ֱ

Wetlands offer a guide to our environmental health 

Wetlands offer a guide to our environmental health 

Wetlands offer a guide to our environmental health 
A view of Khurais, a biodiverse wetland established by Aramco alongside its operating facilities. (Aramco photo)
Short Url

Freshwater ecosystems around the world are under intense pressure owing to a warming climate, pollution and declining biodiversity. Indeed, some 35 percent of wetland areas were lost between 1970 and 2015 — a rate three times faster than deforestation.

Of the remaining wetland habitats, 65 percent are deemed to be at moderate to high risk, while 37 percent of the world’s rivers that stretch more than 1,000 km are no longer free flowing throughout their entire length.

Freshwater habitats support more than 10 percent of all known species, including approximately a third of vertebrates and half of all fish, despite covering less than 1 percent of the Earth’s surface.

This diversity of life contributes to the cycling of nutrients, flood control and climate change mitigation, offers a bioindicator of wetland quality, and supports the culture and livelihoods of billions of people worldwide.

Freshwater ecosystems are increasingly degraded by pollution and land conversion for agricultural purposes, water extraction and the construction of dams, which also block fish migration routes.

Overfishing and the introduction of invasive alien species have also played a notably significant role in driving extinctions.

For more than 20 years, extinction risk assessments of bird, amphibian and mammal species from the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species have been crucial for tracking biodiversity trends and informing conservation policies. 

However, freshwater fish and invertebrates have received minimal attention or investment from the conservation community.

Consequently, recent target-setting for freshwater systems has primarily concentrated on abiotic hydrological measures, such as water use and quality. This reliance assumes that terrestrial species data can effectively represent freshwater species.

Freshwater fish and invertebrates have received minimal attention or investment from the conservation community.

Hany Tatwany

However, evidence shows this approach is often inadequate, especially when the surrogate species are from different environmental realms. Furthermore, the validity of using abiotic surrogates for assessing freshwater biodiversity remains largely untested.

Until recently, freshwater habitats have not been given the same priority as their terrestrial and marine counterparts in global environmental governance and have often been included within either terrestrial or marine systems despite evidence of their distinct management needs.

For example, the UN Sustainable Development Goals primarily focus on terrestrial and marine biomes, even though freshwater species are vital to achieving these goals.

As nature’s contributions to people, known as NCP, are integrated into conservation policies, management and sustainability frameworks, it is essential to recognize that the role of wildlife remains significantly underrepresented in the scientific understanding underpinning these efforts.

Aligning existing evidence with the NCP conceptual framework will demonstrate that wildlife directly supports human well-being, from providing ecosystem services and addressing climate change to combating food insecurity.

The contributions of wildlife to people, known as WCP, refer to these benefits. Unfortunately, existing knowledge gaps pose a risk that undermines our policy and management initiatives, preventing us from meeting our NCP, biodiversity and sustainability goals.

Enhancing wildlife monitoring and modelling is essential for understanding WCP in both terrestrial and aquatic environments. Addressing taxonomic, geographic and cultural biases in research is equally important.

These actions will help align biodiversity protection with NCP policies, fostering sustainable relationships with nature and balancing environmental protection with human well-being. In the process, we can rescue our wetlands from oblivion.

Hany Tatwany is a highly knowledgeable conservationist with more than 38 years of experience in biodiversity conservation.

 

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation initiative ‘outrageous’: UN probe chief

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation initiative ‘outrageous’: UN probe chief
Updated 3 min 20 sec ago

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation initiative ‘outrageous’: UN probe chief

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation initiative ‘outrageous’: UN probe chief
  • GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel completely cut off supplies into Gaza for more than two months, sparking warnings of mass famine
  • UN and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the foundation over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives

GENEVA: The use of the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to distribute food in the Palestinian territory is “outrageous,” the head of a UN inquiry said Wednesday.
Navi Pillay, who chairs the UN’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Israel and the Palestinian territories, joined a growing chorus of criticism of the GHF’s operations, and cited its US links.
“In every war, the siege and starvation surely leads to death,” the former UN rights chief told journalists.
“But this initiative of what’s called a foundation, a private foundation, to supply food, is what I see as outrageous, because it involves the United States itself, the government, and it turns out, as we watch daily, that people who go to those centers are being killed as they seek food.”
An officially private effort with opaque funding, GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel completely cut off supplies into Gaza for more than two months, sparking warnings of mass famine.
The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the foundation over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives.
Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points.
Pillay said the commission would “have to look into... the policy purpose and how it’s being effected.
“We have to spell out what is the motive of, right now, the killing of people who are coming for humanitarian aid from this so-called foundation — and that lives are being lost just in trying to secure food for their children.”
Unprecedented in its open-ended scope, the three-person Commission of Inquiry was established by the UN Human Rights Council in May 2021 to investigate alleged violations of international humanitarian and human rights law in Israel and the Palestinian territories.
South African former High Court judge Pillay, 83, served as a judge on the International Criminal Court and presided over the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.
On Tuesday she presented the commission’s latest report to the Human Rights Council.
It said Israel had attacked Gaza’s schools, religious and cultural sites as part of a “widespread and systematic” assault on the civilian population, in which Israeli forces have committed “war crimes” and “the crime against humanity of extermination.”
Israel does not cooperate with the investigation and has long accused it of “systematic anti-Israel discrimination.”


