ֱ

The hardest job in Washington? A look at those who have served as chief of staff for Trump

Former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump greets his campaign manager Susie Wiles (L) during an election night event at the West Palm Beach Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Florida, on November 6, 2024. (AFP)
Former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump greets his campaign manager Susie Wiles (L) during an election night event at the West Palm Beach Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Florida, on November 6, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 10 November 2024

The hardest job in Washington? A look at those who have served as chief of staff for Trump

The hardest job in Washington? A look at those who have served as chief of staff for Trump

WASHINGTON: Susie Wiles will be the latest occupant of the hottest hot seat in Washington — Donald Trump’s chief of staff.
It’s a tough job under the best of circumstances, responsible for networking with lawmakers, administration officials and outside groups while also keeping the White House running smoothly.
But it’s been particularly challenging under Trump, who has a history of resenting anyone who tries to impose order on his chaotic management style. Four people served as chief of staff during his first term, and sometimes things ended on acrimonious terms.




This combination photo of President-elect Donald Trump's longtime friends, aides and allies shows Boris Epshteyn, from top row left, Richard Grenell, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Howard Lutnick, from center row left, Linda McMahon, Stephen Miller, Elon Musk, Brooke Rollins and from bottom row left Lara Trump, Dana White and Susie Wiles. (AP)

Will past be prologue? It’s impossible to know. So far, Wiles has fared better than most in Trump’s orbit, and she just steered his presidential campaign to victory.
Here’s a look at who came before her.
Reince Priebus
Priebus chaired the Republican National Committee while Trump ran for president in 2016, and he became Trump’s first chief of staff in the White House. Priebus was symbolic of the awkward alliance between the party establishment and Trump’s insurgency, and he struggled to balance the two.
The White House was plagued by infighting and failed to advance legislative goals such as repealing the Affordable Care Act. Priebus was sometimes viewed as untrustworthy by various factions vying for Trump’s favor. Anthony Scaramucci, who memorably but briefly served as Trump’s communications director, profanely attacked him for allegedly leaking information to the media.
Six months into his first term, Trump pushed out Priebus on July 28, 2017. The decision was announced on Twitter, which was par for the course in those tumultuous years.
John Kelly
Next up was Kelly, who had been Trump’s first Homeland Security secretary. Trump liked the way that Kelly, a former four-star Marine general who had served in Iraq, led his immigration crackdown.
But he soon became frustrated by Kelly’s attempts to impose military-style order on the chaotic White House. Kelly clashed with the president and some of his allies, ultimately becoming more isolated and less influential.
Trump appeared so eager to get rid of Kelly, he announced his departure on Dec. 8, 2018, without having a replacement lined up.
While Kelly served longer in the role than anyone else, his break with Trump was ultimately the most acrimonious. He described his former boss in acidic terms last month, saying Trump met the definition of a fascist and once praised Adolf Hitler as having done “some good things.”
Mick Mulvaney
It took days for Trump to settle on a replacement for Kelly, an unusual delay for a such a critical role. He chose Mulvaney, a former South Carolina congressman who was running the White House budget office at the time.
The decision came with an asterisk — Trump called Mulvaney his “acting” chief of staff, suggesting the position would be temporary.
Mulvaney abandoned Kelly’s strict management approach and decided to “let Trump be Trump.” Instead of managing the seemingly unmanageable president, Mulvaney focused on overseeing the staff and working with lawmakers.
He held the job for a little more than a year, departing on March 6, 2020, after Trump was acquitted in his first impeachment trial.
Mark Meadows
Trump turned to Meadows, a North Carolina congressman and leader of the right-wing House Freedom Caucus, to serve as his fourth chief of staff. It was a challenging time, with the coronavirus spreading in the United States and around the globe.
Long viewed as one of the roadblocks to congressional deal-making, Meadows played a leading role in negotiating pandemic relief legislation. He also proved himself as a loyalist as Trump was running for reelection against Joe Biden. Meadows oversaw a White House awash in conspiracy theories about voter fraud as Trump tried to overturn his defeat.
A former aide said Meadows frequently burned papers in his office fireplace during this time. Meadows refused to cooperate with a House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the US Capitol, and he was indicted in election-related cases in Georgia and Arizona. He’s pleaded not guilty.


