ֱ

Arab Americans’ vote will matter in this election, Middle East Institute panel hears

Short Url
Updated 29 October 2024

Arab Americans’ vote will matter in this election, Middle East Institute panel hears

Arab Americans’ vote will matter in this election, Middle East Institute panel hears

LONDON: Just days before Americans head to the polls to decide who will be the next US president, Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris find themselves neck and neck in the race for the White House. With the contest balanced on a razor’s edge, any minor development at this point could be enough to decisively swing the vote.

Although they make up just 1 percent of the total electorate, Arab Americans represent a significant constituency in several swing states, where even a handful of votes could influence the election outcome. As such, neither of the main candidates can afford to take their votes for granted.

That is why Arab News teamed up with polling agency YouGov to survey the attitudes of Arab Americans across all geographies, age ranges, genders and income brackets to see which way the community was leaning, and what issues mattered to them most.

What became abundantly clear from the survey was that Arab Americans are not a monolith motivated by any single issue. Domestic matters, such as the economy and the cost of living, loomed large, while border security and abortion rights were also key considerations.

However, it was the plight of the Palestinians that emerged as the biggest issue for Arab Americans of all generations; namely the ongoing Israeli offensive against Hamas in Gaza and the perceived failure of President Joe Biden’s administration to rein in Israel.




Asked which candidate they were most likely to vote for, 45 percent said Trump while 43 percent opted for Harris. (AFP/File)

Brian Katulis, a senior fellow for US foreign policy at Middle East Institute, who moderated a special panel discussion on Monday to examine the poll findings, said the prominence of the Palestinian issue in this election showed there was still a role for the US to play in the region.

“Within the political discussion we’re having in this country, it does imply that there’s actually a strong interest in the US engaging more deeply in the Middle East — just doing it in the right way,” said Katulis.

“There’s a serious difference over who and which candidate is the right way. But for those who’ve said that we should just pull back from the region, restrain ourselves, there’s some who say that, but I think there’s a general impulse here that we need to actually delve more deeply into trying to solve — or not solve, but engage — these questions in a proper way in the region itself, but then politically here at home.”

Asked to place six key issues in order of priority, 26 percent of Arab Americans polled by YouGov said the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is their chief concern. The economy and the cost of living were not far behind, representing the chief concerns for 19 percent of respondents.

“The highest priority, in terms of issues that Arab Americans face, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict came at 26 percent — the highest — then followed by the economy and cost of living,” Lara Barazi, a freelance data consultant and former research director at YouGov, told the MEI panel.

Palestine appeared to be of most concern to Arab Americans in lower income brackets: 37 percent of those earning under $40,000, falling to 22 percent among those paid $80,000 or more.

“These are their issues that kind of mirror what’s going on right now in the US, not only for Arab Americans, when we look at income,” said Barazi.




If Harris does beat Trump to the presidency, it remains unclear whether she will shift the Democratic Party’s stance on Israel. (AFP/File)

“The highest priority goes to the Palestinian conflict. It’s 41 percent of the lowest earners who support the Palestinian-Israeli conflict versus the highest earners. Basically, they’re interested in the economy, cost of living and the Palestinian conflict, but they do put a lot of weight on the economy and cost of living.”

What was also interesting about the findings was how much of a priority the Middle East conflict was for respondents identifying as Republican, Democrat and independent.

“We see that the highest (ranking) for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict comes from independents and the lowest comes from Republicans,” said Barazi. “Only 17 percent of Republicans said that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a top priority for us, while cost of living comes the highest for Republicans.”

Despite Trump being perceived as more supportive of the Israeli government than Harris, many Arab Americans indicated in the poll that they would still vote for him, which suggested they are penalizing the Democrats over the Biden administration’s perceived failure to rein in Israel.

Asked which candidate they were most likely to vote for, 45 percent said Trump while 43 percent opted for Harris, although this gap could easily be narrowed — or slightly widened — by the survey’s 5.93 percent margin of error.

The slightly higher support for Trump than for Harris comes despite the fact that 40 percent of those polled described themselves as Democrats, 28 percent as Republicans and 23 percent as independents.

The findings were somewhat puzzling, especially as Trump has announced his intention to expand his 2017 travel ban on people from seven majority-Muslim countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen) and has said if elected he would bar Palestinian refugees from entering the US, policies that few Arab Americans would support.

Nevertheless, it appears Biden’s record on the Middle East over the past year has been the deciding factor for many.

Also taking part in Monday’s MEI panel discussion, Yasmeen Abu Taleb, a White House reporter at The Washington Post, said the Democrats never expected the issue of Palestine to hang over the campaign in the way that it has.