German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate

German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate
Updated 28 min 55 sec ago

German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate

German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate
  • “It is never too late to come to the negotiating table if one comes with sincere intentions,” Johann Wadephul said
  • Wadephul said Israel’s fear that Iran would develop nuclear weapons was justified

BERLIN: Germany’s foreign minister appealed to Iran’s leaders to make credible assurances that it is not seeking a nuclear weapon and to show it is willing to find a negotiated solution as fears mount of further military escalation between Iran and Israel.

“We are still ready to negotiate a solution. However, Iran must act urgently ... it is never too late to come to the negotiating table if one comes with sincere intentions,” Johann Wadephul said at a news conference with his Jordanian counterpart on Wednesday.

Wadephul said Israel’s fear that Iran would develop nuclear weapons was justified and it had a right to self-defense.

“The Israeli decision to do something against this threat is comprehensible,” he said, adding civilian deaths on both sides were regrettable after air attacks between Iran and Israel.

His ministry was arranging special flights later on Wednesday and on Thursday to each repatriate about 180 German citizens via Amman, he said.

Wadephul also said Germany had agreed to create an economic council with Syria to improve cooperation and boost prosperity and stability there.


Saudi and Bahraini military chiefs discuss efforts to fight terrorism

Saudi and Bahraini military chiefs discuss efforts to fight terrorism
Updated 16 min 33 sec ago

Saudi and Bahraini military chiefs discuss efforts to fight terrorism

Saudi and Bahraini military chiefs discuss efforts to fight terrorism
  • Review recent work and achievements of the Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition, including its strategic initiatives and regional programs

RIYADH: During a meeting in Manama on Wednesday, the secretary-general of the Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition, Maj. Gen. Mohammed Al-Moghedi from ֱ, and the chief of staff of the Bahrain Defence Force, Lt. Gen. Theyab Al-Nuaimi, reviewed the coalition’s recent work and achievements.

In particular, they looked at its strategic initiatives and regional programs in various locations including the African Sahel region, the Saudi Press Agency reported.

They discussed ֱ’s flagship training program for specialized counterterrorism operatives in more than 27 member states, the funding mechanisms employed by those states to support the work of the coalition, and operational strategies for implementing its mission.

Al-Moghedi and Al-Nuaimi emphasized the importance of joint action and stronger coordination among coalition member states, and the enhancement of capabilities in key operational areas, including: efforts to counter intellectual extremism; strategic media; tackling the financing of terrorism; and military operations.

They reiterated a shared commitment to deeper cooperation, unified efforts, and enhanced coordination to combat terrorism.


Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict
Updated 32 min 21 sec ago

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said ‘maximum force protection’ was being provided for US troops in the Middle East
  • He said that it is Trump’s decision whether to provide Israel a ‘bunker buster’ bomb to strike at the core of Iran’s nuclear program

WASHINGTON: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers Wednesday that the Pentagon was providing possible options to President Donald Trump as he decides next steps on Iran but would not say whether the military was planning to assist with Israeli strikes, an action that could risk dragging America into a wider war in the Middle East.
Hegseth was on Capitol Hill for the last of his series of often combative hearings before lawmakers, who have pressed him on everything from a ban on transgender troops to his use of a Signal chat to share sensitive military plans earlier this year.
In questioning before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hegseth said “maximum force protection” was being provided for US troops in the Middle East and that it is Trump’s decision whether to provide Israel a ”bunker buster” bomb to strike at the core of Iran’s nuclear program, which would require US pilots flying a B-2 stealth bomber. He would not indicate what the US may do next.
“My job — our job, the chairman and I — at all times is to make sure the president has options and is informed of what those options might be and what the ramifications of those options might be,” Hegseth said, referring to Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who was testifying alongside him.
The US has shifted significant numbers of refueling tanker and fighter aircraft to position them to be able to respond to the escalating conflict, such as supporting possible evacuations, or airstrikes. Hegseth said this week that was done to protect US personnel and air bases.
Hegseth, who is appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday, has spent vast amounts of time during his first months in office promoting the social changes he’s making at the Pentagon. He’s been far less visible in the administration’s more critical international security crises and negotiations involving Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Gaza and Iran.


UAE president, Russia’s Putin discuss Iran-Israel conflict

UAE president, Russia’s Putin discuss Iran-Israel conflict
Updated 44 min 33 sec ago

UAE president, Russia’s Putin discuss Iran-Israel conflict

UAE president, Russia’s Putin discuss Iran-Israel conflict
  • Emirati, Russian leaders proposed ways to contain the military escalation

LONDON: Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone call with UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan to discuss the latest developments in the Iran-Israel conflict, which entered its sixth day as of Wednesday.

The leaders addressed the grave implications of the conflict — which began on Friday — on regional and global security, according to the Emirates News Agency.

They discussed efforts to contain the war and halt the spiraling escalation, and highlighted the importance of exercising restraint and pursuing dialogue to avoid further threats to security.

Putin and Sheikh Mohamed voiced their support for all efforts aimed at achieving a solution through diplomatic means, WAM reported.