ֱ

Three Republican-led states to send hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington

Three Republican-led states to send hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington
Protesters confront members of the National Guard patrolling Union Station in the US capital, Washington, D.C., on August 16, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 17 August 2025

Three Republican-led states to send hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington

Three Republican-led states to send hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington
  • West Virginia said it was deploying 300 to 400 Guard troops, while South Carolina pledged 200 and Ohio says it will send 150 in the coming days
  • By adding outside troops to the existing D.C. Guard deployment and federal law enforcement presence, Trump is exercising even tighter control over the city

WASHINGTON: Three Republican-led states said Saturday that they were deploying hundreds of National Guard members to the nation’s capital to bolster the Trump administration’s effort to overhaul policing in Washington through a federal crackdown on crime and homelessness.
West Virginia said it was deploying 300 to 400 Guard troops, while South Carolina pledged 200 and Ohio says it will send 150 in the coming days, marking a significant escalation of the federal intervention.
The moves came as protesters pushed back on federal law enforcement and National Guard troops fanning out in the heavily Democratic city following President Donald Trump’s executive order federalizing local police forces and activating about 800 District of Columbia National Guard members.
By adding outside troops to the existing D.C. Guard deployment and federal law enforcement presence, Trump is exercising even tighter control over the city. It’s a power play that the president has justified as an emergency response to crime and homelessness, even though city officials have noted that violent crime is lower than it was during Trump’s first term in office.
National Guard members have played a limited role in the federal intervention so far, and it’s unclear why additional troops are needed. They have been patrolling at landmarks like the National Mall and Union Station and assisting law enforcement with tasks including crowd control.
National Guard members are coming from West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio
The Republican governors of the three states said they were sending hundreds of troops at the request of the Trump administration.
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey said he directed 300 to 400 Guard troops to head to Washington, adding that the state “is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation’s capital.”
South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster said he authorized the deployment of 200 of his state’s National Guardsmen to help law enforcement in Washington at the Pentagon’s request. He noted that if a hurricane or other natural disaster strikes, they would be recalled.
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said he would send 150 military police from the Guard to “carry out presence patrols and serve as added security” and that they were expected to arrive in the coming days. His statement said Army Secretary Dan Driscoll requested the troops.
The activations suggest the Trump administration sees the need for additional manpower after the president personally played down the need for Washington to hire more police officers.
Protest pushes back on federal crackdown in Washington
A protest against Trump’s intervention drew scores to Dupont Circle on Saturday before a march to the White House, about 1.5 miles away. Demonstrators assembled behind a banner that said, “No fascist takeover of D.C.,” and some in the crowd held signs saying, “No military occupation.”
Morgan Taylor, one of the protest organizers, said they were hoping to spark enough backlash to Trump’s actions that the administration would be forced to pull back on its crime and immigration agenda.
“It’s hot, but I’m glad to be here. It’s good to see all these people out here,” she said. “I can’t believe that this is happening in this country at this time.”
Fueling the protests were concerns about Trump overreaching and that he had used crime as a pretext to impose his will on Washington.
John Finnigan, 55, was taking a bike ride when he ran into the protest in downtown Washington. The real estate construction manager who has lived in the capital for 27 years said Trump’s moves were “ridiculous” because crime is down.
“Hopefully, some of the mayors and some of the residents will get out in front of it and try and make it harder for it to happen in other cities,” Finnigan said.
Jamie Dickstein, a 24-year-old teacher, said she was “very uncomfortable and worried” for the safety or her students given the “unmarked officers of all types” now roaming Washington and detaining people.
Dickstein said she turned out to the protest with friends and relatives to “prevent a continuous domino effect going forward with other cities.”
Surge of federal law enforcement in Washington draws mixed reactions
Federal agents have appeared in some of the city’s most highly trafficked neighborhoods, garnering a mix of praise, pushback and alarm from local residents and leaders across the country.
City leaders, who are obliged to cooperate with Trump’s order under the federal laws that direct the district’s local governance, have sought to work with the administration, though they have bristled at the scope of the president’s takeover.
On Friday, the administration reversed course on an order that aimed to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as an “emergency police commissioner” after the district’s top lawyer sued.
After a court hearing, Trump’s attorney general, Pam Bondi, issued a memo directing the Metropolitan Police Department to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law.
City officials say they are evaluating how to best comply.
In his order Monday, Trump declared an emergency due to the “city government’s failure to maintain public order.” He said that impeded the “federal government’s ability to operate efficiently to address the nation’s broader interests without fear of our workers being subjected to rampant violence.”
In a letter to city residents, Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, wrote that “our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now.”
She added that if Washington residents stick together, “we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy — even when we don’t have full access to it.”


