ֱ

Judge indefinitely bars Trump from fining University of California over alleged discrimination

Judge indefinitely bars Trump from fining University of California over alleged discrimination
Pro-Palestinian protesters set up a tent encampment in front of Sproul Hall on the UC Berkeley campus on April 22, 2024 in Berkeley, California. (FILE/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 15 sec ago

Judge indefinitely bars Trump from fining University of California over alleged discrimination

Judge indefinitely bars Trump from fining University of California over alleged discrimination
  • US District Judge Rita Lin on Friday granted a preliminary injunction sought by labor unions and other groups representing UC faculty, students and employees

WASHINGTON: The Trump administration cannot fine the University of California or summarily cut the school system’s federal funding over claims it allows antisemitism or other forms of discrimination, a federal judge ruled late Friday in a sharply worded decision.
US District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco issued a preliminary injunction barring the administration from canceling funding to UC based on alleged discrimination without giving notice to affected faculty and conducting a hearing, among other requirements.
The administration over the summer demanded the University of California, Los Angeles pay $1.2 billion to restore frozen research funding and ensure eligibility for future funding after accusing the school of allowing antisemitism on campus. UCLA was the first public university to be targeted by the administration over allegations of civil rights violations.
It has also frozen or paused federal funding over similar claims against private colleges, including Columbia University.
In her ruling, Lin said labor unions and other groups representing UC faculty, students and employees had provided “overwhelming evidence” that the Trump administration was “engaged in a concerted campaign to purge ‘woke,’ ‘left,’ and ‘socialist’ viewpoints from our country’s leading universities.”
“Agency officials, as well as the President and Vice President, have repeatedly and publicly announced a playbook of initiating civil rights investigations of preeminent universities to justify cutting off federal funding, with the goal of bringing universities to their knees and forcing them to change their ideological tune,” Lin wrote.
She added, “It is undisputed that this precise playbook is now being executed at the University of California.”
At UC, which is facing a series of civil rights probes, she found the administration had engaged in “coercive and retaliatory conduct in violation of the First Amendment and Tenth Amendment.”
Messages sent to the White House and the US Department of Justice after hours Friday were not immediately returned. Lin’s order will remain in effect indefinitely.
University of California President James B. Milliken has said the size of the UCLA fine would devastate the UC system, whose campuses are viewed as some of the top public colleges in the nation.
UC is in settlement talks with the administration and is not a party to the lawsuit before Lin, who was nominated to the bench by President Joe Biden, a Democrat. In a statement, the university system said it “remains committed to protecting the mission, governance, and academic freedom of the University.”
The administration has demanded UCLA comply with its views on gender identity and establish a process to make sure foreign students are not admitted if they are likely to engage in anti-American, anti-Western or antisemitic “disruptions or harassment,” among other requirements outlined in a settlement proposal made public in October.
The administration has previously struck deals with Brown University for $50 million and Columbia University for $221 million.
Lin cited declarations by UC faculty and staff that the administration’s moves were prompting them to stop teaching or researching topics they were “afraid were too ‘left’ or ‘woke.’”
Her injunction also blocks the administration from “conditioning the grant or continuance of federal funding on the UC’s agreement to any measures that would violate the rights of Plaintiffs’ members under the First Amendment.”
She cited efforts to force the UCs to screen international students based on “’anti-Western” or “‘anti-American’” views, restrict research and teaching, or adopt specific definitions of “male” and “female” as examples of such measures.
President Donald Trump has decried elite colleges as overrun by liberalism and antisemitism.
His administration has launched investigations of dozens of universities, claiming they have failed to end the use of racial preferences in violation of civil rights law. The Republican administration says diversity, equity and inclusion efforts discriminate against white and Asian American students.


Alibaba denies report it helps China’s military target US

Alibaba denies report it helps China’s military target US
Updated 13 sec ago

Alibaba denies report it helps China’s military target US

Alibaba denies report it helps China’s military target US

BEIJING: Chinese tech giant Alibaba denies helping Beijing target the United States, telling AFP on Saturday that a recent media report was “completely false.”
The Financial Times reported early Saturday that Alibaba “provides tech support for Chinese military ‘operations’ against (US) targets,” according to a White House memo provided to the newspaper.
The memo claimed that Alibaba hands customer data, including “IP addresses, WiFi information and payment records,” to Chinese authorities and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the report said.
The FT said it could not independently verify the claims, noting that the White House believes the actions threaten US security.
An Alibaba Group spokesperson told AFP “the assertions and innuendos in the article are completely false.”
The Hangzhou-based firm called the memo a “malicious PR operation (that) clearly came from a rogue voice looking to undermine President Trump’s recent trade deal with China.”
The dispute highlights persisting suspicions between Beijing and Washington, which are locked in competition for technological superiority.
Since returning to office in January, US President Donald Trump has reignited a fierce trade war with China.
After months of tit-for-tat tariffs, he and counterpart Xi Jinping agreed to a one-year truce late last month.
A spokesman for China’s embassy in the United States also denied the reported memo’s claims.
“The Chinese government... will never require companies or individuals to collect or provide data located in foreign countries in violation of local laws,” said Liu Pengyu in a statement on X.
The report adds to growing concern in Washington about China’s potential use of advanced technology to spy.
On Thursday, California-based artificial intelligence firm Anthropic said it had detected and disrupted what it described as the first documented cyber-espionage campaign conducted largely autonomously by AI.
The activities were attributed to a “Chinese state-sponsored group” designated as GTG-1002, Anthropic said.
Asked about the report at a news conference on Friday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said he was “not familiar with the specifics,” adding that Beijing had consistently fought hacking activities.