ֱ

Fleeing Maduro then Trump, Venezuelans seek refuge in Spain

Fleeing Maduro then Trump, Venezuelans seek refuge in Spain
Venezuelans were for the first time the largest group applying for asylum in the EU in the first quarter after Germany received fewer Syrians following the toppling of Bashar Assad. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 22 August 2025

Fleeing Maduro then Trump, Venezuelans seek refuge in Spain

Fleeing Maduro then Trump, Venezuelans seek refuge in Spain
  • Venezuelans facing US expulsion under Trump
  • Migrants face housing, job challenges rebuilding lives in Spain

MADRID: After surviving the perilous trek through the jungle of Panama’s Darien Gap with his wife and three daughters to reach the United States, Venezuelan policeman Alberto Peña thought he had found a haven from the persecution he says he fled from back home.
But two years later, President Donald Trump’s drive to end temporary protected status for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans in the US forced Peña and his family to move once again — this time to Spain.
“Migrating twice is difficult, both for oneself and for one’s children,” Peña said from Madrid. “But peace of mind is priceless.”
He is among a growing number of Venezuelans who have become the new drivers of migration to Europe.
Venezuelans were for the first time the largest group applying for asylum in the EU in the first quarter after Germany received fewer Syrians following the toppling of Bashar Assad last year and migration controls in the Mediterranean reduced arrivals via Tunisia and Libya.
For years, the US was a haven for Venezuelans fleeing President Nicolas Maduro’s leftist government, but in Trump’s second term many are being branded criminals and forced to seek refuge elsewhere.
Spain, which has pursued a more flexible migration policy to address labor shortages even as European peers take a tougher approach, also shares language and cultural values that make it the natural alternative for many of the 1 million Venezuelans living in the US who fear deportation, said Tomás Paez, head of the Venezuelan Diaspora Observatory.
Fear of being sent to prisons such as the notorious Alligator Alcatraz in Florida is driving many Venezuelans to “self-deport,” said Paez.
“People are even afraid to go to school or work for fear of being raided and arrested,” he said. “They don’t know what to do, so there’s an exodus.”
Spanish NGOs have observed an increase in Venezuelans arriving or seeking guidance on how to relocate to Spain.
At least three of every 10 appointments are with Venezuelans living in the US, said Jesús Alemán, leader of the Madrid-based NGO Talento 58, which advises Venezuelan migrants such as Meliana Bruguera.

RESIDENCE PERMIT
Bruguera, 41, arrived in the US saying she was fleeing threats back in Venezuela. She was pregnant and carrying her five-year-old daughter and a temporary humanitarian visa that Trump canceled for nearly 350,000 Venezuelans when she was in the process of renewing it.
Fearing deportation, she chose to leave her job as a kindergarten teacher to migrate again, this time to Spain.
“I couldn’t stop crying at work. I kept saying: ‘This is inhumane. Why are they kicking me out of the United States too?’,” she said in Madrid.
Spanish official data shows Venezuelan arrivals overall are accelerating. About 59 percent of all 77,251 asylum applications received in the first half of 2025 were by Venezuelans compared with 38 percent of all applications a year ago.
An unknown number of Venezuelans also have EU passports through family links and are applying for residency in Spain via that route.
Overall, there has been a 14 percent drop in asylum applications to Spain in the first half of the year compared with the same period last year. Total asylum applications to the EU are also down in the first quarter this year, compared with the same period in 2024, with fewer Syrians and Afghans arriving, while applications from Venezuelans are up.
According to an internal European Commission report seen by Reuters, 52,943 Venezuelans had applied for asylum in the EU to July 27 this year.

