ֱ

An AI-powered tool aims to combat fake news in the Arab world and beyond

Special An AI-powered tool aims to combat fake news in the Arab world and beyond
Misinformation and disinformation are considered a top short-term global risk that not only mislead the public but also erode trust, deepen societal divisions and threaten fundamental human rights. (Shutterstock illustration)
Short Url
Updated 22 November 2024

An AI-powered tool aims to combat fake news in the Arab world and beyond

An AI-powered tool aims to combat fake news in the Arab world and beyond
  • Developed jointly with EU academic institutions, FRAPPE is the brainchild of Preslav Nakov of Abu Dhabi’s MBZUAI
  • System trained with 23 different linguistic techniques, can identify specific persuasion and propaganda techniques

RIYADH: Rising concern over disinformation’s role in manipulating public opinion has motivated Preslav Nakov, a professor at the UAE’s Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, to develop an AI-powered tool for detecting propaganda.

FRAPPE, short for Framing, Persuasion and Propaganda Explorer, is designed to assess news framing techniques and identify potential instances of information manipulation.

Nakov, chair of the natural language processing department and professor of natural language processing at the Abu Dhabi-based MBZUAI, said that AI plays a central role in FRAPPE by analyzing, categorizing and detecting complex patterns that influence readers’ opinions and emotions.

The tool offers real-time, on-the-fly analysis of individual articles while enabling a comprehensive comparison of framing and persuasion strategies across a wide range of media outlets, he told Arab News.

The UN defines disinformation as inaccurate information deliberately created and disseminated with the intent to deceive the public and cause serious harm. It can be spread by both state and non-state actors and can affect human rights, fuel armed conflict and undermine public policy responses.

The Global Risks Report 2024 by the World Economic Forum identifies misinformation and disinformation as a top short-term global risk. These forms of deceptive communication not only mislead the public but also erode trust, deepen societal divisions and threaten fundamental human rights.

Nevertheless, the WEF highlighted in an article in June that while AI technologies are being used in the production of both misinformation and disinformation, they can be harnessed to combat this risk by analyzing patterns, language and context.




Prof. Preslav Nakov, developer of an AI-powered tool for detecting propaganda. (Supplied)

Nakov said that FRAPPE, trained with 23 different linguistic techniques, “uses AI to identify specific persuasion and propaganda techniques, such as name-calling, loaded language, appeals to fear, exaggeration and repetition.”

“FRAPPE further uses AI to perform framing analysis,” he said, adding that the tool distinguishes “the main perspectives from which an issue is being discussed: Morality, fairness, equality, political, and cultural identity.”

With a database of in excess of 2.5 million articles from more than 8,000 sources, the multilingual system enables users to explore and compare how different countries and outlets frame and present information.

DID YOUKNOW?

• Disinformation is the intentional spread of false information to sway public opinion.

• Propaganda often employs loaded language to elicit emotional reactions.

• A WEF report identifies disinformation and misinformation as a top short-term risk.

Moreover, to build the training data for the system, more than 40 journalists from several European countries contributed to the manual analysis of news content in 13 languages.

This manual analysis, according to Nakov, allows FRAPPE to discern the underlying frames that shape how stories are told and perceived. By identifying the dominant frames within an article, FRAPPE compares these across media sources, countries and languages, providing valuable insights into how framing varies globally.

FRAPPE is designed for a broad audience, including the general public, journalists, researchers, and even policymakers.




With an extensive database, FRAPPE's multilingual system enables users to explore and compare how different countries and outlets frame and present information. (Supplied)

“For the general user, FRAPPE serves as an educational tool to explore how news content is framed, enabling them to identify propaganda techniques like name-calling, flag-waving, loaded language and appeals to fear,” Nakov said.

“For journalists and policymakers, FRAPPE offers a powerful tool to examine and compare framing and persuasion strategies across different countries, languages and outlets,” he added.

The system relies on annotations from journalists who manually identified persuasion and propaganda techniques across a wide range of articles. This minimizes the risk of overly subjective or one-sided interpretations.

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

Transparency and unbiased analysis were fundamental in the development of FRAPPE. Nakov said: “Users should be aware that our models use neural networks and, as such, they lack explainability.”

He also warned that “despite our intent, due to potential unintended article selection biases, FRAPPE might be favoring some political or social standpoints.”

