ֱ

Ukraine’s air force warns that Russian drones entered Poland’s airspace

Patriot missles are seen at the Rzeszow-Jasionka Airport, March 25, 2022, in Jasionka, Poland. (AP)
Patriot missles are seen at the Rzeszow-Jasionka Airport, March 25, 2022, in Jasionka, Poland. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 10 September 2025

Ukraine’s air force warns that Russian drones entered Poland’s airspace

Patriot missles are seen at the Rzeszow-Jasionka Airport, March 25, 2022, in Jasionka, Poland. (AP)
  • “Polish and allied aircraft are operating in our airspace, while ground-based air defense and radar reconnaissance systems have been brought to the highest state of readiness,” Poland’s operational command said in a post on X

WARSAW: Poland’s military said Wednesday that the country’s airspace was “repeatedly” violated by drones during a Russian attack on Ukraine.
“During today’s attack by the Russian Federation aimed at targets in Ukraine, our airspace was repeatedly violated by drones,” the operational command of Poland’s armed forces said in a statement on social media.
It added that operations were underway to “identify and neutralize” some targets and to locate others that had been downed.
The command said earlier that Polish and allied aircraft had been mobilized in response to the Russian attack.
Warsaw’s main Chopin Airport was also closed, according to a US Federal Aviation Administration notice citing “unplanned military activity related to ensuring state security.”
The alleged incursion comes a day after Poland’s newly elected nationalist President Karol Nawrocki warned that Russian leader Vladimir Putin was ready to invade more countries after launching his war in Ukraine.
“We do not trust Vladimir Putin’s good intentions,” Nawrocki told reporters Tuesday at a press conference in Helsinki.
“We believe that Vladimir Putin is ready to also invade other countries.”
NATO-member Poland, a major supporter of Ukraine, hosts over a million Ukrainian refugees and is a key transit point for Western humanitarian and military aid to the war-torn country.
Russian drones and missiles have crossed into the airspace of NATO members Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania several times during the three-and-a-half-year war.
Last month, Warsaw said a Russian military drone flew into its airspace and exploded in farmland in eastern Poland, calling the incident a “provocation.”


India, US sign 10-year defense pact to boost intelligence, tech cooperation

India, US sign 10-year defense pact to boost intelligence, tech cooperation
Updated 13 sec ago

India, US sign 10-year defense pact to boost intelligence, tech cooperation

India, US sign 10-year defense pact to boost intelligence, tech cooperation
  • Partnership ‘critical’ to ensure free and open Indo-Pacific, Indian defense chief says
  • New accord highlights India, US common concern over China, according to experts

NEW DELHI: Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh and US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed on Friday a 10-year defense framework to expand cooperation, marking a “new era” in bilateral ties amid tensions over Washington’s tariff war.

The defense chiefs signed the framework for the US-India Major Defense Partnership, which is expected to provide policy direction for their ties, on the sidelines of a ministerial meeting organized by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Kuala Lumpur.

“This will usher in a new era in our already strong defense partnership … It is a signal of our growing strategic convergence and will herald a new decade of partnership,” Singh said in a statement on X.

“Defense will remain as a major pillar of our bilateral relations. Our partnership is critical for ensuring a free, open and rules-based Indo-Pacific region.”

The agreement comes as the two countries are working on closing a trade deal amid tense ties after US President Donald Trump slapped 50 percent tariffs on India, including a 25 percent penalty for importing Russian oil.

Hegseth wrote on X that the framework was a “cornerstone for regional stability and deterrence” and will increase India-US intelligence and tech collaboration.

“We’re enhancing our coordination, info sharing, and tech cooperation. Our defense ties have never been stronger,” he said.

The pact signed on Friday is an extension of a similar agreement inked in 2015, which had covered joint technology development, defense trade and military exchanges.

Plans for the extension were announced in February, when India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Trump in Washington.

They pledged during their meeting “to elevate military cooperation across all domains — air, land, sea, space, and cyberspace — through enhanced training, exercises, and operations, incorporating the latest technologies,” according to a joint statement.

“India-US strategic relationship, particularly defense relationship, is on track and so that shows the common concern of both the countries, which is basically driven by the Chinese threat,” Laxman Kumar Behera, a research fellow at the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, told Arab News.

“This comes at a very difficult time (because of trade tensions), and unlike in the last time, when the relationship was quite good … but nonetheless this agreement shows that the strategic relationship is still intact, despite the economic relation is in little trouble.”

The new pact is likely to benefit both Washington and Delhi in terms of more support to counter Chinese growth and influence over the Indo-Pacific region, said Bharat Karnad, an emeritus professor for national security studies at the Center for Policy Research in New Delhi.