Venezuela’s economy has experienced a prolonged crisis marked by triple-digit inflation and the exodus of more than 9 million migrants seeking better opportunities abroad, according to the Venezuelan Diaspora Observatory. The government has blamed the economic collapse on sanctions by the United States and others, which it brands an “economic war.”
Most Venezuelan migrants have stayed in Latin America, overburdening already struggling public services in places like Colombia, where they get 10-year visas and access to public education and health care.
But Spain offers Venezuelans a relatively easy migration path, since they receive an automatic residence permit for humanitarian reasons if their asylum request is rejected.
That is better treatment than that received by thousands of migrants from West Africa to Spain each year, said Juan Carlos Lorenzo, a coordinator at the Spanish Commission for Refugee Aid in the Canary Islands.
“It is a privileged treatment that is almost only applied to Venezuelans,” he said.
But resettling is not easy. At least four Venezuelans who had moved from the US to Spain told Reuters it was harder to find a house to rent and a job than in the US
Bruguera and her children are staying in a Red Cross refuge while they wait for their application to be approved. Her husband, who joined them in Madrid from Venezuela, has found it difficult to rent an apartment and is living in a garage.
“Migrating a second time is doubly devastating, because you achieve stability ... and then you find that dream vanishing,” she said.
(Reporting by Corina Pons and Charlie Devereux in Madrid and Layli Foroudi in Paris; Additional reporting by Joan Faus in Barcelona; Editing by Alison Williams)


FBI searches home and office of ex-Trump national security adviser John Bolton

FBI searches home and office of ex-Trump national security adviser John Bolton
Updated 8 sec ago

FBI searches home and office of ex-Trump national security adviser John Bolton

FBI searches home and office of ex-Trump national security adviser John Bolton
WASHINGTON: The FBI on Friday searched the Maryland home and Washington office of former Trump administration national security adviser John Bolton as part of a criminal investigation into the potential mishandling of classified information, a person familiar with the matter said.
Bolton, who emerged as an outspoken critic of President Donald Trump after being fired in 2019 and feuded with the first Trump administration over a scathing book he wrote documenting his time in the White House, was not in custody Friday and has not been charged with any crimes, said the person who was not authorized to discuss the investigation by name and spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity.
The searches, seemingly the most significant public step the Justice Department has taken against a perceived enemy of the president, are likely to elicit fresh alarm that the Trump administration is using its law enforcement powers to target the Republican’s foes. They come as the Trump administration has moved to examine the activities of other critics, including by authorizing a grand jury investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe that dogged Trump for much of his first term, and as FBI and Justice Department leaders signal their loyalty to the president.
They also unfolded against the backdrop of a 2022 search for classified documents at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, an action that produced since-dismissed criminal charges but remains the source of outrage for the president and supporters who insist he was unjustly targeted despite the retrieval of top-secret records. Current FBI Director Kash Patel, who included Bolton on a list of “members of the Executive Branch Deep State” in a 2023 book, said in a Fox News Channel interview this week that the Mar-a-Lago search represented a “total weaponization and politicization” of the bureau.
Speaking to reporters during an unscheduled visit to the White House Historical Association, Trump said he had seen news coverage of Friday’s searches and expected to be briefed about it by the Justice Department but also insisted he didn’t “want to know about it.”
“I could know about it. I could be the one starting it. I’m actually the chief law enforcement officer. But I feel that it’s better this way,” Trump said.
Bolton had said in interviews in the last few months that he was mindful that he could scrutinized, telling the AP in January shortly before Trump took office, “Anybody who ever disagrees with Trump has to worry about retribution. It’s a pretty long list.”
“It’s been a long time since people used to talk about Richard Nixon’s enemies list. But that seems to be Trump’s approach. And so it’s uncharted territory in many respects,” Bolton said.
Bolton was in his office building at the time
Bolton was not home for the search of his home, but after it started, he was spotted Friday morning standing in the lobby of the Washington building where he keeps an office and talking to two people with “FBI” visible on their vests. He left a few minutes later and appeared to have gone upstairs in the building. Agents were seen taking bags into the office building through a back entrance.
Messages left with a spokesperson for Bolton were not immediately returned, and a lawyer who has represented Bolton had no immediate comment.
The Justice Department had no comment, but leaders appeared to cryptically refer to the search of Bolton’s home in a series of social media posts Friday morning.
Patel posted on X: “NO ONE is above the law… @FBI agents on mission.” Attorney General Pam Bondi shared his post, adding: “America’s safety isn’t negotiable. Justice will be pursued. Always.”
The Justice Department is separately conducting mortgage fraud investigations into Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California and New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought a civil fraud lawsuit against Trump and his company, and ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith faces an investigation from an independent watchdog office. Schiff and James have vigorously denied any wrongdoing through their lawyers.
Trump and Bolton have been at odds for years
Bolton served as Trump’s third national security adviser for 17 months and clashed with him over Iran, Afghanistan and North Korea.
He faced scrutiny during the first Trump administration over a book he wrote about his time in government that officials argued disclosed classified information. To make its case, the Justice Department in 2020 submitted sworn statements from senior White House officials, including then-National Security Agency Director Paul Nakasone, asserting that Bolton’s manuscript included classified information that could harm national security if exposed.
Bolton’s lawyers have said he moved forward with the book after a White House National Security Council official, with whom Bolton had worked for months, said the manuscript no longer contained classified information.
The Justice Department in 2021 abandoned its lawsuit and dropped a separate grand jury investigation, with Bolton’s lawyer calling the effort to block the book “politically motivated” and illegitimate.
Bolton’s harshly critical book, “The Room Where It Happened,” portrayed Trump as grossly ill-informed about foreign policy and said he “saw conspiracies behind rocks, and remained stunningly uninformed on how to run the White House, let alone the huge federal government.”
Trump responded by slamming Bolton as a “crazy” war-monger who would have led the country into “World War Six.”
Bolton served as US ambassador to the United Nations under President George W. Bush and also held positions in President Ronald Reagan’s administration. He considered running for president in 2012 and 2016.
Trump, on his first day back in office this year, revoked the security clearances of more than four dozen former intelligence officials, including Bolton. Bolton was also among a group of former Trump officials whose security details were canceled by Trump earlier this year.
In 2022, an Iranian operative was charged in a plot to kill Bolton in presumed retaliation for a 2020 US airstrike that killed the country’s most powerful general.
The handling of classified information by top government officials has been a politically loaded topic in recent years. Besides Trump, the Justice Department also investigated whether then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, mishandled classified information after serving as vice president in the Obama administration, and the FBI also recovered what it said were classified documents from the home of former Trump Vice President Mike Pence. Neither man was charged.

