ֱ

Ukrainians rally around Zelensky as defender of Ukraine’s interests after White House blowout

Ukrainians rally around Zelensky as defender of Ukraine’s interests after White House blowout
1 / 2
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks during an interview with Bret Baier during a taping of FOX News Channel's Special Report with Bret Baier in Washington on Feb. 28, 2025. (AP Photo)
Ukrainians rally around Zelensky as defender of Ukraine’s interests after White House blowout
2 / 2
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks during an interview with Bret Baier during a taping of FOX News Channel's Special Report with Bret Baier in Washington on Feb. 28, 2025. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 01 March 2025

Ukrainians rally around Zelensky as defender of Ukraine’s interests after White House blowout

Ukrainians rally around Zelensky as defender of Ukraine’s interests after White House blowout
  • Many Ukrainians on Friday seemed unfazed by the blowout between Zelensky and Tru
  • Backers praised his commitment to acting in Ukraine’s national interest, even if it meant coming into conflict with the US president

KYIV, Ukraine: Soon after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky left the White House on Friday after an astonishing Oval Office blowout with President Donald Trump, Ukrainians rallied around Zelensky as a defender of his country’s interests.
The shouting match that unfolded in the final minutes of the highly anticipated meeting between the two leaders seemed to dash, at least for now, Ukrainian hopes that the United States could be locked in as a reliable partner in helping fend off, and conclude, Russia’s three-year onslaught.
The exchange, which saw a frustrated Zelensky lectured by Trump and Vice President JD Vance over what they saw as his lack of gratitude for previous US support, delighted officials in Moscow, who saw it as a final breakdown in relations between Washington and the Ukrainian leader.
Many Ukrainians unfazed by the row
But many Ukrainians on Friday seemed unfazed by the blowout between Zelensky and Trump, expressing a sense that the Ukrainian leader had stood up for their country’s dignity and interests by firmly maintaining his stance in the face of chiding from some of the world’s most powerful men.
Nataliia Serhiienko, 67, a retiree in Kyiv, said she thinks Ukrainians approve of their president’s performance in Washington, “because Zelensky fought like a lion.”
“They had a heated meeting, a very heated conversation,” she said. But Zelensky “was defending Ukraine’s interests.”
The meeting at the White House was meant to produce a bilateral agreement that would establish a joint investment fund for reconstructing Ukraine, a deal that was seen as a potential step toward bringing an end to the war and tying the two countries’ economies together for years to come.
But as Zelensky and his team departed the White House at Trump’s request, the deal went unsigned, and Ukraine’s hopes for securing US security backing seemed farther away than ever.
Yet as the Ukrainian leader was set to return to Kyiv empty handed, his support at home seemed undiminished.

Regional Ukrainian leader says president ‘held strong’
As two drones struck Ukraine’s second-largest city Kharkiv on Friday night, the head of the region which sits on the border with Russia, Oleh Syniehubov, praised Zelensky. He said the president held strong to his insistence that no peace deal could be made without assurances for Ukraine’s security against future Russian aggression.
“Our leader, despite the pressure, stands firm in defending the interests of Ukraine and Ukrainians. … We need only a just peace with security guarantees,” Syniehubov said.
Kyiv resident Artem Vasyliev, 37, said he had seen “complete disrespect” from the United States in the Oval Office exchange, despite the fact that Ukraine “was the first country that stood up to Russia.”
“We are striving for democracy, and we are met with total disrespect, toward our warriors, our soldiers, and the people of our country,” said Vasyliev, a native of Russian-occupied Luhansk in eastern Ukraine.
Vasyliev criticized the US president for what he said was a failure to recognize the human cost of Russia’s invasion, saying Trump “doesn’t understand that people are dying, that cities are being destroyed, people are suffering, mothers, children, soldiers.”
“He cannot understand this, he is just a businessman. For him, money is sacred,” he said.
Broad praise for Zelensky on social media
Ukrainian social media was awash in praise for Zelensky late Friday, with officials on the national, regional and local level chiming in to voice their support for their leader.
The outpouring resembled a recent surge in Ukrainian unity after Trump denigrated Zelensky by making false claims that Ukraine was led by a “dictator” who started the war with Russia — comments that led some of the Ukrainian president’s harshest critics to rally around him.
Oleksandr Prokudin, head of Ukraine’s southern Kherson region, which was mostly occupied by Russia early in the war but later partially retaken by Ukrainian forces, said three years of war had hardened his countrymen to the ups and downs of the fight to survive.
“We know what pressure is, on the front lines, in politics, in daily struggle,” Prokudin said. “It has made us stronger. It has made the president stronger. Determination is the force that drives us forward. And I am confident that we will endure this time as well.”
Trump’s administration cast the heated exchange with Zelensky as part of its “America First” policy and slammed the Ukrainian leader for a perceived lack of gratitude for US assistance.
But Zelensky’s backers in Ukraine praised his commitment to acting in Ukraine’s national interest — even if it meant coming into conflict with the president of the United States.
“Unwavering commitment to Ukraine’s interests and devotion to his country. This is what we saw today in the United States. Support for the President of Ukraine,” Vice Prime Minister Oleksii Kuleba wrote on Telegram Friday.
Not all of Ukraine’s political figures, however, were as full-throated in their praise for how the Oval Office meeting concluded. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said that he hoped “that Ukraine does not lose the support of the United States, which is extremely important to us.”
“Today is not the time for emotions, from either side. We need to find common ground,” Klitschko wrote in a post on Telegram.


