ֱ

Ireland’s president elect is a left-wing, anti-establishment figure who is outspoken on Gaza

Ireland’s president elect is a left-wing, anti-establishment figure who is outspoken on Gaza
Catherine Connolly smiles to supporters after being elected as the new President of Ireland at Dublin Castle, Ireland, Saturday, Oct. 25, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 37 sec ago

Ireland’s president elect is a left-wing, anti-establishment figure who is outspoken on Gaza

Ireland’s president elect is a left-wing, anti-establishment figure who is outspoken on Gaza
  • Connolly vowed Saturday to be “an inclusive president” who would champion diversity and be “a voice for peace”
  • Connolly’s outspoken style and message of social equality and inclusivity have appealed to many, especially younger voters

LONDON: Ireland’s president for the next seven years is an independent lawmaker who has long spoken in support of Palestinians and has been vocal about her distrust of European Union policies.
Left-wing independent Catherine Connolly, 68, secured 63 percent of votes in a landslide election victory on Saturday, comfortably defeating her center-right rival, former Cabinet minister Heather Humphreys.
The politician won after Ireland’s left-leaning opposition parties, including Sinn Féin, united to back her, and she is expected to be a voice unafraid to challenge Ireland’s center-right government.
While Irish presidents hold a largely ceremonial role and do not have executive powers like shaping laws, they represent Ireland on the world stage and are often seen as a unifying voice on major issues. Connolly will succeed Michael D. Higgins, a popular president who has been vocal about the war in Gaza and NATO spending, among other things.
Connolly vowed Saturday to be “an inclusive president” who would champion diversity and be “a voice for peace.”
A look at Connolly’s background and views:
From independent lawmaker to president
Connolly, a mother to two sons, has served three terms as an independent lawmaker for Galway West since she was elected to Parliament in 2016. In 2020 she became the first woman to be the deputy speaker of Parliament’s lower house.
She grew up in social housing in a suburb of Galway in western Ireland as one of 14 children. Her mother died when she was nine years old, and her father worked at a local shipyard. As a student, she volunteered with a Catholic organization to help older people and took on other community roles.
She has degrees in clinical psychology and law, and was a lawyer before she entered politics.
Connolly began her political career when she was elected as a Labour Party member of Galway City Council in 1999. Five years later, she was elected mayor of the city of Galway. She left Labour in 2007.
Outspoken views against Israel and the EU
Connolly has not shied from criticizing Israel over the war in Gaza.
In September she drew fire for calling Hamas “part of the fabric of the Palestinian people.” Prime Minister Micheál Martin criticized her for appearing reluctant to condemn the militant group’s actions in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel that ignited the two-year Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.
She later maintained that she “utterly condemned” Hamas’ actions, while also criticizing Israel for carrying out what she called a genocide in Gaza.
On Europe, she has repeatedly criticized the European Union for its growing “militarization” following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, drawn comparisons with Nazi-era armament in the 1930s, and questioned NATO expansion in the east. Critics have said those comments, along with others critical of the US and UK, risk alienating Ireland’s allies.
Connolly has also stressed she wants to defend Ireland’s tradition of military neutrality, in the face of calls for the country to contribute more to European defense. During her campaign, she said there should be a referendum on a government plan to remove the “triple lock” — the conditions for the deployment of Irish soldiers on international missions.
Connolly’s outspoken style and message of social equality and inclusivity have appealed to many, especially younger voters. In televised presidential debates, she has said she will respect the limits of the office — though she also said in her acceptance speech that she would speak “when it’s necessary” as president.
“Together, we can shape a new republic that values everybody, that values and champions diversity and that takes confidence in our own identity, our Irish language, our English language, and new people who have come to our country,” she said Saturday at Dublin Castle.