Protesters out in force for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ rallies across US

Protesters out in force for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ rallies across US
Updated 4 sec ago

Protesters out in force for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ rallies across US

Protesters out in force for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ rallies across US
  • With signs such as “Nothing is more patriotic than protesting” or “Resist Fascism,” in many places the events looked more like a street party

WASHINGTON: Huge crowds took to the streets in all 50 US states at “No Kings” protests on Saturday, venting anger over President Donald Trump’s hardline policies, while Republicans ridiculed them as “Hate America” rallies.

Organizers said seven million people marched in protests spanning New York to Los Angeles, with demonstrations popping up in small cities across the US heartland and even near Trump’s home in Florida.

“This is what democracy looks like!” chanted thousands in Washington near the US Capitol, where the federal government was shut down for a third week because of a legislative deadlock.

Colorful signs called on people to “protect democracy,” while others demanded the country abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency at the center of Trump’s anti-immigrant crackdown.

Demonstrators slammed what they called the Republican billionaire’s strong-arm tactics, including attacks on the media, political opponents and undocumented immigrants.

“I never thought I would live to see the death of my country as a democracy,” 69-year-old retiree Colleen Hoffman said as she marched down Broadway in New York.

“We are in a crisis — the cruelty of this regime, the authoritarianism. I just feel like I cannot sit home and do nothing.”

In Los Angeles, protesters floated a giant balloon of Trump in a diaper.

Many flew flags, with at least one referencing pirate anime hit “One Piece,” brandishing the skull logo that has recently become a staple of anti-government protests from Peru to Madagascar.

“Fight Ignorance not migrants,” read one sign at a protest in Houston, where nearly one-quarter of the population is made up of immigrants, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

While animated, the protests were largely peaceful.

But in downtown Los Angeles, police fired nonlethal rounds and tear gas late Saturday to disperse crowds that included “No Kings” protesters, the Los Angeles Times reported.

“After thousands of people gathered to express their constitutional 1st Amendment rights peacefully earlier in the day, nearly a hundred agitators marched over to Aliso and Alameda” where they used lasers and industrial-size flashing lights, the LAPD Central Division said on X.

“A Dispersal Order was issued and the demonstrators were dispersed from the area,” it added, without specifying if any arrests were made.

Trump responds

It was not possible to independently verify the organizers’ attendance figures. In New York, authorities said more than 100,000 gathered at one of the largest protests, while in Washington, crowds were estimated at between 8,000 and 10,000 people.

Trump’s response to Saturday’s events was typically aggressive, with the US president posting a series of AI-generated videos to his Truth Social platform depicting him as a king.

In one, he is shown wearing a crown and piloting a fighter jet that drops what appears to be feces on anti-Trump protesters.

His surrogates were in fighting form, too, with House Speaker Mike Johnson deriding the rallies as being “Hate America” protests.

“You’re going to bring together the Marxists, the Socialists, the Antifa advocates, the anarchists and the pro-Hamas wing of the far-left Democrat Party,” he told reporters.

Protesters treated that claim with ridicule.

“Look around! If this is hate, then someone should go back to grade school,” said Paolo, 63, as the crowd chanted and sang around him in Washington.

