ֱ

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London

Police officers detain a protester during a rally organised by Defend Our Juries, challenging the British government's proscription of
Police officers detain a protester during a rally organised by Defend Our Juries, challenging the British government's proscription of "Palestine Action" under anti-terrorism laws, in London on August 9, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 11 August 2025

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London
  • 532 people were arrested during Saturday’s demonstration in Parliament Square, 522 of them for displaying support for the proscribed group, and 348 of them were age 50 or over
  • Palestine Action was designated a terrorist organization last month but critics say ‘inappropriate use of terror laws’ exacerbates social divisions and is ‘conflating protest with terrorism’
  • Protesters ‘were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate, to the point of absurdity, to be treating them as terrorists,’ says Amnesty International chief

LONDON: British prime minister Keir Starmer faces mounting criticism after hundreds of people were detained during a demonstration in Parliament Square in London at the weekend against the government’s decision to ban Palestine Action.

The Metropolitan Police said officers arrested 532 people on Saturday, 522 of them for displaying items in support of the proscribed group. A breakdown of the arrest figures released on Sunday revealed that 348 of those apprehended were age 50 or over, .

The protest, organized by Defend Our Juries, an organization that “supports collective action to expose this corruption of democracy and the rule of law,” took place after ministers warned they would take action against anyone who showed public support for Palestine Action, which was designated a terrorist organization last month.

Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones defended the crackdown, saying: “The right to peacefully protest in this country is a cornerstone of our democracy, and of course we respect that. But with regards to Palestine Action, they are a proscribed terrorist organization and their actions have not been peaceful.

“They have violently carried out criminal damage to RAF aircraft. We have credible reports of them targeting Jewish-owned businesses here in the United Kingdom, and there are other reasons which we can’t disclose because of national security.

“But they are a proscribed terrorist organization and anyone showing support for that terrorist organization will feel the full force of the law.”

The prime minister’s office also defended the proscription, saying it followed “strong security advice” and citing attacks said to be linked to the group involving violence, injury and criminal damage.

Officials said the UK’s Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had linked the group to three separate acts of terrorism.

However, the move drew sharp criticism from across the political spectrum.

Baroness Shami Chakrabarti, a member of Starmer’s ruling Labour Party and of the House of Lords, warned that the ban risked deepening social divisions.

“The proscription of Palestine Action is in danger of becoming a mistake of poll tax proportions,” she told The Independent, referring to a highly unpopular taxation policy of former prime minister Margaret Thatcher’s government that led to violent protests in the early 1990s across the UK.

“The courts have already found an arguable case that it breaches fundamental rights and more, not less, people are coming out to protest against both atrocities in Gaza and inappropriate use of terror laws at home.

“The notable presence of so many older people highlights the strength of genuine feeling. Criminal damage at air force bases can be prosecuted, but sweeping guilt by association only exacerbates community tensions and creates a bigger headache for the police.”

Former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain described the arrests as “madness,” and said Palestine Action was “not equivalent” to terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda or Daesh, adding that this was why he had voted against its ban.

Independent MP Diane Abbott said: “The government is in danger of making itself look both draconian and foolish.”

Left-wing Labour MP Nadia Whittome, who also opposed the ban, accused ministers of “conflating protest with terrorism.” In a message posted on social media platform X, she said: “Last month, I warned that proscribing Palestine Action would result in the mass criminalization of people who are not even members of the group. Now, more than 500 people have been arrested. I voted against the proscription; we shouldn’t be conflating protest with terrorism.”

Former chief prosecutor Nazir Afzal warned that the mass arrests would clog the justice system: “These would probably be jury trials as each of them would be advised to plead not guilty and expect a trial in 2027 at the earliest. I also suspect that no jury would convict anyhow.”

Amnesty International described the level of policing as “disproportionate to the point of absurdity.”