At UN climate talks in Brazil, the only sign of the United States is an empty chair

At UN climate talks in Brazil, the only sign of the United States is an empty chair
Updated 59 min 12 sec ago

At UN climate talks in Brazil, the only sign of the United States is an empty chair

At UN climate talks in Brazil, the only sign of the United States is an empty chair
  • Brazil President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, whose nation is hosting these talks, urged negotiators not to forget that “the climate emergency is an increase of inequality”

BELEM, Brazil: A litany of recent weather disasters rang long Monday at the opening of UN climate negotiations: Hurricane Melissa in Jamaica, a deadly tornado in Brazil, droughts and fire in Africa. Against that backdrop, activists used an empty chair to drive home the absence from these talks of the United States, the world’s richest nation and second-biggest carbon polluter.
World leaders highlighted the devastation wrought on some of the world’s poorest places to show the need to work collectively to fight global warming, which is fueling extreme weather. But any united front will be without the US, one of only four nations missing the talks, along with tiny San Marino and strife-torn Afghanistan and Myanmar.
The 195 nations who did come to Belem, a weathered city on the edge of the Brazilian Amazon, for the talks known as COP30 were told that only together can they swiftly reduce the emissions from coal, oil and gas that cause climate change.
While the activists’ empty chair primarily illustrated the US absence, it was also intended to be a call-out for other nations “to step in and step up,” Danni Taaffe with Climate Action Network International told The Associated Press.
Those leading the talks sounded a similar note.
“Humanity is still in this fight. We have some tough opponents, no doubt, but we also have some heavyweights on our side. One is the brute power of the market forces as renewables get cheaper,” United Nations climate secretary Simon Stiell said.
A clear mandate
Brazil President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, whose nation is hosting these talks, urged negotiators not to forget that “the climate emergency is an increase of inequality.”
“It deepens the perverse logic that defines who is worthy of living and who should die,” Lula said.
This year’s talks are not expected to produce an ambitious new deal. Instead, organizers and analysts frame this year’s conference as the “implementation COP.” Countries had a clear mandate: arrive with their updated national plans to fight climate change.
On Monday, the United Nations released updated calculations showing that those national pledges promise to reduce projected 2035 global greenhouse gas emissions 12 percent below 2019 levels. That’s 2 points better than last month, before new pledges rolled in.
Attendees on Monday stressed cooperation, with Stiell saying that individual nations simply cannot cut heat-trapping gas emissions fast enough on their own.
André Corrêa do Lago, president of this year’s conference, emphasized that negotiators must engage in “mutirão” — a local Indigenous term that refers to a group uniting to complete a task.
A united front — without the US
Complicating those calls is the absence of the United States, where US President Donald Trump has long denied the existence of climate change.
The UN’s updated figures Monday depend on a US pledge that came from the Biden administration in December — before Trump returned to the White House and began working to boost fossil fuels and block clean energy like wind and solar. His administration did not send high-level negotiators to Belem, and he began his second term by withdrawing for the second time from the 10-year-old Paris Agreement, the first global pact to fight climate change.
The Paris Agreement sought to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above the historical average, but many scientists now say it’s unlikely countries will stay below that threshold.
The United States has put more heat-trapping carbon dioxide into the air from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas than any other country. China is the No. 1 carbon polluter now, but because carbon dioxide stays in the air for at least a century, more of it was made in the US.
Palau Ambassador Ilana Seid, who chairs the Alliance of Small Island States, said the US withdrawal “has really shifted the gravity” of the negotiating system.
Trump’s actions damage the fight against climate change, former US Special Envoy for Climate Todd Stern said.
“It’s a good thing that they are not sending anyone. It wasn’t going to be constructive if they did,” he said.
Though the US government isn’t showing up, some attendees including former top US negotiators are pointing to US cities, states and businesses that they said will help take up the slack.
‘A tragedy of the present’
Lula and Stiell said the 10-year-old Paris Agreement is working to a degree, but action needs to be accelerated. They pointed to devastation in the past few weeks including Hurricane Melissa in the Caribbean, typhoons smashing Vietnam and the Philippines and a tornado ripping through southern Brazil.
Scientists have said extreme weather events have become more frequent as Earth warms.
“Climate change is not a threat of the future. It is already a tragedy of the present time,’’ Lula said.