe until the final moment that his name was on the list of prisoners to be released after the Oct. 10 ceasefire.

He said: “They were calling out cell numbers, and I was sitting on my bed in room number six feeling like I am not part of it.

“There were so many times when I should have been part of it over all those years. But the whole thing is so huge and so painful, I didn’t want to interact. It was a defense mechanism.”

The 24 hours before his release were particularly painful, as prisoners were subjected to an intense final round of beatings.

During the 48-hour transfer that followed, prisoners were not allowed to open the curtains on the buses until they reached Egypt.

It was only then that Abu Srour saw the sky for the first time outside prison walls.