Others underlined the deep polarization tearing apart American politics.

“Here’s the thing about what right-wingers say: I don’t give a crap. They hate us,” said Tony, a 34-year-old software engineer.

‘Country of equals’

Deirdre Schifeling of the American Civil Liberties Union said protesters wanted to convey that “we are a country of equals.”

“We are a country of laws that apply to everyone, of due process and of democracy. We will not be silenced,” she told reporters.

Leah Greenberg, co-founder of the Indivisible Project, slammed the Trump administration’s efforts to send National Guard troops into Democratic-led US cities, including Los Angeles, Washington, Chicago, Portland and Memphis.

“It is the classic authoritarian playbook: threaten, smear and lie, scare people into submission,” Greenberg said.

Addressing the crowd outside the US Capitol, progressive Senator Bernie Sanders warned of the dangers democracy faced under Trump.

“We have a president who wants more and more power in his own hands and in the hands of his fellow oligarchs,” he said.

Isaac Harder, 16, said he feared for his generation’s future.

“It’s a fascist trajectory. And I want to do anything I can to stop that.”


Bolivia votes in runoff election, marking pro-market shift and US embrace

Bolivia votes in runoff election, marking pro-market shift and US embrace
Updated 19 October 2025

Bolivia votes in runoff election, marking pro-market shift and US embrace

Bolivia votes in runoff election, marking pro-market shift and US embrace
  • The race pits centrist Senator Rodrigo Paz against conservative former president Jorge Quiroga
  • Runoff between two pro-market candidates from privileged backgrounds signals an epochal shift for Bolivia

LA PAZ: Bolivians vote in a presidential runoff on Sunday that marks a decisive rejection of the socialist government and a likely foreign policy shift closer to the United States after decades of frosty relations. The race pits centrist Senator Rodrigo Paz against conservative former president Jorge “Tuto” Quiroga. Both candidates have pledged to strengthen diplomatic ties with Washington – strained since 2009 – and seek US-backed financial support to stabilize Bolivia’s fragile economy. The runoff between two pro-market candidates from privileged backgrounds signals an epochal shift for Bolivia, following two decades of dominance by the leftist Movement to Socialism party, founded by Evo Morales and once backed by the country’s Indigenous majority.
For some voters the finalists echo the conservative governments of the 1990s, which championed privatization and close relations with the United States. Morales, who took power in 2006 and was Bolivia’s first Indigenous leader, pursued alliances with Cuba, Venezuela and Russia, and nationalized the oil and gas industry.
“This election marks a political turning point,” said Glaeldys Gonzalez Calanche, analyst for the Southern Andes at International Crisis Group. Regardless of the outcome, “Bolivia is heading in a new direction,” she said.
Quiroga has promised “radical change,” including deep cuts to public spending and closing or privatizing loss-making state-owned companies. Paz favors a more gradual approach, maintaining social programs for the poor while promoting private-sector growth. Opinion polls show Quiroga with a narrow lead. A September Ipsos survey gave him 47 percent support to Paz’s 39 percent, though Paz outperformed expectations in the August first round.
Voting stations open at 8 a.m. local time (1200 GMT) and close at 4 p.m., with initial results expected after 9 p.m. The winner will take office on November 8.
Voters want economic change
Paz in late September announced plans for an economic cooperation deal worth $1.5 billion with US officials to ensure fuel supplies, while Quiroga is pushing for a $12 billion international bailout backed by multilateral lenders.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this week that both presidential candidates “want stronger, better relations with the United States,” after decades of anti-American leadership. “This election is a transformative opportunity,” he said on Wednesday. Some Bolivians have voiced fears of austerity measures such as those seen in neighboring Argentina under President Javier Milei, though Paz has rejected drastic spending cuts and Quiroga insists his policies will benefit ordinary Bolivians. Support for the Movement to Socialism all but collapsed in the election’s first round.
Inflation has surged to 23 percent since the start of the year, while fuel and dollar shortages have crippled consumer demand. Natural gas exports – once Bolivia’s economic engine – have plummeted, straining the boliviano currency and limiting fuel imports.
In La Paz’s commercial district, appliance stores are shuttered and shops empty of customers. “There are months with zero sales,” said Mercedes Quisbert, head of the local Importers’ Association. Up until this year, shopkeepers and street-sellers had been just about managing to weather the crisis, she said – but not anymore.
Bolivia has one of Latin America’s highest rates of informal employment, with around 84 percent of the population working outside the formal labor market, according to official data. Millions rely on buying and selling goods to make a living.
“We’re basically surviving,” said Marcela Martinez, 52, as she compared prices at a market in La Paz. She was planning to vote for Paz on Sunday. “We need new people to come in.”