Despite Trump being perceived as more supportive of the Israeli government than Harris, many Arab Americans indicated in the poll that they would still vote for him. (AFP/File)


“We’ve never seen the issue of Palestine be this big of a political issue for this long,” she said. “I think in the Biden administration, there was a sense that people would be really angry and protest for a month or two. They hoped the war would be over by January.

“They were always wildly optimistic that this was not going to hang over them as an election issue. And here we are, more than a year later, and it’s still a key driver of the election. I think that’s an important signal of how much the politics have shifted on this.

“I don’t think we’ve seen this in US politics, where the debate has been this intense and sustained.”

If Harris does beat Trump to the presidency, it remains unclear whether she will shift the Democratic Party’s stance on Israel or if the policy of the Biden administration, of which she is part, will remain broadly unchanged.

“Obviously it depends on who wins but I do think if you saw a Harris presidency, it’s not going to be the dramatic change that people are pushing for,” said Abu Taleb. “But I do think there are signs that the Democratic Party is shifting on Israel, and in subtle but important ways.”

Although the Arab News-YouGov poll focused on Arab American opinion, the panel discussion naturally expanded to the prevailing attitudes among the Arab populations and leaderships in the Middle East. Tarek Ali Ahmad, head of research and studies at Arab News, said that many in the Middle East are holding their breath.

“People are essentially just waiting for the election day to come,” he added. “That’s when everyone’s going to be like, OK, now we can finally stop this election game, campaigning, and we can actually get to solid, concrete policy that will affect what’s going to happen, whether or not we’re going to see an actual end to the conflict, or we’re going to see even further.

“We haven’t heard anything in terms of preference to whichever candidate comes through. But at the same time, we cannot dismiss the fact that any incoming president will have a lot to clean up with regards to everything that’s happening on the ground.”




“So there’s so many different aspects that come to shift public opinion on the ground with regards to who’s going to be president,” Ali Ahmad said. (AFP/File)

On whether or not the Arab world has any preference for the US presidency, Ali Ahmad said many in the region have remained tight-lipped, preferring to wait and see the outcome of this closely fought race.

“There’s a lot of different points of view and there’s no real proper preference for either candidate because of the fact that it’s just such a razor-thin difference,” he said.

“Now you have people on the ground talking about how, essentially, every single event that occurs causes a shift in opinion, from (Israel) entering into Lebanon, from the bombing of Iran, to even Biden’s resignation from the nomination.

“So there’s so many different aspects that come to shift public opinion on the ground with regards to who’s going to be president.”

Reflecting on the significance of the role of the Arab American constituency in the election, Ali Ahmad said many seem to recognize their vote can make a significant difference.

“The reason why there’s a big turnout, as we said, nine out of 10 Americans are set to go vote, is that 80 percent of those who responded found that their vote actually counts and will matter in this year's election,” he said.

“They really feel that they could actually change it and make that difference, whether it is to punish the Democrats or whether it is to actually vote for an independent.”


Met Police sack British officer over ‘racism’ revealed in BBC Panorama probe

Met Police sack British officer over ‘racism’ revealed in BBC Panorama probe
Updated 23 October 2025

Met Police sack British officer over ‘racism’ revealed in BBC Panorama probe

Met Police sack British officer over ‘racism’ revealed in BBC Panorama probe
  • Philip Neilson dismissed with immediate effect on Thursday after Met hearing upholds three allegations, including making ‘highly racist and discriminatory remarks’ about different ethnic groups
  • Neilson is the first of 10 current or former officers to face a hearing as part of the Metropolitan Police’s accelerated misconduct proceedings regarding footage recorded during the investigation

LONDON: A Metropolitan Police officer at Charing Cross police station in London has been sacked for gross misconduct after being secretly recorded in a BBC Panorama undercover investigation making racist comments and endorsing inappropriate force.

Philip Neilson was dismissed with immediate effect on Thursday after a Met hearing upheld three allegations against him, including making “highly racist and discriminatory remarks” about different ethnic groups.

Neilson was recorded by BBC undercover reporter Rory Bibb describing an “invasion” of “scum” from the Middle East, and making offensive remarks about individuals from Algeria and Somalia.

He is the first of 10 current or former officers to face a hearing as part of the Met Police’s accelerated misconduct proceedings regarding footage recorded during the Panorama investigation, according to the BBC.

The first allegation against Neilson involved glorifying the use of inappropriate force against a restrained detainee and promoting unlawful violence against migrants.

The second involved Neilson referring to Somalians as “scum” and claiming there was an invasion of the UK by migrants, comments the undercover reporter described as “floridly racist.”