“Considering how fast the Chinese Navy is growing, it is the largest navy in the world right now … Everybody needs help. The Americans need our help because we are locationally right there. We are a principal player in the Indo (Pacific) ocean basin,” he told Arab News.

“While we require the help in terms of, you know, their satellite intelligence … They have enormous satellite constellations that can pick up Chinese naval movements and so on, much farther than our own satellite constellation can pick up those kinds of things. So, you know, it is very helpful.”


Schengen visa system must be reformed to aid human rights activists: Amnesty

Schengen visa system must be reformed to aid human rights activists: Amnesty
Updated 27 min 15 sec ago

Schengen visa system must be reformed to aid human rights activists: Amnesty

Schengen visa system must be reformed to aid human rights activists: Amnesty
  • System prohibitively strict for applicants from 104-visa restricted countries
  • They face ‘indirect discrimination’ and are racialized as Black, Asian and Muslim

LONDON: European visa systems in the Schengen area are prohibitively strict for human rights figures seeking to enter the continent from impoverished and dangerous parts of the world, Amnesty International has said.

In a report, the organization called on Schenghen states to close the obstacles to rights and values that they claim to uphold.

The report identified 104 visa-restricted countries — mainly in South Asia, Africa and the Middle East — where human rights figures face substantial difficulty in accessing short-term European visas.

The applicants intend to travel to the 29 Schengen states in Europe for advocacy, networking, or to flee danger in their home countries, Amnesty said.

But through Schengen policies, they face “indirect discrimination” and are racialized as Black, Asian and Muslim, resulting in negative impacts on their mobility.

Erika Guevara Rosas, senior director for research, advocacy, policy and campaigns at Amnesty, said: “The inability to access Schengen visas means that the voices and testimonies of human rights defenders from countries in the Global South are excluded from forums where decisions that deeply affect their lives are made.

“While Schengen states are entitled to decide who enters their territory, the impact of their visa systems on human rights defenders from 104 countries represents a clear disconnect between what they have committed to, through their guidelines and other commitments to protect human rights defenders, and what they actually do.”

Amnesty identified key barriers to entry for applicants seeking visas from the 104 countries. The first is deciding where to submit a visa application; many Schengen states lack diplomatic representations or agreements with the visa-restricted countries, meaning applicants must travel abroad to file their documents, the organization said.

Supporting documents also present another hurdle, as many applicants are from marginalized groups and lack the appropriate financial and employment statements, Amnesty added.

Schengen states can turn to the revised version of the EU Visa Handbook, published by the European Commission last year, for welcome changes to visa policy, Amnesty said.

The updated guidelines include practical examples of how Schengen states can aid visa applications by human rights figures.

The handbook should be “well disseminated and fully implemented,” including among visa officers outside Europe, the organization said.

Amnesty also called for the creation of a fast-track visa system designed for human rights activists outside Europe.

Rosas said: “Ensuring that human rights defenders have access to short-stay Schengen visas in a reliable, predictable, transparent and timely manner is indispensable to realize their right to defend rights without discrimination.”

In its report, Amnesty spoke to 42 international organizations, within and outside Europe, which have facilitated the journeys of hundreds of human rights figures to the Schengen area.

It also gathered testimonies from 32 human rights activists with firsthand experience of European visa processes.


Islamabad warns fragile truce hinges on Kabul’s action against cross-border militancy

Islamabad warns fragile truce hinges on Kabul’s action against cross-border militancy
Updated 31 October 2025

Islamabad warns fragile truce hinges on Kabul’s action against cross-border militancy

Islamabad warns fragile truce hinges on Kabul’s action against cross-border militancy
  • Pakistan, Afghanistan engaged in deadly clashes this month after Islamabad conducted airstrikes on what it said were TTP militants inside Afghanistan
  • Kabul, which denies sheltering the group, condemned the strikes as a violation of its sovereignty and responded with cross-border fire along the 2,600 km frontier

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Afghanistan have agreed to extend a ceasefire during talks in Istanbul after the worst border clashes between the neighbors in years, Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on Friday, adding that the onus was now on Kabul to take action against militant groups.

The fresh round of negotiations, facilitated by Turkiye and other friendly nations, was aimed at easing border clashes that left dozens of soldiers, civilians and militants dead, before a temporary ceasefire was reached on Oct. 19. A second round of talks that started in Istanbul on Oct. 25 failed to reach breakthrough earlier this week, before Turkiye announced on Thursday evening that the ceasefire would continue. 