US defers to Israel on killing of journalists

US defers to Israel on killing of journalists
Updated 5 sec ago

US defers to Israel on killing of journalists

US defers to Israel on killing of journalists
  • Al Jazeera said four other employees — correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh and cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa — were also killed when the strike hit a tent set up for journalists outside the main gate of Al-Shifa Hospital

WASHINGTON: The United States on Tuesday declined to criticize Israel over the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in the Gaza Strip, referring questions to its ally.
The Israeli military alleged that Anas Al-Sharif, a prominent face on the Qatar-based network covering the violence, headed a Hamas “terrorist cell” and was “responsible for advancing rocket attacks” against Israelis.
“What I will tell you is that we refer you to Israel for information regarding Al-Sharif,” State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters.
She voiced respect for journalists who cover war zones but said that Hamas members have been “embedded in society, including posing as journalists.”
“It is a horrible thing to do for those of you who are committed to finding information for people to be in that situation,” she said.
European and Arab governments, the United Nations and media rights groups all voiced outrage over the killing.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said that there needed to be “clear evidence” for Israel’s allegations and respect for rules of war against targeting journalists.
Al Jazeera said four other employees — correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh and cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa — were also killed when the strike hit a tent set up for journalists outside the main gate of Al-Shifa Hospital.
According to local journalists who knew him, Sharif had worked at the start of his career with a Hamas communication office, where his role was to publicize events organized by the group that has ruled the Gaza Strip since 2006.
 

 


Philippines voices concern over ‘dangerous’ Chinese actions

Philippines voices concern over ‘dangerous’ Chinese actions
Updated 12 August 2025

Philippines voices concern over ‘dangerous’ Chinese actions

Philippines voices concern over ‘dangerous’ Chinese actions
  • PCG spokesperson Jay Tarriela said the PCG offered medical and search-and-rescue assistance via radio, but received no response from the Chinese side

MANILA: The Philippines expressed serious concern on Tuesday over what it called “dangerous maneuvers and unlawful interference” by Chinese vessels during a coast guard supply mission for Filipino fishermen in the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea.
Manila’s Coast Guard deployed three vessels on Monday to deliver supplies, such as fuel and ice, to dozens of fishermen operating around the disputed atoll when they encountered “hazardous” and “blocking actions” from Chinese vessels in the area.
“Their actions not only posed a grave danger to Philippine personnel and vessels, but also resulted in the unfortunate collision between the two Chinese vessels,” the Philippine Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
Philippine Coast Guard footage showed a Chinese Coast Guard ship trailing the PCG vessel before a Chinese navy ship suddenly cut across its path, colliding with it and damaging the Coast Guard’s forecastle. It was the first known collision between Chinese vessels in the area.
“Our assessment is that the real objective of the PLA Navy ship is to ram our Philippine Coast Guard (vessel). That is also (the) assessment of our Philippine Coast Guard,” Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief of Staff General Romeo Brawner told reporters on Tuesday.
China’s actions also drew condemnation from the US, a treaty ally of the Philippines. 
“We condemn this latest reckless action by China directed against a Philippine vessel... and commend the Philippine Coast Guard for their professionalism and their offer to render assistance,” US Ambassador to Manila, MaryKay Carlson, said on X.
PCG spokesperson Jay Tarriela said the PCG offered medical and search-and-rescue assistance via radio, but received no response from the Chinese side. He added there was no confirmation on whether any Chinese crew members were injured during the clash.
“Yesterday’s incident demonstrates the importance of adhering to international maritime rules,” the Philippine Foreign Ministry said. It reaffirmed its commitment to diplomacy and dialogue in resolving differences.
Rear Admiral Roy Trinidad, Philippine navy spokesperson for the South China Sea, warned at a press briefing on Tuesday that similar incidents could happen again as long as China continued to conduct what he called “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive” activities in the strategic waterway.

 


Rubio speaks to Russian FM Lavrov ahead of summit

Rubio speaks to Russian FM Lavrov ahead of summit
Updated 12 August 2025

Rubio speaks to Russian FM Lavrov ahead of summit

Rubio speaks to Russian FM Lavrov ahead of summit
  • Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has described the meeting as a ‘personal victory’ for Putin
  • Marco Rubio: ‘People have to understand — for President Trump, a meeting is not a concession’

WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke by telephone Tuesday with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to prepare for the summit in Alaska between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the State Department said.
“Both sides confirmed their commitment to a successful event,” State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters.
Bruce confirmed that Putin had requested the meeting, which will take place Friday in the US state of Alaska.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has described the meeting as a “personal victory” for Putin, who had been shunned by the West since his invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Rubio, in a radio interview earlier Tuesday, rejected criticism of the summit.
Trump “feels like, ‘Look, I’ve got to look at this guy across the table. I need to see him face to face. I need to hear him one on one. I need to make an assessment by looking at him,’” Rubio told the “Sid and Friends” show.
“People have to understand — for President Trump, a meeting is not a concession,” Rubio said.