Shutdowns began as a way to enforce federal law. Now Trump is using it to take more power

Shutdowns began as a way to enforce federal law. Now Trump is using it to take more power
Updated 14 sec ago

Shutdowns began as a way to enforce federal law. Now Trump is using it to take more power

Shutdowns began as a way to enforce federal law. Now Trump is using it to take more power

Shutdowns began as a way to enforce federal law. Now Trump is using it to take more power
WASHINGTON: The government shutdown, already the second-longest in history, with no end in sight, is quickly becoming a way for President Donald Trump to exercise new command over the government.
It wasn’t always this way. In fact, it all started with an attempt to tighten Washington’s observance of federal law.
The modern phenomena of the US government closing down services began in 1980 with a series of legal opinions from Attorney General Benjamin Civiletti, who was serving under Democratic President Jimmy Carter. Civiletti reached into the Antideficiency Act of 1870 to argue that the law was “plain and unambiguous” in restricting the government from spending money once authority from Congress expires.

President Jimmy Carter, right, meets with Attorney General Benjamin Civiletti at the White House in Washington, Dec. 13, 1979. (AP Photo/File)

In this shutdown, however, the Republican president has used the funding lapse to punish Democrats, tried to lay off thousands of federal workers and seized on the vacuum left by Congress to reconfigure the federal budget for his priorities.
“I can’t believe the Radical Left Democrats gave me this unprecedented opportunity,” Trump posted on his social media platform at the outset of the shutdown.
Democrats have only dug into their positions.
It’s all making this fight that much harder to resolve and potentially redefining how Washington will approach funding lapses altogether.
Why does the US government even have shutdowns?
In the post-Watergate years, Civiletti’s tenure at the Department of Justice was defined by an effort to restore public trust in Washington, sometimes with strict interpretations of federal law.
When a conflict between Congress and the Federal Trade Commission led to a delay in funding legislation for the agency, Civiletti issued his opinion, later following it up with another opinion that allowed the government to perform essential services.
He did not know that it would set the groundwork for some of the most defining political battles to come.
“I couldn’t have ever imagined these shutdowns would last this long of a time and would be used as a political gambit,” Civiletti, who died in 2022, told The Washington Post six years ago.
How shutdowns evolved
For the next 15 years, there were no lengthy government shutdowns. In 1994, Republicans retook Congress under House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia and pledged to overhaul Washington. Their most dramatic standoffs with Democratic President Bill Clinton were over government shutdowns.
Historians mostly agree the shutdowns did not work, and Clinton was able to win reelection in part by showing he stood up to Gingrich.

A member of the US Navy receives free food from volunteers with Feeding San Diego food bank on October 24, 2025 in San Diego, California as the US government shutdown entered its fourth week Wednesday, becoming the second longest in history. (AFP

“The Republicans in the Gingrich-era, they do get some kind of limited policy victories, but for them overall it’s really kind of a failure,” said Mike Davis, adjunct professor of history at Lees-McRae College.
There was one more significant shutdown in 2013 when tea party Republicans sparred with Democratic President Barack Obama. But it was not until Trump’s first term that Democrats adopted the tactic of extended government shutdowns.
How is this shutdown different?
During previous funding lapses, presidential administrations applied the rules governing shutdowns equally to affected agencies.
“A shutdown was supposed to close the same things under Reagan as under Clinton,” said Charles Tiefer, a former acting general counsel for the House and a professor emeritus at the University of Baltimore School of Law. He said that in this shutdown, the Trump administration has used “a kind of freewheeling presidential appropriation power, which is contrary to the whole system, the original Constitution, and the Antideficiency Act.”
The administration has introduced a distinctly political edge to the funding fight, with agencies updating their websites to include statements blaming Democrats for the shutdown. The Department of Defense has tapped research and development funds to pay active-duty service members. Trump has tried to initiate layoffs for more than 4,000 federal employees who are mostly working in areas perceived to be Democratic priorities.
During a luncheon at the White House with GOP senators this week, Trump introduced his budget director Russ Vought as “Darth Vader” and bragged how he is “cutting Democrat priorities and they’re never going to get them back.”
Democrats have only been emboldened by the strategy, voting repeatedly against a Republican-backed bill to reopen the government. They argue that voters will ultimately hold Republicans accountable for the pain of the shutdown because the GOP holds power in Washington.
Democrats are confident they have chosen a winning policy demand on health care plans offered under Affordable Care Act marketplaces, but there is an undercurrent that they are also fighting to halt Trump’s expansion of presidential power.