Its chief executive, Sacha Deshmukh, said: “Peaceful protest is a fundamental right. People are understandably outraged by the ongoing genocide being committed in Gaza and are entitled under international human rights law to express their horror.

“The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate, to the point of absurdity, to be treating them as terrorists. We have long criticized UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded, and a threat to freedom of expression. These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.”

Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori said the protest would “go down in our country’s history as a momentous act of collective defiance of an unprecedented attack on our fundamental freedoms.”

She argued that the large number of people granted street bail showed the law was “unenforceable.” Street bail is a process under which arrested individuals can be granted bail before they are taken to a police station.

Under the UK’s Terrorism Act 2000, membership of or support for a proscribed organization carries a maximum prison term of 14 years. In some cases, prosecutions require approval from both the Crown Prosecution Service and the Attorney General.


Venezuela’s Maduro to US: ‘No crazy war, please!’

Venezuela’s Maduro to US: ‘No crazy war, please!’
Updated 8 sec ago

Venezuela’s Maduro to US: ‘No crazy war, please!’

Venezuela’s Maduro to US: ‘No crazy war, please!’

CARACAS: Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on Thursday launched a plea in English as tensions mount between Washington and Caracas: “No crazy war, please!“
Maduro’s comment came after US President Donald Trump said he had authorized covert action against the South American nation, and amid an escalating US military campaign against alleged drug traffickers in the Caribbean and Pacific.
“Yes peace, yes peace forever, peace forever. No crazy war, please!” Maduro said in a meeting with unions aligned with the leftist leader, a former bus driver and union leader.
The United States has deployed stealth warplanes and Navy ships as part of what it calls anti-narcotics efforts, but has yet to release evidence that its targets — eight boats and a semi-submersible — were smuggling drugs.
The US strikes, which began on September 2, have killed at least 37 people, according to an AFP tally based on US figures.
Regional tensions have flared as a result of the campaign, with Maduro accusing Washington of seeking regime change.
Last week, Trump said he had authorized covert CIA action against Venezuela and was considering strikes against alleged drug cartels on land.
The Republican billionaire president accuses Maduro of heading a drug cartel, a charge the Venezuelan leader denies.
“We know the CIA is present” in Venezuela, the country’s defense minister Vladimir Padrino said Thursday.
“They may deploy — I don’t know how many — CIA-affiliated units in covert operations...and any attempt will fail.”
Padrino was overseeing military exercises along Venezuela’s coast in response to the US military deployment in the Caribbean.
Experts have questioned the legality of using lethal force in foreign or international waters against suspects who have not been intercepted or questioned.
 


Air traffic control staffing crisis delay more flights as US government shutdown remains unresolved

Air traffic control staffing crisis delay more flights as US government shutdown remains unresolved
Updated 24 October 2025

Air traffic control staffing crisis delay more flights as US government shutdown remains unresolved

Air traffic control staffing crisis delay more flights as US government shutdown remains unresolved
  • Some 13,000 air traffic controllers and about 50,000 Transportation Security Administration officers must work without pay during the government shutdown
  • FAA is 3,500 air traffic controllers short of targeted staffing levels and many had been working mandatory overtime and six-day weeks even before the shutdown