The clashes erupted after Pakistan launched airstrikes inside Afghanistan against Pakistani Taliban militants it says are based there and responsible for attacks on its forces. Kabul condemned the strikes as a violation of its sovereignty and denies sheltering the group. The border, which runs more than 2,600 km (1,600 miles), has long been a source of friction with frequent skirmishes and mutual accusations over militant sanctuaries.

Information Minister Tarar described the outcome of the Istanbul talks as a “victory” for Pakistan and said the responsibility now rested with the Afghan Taliban to take concrete action against militant groups, the state-run Pakistan TV Digital reported.

“Pakistan’s stance has been clear, support for terrorism must end. A mechanism for monitoring, verification, and enforcement in case of violations will also be implemented,” he said, thanking Qatar and Turkiye for their mediation.

“All parties have agreed to put in place a monitoring and verification mechanism that will ensure maintenance of peace and impose penalties on the violating party,” Turkiye’s Foreign Ministry said of the October 25–30 talks.

It added that a follow-up meeting would be held in Istanbul on November 6 to decide how the mechanism will be implemented, and that Turkiye and Qatar “stand ready to continue cooperation with both sides for lasting peace and stability.”

Kabul government spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid issued a separate statement shortly before midnight in Istanbul confirming the conclusion of the talks and saying both sides had agreed to continue discussions in future meetings.

A senior Pakistani security official, requesting anonymity, said Islamabad viewed the Istanbul understanding as a welcome step but a conditional truce, hinging on verifiable action by Kabul.

“Pakistan welcomes the interim understanding reached in Istanbul under the mediation of Türkiye and Qatar,” the official said. “But this ceasefire is not open-ended or unconditional. The single litmus test for its continuation is that Afghanistan will not allow its territory to be used for attacks against Pakistan and will take clear, verifiable and effective steps against [militants].”

The official added that Pakistan expected credible evidence of action, such as dismantling of hideouts, disruption of logistical networks, and prosecution of militant leadership, to be reported through the monitoring and verification mechanism agreed under the mediators’ auspices.

“If Afghanistan fails to deliver verifiable proof of agreed steps, or if militants continue to launch attacks from Afghan soil, Pakistan will deem the ceasefire violated and reserves all options to safeguard its sovereignty and citizens,” the official warned.

He said Pakistan had entered the new phase “in good faith, but with realism,” given past patterns of cross-border violence.

“This arrangement is a conditional truce — one which hinges on demonstrable responsibility by the Afghan side,” he said. “Failure to meet that responsibility will require Pakistan to revert to other measures.”

The clashes erupted on Oct. 11 after Pakistan conducted airstrikes on what it called Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan-affiliated targets in Afghanistan. Kabul said it was a violation of its sovereignty.

Pakistan has long accused Afghanistan of allowing the use of its soil by militant groups, particularly the TTP that has stepped up attacks inside Pakistan in recent years. Kabul denies the allegation.

  • With inputs from Reuters
  • This article originally appaeared on

UN asks US to stop strikes on alleged drug boats

UN asks US to stop strikes on alleged drug boats
Updated 31 October 2025

UN asks US to stop strikes on alleged drug boats

UN asks US to stop strikes on alleged drug boats
  • Volker Turk: ‘These attacks – and their mounting human cost – are unacceptable’

GENEVA: The United Nations on Friday urged the United States to halt strikes on vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific allegedly carrying drug traffickers, and to prevent “extrajudicial killings.”

US strikes in the Caribbean and the Pacific in recent weeks have killed at least 62 people on boats that Washington claims were ferrying drugs. Family members and victims’ governments have said some of them were fishermen.

UN rights chief Volker Turk said these people had been killed “in circumstances that find no justification in international law.”

“These attacks – and their mounting human cost – are unacceptable,” he said in a statement.

“The US must halt such attacks and take all measures necessary to prevent the extrajudicial killing of people aboard these boats, whatever the criminal conduct alleged against them.”

President Donald Trump’s administration has said in a notice to Congress that the United States is engaged in “armed conflict” with Latin American drug cartels, describing them as terrorist groups as part of its justification for the strikes.

Tensions are mounting in the region with Trump saying he has authorized CIA operations in Venezuela, and that he is considering ground attacks against alleged drug cartels in the country.

“Countering the serious issue of illicit trafficking of drugs across international borders is – as has long been agreed among states – a law-enforcement matter, governed by the careful limits on lethal force set out in international human rights law,” Turk said.

“Under international human rights law, the intentional use of lethal force is only permissible as a last resort against individuals who pose an imminent threat to life.”