Furloughed federal worker Issac Stein, 31, works at his hot dog stand in Washington, D.C. on October 24, 2025, weeks into the continuing US government shutdown. (REUTERS)

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, acknowledged that his state has more to lose than perhaps any other due to the large number of federal employees and activity based there. But he argued that his constituents are fed up with a “nonstop punishment parade” from Trump that has included layoffs, cancelation of money for economic development projects, pressure campaigns against universities and the dismissal of the US attorney for Virginia.
“It kind of stiffens folks’ spines,” Kaine said.
Democratic resolve will be tested in the coming week. Federal employees, including lawmakers’ own staff, have now gone almost an entire month without full paychecks. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which helps about 1 in 8 Americans buy groceries, faces a potential funding cliff on Nov. 1. Air travel delays threaten to only grow worse amid air traffic controller shortages.
Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, said he hopes his colleagues start negotiating quickly to end the impasse.
He said he’s been one of the few members of the Democratic caucus to vote for ending the shutdown because “it empowers the president beyond what he would be able to do otherwise, and it damages the country.”


US and China say a trade deal is drawing closer as Trump and Xi ready for a high-stakes meeting

US and China say a trade deal is drawing closer as Trump and Xi ready for a high-stakes meeting
Updated 58 min 10 sec ago

US and China say a trade deal is drawing closer as Trump and Xi ready for a high-stakes meeting

US and China say a trade deal is drawing closer as Trump and Xi ready for a high-stakes meeting
  • China’s top trade negotiator, Li Chenggang, said the two sides had reached a “preliminary consensus.” US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said there was “a very successful framework”
  • Any agreement would be a relief to international markets even if it does not address underlying issues involving manufacturing imbalances and access to state-of-the-art computer chips

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia: A trade deal between the United States and China is drawing closer, officials from the world’s two largest economies said Sunday as they reached an initial consensus for President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping to aim to finalize during their high-stakes meeting.
Any agreement would be a relief to international markets even if it does not address underlying issues involving manufacturing imbalances and access to state-of-the-art computer chips.
Beijing recently limited exports of rare earth elements that are needed for advanced technologies, and Trump responded by threatening additional tariffs on Chinese products. The prospect of a widening conflict risked weakening economic growth worldwide.
China’s top trade negotiator, Li Chenggang, told reporters the two sides had reached a “preliminary consensus,” while Trump’s treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, said there was “a very successful framework.”

Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng leaves after the trade talks between the US and China, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on October 26, 2025. (REUTERS)

Trump also expressed confidence that an agreement was at hand, saying the Chinese “want to make a deal and we want to make a deal.” The Republican president is set to meet with Xi on Thursday in South Korea, the final stop of his trip through Asia.
Bessent told CBS’ “Face the Nation” that the threat of additional higher tariffs on China was “effectively off the table.” In interviews on several American news shows, he said discussions with China yielded initial agreements to stop the precursor chemicals for fentanyl from coming into the US, and that Beijing would make “substantial” purchases of soybean and other agricultural products while putting off export controls on rare earths.

 

When asked how close a deal was, Trump’s trade representative, Jamieson Greer, said on “Fox News Sunday” that “it’s really going to depend” on the two presidents.
Meanwhile, Trump reiterated that he plans to visit China in the future and suggested that Xi could come to Washington or Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s private club in Florida.
The progress toward a potential agreement came during the annual summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, in Kuala Lumpur, with Trump seeking to burnish his reputation as an international dealmaker.
Yet his way of pursuing deals has meant serious disruptions at home and abroad. His import taxes have scrambled relationships with trading partners while a US government shutdown has him feuding with Democrats.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent leaves after the trade talks between the US and China, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on October 26, 2025. (REUTERS)