Neilson was also recorded saying a detainee who had overstayed his visa stay in the UK should have a “bullet through his head.”

Commander Jason Prins, chair of the panel held in southwest London on Thursday, found all the allegations proven.

“It was or must have been obvious to him that the comments made were abhorrent,” Prins said. “The conduct of the officer is a disgrace.”

Neilson, who had worked for the Met Police for four years, denied being racist and said that the BBC undercover reporter had “breached his human rights.”

The officer acknowledged that the remarks were inappropriate, but argued that they only constituted misconduct, with some being made while he was intoxicated after consuming a large amount of alcohol.

A second police officer featured in BBC Panorama, Martin Borg, was also dismissed on Thursday after the Met’s panel upheld five out of eight allegations of gross misconduct against him.

The scandal is the second to affect Charing Cross police station in central London following the exposure of shocking messages exchanged by officers in 2022. Officers at the station were found by the Independent Office for Police Conduct to have joked about rape and domestic abuse, and also made racist comments in messages exchanged from 2016-2018, The Independent reported.


Reform UK’s only Black branch chair quits party

Reform UK’s only Black branch chair quits party
Updated 23 October 2025

Reform UK’s only Black branch chair quits party

Reform UK’s only Black branch chair quits party
  • Neville Watson cites rise of Islamophobia, anti-migrant sentiment
  • ‘I don’t want to see a society where we weaponize our faith against Islam’

LONDON: Reform UK’s only Black branch chair has resigned from the right-wing party.
Neville Watson told The Guardian that the tone of the migration debate in the UK is doing “more harm than good,” and that he is alarmed by the rise of Christian nationalism and Islamophobia among the party membership.
“Reform has so much momentum at the moment, but leaving has allowed me to proclaim who I am without flinching,” he said.
“I don’t want to see a society where we weaponize our faith against Islam. We respect our Muslim brothers and sisters.”
Watson, who chaired the party’s Enfield branch in north London, said he is worried that party members are “sympathetic” to far-right activist Tommy Robinson, and politics is “losing its compassion.”
Under his leadership, the Enfield branch drew in a diverse membership, including Nigerian and Turkish residents.
But he told The Guardian: “I know that down the track, there’s going to be other issues that I’m going to come into conflict (with Reform) on.
“The march in London recently, with Tommy Robinson, where the term Christian nationalism suddenly raised its head, where they were using Christian emblems to advance to me an ideology that is not Christian … I know that (Reform leader) Nigel (Farage) himself has distanced himself from anything to do with the likes of Tommy Robinson, but I do know that there are still people within Reform who are quite sympathetic to his ideas.”
Politicians “are stoking a fire,” Watson said. “Some might be stoking it with a smaller stick — and that type of conversation, with the boats, the (asylum) hotels, I feel it’s doing more harm than good in terms of community relations.”


Zelensky hopes for ‘positive decision’ on EU use of Russian assets

Zelensky hopes for ‘positive decision’ on EU use of Russian assets
Updated 48 min 16 sec ago

Zelensky hopes for ‘positive decision’ on EU use of Russian assets

Zelensky hopes for ‘positive decision’ on EU use of Russian assets
  • “I hope that they will make a political decision, positive decision in one or another way to help Ukraine with funds,” Zelensky said
  • The move is fraught with legal and political perils

BRUSSELS: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed hope Thursday that the European Union would move forward with plans to help Ukraine with a mammoth new “reparations loan” funded by frozen Russian assets.
Zelensky was in Brussels for talks with EU leaders, who discussed plans to hand 140 billion euros ($162 billion) to Kyiv over the next few years, to keep it afloat as the war with Russia drags on.
“I hope that they will make a political decision, positive decision in one or another way to help Ukraine with funds,” Zelensky told a press conference after the meeting.
The European Commission, the EU’s executive, has floated a complex scheme that would see Ukraine pay back the money only once Russia coughs up for the damages it has caused.
The move is fraught with legal and political perils. Belgium, where the bulk of the money is held, has demanded guarantees that the rest of the bloc will share any liabilities if Russia takes the matter to court.
EU officials are hoping that the EU’s 27 leaders will give a preliminary go-ahead on Thursday for the commission to draw up a formal legal proposal for the loan.
“I think that the dialogue was really, maybe not simple, but it was very good,” Zelensky said of the talks. “Really we count on decisions on this topic.”
“Russia brought war to our land, and they have to pay for this war,” he said.
Asked to sum up his meeting with US President Donald Trump last week, which Ukrainian officials described as “tense,” Zelensky suggested the outcome was better than it perhaps initially seemed.
Zelensky came back empty handed after traveling to Washington in the hope of securing US long-range Tomahawk missiles to hit back at Russia — but the meeting was ultimately followed by US sanctions on Russia’s energy sector.
“The result of this meeting — we have sanctions on Russian energy. We don’t have a meeting in Hungary without Ukraine, and we have not yet Tomahawks. That’s it. This is the result. I think, not bad,” Zelensky said.
“Each day brings something,” he added. “Maybe tomorrow we will have Tomahawks.”
The idea of a summit in Budapest between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin was floated after a call between the two leaders.
But the plan was shelved this week, with Washington expressing its disappointment at the lack of progress in ceasefire negotiations with Moscow and later slapping sanctions on Russia’s two largest oil companies.