Japan’s LDP, Ishin agree to form coalition government, Kyodo says

Japan’s LDP, Ishin agree to form coalition government, Kyodo says
Updated 19 October 2025

Japan’s LDP, Ishin agree to form coalition government, Kyodo says

Japan’s LDP, Ishin agree to form coalition government, Kyodo says
  • Sanae Takaichi’s path to succeed Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba had seemed all but certain
  • But then the long-ruling LDP’s junior partner, Komeito, quit their 26-year coalition

TOKYO: Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party and the Japan Innovation Party have broadly agreed to form a coalition government, setting the stage for the country’s first female prime minister, Kyodo news agency reported on Sunday.
Sanae Takaichi, leader of the conservative LDP, and Hirofumi Yoshimura, head of the smaller right-leaning group, known as Ishin, are set to sign an agreement on their alliance on Monday, Kyodo said.
Calls to the LDP and Ishin headquarters to seek comment went unanswered outside business hours.
Ishin’s co-head, Fumitake Fujita, raised expectations for a deal on Friday, saying the two parties had made “big progress” in coalition talks.
Ishin lawmakers will vote for Takaichi in an election to choose the prime minister in parliament on Tuesday, but the party does not plan to send ministers to Takaichi’s cabinet initially, the news agency said.
Takaichi’s path to succeed Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba had seemed all but certain after she won her party’s presidency early this month. But then the long-ruling LDP’s junior partner, Komeito, quit their 26-year coalition, setting off a flurry of negotiations with rival parties to select the next premier.
In an effort to get Ishin on board, the LDP offered to keep working toward banning donations from companies and other organizations and exempting food items from Japan’s sales tax, Kyodo said.
Ishin has proposed eliminating the tax on food items for two years.


Tropical storm kills family of five as hits Philippines

Tropical storm kills family of five as hits Philippines
Updated 19 October 2025

Tropical storm kills family of five as hits Philippines

Tropical storm kills family of five as hits Philippines
  • The family, including two children aged two and 11 years old, were crushed to death when a tree fell on their house
  • Fengshen hovered over Manila Bay late morning Sunday with gusts of up to 90 kilometers an hour

MANILA: Tropical Storm Fengshen killed a family of five Sunday as it plowed across the Philippines’ main island Luzon, police and disaster officials said.
The family, including two children aged two and 11 years old, were crushed to death when a tree fell on their house at daybreak, police official Sonny Ombajino said by telephone.
The incident occurred at a village near the town of Pitogo, about 153 kilometers (95 miles) southeast of Manila, as the storm raked across the southeastern section of Luzon overnight.
Fengshen hovered over Manila Bay late morning Sunday with gusts of up to 90 kilometers (56 miles) an hour and was poised to strike provinces north of the capital Manila, the state weather service said.
At least 47,000 people left their homes and headed to government-designated temporary shelters across southeast Luzon since Saturday, local disaster officials said, as the weather service warned of possible coastal flooding and landslides.
The Philippines is hit by around 20 storms and typhoons each year, routinely striking areas where millions of people live in poverty.
Scientists warn that storms are becoming more powerful as the planet warms due to human-driven climate change.
Fengshen comes as the country reels from a series of major earthquakes that killed at least 87 people over the past three weeks.