WASHINGTON: Air traffic control staffing issues are delaying travel at airports in New York, Washington, Newark and Houston, the Federal Aviation Administration said late on Thursday, as a US government shutdown hit its 23rd day.
The FAA was reporting staffing issues at 10 different locations and issued ground stops at Houston Bush and Newark airports. Flights at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport were being delayed an average of 31 minutes and delays at New York LaGuardia were averaging 62 minutes.
Some 13,000 air traffic controllers and about 50,000 Transportation Security Administration officers must work without pay during the government shutdown.
FlightAware, a flight tracking site, said more than 4,200 US flights had been delayed Thursday, including more than 15 percent of flights at Reagan, Newark and LaGuardia and 13 percent at Bush.
Federal officials are worried that absences by controllers may increase over the weekend. Controllers will miss their first full paycheck on Tuesday.
“We fear there will be significant flight delays, disruptions and cancelations in major airports across the country this holiday season,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said.
Democrats reject the contention that they are responsible and say it is President Donald Trump and Republicans who refuse to negotiate.
Air traffic control has become a flashpoint in the debate over the shutdown with both parties blaming the other. Unions and airlines have urged a quick end to the standoff.
In 2019, during a 35-day shutdown, the number of absences by controllers and TSA officers rose as workers missed paychecks, extending checkpoint wait times at some airports. Authorities were forced to slow air traffic in New York and Washington, which put pressure on lawmakers to end that standoff.
The FAA is about 3,500 air traffic controllers short of targeted staffing levels and many had been working mandatory overtime and six-day weeks even before the shutdown. 


Britain calls for strong measures against Russia as Ukraine’s Zelensky heads to London

Britain calls for strong measures against Russia as Ukraine’s Zelensky heads to London
Updated 24 October 2025

Britain calls for strong measures against Russia as Ukraine’s Zelensky heads to London

Britain calls for strong measures against Russia as Ukraine’s Zelensky heads to London
  • Starmer said Putin had shown he was not serious about proposals to end the war

LONDON: Britain on Friday called for a raft of measures against Russia to strengthen Ukraine’s hand ahead of any future peace talks, as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky heads to London for discussions with key allies.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s office said he would press a meeting of the “Coalition of the Willing” countries that have pledged to strengthen support for Ukraine to take Russian oil and gas off the global market, use frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine, and give Kyiv more long-range missiles.
The meeting comes after US President Donald Trump hit Russia’s two biggest oil companies with sanctions, in a dramatic U-turn after he said last week that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin would soon hold a summit in Budapest to try to end the war in Ukraine.
Starmer said Putin had shown he was not serious about proposals to end the war.
“Time and again we offer Putin the chance to end his needless invasion, to stop the killing and recall his troops, but he repeatedly rejects those proposals and any chance of peace,” Starmer said in a statement.
“We must ratchet up the pressure on Russia and build on President Trump’s decisive action.”
Friday’s talks in London will be a mixture of in-person and virtual, with NATO chief Mark Rutte, Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen expected to join Starmer and Zelensky in London.
Zelensky welcomed Trump’s energy sanctions in a trip to Brussels on Thursday, where he also urged European leaders to give Kyiv long-range weapons and use frozen Russian assets to arm Ukraine further.
Moscow has said it would deliver a “painful response” if the assets were seized under the plan to use them to provide a 140 billion-euro  loan to Kyiv.
In another bid to starve Moscow of revenue, the EU approved a 19th package of sanctions that includes a ban on Russian liquefied natural gas imports.


Putin defiant after Trump sanctions Russian oil companies over Ukraine

Putin defiant after Trump sanctions Russian oil companies over Ukraine
Updated 24 October 2025

Putin defiant after Trump sanctions Russian oil companies over Ukraine

Putin defiant after Trump sanctions Russian oil companies over Ukraine
  • Putin shrugs off impact expanded US-EU sanctions, warns on long-range weapons
  • US sanctions prompted Chinese state oil majors to suspend Russian oil purchases in the short term