Turk stressed that “based on the very sparse information provided publicly by the US authorities, none of the individuals on the targeted boats appeared to pose an imminent threat to the lives of others or otherwise justified the use of lethal armed force against them under international law.”

He called for “prompt, independent, and transparent investigations into these attacks.”


Xi invites Canada PM to China in first meet in 8 years

Xi invites Canada PM to China in first meet in 8 years
Updated 31 October 2025

Xi invites Canada PM to China in first meet in 8 years

Xi invites Canada PM to China in first meet in 8 years
  • Canada’s relations with China are among the worst of any Western nation but both are at the sharp end of Donald Trump’s tariff onslaught, even after Xi and the US leader’s deal Thursday to dial back tensions

GYOENGJU: President Xi Jinping on Friday invited Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to China, in the first formal talks between the nations’ leaders since 2017, before also holding first discussions with Japan’s new premier.
Canada’s relations with China are among the worst of any Western nation but both are at the sharp end of Donald Trump’s tariff onslaught, even after Xi and the US leader’s deal Thursday to dial back tensions.
“Recently, with the joint efforts of both sides, China-Canada relations have shown a recovery toward a trend of positive development,” Xi told Carney as they met at an APEC summit in South Korea, inviting the Canadian to visit China.
“China is willing to work with Canada to bring China-Canada relations back to the right track,” Xi added.
“In recent years, we have not been as engaged,” said Carney, accepting Xi’s invitation.
Tha Canadian leader pointed to “constructive and pragmatic dialogue” as a route to addressing their “current issues.”
He also cited dialoque as a way “to help build a more sustainable, inclusive international system.”
Ties fell into a deep freeze in 2018 after the arrest of a senior Chinese telecom executive on a US warrant in Vancouver and China’s retaliatory detention of two Canadians on espionage charges.
In July, Carney announced an additional 25 percent tariff on steel imports that contain steel melted and poured in China.
Beijing announced the following month it would impose a painful temporary customs duty of 75.8 percent on Canadian canola imports.
Canada is among the world’s top producers of canola, an oilseed crop that is used to make cooking oil, animal meal and biodiesel fuel.
But Canada and China have both been heavily targeted by Trump’s global trade onslaught.
Trump said on Thursday he would halve fentanyl-related tariffs on China to 10 percent while Xi agreed to keep rare earths flowing and boost imports of US soybeans.
But the average US tariff on Chinese imports remains at 47 percent, Trump said.
The US president on Saturday said he was hiking tariffs on Canadian goods by an additional 10 percent and terminated all trade talks.
This followed what Trump called a “fake” anti-tariff ad campaign that featured the late ex-president Ronald Reagan.
“(The) old world of steady expansion of rules-based liberalized trade and investment, a world on which so much of our nations’ prosperity — very much Canada’s included — (is based), that world is gone,” Carney told the APEC gathering.
He also talked up Canada’s potential as an “energy superpower” and major supplier of liquified natural gas (LNG) to Asia.

- Japan -

Later Xi met Japan’s first woman premier, Sanae Takaichi, for the first time since she was appointed this month.
Chinese state media quoted Xi as saying that China was ready to work with Japan for constructive, stable bilateral ties that meet requirements of new era.
Takaichi is a regular visitor to the flashpoint Yasukuni shrine honoring Japan’s war dead is seen as a China hawk, although recently she has toned down her remarks.
But in her first policy address last Friday, she still declared that the military activities of China — and North Korea and Russia — “have become a grave concern.”
She announced that Japan would be spending two percent of gross domestic product on defense this fiscal year — two years ahead of schedule — prompting criticism from China.
She is also a strong backer of Taiwan and backs security cooperation with the self-ruled island.
Japanese media said that Takaichi was expected to convey to Xi grave concerns over China’s behavior, including around the disputed Senkaku Islands, known as the Diaoyu Islands by China.
She was also expected to press for the early release of Japanese citizens detained in China and request that the safety of Japanese expatriates in China be ensured, the reports said.
Her public comments at the start of the meeting focused only on reducing “concerns” and increasing “mutual understanding and cooperation.”
Japanese industry is also keen to ensure that supplies of rare earths from China — which have become a football in Xi’s trade tussle with Trump — keep flowing.
“It could be a frosty get-to-know-you meeting as Xi Jinping has not sent a congratulatory message to Takaichi, wary of her reputation as a China hawk,” Yee Kuang Heng, a professor at the University of Tokyo’s Graduate School of Public Policy, told AFP.
“Overall though, stability is a shared priority,” Heng said.