Pakistan, Afghanistan reach ceasefire agreement in Doha after fierce clashes

Pakistan, Afghanistan reach ceasefire agreement in Doha after fierce clashes
Updated 11 min 20 sec ago

Pakistan, Afghanistan reach ceasefire agreement in Doha after fierce clashes

Pakistan, Afghanistan reach ceasefire agreement in Doha after fierce clashes
  • The agreement was arrived at during a round of negotiations mediated by Qatar and Turkiye on Saturday, Qatar’s foreign ministry said in a statement
  • Clashes havekilled dozens and wounded hundreds in the worst violence between the two neighbors since the Taliban seized power in Kabul in 2021

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif announced on Sunday that Islamabad had reached a ceasefire agreement with Kabul in Doha, after days of fierce clashes between the two sides left dozens dead and increased tensions between the neighbors. 

Asif was leading a Pakistani delegation in Doha on Saturday for talks with Afghanistan after days of fierce battles between the two countries along their long and porous border, which led to the deaths of dozens of people on both sides. Pakistan also carried out airstrikes in Kandahar and Kabul before the two sides reached an uneasy truce that opened the window for bilateral talks arranged by Qatar.

Pakistan has long accused Afghanistan of sheltering militant groups like the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the separatist Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and facilitating their attacks against its civilians and security forces. Kabul denies the allegation, though it has become a key sticking point between the two countries and has led more serious skirmishes than ever before.

“A ceasefire agreement has been reached between Pakistan and Afghanistan,” Asif wrote on social media platform X on Sunday. 

“The series of terrorist activities from Afghanistan on Pakistani soil will cease immediately. Both neighboring countries will respect each other’s territory — Alhamdulillah.”

Afghan relatives and mourners offer prayers during the funeral ceremony of victims, killed in aerial strikes by Pakistan, at the Urgun district of Paktika province on Oct. 18, 2025. (AFP)

The minister said delegations from Afghanistan and Pakistan will meet again in Istanbul on Oct. 25 in which detailed discussions will take place. Asif thanked Qatar and Turkiye for their mediation efforts. 

The development was also confirmed by Qatar’s foreign ministry in a statement, which said both Pakistan and Afghanistan have agreed to an “immediate ceasefire” after the Doha talks on Saturday. 

“During the negotiations, the two sides agreed to an immediate ceasefire and the establishment of mechanisms to consolidate lasting peace and stability between the two countries,” it said. 

Afghan government spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid said the two sides had reaffirmed their commitment to peace, mutual respect and maintaining strong neighborly relations. He said both sides are committed to resolving their disputes through dialogue.

“It has been decided that neither country will undertake any hostile actions against the other, nor will they support groups carrying out attacks against the Government of Pakistan,” Mujahid wrote on X. 

Pakistan ceremonial guards lay a wreath during the funeral ceremony of a Frontier Corps paramilitary personnel, killed during the Afghanistan-Pakistan border clashes, in Kohat on Oct. 17, 2025. (AFP)

He said both nations will refrain from targeting each other’s security forces, civilians or critical infrastructure. 

Tensions rose sharply on Friday when a militant attack on a Pakistani security compound in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province bordering Afghanistan killed at least seven soldiers. The attack elicited airstrikes from the authorities in Islamabad in an Afghan border town against the Hafiz Gul Bahadar group. 

The Afghanistan Cricket Board told AFP that three players who were in the region for a tournament were killed by the airstrikes, revising down an earlier toll of eight.

Afghanistan withdrew from the Twenty20 international tri-series in Pakistan next month in response, following which the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) announced Zimbabwe would take part in the series in its place. 

Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on Saturday Pakistan had carried out “precision strikes” in which about 70 militants had been killed.

“All speculations and assertions being made regarding targeting of civilians are false and meant to generate support for terrorist groups operating from inside Afghanistan,” he added.