Trump attends ceasefire ceremony between Thailand and Cambodia

At the summit, Thailand and Cambodia signed an expanded ceasefire agreement during a ceremony attended by Trump. His threats of economic pressure prodded the two nations to halt skirmishes along their disputed border earlier this year.
Thailand will release Cambodian prisoners and Cambodia will begin withdrawing heavy artillery as part of the first phase of the deal. Regional observers will monitor the situation to ensure fighting doesn’t restart.
“We did something that a lot of people said couldn’t be done,” Trump said. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet called it a “historic day,” and Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said the agreement creates “the building blocks for a lasting peace.”
The president signed economic frameworks with Cambodia, Thailand and Malaysia, some of them aimed at increasing trade involving critical minerals. The United States wants to rely less on China, which has used limits on exports of key components in technology manufacturing as a bargaining chip in trade talks.
“It’s very important that we cooperate as willing partners with each other to ensure that we can have smooth supply chains, secure supply chains, for the quality of life, for our people and security,” Greer said.
Trump reengages with a key region of the world
Trump attended this summit only once during his first term, and US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth seemed unfamiliar with ASEAN during his confirmation hearing in January.
This year’s event was a chance for Trump to reengage with nations that have a combined $3.8 trillion economy and 680 million people.
“The United States is with you 100 percent, and we intend to be a strong partner and friend for many generations to come,” Trump said. He described his counterparts as “spectacular leaders” and said that “everything you touch turns to gold.”

 

Trump’s tariff threats were credited with helping spur negotiations between Thailand and Cambodia. Some of the worst modern fighting between the two countries took place over five days in July, killing dozens and displacing hundreds of thousands of people.
The president threatened, at the time, to withhold trade agreements unless the fighting stopped. A shaky truce has persisted since then.
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim praised the agreement between Thailand and Cambodia, saying at the summit that “it reminds us that reconciliation is not concession, but an act of courage.”
Tariffs are in focus on Trump’s trip
Trump in Kuala Lumpur met Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who was also attending the summit. There has been friction between them over Brazil’s prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro, the country’s former president and a close Trump ally. Bolsonaro was convicted last month of attempting to overturn election results in his country.
During their meeting, Trump said he could reduce tariffs on Brazil that he enacted in a push for leniency for Bolsonaro.
“I think we should be able to make some good deals for both countries,” he said.
While Trump was warming to Lula, he avoided Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. The president is angry with Canada because of a television advertisement protesting his trade policies, and on his way to the summit announced on social media he would raise tariffs on Canada because of it.
One leader absent from the summit was Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Although he was close with Trump during Trump’s first term, the relationship has been more tense lately. Trump caused irritation by boasting that he settled a recent conflict between India and Pakistan, and he has increased tariffs on India for its purchase of Russian oil.


Melissa strengthens into a Category 4 hurricane, threatening catastrophic flooding in Jamaica, Haiti

Melissa strengthens into a Category 4 hurricane, threatening catastrophic flooding in Jamaica, Haiti
Updated 36 min ago

Melissa strengthens into a Category 4 hurricane, threatening catastrophic flooding in Jamaica, Haiti

Melissa strengthens into a Category 4 hurricane, threatening catastrophic flooding in Jamaica, Haiti
  • Hurricane expected to move near or over Jamaica as a major hurricane early Tuesda, then reach Cuba Tuesday night
  • US National Hurricane Center said extensive damage to infrastructure, power and communication outages were to be expected

KINGSTON, Jamaica: A strengthening Melissa grew into a Category 4 hurricane Sunday and US forecasters said it could reach Category 5 status, unleashing torrential rain and threatening to cause catastrophic flooding in the northern Caribbean, including Haiti and Jamaica,
The US National Hurricane Center added that Melissa is expected to move near or over Jamaica as a major hurricane early Tuesday, then reach Cuba Tuesday night, and head across the southeastern Bahamas on Wednesday.
“Conditions (in Jamaica) are going to go down rapidly today,” Jamie Rhome, the center’s deputy director, said on Sunday. “Be ready to ride this out for several days.”
Melissa was centered about 115 miles (185 kilometers) south-southwest of Kingston, Jamaica, and about 295 miles (475 kilometers) south-southwest of Guantánamo, Cuba, on Sunday night. It had maximum sustained winds of 145 mph (230 kph) and was moving west at 5 mph (7 kph), the hurricane center said.
Melissa was expected to drop rains of up to 30 inches (760 millimeters) on Jamaica and southern Hispaniola — Haiti and the Dominican Republic — according to the hurricane center. Some areas may see as much as 40 inches (1,010 millimeters) of rain.
It also warned that extensive damage to infrastructure, power and communication outages, and the isolation of communities in Jamaica were to be expected.