Ex-army officer accused of ‘rules breach’ in Israeli firm’s bid for $2bn UK contract

Ex-army officer accused of ‘rules breach’ in Israeli firm’s bid for $2bn UK contract
Updated 42 min 59 sec ago

Ex-army officer accused of ‘rules breach’ in Israeli firm’s bid for $2bn UK contract

Ex-army officer accused of ‘rules breach’ in Israeli firm’s bid for $2bn UK contract
  • Former brigadier was hired by Elbit Systems UK, which is competing to run the training program he had previously overseen, according to report in The Times
  • Whistleblower sent dossier of evidence to UK defense ministry showing he attended meetings on the bid before ‘cooling-off period expired’ 

LONDON: A former British army officer shared information with a subsidiary of Israel’s largest arms manufacturer as it prepared to bid for a £2 billion government defense contract, The Times newspaper reported.

Brig. Philip Kimber broke Ministry of Defence rules by attending meetings at Elbit Systems UK in the weeks after he left the army, according to a dossier sent to the ministry by a whistleblower and seen by The Times. 

Kimber attended a meeting at the firm on how to win a major contract for a training program that he had led before he left the army, the article alleges.

An MoD investigation found Elbit had gained no commercial advantage and could continue to participate in the bidding process.

Elbit Systems UK is part of a consortium in the running for a 15-year contract to operate the Collective Training Transformation Programme to overhaul army training. A decision on the contract is expected imminently.

Kimber, who was the training program’s director, left the army in September 2022 and was recruited by Elbit the following month.

He was hired by Elbit to deliver the contract if and when the company won it.

The report said he had signed a business appointments letter, which stated he “will not be involved in CTTP” until after a cooling-off period expired in June 2023.

The dossier included 19 incidents where the whistleblower claimed Kimber attended meetings about the bid in breach of the MoD’s business appointment rules. 

Elbit Systems UK told The Times that it follows the requirements and procedures advised by the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments “regarding our employees who have served in the UK armed forces.”

The MoD said: “The individual was not employed by the army at the time of the contract advert, pre-qualification questionnaire or invitation to negotiate. The competition for the army’s Collective Training Transformation Programme remains ongoing and no commercial advantage has been gained by any company. We follow strict procurement protocols to ensure fairness, value for taxpayers, and adherence to regulations.”

Francis Tusa, a defense analyst, told The Times: “A dossier of emails and WhatsApp appear to show a crucial — and questionable — overlap between the months after the departure of the senior officer who was running CTTP and him actively advising Elbit about that program when he was under certain restrictions. If the dossier’s dates do stack up, I can’t understand the MoD’s ‘nothing to see here’ approach — it would seem to me to be a clear breach of the rules.”