On the positive side, however, “FRAPPE has the potential to influence the way news articles are perceived and consumed, and journalists may become more aware of the language they use and its potential impact on readers.”




FRAPPE has the ability to spot persuasive or manipulative techniques in news content. (Supplied)

To spot persuasive or manipulative techniques in news content, Nakov advises readers and viewers to “watch out for emotional language designed to provoke strong reactions like fear or anger, and be mindful of loaded words, such as ‘radical’ and ‘heroic, which carry emotional weight.”

He urged readers to critically assess articles that rely too heavily on a single expert or selective quotes, stressing the importance of considering how different outlets might report the same event in contrasting ways.

To gain a clearer perspective, Nakov advises cross-checking sources and comparing how different media outlets cover the same story. This approach helps reveal varying angles, biases or framing techniques.

He also stressed that oversimplified “us versus them” narratives “often indicate manipulation, as do articles that frame an issue with a particular angle, leaving out important details.




FRAPPE has been featured in numerous EU workshops focused on combating fake news. (Supplied)

“False dilemmas, where only extreme choices are presented and repetitive phrases meant to reinforce a point are also red flags,” he said.

“FRAPPE envisions empowering individuals and institutions to make more informed decisions by revealing the framing and persuasion techniques embedded in media content. Its aim is to enhance transparency in journalism, promote trust in media and contribute to a more informed, media-literate public.”

Developed in collaboration with the European Commission’s Joint Research Center and several academic institutions across Europe, FRAPPE was launched ahead of the 2024 European Parliament election, held in the EU between June 6-9 this year.

The tool, integrated into the Europe Media Monitor, has been featured in numerous EU workshops focused on combating fake news.



Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author
Updated 04 November 2025

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author
  • Brutality rose significantly in last 2 years, says Nasser Abu Srour

DUBAI: Palestinian author Nasser Abu Srour, who was released last month after 32 years in captivity, said torture and brutality inside Israeli prisons had intensified in the past two years, turning detention centers into “another front” of the conflict in Gaza.

Abu Srour was among more than 150 Palestinians serving life sentences who were freed under a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire deal. He was exiled to Egypt, where he was placed in a five-star hotel in Cairo — a jarring contrast, he said, to the conditions he endured during imprisonment.

After Oct. 7, 2023, beatings and deprivation of food and warmth increased in prisons. Even the guards’ uniforms were replaced with ones bearing tags that read “fighters” or “warriors,” he said.

Abu Srour added: “They started acting like they were in a war, and this was another front, and they started beating, torturing, killing like warriors.”

He described how areas without security cameras became “places for brutality,” where guards would tie prisoners’ hands behind their heads, throw them to the ground, and trample on them.

“All cultural life in the prison ended in the last two years,” he said, as all reading and writing materials were confiscated. Daily rations were minimal, and prisoners were only given one set of thin clothes.

He recalled that prisoners were always hungry, and because their bodies were weak they “couldn’t handle even a medium temperature.”

He added: “Whenever someone was leaving prison, everyone would try to become their friends so they would get their T-shirt or underwear, or anything.”

Abu Srour took part in the First Intifada, the Palestinian uprising between 1987 and 1993, when he was charged as an accomplice in the death of an Israeli Shin Bet security officer.

He was sentenced to life in prison without parole in 1993, based on a confession extracted under torture.

In his more than three decades behind bars, Abu Srour completed a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in political science and turned to writing. He began composing poetry and other works that were smuggled out of prison.

His memoir “The Tale of a Wall: Reflections on Hope and Freedom,” dictated to a relative through phone calls over two years, has been translated into seven languages and is a finalist for the Arab Literature Prize.

After years of torture and unheeded appeals, Abu Srour struggled to believe until the final moment that his name was on the list of prisoners to be released after the Oct. 10 ceasefire.

He said: “They were calling out cell numbers, and I was sitting on my bed in room number six feeling like I am not part of it.

“There were so many times when I should have been part of it over all those years. But the whole thing is so huge and so painful, I didn’t want to interact. It was a defense mechanism.”

The 24 hours before his release were particularly painful, as prisoners were subjected to an intense final round of beatings.

During the 48-hour transfer that followed, prisoners were not allowed to open the curtains on the buses until they reached Egypt.

It was only then that Abu Srour saw the sky for the first time outside prison walls.