F-35s, fires and fixing: Ukraine, Gaza wars threaten climate

F-35s, fires and fixing: Ukraine, Gaza wars threaten climate
Updated 23 October 2025

F-35s, fires and fixing: Ukraine, Gaza wars threaten climate

F-35s, fires and fixing: Ukraine, Gaza wars threaten climate
  • The cost of the climate damage attributable to the war already exceeds $43 billion, de Klerk said
  • A separate study looking at the Israeli-Hamas war in Gaza estimates the carbon footprint for the first 15 months topped 32 million tons of emissions

LONDON: From fuel guzzled by fighter jets to wildfires sparked by shelling, the war in Ukraine has created vast amounts of planet-warming emissions, according to a new study that says Russia should pay for the damage to the global climate.
The first three years of conflict have generated almost 237 million metric tons of greenhouse gases (GHG), equivalent to putting 120 million fossil-fuel cars on the road, or the combined annual emissions of Belgium, Austria and Ireland, according to researchers.
“This is pushing us in the wrong direction at a time when we drastically have to cut emissions,” said climate researcher Lennard de Klerk, lead author of the report tallying the war’s emissions, which was published this month.
The cost of the climate damage attributable to the war — in which hundreds of thousands have been killed on both sides — already exceeds $43 billion, de Klerk said.
“Russia should pay compensation for this damage as part of wider war reparations,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
A separate study looking at the Israeli-Hamas war in Gaza estimates the carbon footprint for the first 15 months topped 32 million tons of emissions, when post-conflict reconstruction is factored in.
That is comparable to the annual emissions of Ivory Coast.
“The numbers are staggering for such an intense period,” said Benjamin Neimark, who led the research by UK and US-based experts.
“Most direct conflict emissions come from jet fuel, but what really surprised us were the projected emissions for reconstruction. That was a shock and made us sit up.”
The pioneering studies will be presented on the sidelines of next month’s COP30 climate summit in Brazil.
Climate researchers say conflicts and climate change create a cycle of destruction — not only does war drive climate change, but climate change can fuel conflict in fragile regions as competition intensifies over water and other resources.

WILDFIRES
While military activity is the biggest source of conflict-related emissions in Ukraine, de Klerk said he was surprised to find wildfires account for a fifth of the war’s carbon footprint since Russia’s 2022 invasion.
Relentless shelling has sparked thousands of blazes which have ravaged forests and farmland, with some likely exacerbated by the detonation of land mines and unexploded ordnance strewn across the landscape.
Nearly 850,000 hectares were torched last year, according to the report by the Initiative on GHG Accounting of War, an international research team led by de Klerk.
“This is more than 20 times the annual average,” he said. “The summer of 2024 was extremely dry, most likely due to climate change, which enabled fires to spread.”
With the expansion of the war in Gaza, missile strikes across the Lebanon-Israel border also ignited fires, destroying forests and farmland.
As in Ukraine, blazes quickly raged out of control due to the dangers firefighters face operating in these war zones.

RECONSTRUCTION
The destruction of energy infrastructure in both Ukraine and Gaza has also increased emissions.
Russia’s targeting of oil depots has sent tons of fuel up in flames, while attacks on gas and electricity infrastructure have released potent GHGs like methane and sulfur hexafluoride or SF6, which has a global warming potential 24,000 times greater than CO2.
Before Israel launched its assault on Gaza in October 2023, about a quarter of the enclave’s electricity came from solar panels – one of the highest shares in the world.
But the destruction of most solar infrastructure has increased reliance on polluting diesel-powered generators.
Neimark said the carbon footprint of post-war reconstruction in Gaza, where about 68,000 people have been killed, would dwarf emissions from the conflict itself.
Israel’s intense bombardment has destroyed more than 90 percent of housing and turned Gaza into a wasteland, creating 60 million tons of debris, according to UN estimates.
Rebuilding homes and infrastructure will require enormous quantities of concrete and steel, whose production are highly carbon-intensive.
The decimation of farmland, orchards and shrub land has also raised the risk of desertification in a region that is already vulnerable to the effects of climate change, said Neimark, a senior lecturer at Queen Mary University of London.
Both wars have additionally increased global emissions away from the frontlines.
Airspace closures have forced commercial flights to reroute, pushing up fuel consumption. Flights from London to Tokyo now take almost three hours longer, de Klerk said.
Unrest in the Middle East has similarly disrupted international shipping through the Red Sea, boosting emissions due to longer routes and the need for faster sailing speeds.