MOSCOW: Russian President Vladimir Putin remained defiant on Thursday after US President Donald Trump hit Russia’s two biggest oil companies with sanctions to pressure the Kremlin leader to end the war in Ukraine, a move that pushed global oil prices up 5 percent.
The US sanctions prompted Chinese state oil majors to suspend Russian oil purchases in the short term, trade sources told Reuters. Refiners in India, the largest buyer of seaborne Russian oil, are set to sharply cut their crude imports, according to industry sources.
The sanctions target oil giants Rosneft and Lukoil, which together account for more than 5 percent of global oil output, and mark a dramatic U-turn by Trump, who said only last week that he and Putin would soon hold a summit in Budapest to try to end the war in Ukraine.
While the financial impact on Russia may be limited in the short term, the move is a powerful signal of Trump’s intent to squeeze Russia’s finances and force the Kremlin toward a peace deal in its 3-1/2-year-old full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Putin derided the sanctions as an unfriendly act, saying they would not significantly affect the Russian economy and talked up Russia’s importance to the global market. He warned a sharp supply drop would push up prices and be uncomfortable for countries like the United States.
“This is, of course, an attempt to put pressure on Russia,” Putin said. “But no self-respecting country and no self-respecting people ever decides anything under pressure.”
Asked about Putin comment that the new sanctions would not have significant impact, Trump told reporters later on Thursday: “I’m glad he feels that way. That’s good. I’ll let you know about it in six months from now.”
With Ukraine asking US and European allies for long-range missiles to help turn the tide in the war, Putin also warned that Moscow’s response to strikes deep into Russia would be “very serious, if not overwhelming.”

Trump’s latest about face
Trump, in his latest about-face on the conflict, said on Wednesday that the planned Putin summit was off because it would not achieve the outcome he wanted and complained that his many “good conversations” with Putin did not “go anywhere.”
“We canceled the meeting with President Putin — it just didn’t feel right to me,” Trump told reporters at the White House. “It didn’t feel like we were going to get to the place we have to get. So I canceled it, but we’ll do it in the future.”
Putin said Trump most likely meant the summit had been postponed. The two leaders met in Alaska in August.
Russia has signalled that its conditions for ending the war in Ukraine — terms which Kyiv and many European countries regard as tantamount to surrender — remain unchanged.
The conflict raged on as European Union leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met in Brussels on Thursday to discuss funding for Ukraine.
EU leaders agreed to meet Ukraine’s pressing financial needs for the next two years but stopped short of explicitly endorsing the use of Russian frozen assets to give Kyiv a large loan, after concerns were raised by Belgium.
Moscow said it would deliver a “painful response” if the assets were seized.

Zelensky urges more pressure on Moscow
Ukraine’s Zelensky hailed the sanctions as “very important” but that more pressure would be needed on Moscow to get it to agree to a ceasefire.
After the August summit with Putin, Trump dropped his demand for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine and embraced Moscow’s preferred option of going straight to negotiating an overall peace settlement.
But in recent days he has reverted to the idea of an immediate ceasefire, something that Kyiv supports but which Moscow, whose forces are steadily edging forward on the battlefield, has repeatedly made clear it has no interest in.
Russia has said it opposes a ceasefire because it believes it would only be a temporary pause before fighting resumes, giving Ukraine time and space to rearm at a time when Moscow says it has the initiative on the battlefield.
Separately, EU and NATO member Lithuania on Thursday said two Russian military aircraft briefly entered its airspace, prompting a formal protest and a reaction from NATO forces, while Russia denied the incident.

EU targets Russian LNG
In another bid to starve Moscow of revenue, the European Union adopted its 19th package of Russia sanctions on Thursday, banning Russian liquefied natural gas imports and targeting entities including Chinese refiners and Central Asian banks.
The EU has reduced its reliance on once-dominant supplier Russia by roughly 90 percent since 2022, when the current conflict began, but nonetheless imported more than 11 billion euros of Russian energy in the first eight months of this year. LNG now represents the biggest EU import of Russian energy.
Russian oil and gas revenue, currently down by 21 percent year-on-year, accounts for around one-quarter of its budget and is the most important source of cash for Moscow’s war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year.
However, Moscow’s main revenue source comes from taxing output, not exports, which is likely to soften the immediate impact of the sanctions on state finances.