Ukrainian troops doubt quick ceasefire, reject territorial concessions

Ukrainian troops doubt quick ceasefire, reject territorial concessions
Updated 12 August 2025

Ukrainian troops doubt quick ceasefire, reject territorial concessions

Ukrainian troops doubt quick ceasefire, reject territorial concessions
  • Ukraine fears Trump and Putin could use their summit to dictate terms of peace and force Kyiv to abandon territory
  • Trump said on Monday that both Kyiv and Moscow would need to cede land to end the war

KHARKIV REGION: Ukrainian soldiers preparing for battle say they have little faith in prospects for a quick ceasefire, and many reject suggestions that Kyiv should give up any of its hard-fought territory to Russia.
Reuters interviewed troops at two training bases in the northeastern Kharkiv region this week, days ahead of a planned meeting in Alaska between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.
Ukraine fears the two leaders could use their summit on Friday to dictate terms of peace and force Kyiv to abandon territory, a move Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has flatly rejected.
“Give it away to whom? Give it away for what?” asked the commander of a training base for Ukraine’s 58th Motorized Brigade, whose call sign is Chef.
Trump said on Monday that both Kyiv and Moscow would need to cede land to end the war, now in its fourth year. European Union leaders rallied to Ukraine’s defense on Tuesday, saying it must have the freedom to decide its own future.
The joint statement came as Russian forces made a sudden thrust into eastern Ukraine in a bid to break a key defensive line, likely aimed at boosting pressure on Kyiv to give up land.
The rapid battlefield push by Russia’s larger and better-equipped army followed months of deadly air strikes on Ukrainian towns and cities.
A Gallup poll released last week found that 69 percent of Ukrainians favor a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. However, around the same number believe fighting won’t end soon.
“Every path to peace is built through negotiations,” said another 58th Brigade soldier, call sign Champion, sitting inside an armored vehicle.
“But I cannot say that tomorrow there will be peace just like that... Because the enemy continues to creep in.”
Trump said his talks with Putin would be “a feel-out meeting” and that he would tell the Russian leader to “end this war.” But he also hinted that he may walk away and let the two sides continue fighting.
Other Ukrainian troops training in the Kharkiv region also welcomed a ceasefire, but said the Kremlin would need to be forced into making peace.
“Until Russia suffers losses big enough to give up the idea of military pressure on us, (fighting) will continue,” said an instructor from the 43rd Separate Mechanized Brigade, whose call sign is Snail.
“We will not be able to stop this otherwise.”


Protest-hit UK town bids to empty asylum-seeker hotel

Protest-hit UK town bids to empty asylum-seeker hotel
Updated 12 August 2025

Protest-hit UK town bids to empty asylum-seeker hotel

Protest-hit UK town bids to empty asylum-seeker hotel
  • The council in Epping, northeast of London, applied for an interim injunction against the housing of of asylum seekers
  • Protests broke out in the town in July after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl

LONDON: A UK town applied for a High Court injunction on Tuesday to stop asylum seekers being housed in a local hotel, following protests, some of which turned violent.
The council in Epping, northeast of London, applied for an interim injunction against the housing of of asylum seekers and refugees at the Bell Hotel, citing “the clear risk of further escalating community tensions.”
“The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub we could have closed it down long ago,” Epping Forest district council leader Chris Whitbread, from the Conservative party, said in a statement.
Protests broke out in the town in July after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl, which he denies.
Since then hundreds of people have taken part in protests and counter-protests outside the Bell Hotel. Further anti-immigration demonstrations also spread to London and around England.
Police said there had been at least six protests in Epping since July 17 and 28 people have been arrested and 16 people charged in connection with disorder.
Police officers and vehicles have been attacked during some protests.
The council is arguing that since the accommodation is not being used as a hotel, it breaches planning permissions, especially due to its proximity to schools and a care home.
“So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals ... before being housed at the hotel,” Whitbread said.
“The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community.”
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to slash the number of migrants and asylum seekers in Britain to stave off pressure from the hard-right Reform UK party.
But the Epping council leader accused the government of “not listening.”
“We should not have to take this fight to the High Court, but we are left with no choice,” said Whitbread.