MILITARY DATA HOLE
This new research on Gaza and Ukraine is part of a wider push to increase transparency around global military emissions.
Even in peacetime, armies have large carbon footprints — maintenance of bases, transport of troops and equipment, military exercises and weapons production all add up.
The Conflict and Environment Observatory, a UK-based non-profit, estimates the world’s militaries are responsible for about 5.5 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions.
But countries are not required to report their military emissions to international climate bodies.
Experts say the data gap means we risk underestimating the size of emission cuts required to limit the global temperature increase to below 1.5 Celsius.
With many countries now ramping up defense spending in response to multiple crises, there are fears this will both increase military emissions and divert funding from efforts to tackle climate change.
Climate researchers say militaries must be forced to report their emissions.
“We can’t start making meaningful cuts without adequate baselines,” Neimark said.
“The military has long operated as if the emissions coming out of an F-35 don’t stink, and that has to stop.”


Sellers cancel deals with Chinese oil refiner Yulong after UK sanctions, sources say

Sellers cancel deals with Chinese oil refiner Yulong after UK sanctions, sources say
Updated 23 October 2025

Sellers cancel deals with Chinese oil refiner Yulong after UK sanctions, sources say

Sellers cancel deals with Chinese oil refiner Yulong after UK sanctions, sources say
  • Most of the cancelations apply to spot cargoes that were due to load after November 13, when the sanctions take effect
  • The decision to cancel the contracts partly stems from concerns about the ability to make payments

SINGAPORE: Several suppliers have canceled sales of Middle Eastern and Canadian oil to China’s Yulong Petrochemical after the UK imposed sanctions on the refiner, which is likely to push it to buy more Russian crude, multiple sources familiar with the deals said.
The refiner, China’s newest with a capacity of 400,000 barrels per day and one of the country’s largest single Russian oil customers, is among the entities Britain designated last week to curb Moscow’s oil revenues used to fund the Ukraine war.
Suppliers that are unwinding supply deals include European majors TotalEnergies, BP, trading house Trafigura, Chinese state trader PetroChina International and others, the sources said.
Most of the cancelations apply to spot cargoes that were due to load after November 13, when the sanctions take effect.
PetroChina International and TotalEnergies each exited transactions supplying Access Western Blend, a heavy crude exported from Canada, said two other sources, who have knowledge of those transactions.
BP declined to comment. Total, PetroChina and Yulong did not respond to requests for comment.
Trafigura had been supplying Yulong with 2 million barrels a month of Omani and Abu Dhabi Upper Zakum crude under an annual contract, said sources with knowledge of the company’s transactions with Yulong.

PIVOT TO RUSSIAN OIL
The decision to cancel the contracts partly stems from concerns about the ability to make payments as large western banks will avoid working with sanctioned entities, the sources said.
With dwindling access to non-sanctioned crude supplies, Yulong will most likely buy more Russian oil, which already accounts for about half of its intake.
“We are already hearing Yulong is moving toward running predominantly sanctioned barrels, which, similar to the sanctions impact on Nayara, may necessitate run cuts,” said Sun Jianan, an analyst with consultancy Energy Aspects.
India’s Nayara Energy, partially owned by Russian major Rosneft, has reduced its refinery runs after European Union sanctions were imposed in July.
While larger companies step away from Yulong, smaller companies without UK connections could continue dealings, said an executive whose company continues supplying Yulong and declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter.
Yulong buys 150,000 to 250,000 barrels per day of Russian crude, according to estimates by traders and tanker tracker Vortexa.
Most of Yulong’s Russian imports are ESPO Blend from the country’s Pacific coast that Chinese refineries favor because of the short transit period for the shipments. Recently, Yulong has also imported Urals crude from Russia’s European ports, said three traders familiar with Yulong’s procurement patterns.
It secures most of its Russian supply from dealers linked to major Russian producers, said two of those sources.
Built on a man-made island near the port of Yantai in the northeastern province of Shandong, Yulong Petrochemical is a joint venture between private aluminum firm Nanshan Group and government-backed Shandong Energy Group.