EU takes small step toward using Russian assets for Ukraine

EU takes small step toward using Russian assets for Ukraine
Updated 24 October 2025

EU takes small step toward using Russian assets for Ukraine

EU takes small step toward using Russian assets for Ukraine
  • So-called “reparation loan” is seen as crucial to helping keep Kyiv in the fight against Moscow — but it is fraught with legal and political perils
  • The EU froze some 200 billion euros of Russian central bank assets after Moscow’s tanks rolled into Ukraine in 2022

BRUSSELS, Belgium: EU leaders on Thursday tasked the European Commission to move ahead with options for funding Ukraine for two more years, leaving the door open for a mammoth loan using frozen Russian assets.
In broadly-worded conclusions adopted after marathon talks in Brussels, EU leaders stopped short of greenlighting plans for the 140-billion-euro ($162-billion) “reparations loan” — pushing that crunch decision to December.
But diplomats said the text was a step toward a potential agreement — though it was watered down in the face of strong objections from Belgium, where the bulk of the Russian central bank funds frozen after the 2022 invasion are held.
European Council President Antonio Costa said the bloc had “committed to ensure that Ukraine’s financial needs will be covered for the next two years.”
“Russia should take good note of this: Ukraine will have the financial resources it needs to defend itself,” he told a news conference.
The EU froze some 200 billion euros of Russian central bank assets after Moscow’s tanks rolled into Ukraine, and the European Commission has proposed using the funds to provide a huge loan to Kyiv — without seizing them outright.
Speaking beside Costa, Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said there was still tough work ahead on the complex proposal.
“We agreed on the ‘What’ — that is, the reparations loan — and we have to work on the ‘How,’ how we make it possible,” she said.
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was in Brussels to shore up European support, welcomed the summit outcome as a signal of “political support” for the notion of using Russian assets to keep Kyiv in the fight.

 ‘Judicial questions’ 

The vast majority of the Russian funds is held in international deposit organization Euroclear, based in Belgium — the most vocal skeptic of a plan it fears could open it up to costly legal challenges from Russia.
The Brussels talks were focused largely on addressing those concerns.
Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever repeated demands for guarantees from all EU countries that they share the risk if Russia sues, and said other countries must also tap Moscow’s assets on their territory — threatening otherwise to block the plan.
“I’m only poor little Belgium, the only thing I can do is point out where the problems are and to gently ask solutions for the essential problem,” De Wever told reporters after the talks.
Belgium has not been alone however in raising concerns.
French President Emmanuel Macron acknowledged the plan “raises judicial questions, and questions over risk sharing” — while also saying it remained the best option for shoring up Ukraine these next two years.
The summit conclusions — adopted by all member states with the exception of Hungary, seen as Russia’s closest ally in the 27-nation bloc — did not mention the loan directly, instead inviting the commission “to present, as soon as possible, options for financial support.”
Still, a European diplomat described it as “a great success.”
Another diplomat said the compromise wording “does not close but does not rush” the sensitive matter of using Russian assets for Ukraine.

US oil sanctions 

The EU talks were taking place a day after the bloc agreed a 19th package of sanctions on Russia and US President Donald Trump hit Moscow with sanctions on two oil majors, Rosneft and Lukoil.
Zelensky hailed the US sanctions as sending a “strong and much-needed message” to Russia — whose leader Vladimir Putin hit back insisting they would not significantly damage the country’s economy.
“Good, I’m glad he feels that way,” Trump told reporters at the White House when asked about Putin’s response. “I’ll let you know about it in six months from now. Let’s see how it all works out.”
The US measures represent a major stepping up of its actions against Russia and reflect Trump’s frustration at being unable to persuade Putin to end the conflict despite what he calls his personal chemistry with the Kremlin chief.
Zelensky said he hoped Trump’s shift on sanctions would also herald a change of mind on giving Ukraine long-range Tomahawk missiles — after Kyiv came away from a meeting in Washington empty-handed last week.
The EU sanctions package meanwhile saw the bloc bring forward a ban on the import of liquefied natural gas from Russia by a year to the start of 2027, and blacklist more than 100 extra tankers from Moscow’s so-called “shadow fleet” of aging oil vessels.