 

 

Melissa should be near or over Cuba by late Tuesday, where it could bring up to 12 inches (300 millimeters) of rain, before moving toward the Bahamas later Wednesday.
The Cuban government issued a hurricane warning for the provinces of Granma, Santiago de Cuba, Guantanamo, and Holguin. It also sent a tropical storm warning to the province of Las Tunas.
Airports closed and shelters activated
Jamaica’s two main airports, the Norman Manley International Airport and the Sangster International Airport in Montego Bay, were closed by Sunday.
Local officials ordered the evacuation in the seaside community of Old Harbor Bay in the southern parish of St. Catherine on Sunday.
The order came after Jamaican officials said at a press conference earlier that they were contemplating enforcement because many residents in flood prone and low-lying communities were not heeding the advice to seek safer alternative locations.
Melissa is forecast to reach Category 5 when it makes landfall along the south coast on Tuesday.
Desmond McKenzie, who is leading the Jamaican government’s disaster response, said in a press conference, that all the more of 650 shelters in Jamaica are open.
Officials said earlier that warehouses across the island were well-stocked and thousands of food packages pre-positioned for quick distribution if needed.
Evan Thompson, the principal director of the Meteorological Service of Jamaica, said the storm surge is expected mainly over the southern side of the island.
“There is potential (for) flooding in every parish of our country,” Thompson said. “If you’re in a flood prone, low-lying area, you need to take note. If you’re near a river course or a gully, you need to take special note and find some alternative location that you can move to should you be threatened by the heavy rainfall.”
Some foreign governments are also preparing for the hurricane’s arrival in Jamaica.
The government of Antigua and Barbuda is housing visiting students at a hotel in Kingston. As of Sunday morning, 52 of them had checked in.
“They have a better bounce back regimen here (at the hotel) in terms of standby power and water (in comparison with university dorms,” said Jewel Moore, 19, a chemistry student at UWI Mona. She and her fellow students are enjoying snacks and games before the hurricane arrives.
“The passing of the storm should be okay,” she added. “It’s getting out that will be a problem.”
The erratic and slow-moving storm has killed at least three people in Haiti and a fourth person in the Dominican Republic, where another person remains missing.
Communities cut off by rising waters
Haitian authorities said three people had died as a consequence of the hurricane and another five were injured due to a collapsed wall. There were also reports of rising river levels, flooding and a bridge destroyed due to breached riverbanks in Sainte-Suzanne, in the northeast.
Many residents are still reluctant to leave their homes, Haitian officials said.
The storm damaged nearly 200 homes in the Dominican Republic and knocked out water supply systems, affecting more than half a million customers. It also downed trees and traffic lights, unleashed a couple of small landslides and left more than two dozen communities isolated by floodwaters.
The Bahamas Department of Meteorology said Melissa could bring tropical storm or hurricane conditions to islands in the southeastern and central Bahamas and the Turks and Caicos Islands by early next week.
Melissa is the 13th named storm of the Atlantic hurricane season, which runs from June 1 to Nov. 30.
The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration had predicted an above-normal season with 13 to 18 named storms.


