ֱ

Homeless who refuse to cooperate with Trump crackdown may go to jail, White House says

A general view of a homeless encampment near the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 11, 2025. (REUTERS)
A general view of a homeless encampment near the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 11, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 13 August 2025

Homeless who refuse to cooperate with Trump crackdown may go to jail, White House says

Homeless who refuse to cooperate with Trump crackdown may go to jail, White House says
  • US communities have long experienced seemingly intractable problems with homelessness, which reached an all-time national high of over 771,000 men, women and children on a single night in 2024

WASHINGTON: Homeless people in Washington, D.C., could face jail time if they do not comply with President Donald Trump’s efforts to crack down on crime and rid the US capital of homeless encampments, the White House said on Tuesday.
“Homeless individuals will be given the option to leave their encampment, to be taken to a homeless shelter, to be offered addiction or mental-health services, and if they refuse, they will be susceptible to fines or to jail time,” White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters.
Leavitt said the administration was exploring strategies to relocate homeless individuals “far from the capital.” She said US Park Police have removed 70 homeless encampments from federal parks since March and are set to clear the remaining two encampments in the city later this week.
Andy Wassenich, director of policy at Miriam’s Kitchen — an organization offering services to the homeless — said his team was out trying to warn people. He said there was still a lot of confusion about what the crackdown may bring.
Their best advice, he said, was: “Go to shelter if you can, if you can stand it. If you have anybody you can stay with, get off the street, and seek safety and let us know what we can do for you.”
Trump said on social media that he wanted the homeless out of Washington even before he announced the extraordinary step of temporarily taking over the District of Columbia’s police department and deploying 800 National Guard troops as part of a crackdown on crime there — an effort that also includes another 500 federal law enforcement agents.
A billionaire real estate developer, Trump described the homeless as one of several groups who have “overtaken” Washington that include “violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs.” He likened his intended crackdown to his administration’s actions to secure the US border with Mexico.

HOMELESSNESS REACHED A RECORD HIGH NATIONWIDE IN 2024
US communities have long experienced seemingly intractable problems with homelessness, which reached an all-time national high of over 771,000 men, women and children on a single night in 2024, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s latest homelessness report to Congress.
The HUD report estimated Washington’s homeless population at 5,616, a 14.1 percent increase from the year before. That made Washington, a city of just over 700,000 people, the 16th out of the 20 US cities with the largest homeless populations, according to the website USA Facts. The top five cities are New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Seattle and Denver.
But the District of Columbia had the highest prevalence of homelessness among US states, with 83 homeless individuals for every 10,000 people, HUD data showed.
Homeless people did not appear to be caught up in a Monday night sweep by 850 officers and federal agents, who the White House said made 23 arrests across the city, an operation which Leavitt announced at a press conference on Monday.
The District of Columbia operates under the Home Rule Act, which gives Congress ultimate authority but allows residents to elect a mayor and city council. Trump bypassed the city’s elected leaders by declaring a “public safety emergency” and invoking a section of the act that allows the president to take over the police force for 30 days under emergency conditions.
On Sunday night, a small group of federal agents arrived at Union Station — a gathering place for homeless people — and briefly questioned a person standing there, according to a man who was outside the building at the time. After about 15 minutes, the agents, who were from a variety of federal agencies, left with little fanfare.
Jacob Adams, a political activist with FLARE USA, a self-described anti-Trump group, was sitting at the organization’s table set up near the fountain outside the station.
He said the agents did nothing to disperse the people who had gathered there, and in fact told them they could stay overnight. “I don’t know if it was a show of force or photo ops. But it didn’t come off as very forceful,” Adams said.
Wassenich said on Tuesday that so far there was little evidence of the unhoused population being directly affected by the surge in law enforcement.
“If they are caught up in other things, that’s certainly possible,” he said. “The tents are still standing. The people are still sleeping on whatever bench they might be on.”