Elbit Systems UK has been targeted by pro-Palestinian activists because it is a subsidiary of Israel’s Elbit Systems, which provides large quantities of weapons used in the Gaza war.


India moves to strengthen ties with Russia, China amid Trump’s tariff war

India moves to strengthen ties with Russia, China amid Trump’s tariff war
Updated 22 August 2025

India moves to strengthen ties with Russia, China amid Trump’s tariff war

India moves to strengthen ties with Russia, China amid Trump’s tariff war
  • Narendra Modi meets Chinese FM, Indian FM visits Russia
  • Delhi, Moscow agree to strengthen trade ties, boost Indian exports

NEW DELHI: In the wake of US President Donald Trump’s steep tariffs on Indian goods, New Delhi has moved to rebuild ties with Beijing while continuing its close energy and defense partnership with Russia, moves that experts say carry strategic opportunities.

After a yearslong standoff between India and China over a deadly clash at their disputed border, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi arrived in the Indian capital on Monday for a two-day visit and talks with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar.

Modi hailed the improved relations with Beijing and said after the meeting that the “steady progress” they made was “guided by respect for each other’s interests and sensitivities.”

 

The two sides also agreed to resume direct flights between China and India to help boost trade and investment, facilitate business and cultural exchanges, and recommence the issuing of journalist and tourist visas.

The thaw in relations comes after Trump imposed 50 percent tariffs on Indian goods, 25 percent of which was a penalty for India buying Russian oil, which Washington said was helping fuel Moscow’s war in Ukraine.

The Indian government said the tariffs were “unjustified and unreasonable” and vowed to “take all necessary steps to protect its national interests.”

The progress in India-China relations was followed by Jaishankar’s three-day visit to Moscow, which ended on Thursday and resulted in the two sides agreeing to boost trade ties.

In a joint news conference with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Jaishankar said that relations between the two countries had been “among the steadiest of the major relationships in the world” since World War II.

The sides reaffirmed their ambition to expand two-way trade, including an increase in Indian exports to Russia.

“This requires swiftly addressing non-tariff barriers and regulatory impediments,” Jaishankar said.

“Enhancing Indian exports to Russia in sectors like pharmaceuticals, agriculture and textiles will certainly help to correct the current imbalance.”

Harsh V. Pant, vice president at Delhi-based think tank Observer Research Foundation, said that while India’s engagements with Russia and China had started before Trump’s global tariff campaign, it had acted as a catalyst.

“What Trump seems to have done is to create a sentiment against America in India and to accelerate India’s ties with these countries,” he told Arab News.

International affairs expert Mohan Guruswamy said that Delhi’s efforts to strengthen ties with China and Russia would assure “India of its strategic independence.”

“By associating with America, it lost it. And associating with America has proved to be expensive,” he told Arab News.

Bharat Karnad, a political scientist and emeritus professor at the Center for Policy Research in Delhi, said India’s frayed ties with Washington were an opportunity for it “to rethink and repurpose (its) strategy.”

“America has always been an unreliable, untrustworthy partner to all its allies. It’s historically been the case that America helps only when its own interests are served and not when the allies’ interests are at stake,” he told Arab News.

This was an opportunity for Modi’s government to support de-dollarization efforts that had been pursued by the BRICS geopolitical forum, which includes India, Russia and China, he said.

“This is the time, and there are still some indications that we are working toward precisely the kinds of BRICS initiative to de-dollarize trade.

“Rather than become captive of the US or Western or any other … trading system, we should have the independence and the flexibility to switch to serve our national interests.”


Niger army says it killed a senior Boko Haram leader in a targeted airstrike

Niger army says it killed a senior Boko Haram leader in a targeted airstrike
Updated 22 August 2025