Milei reforms on the line in pivotal Argentine midterms

Milei reforms on the line in pivotal Argentine midterms
Updated 27 October 2025

Milei reforms on the line in pivotal Argentine midterms

Milei reforms on the line in pivotal Argentine midterms

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina: Polls closed and vote counting began Sunday in Argentina’s pivotal midterm elections, which will determine whether libertarian President Javier Milei can continue his polarizing campaign of downsizing the state.
The legislative elections are the first national test of support for Milei since he won office two years ago on a promise to revive the long-ailing Argentine economy by dint of painful reforms.
Half of the seats in the Chamber of Deputies and one-third of the Senate are up for grabs.
Milei’s small La Libertad Avanza  party is hoping to significantly increase its seat tally in both chambers but is not expected to secure a majority.
Polls closed at 6:00 p.m.  after ten hours of voting, with low turnout seen as a sign of disillusionment both with Milei and the opposition.
Preliminary results are expected Sunday evening.
The election run-up was marked by a run on the national currency, the peso, that forced Milei to seek a bailout from US President Donald Trump, a close ally.
Washington has promised an unprecedented $40 billion package of aid, but the assistance came with a warning from Trump to Argentines that he would not “be generous” if the outcome Sunday is unfavorable for Milei.
Argentines fear the government could depreciate or devalue the peso, widely seen as too strong, after the vote.
Questioned about the possibility on Sunday after he cast his ballot, Economy Minister Luis Caputo replied: “No.”
“Monday is just another day, nothing changes to the economic program or the band system,” he said, referring to the peso-dollar exchange rate band set by the government in April.

‘Nothing for workers’

Clad in his trademark leather jacket, Milei voted in Buenos Aires on Sunday morning, greeting waiting supporters but refusing media questions.
Adriana Cotoneo, a 69-year-old pensioner also voting in Buenos Aires, told AFP she backed his party “not because I believe it’s the best option, but because I’m clear about who I want to be gone” — a reference to the center-left Peronist party that governed Argentina for most of its post-war history but has been dogged by allegations of corruption.
Economist and former TV pundit Milei, 55, electrified the 2023 race by revving a chainsaw at rallies to signify his plans to slash a bloated state and one of the world’s highest inflation rates.
He cut tens of thousands of public sector jobs, froze public works, cut spending on health, education and pensions and led a major deregulation drive, prompting repeated mass protests.
His reforms were blamed for initially plunging millions of Argentines deeper into poverty. But they did slow inflation by two-thirds, to the relief of many, although at a cost of faltering economic growth, consumption and manufacturing.
“The economic plan is not working for the people, for businesses, for industry,” centrist opposition senator Martin Lousteau said as he voted in the capital.
“We need a better Congress, less polarized, with less shouting, insults, and more capacity for dialogue,” he said.

US generosity limited 

Investors began dumping the peso last month after Milei’s party suffered a blistering rejection in bellwether Buenos Aires provincial elections.
Trump stepped in to shore up his closest Latin American ally, calling him a “great leader” and hosting him for talks at the White House.
Milei’s LLA party and its allies could still however struggle to garner the third of seats they need in each chamber to advance the president’s reform agenda in the face of an increasingly combative opposition.
The self-declared “anarcho-capitalist” leader has already seen many of his signature policies blocked by Congress, notably his efforts to privatize major state-owned companies and his veto of increased spending on public universities, emergency pediatric care and people with disabilities.
Adding to his woes, members of Milei’s inner circle have been implicated in a variety of scandals.


Colombia’s left picks Ivan Cepeda as 2026 presidential candidate

Colombia’s left picks Ivan Cepeda as 2026 presidential candidate
Updated 27 October 2025

Colombia’s left picks Ivan Cepeda as 2026 presidential candidate

Colombia’s left picks Ivan Cepeda as 2026 presidential candidate

BOGOTA: Colombian Senator Ivan Cepeda was elected to be the left’s 2026 presidential candidate on Sunday after a primary vote by the Historic Pact, a leftist coalition that brought the country’s current president, Gustavo Petro, to power in 2022.
Cepeda, 63, won the Historic Pact’s primary with 1.02 million votes , surpassing former Health Minister Carolina Corcho, who received 472,062 votes , with 88 percent of votes tallied.
The turnout was low, considering the potential 41.2 million voters, reported by the National Civil Registry. Registered voters are allowed to vote in any primary.
The Electoral Council must decide in the coming weeks whether Cepeda will be able to participate in another interparty referendum in March 2026, in which other politicians will compete in search of a candidate who represents a broader segment of the left and center.
Most political parties will hold their primaries in March, alongside legislative elections. Colombians will go to the polls in May to elect Petro’s successor, and if necessary, a runoff will be held in June.