US strikes 2 more alleged drug-carrying boats, this time in the Pacific Ocean

Updated 3 sec ago

US strikes 2 more alleged drug-carrying boats, this time in the Pacific Ocean

US strikes 2 more alleged drug-carrying boats, this time in the Pacific Ocean
It followed another strike Tuesday night, also in the eastern Pacific
They bring the death toll to at least 37 from attacks that began last month

WASHINGTON: The US military on Wednesday launched its ninth strike against an alleged drug-carrying vessel, killing three people in the eastern Pacific Ocean, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said, expanding the Trump administration’s campaign against drug trafficking in South America.
It followed another strike Tuesday night, also in the eastern Pacific, that killed two people, Hegseth posted on social media hours earlier.
The attacks were departures from the seven previous US strikes that had targeted vessels in the Caribbean Sea.
They bring the death toll to at least 37 from attacks that began last month.
The strikes represent an expansion of the military’s targeting area as well as a shift to the waters off South America, where much of the cocaine from the world’s largest producers is smuggled.
Hegseth’s social media posts also drew a direct comparison between the war on terrorism that the US declared after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the Trump administration’s crackdown.

PM Orban says Hungary is the only country where a Ukraine peace deal can be sealed

PM Orban says Hungary is the only country where a Ukraine peace deal can be sealed
Updated 4 min 40 sec ago

PM Orban says Hungary is the only country where a Ukraine peace deal can be sealed

PM Orban says Hungary is the only country where a Ukraine peace deal can be sealed
  • Orban also said that Ukraine “has for long not been a sovereign country“

BUDAPEST: Hungary is the only country where a peace deal to end the war in Ukraine can be sealed, Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Thursday in a speech marking the anniversary of Hungary’s 1956 anti-Soviet uprising.
Plans for a summit in Budapest between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have been postponed.
Orban also said that Ukraine “has for long not been a sovereign country,” and reiterated that he does not want Ukraine to become a member of the European Union but the bloc should enter into a special relationship with it instead.


UK govt should adopt new Islamophobia definition: Ex-faith minister

UK govt should adopt new Islamophobia definition: Ex-faith minister
Updated 19 min 39 sec ago

UK govt should adopt new Islamophobia definition: Ex-faith minister

UK govt should adopt new Islamophobia definition: Ex-faith minister
  • Lord Khan: New definition ‘opportunity’ to tackle hate against Muslims
  • Muslims are victims of almost half of faith-based hate crimes in country: Home Office

LONDON: A former faith minister in the UK has urged the government to fully adopt a new definition of Islamophobia to help tackle hate against Muslims.

Lord Khan, who oversaw the start of the review into the legal definition of the term, told Sky News: “I hope it’s a clear definition which reflects the terms of reference which protects people, and it’s clear.”

The government is expected to change the technical legal term to “anti-Muslim hostility” after a working group, chaired by former Conservative Minister Dominic Grieve, was tasked in February with defining “unacceptable treatment, prejudice, discrimination and hate targeting Muslims or anyone who is perceived to be Muslim.”

Lord Khan said: “There’s so many definitions out there, this is an opportunity to address the big problem in our communities.

“I would request and urge the government to adopt the definition which fits within the terms of reference on what we wanted to do when we embarked on the process.

“It’s a strong message to our communities that the work that should be done isn’t being done — these are lived experiences and I am one of those people who has suffered.”

A former working definition of Islamophobia adopted by the Labour Party in 2021 said: “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.”

That previous definition raised concerns that a precedent could be set for providing more protection for certain groups, which could impact more broadly on people’s free speech.

Home Office data showed a 20 percent increase in Islamophobic hate crimes last year, with Muslims the victims in almost half of all religious hate-based incidents in the UK.

Many say the lack of a clear Islamophobia definition means many more crimes go unreported.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said in a statement: “The department is carefully considering the independent Working Group’s advice on a definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia, and no government decisions have been made.