Niger army says it killed a senior Boko Haram leader in a targeted airstrike

Niger army says it killed a senior Boko Haram leader in a targeted airstrike
  • Boko Haram began its insurgency in Nigeria in 2009, causing around 35,000 civilian deaths and displacing more than 2 million people
DAKAR, Senegal: The army in Niger says it used a targeted airstrike to kill a senior leader of the Boko Haram jihadi group, which has killed thousands of people in West Africa.
Ibrahim Bakoura was killed in an Aug. 15 strike in the Lake Chad region that killed “dozens of terrorists” and Boko Haram senior leaders, the army claimed in a state television broadcast Thursday. Bakoura, who was in his mid-40s, was “tracked for several weeks” before the strike, the army said.
Boko Haram, a homegrown group of jihadis from neighboring Nigeria that is considered one of the world’s deadliest armed groups, took up arms in 2009 to fight Western education and impose their radical version of Islamic law.
The conflict has spilled into Nigeria’s northern neighbors, including Niger, and resulted in the death of around 35,000 civilians and the displacement of more than 2 million others, according to the United Nations.
There should be skepticism about reports of senior militant deaths, said Wassim Nasr, a Sahel specialist and senior research fellow at the Soufan Center security think tank. He noted Bakoura has been reported dead at least three times in the past and governments have limited capacity to verify remote airstrikes.
Boko Haram split into two factions in the ensuing power struggle after the 2021 death of the group’s longtime leader, Abubakar Shekau, who was falsely reported dead several times. Bakoura came to power in 2022.
One faction is backed by the Daesh group and is known as the Islamic State West Africa Province, or ISWAP. It has become notorious for targeting military positions and has overrun the military in Nigeria on at least 15 occasions in 2025, killing soldiers and stealing weapons, according to an Associated Press count, experts and security reports.
The other faction, Jama’atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda’awati wal-Jihad (JAS), also known as Boko Haram, has increasingly resorted to attacking civilians and perceived collaborators and thrives on robberies and abductions for ransom.
Bakoura’s killing is the latest blow to the network of armed groups in the region in recent weeks following the arrests of top Al-Qaeda affiliated leaders in Nigeria and the son of Boko Haram’s founder in Chad.
Experts say there is a renewed response from intelligence agencies in west and central African countries whose security leaderships have suffered embarrassing loses to armed groups this year.
“What the constant attacks did was cause military and security leaders embarrassment because it got to a point soldiers were running away on sighting ISWAP advances. The attacks inspired renewed response by militaries across the region,” said Taiwo Adebayo, a security researcher at the Institute of Security Studies.
The arrest and killing of top leaders will translate to material gains in the regional fight against insecurity if the government in Niger ensures the groups do not carry out retaliatory attacks or rejuvenate elsewhere, Adebayo said.

NATO chief calls for ‘robust security guarantees’ on Ukraine visit

NATO chief calls for ‘robust security guarantees’ on Ukraine visit
Updated 22 August 2025

NATO chief calls for ‘robust security guarantees’ on Ukraine visit

NATO chief calls for ‘robust security guarantees’ on Ukraine visit
  • Mark Rutte: ‘Robust security guarantees will be essential and this is what we are now working to define’

KYIV: The head of NATO on Friday called for “robust” security guarantees for Ukraine to ensure Russia upholds any potential peace deal and “never again” attempts to invade Ukraine.

The question of eventual security guarantees for Ukraine has been front and center during the latest US-led diplomatic push to broker a peace deal to end the conflict, now in its fourth year.

“Robust security guarantees will be essential and this is what we are now working to define,” Mark Rutte said during a visit to Kyiv, speaking alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

US President Donald Trump, who hosted a meeting of European leaders with Rutte and Zelensky on Monday, said Russia had agreed to some Western security guarantees for Kyiv.

But Moscow later cast doubt on any such arrangement. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Wednesday that discussing security guarantees without Russia was “a utopia, a road to nowhere.”

On a visit to Kyiv, during which an air raid alert sounded across the city, Rutte said security guarantees were needed to ensure “Russia will uphold any deal and will never ever again attempt to take one square kilometer of Ukraine.”

Zelensky said “the guarantees consist of what partners can give Ukraine, as well as what the army in Ukraine should be like” once the war ends.

“And it is too early to say who can provide military personnel, who can provide intelligence, who has a presence at sea or in the air, and who is ready to provide funding,” he added.

Rutte also said it was “too early to exactly say what will be the outcome. But clearly, the US will be involved,” adding: “We do not want a repeat of the Budapest Memorandum or the Minsk Agreement.”

Moscow signed the Budapest Memorandum in 1994, which was aimed at ensuring security for Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan in exchange for them giving up numerous nuclear weapons left from the Soviet era.

Russia violated that first by taking Crimea in 2014, and then by starting a full-scale offensive in 2022, which has killed tens of thousands of people and forced millions to flee their homes.