“We will always defend freedom of speech, including fiercely protecting the right to criticise, express dislike of, or insult religions and the beliefs and practices of those who follow them. This will remain at the front of our minds as we review the definition.”


Russian drone kills two Ukrainian journalists, Zalenskiy condemns Russia

Russian drone kills two Ukrainian journalists, Zalenskiy condemns Russia
Updated 48 min 51 sec ago

Russian drone kills two Ukrainian journalists, Zalenskiy condemns Russia

Russian drone kills two Ukrainian journalists, Zalenskiy condemns Russia
  • Donetsk region governor Vadym Filashkin identified the journalists as Olena Hubanova and Yevhen Karmazin
  • The channel, which broadcasts in Russian, confirmed their deaths and said they were in a car at a petrol station at the time of the strike

KYIV: Two Ukrainian journalists were killed by a Russian drone in the eastern city of Kramatorsk on Thursday in an attack that was condemned by President Volodymyr Zelensky and described by Ukraine’s human rights ombudsman as a war crime.
Donetsk region governor Vadym Filashkin identified the journalists as Olena Hubanova and Yevhen Karmazin from Ukraine’s state-funded Freedom television channel.
The channel, which broadcasts in Russian, confirmed their deaths and said they were in a car at a petrol station at the time of the strike.


Filashkin said they were hit by a Lancet, a costly and powerful drone often used against tanks and armored vehicles.
“This tragedy is further evidence of Russia’s systemic war crimes against civilians,” human rights ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets wrote on Telegram.
The general prosecutor’s office said a colleague of the two journalists had also been wounded and that it had opened a war crime investigation. It posted a photo of a destroyed red car and an image of two flak jackets marked “press” in the boot.
Zelensky said Russia had killed 135 media representatives during its war in Ukraine. He did not say how many of these were journalists.
“These are not accidents or mistakes, but a deliberate Russian strategy to silence all independent voices reporting about Russia’s war crimes in Ukraine,” Zelensky wrote on X.
Russia did not immediately comment on his or Lubinets’ remarks.


Ukraine says Russia returned 1,000 bodies

Ukraine says Russia returned 1,000 bodies
Updated 23 October 2025

Ukraine says Russia returned 1,000 bodies

Ukraine says Russia returned 1,000 bodies
  • Tens of thousands of soldiers have been killed on both sides since Russia invaded, though neither side regularly publishes data on their own casualties
  • The exchange of prisoners of war and killed soldiers is one of the few remaining areas of cooperation between Kyiv and Moscow, which invaded Ukraine in February 2022

KYIV: Russia on Thursday returned 1,000 bodies to Ukraine, which Moscow said were the remains of Kyiv’s soldiers killed in battle, a Ukrainian government agency said.
The exchange of prisoners of war and killed soldiers is one of the few remaining areas of cooperation between Kyiv and Moscow, which invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
“Repatriation measures took place today,” Ukraine’s Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War announced on social media.
“One thousand bodies, which according to the Russian side belong to Ukrainian servicemen, were returned to Ukraine,” the agency added.
Ukraine has said that Moscow handed over to Kyiv the bodies of killed Russian soldiers during previous repatriations.
Kyiv also announced in September, August and July that it had received the remains of 1,000 killed soldiers from Russia, illustrating the intensity of fighting across the sprawling front line.
The Coordination Headquarters said law enforcement would soon begin the process of identifying the repatriated remains and thanked the International Committee of the Red Cross for its role in the repatriation.
Tens of thousands of soldiers have been killed on both sides since Russia invaded, though neither side regularly publishes data on their own casualties.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in February this year told US media that Ukraine has lost more than 46,000 soldiers and that tens of thousands are considered missing in action.
The BBC and independent outlet Mediazona say they have documented more than 135,000 Russian soldiers killed in the three-and-a-half-year campaign, using open-source data, with the actual number likely higher.