ֱ

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group
Protesters demonstrate in support of Palestine Action in front of the Mahatma Gandhi statue in London, England, July 5, 2025. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 07 August 2025

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group
  • Jeremy Shippam, Judit Murray, Fiona Maclean charged under Terrorism Act for supporting a proscribed organization
  • Protests in support of the group set to take place this weekend, 500 people could attend

LONDON: Three people in the UK have been charged for supporting the banned group Palestine Action.

The trio, two women and a man, were detained on July 5 at a protest in Westminster in London. Twenty-six other people were also arrested.

Jeremy Shippam, 71, Judit Murray, 71, and Fiona Maclean, 53, were charged under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. They will appear at Westminster Magistrates Court on Sept. 16.

Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist group in the UK after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base at Brize Norton in England in June this year, causing £7 million ($9.38 million) of damage to two military aircraft.

Support for or membership of a banned group in the UK is a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

Despite the ban, the group is challenging its terrorism designation after the High Court ruled on July 30 it should be reviewed.

Around 500 people, meanwhile, are set to attend a demonstration in support of Palestine Action in London on Saturday.

It follows previous demonstrations after the group’s proscription in London, Manchester and several other major UK cities, at which more than 200 people were arrested.

The group Defend Our Juries, which is helping to organize the protest, said attendees would hold placards reading “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”

A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said: “Defend Our Juries has confirmed that 500-plus people have committed to holding ‘I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action’ signs on Saturday in central London, as part of the Lift the Ban campaign, to end the proscription of Palestine Action.

“Since the threshold for the conditional commitment requirement has been reached, the action will go ahead as planned.”

Dominic Murphy, head of Counter Terrorism Command at the Metropolitan Police, said: “Anyone who displays public support for Palestine Action, a proscribed organisation, is committing an offence under the Terrorism Act and can expect to be arrested and, as these charges show, will be investigated to the full extent of the law.

“These charges relate to three people arrested in central London on 5 July. We are also planning to send case files to the Crown Prosecution Service for the other 26 people arrested on the same day.

“I would strongly advise anyone planning to come to London this weekend to show support for Palestine Action to think about the potential criminal consequences of their actions.”


US appeals court upholds hate crime convictions of 3 white men in 2020 killing of Ahmaud Arbery

US appeals court upholds hate crime convictions of 3 white men in 2020 killing of Ahmaud Arbery
Updated 15 November 2025

US appeals court upholds hate crime convictions of 3 white men in 2020 killing of Ahmaud Arbery

US appeals court upholds hate crime convictions of 3 white men in 2020 killing of Ahmaud Arbery

SAVANNAH, Georgia: A federal appeals court on Friday upheld the hate crime convictions of three white men who chased Ahmaud Arbery through their Georgia subdivision with pickup trucks before one of them killed the running Black man with a shotgun.
A three-judge panel of the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals took well over a year to rule after attorneys for the defendants urged the judges in March 2024 to overturn the case, arguing the men’s history of racist text messages and social media posts failed to prove they targeted Arbery because of his race.
Federal prosecutors used those posts and messages in 2022 to persuade a jury that Arbery’s killing was motivated by “pent-up racial anger.”
The appellate panel’s opinion, written by Judge Elizabeth L. Branch, said prosecutors at the trial showed “that each of the defendants held longstanding prejudice,” and that evidence was sufficient for “a reasonable juror to find that Arbery’s race was the determinative factor” for the deadly neighborhood chase.
Even if the appeals judges had thrown out their hate-crime convictions, the trio faced no immediate reprieve from prison. That’s because they’re also serving life sentences for murder after being convicted in a Georgia state court.
Video of Arbery’s killing fueled national outrage
Father and son Greg and Travis McMichael armed themselves and used a pickup truck to pursue 25-year-old Arbery after spotting him running in their neighborhood just outside the port city of Brunswick on Feb. 23, 2020. A neighbor, William “Roddie” Bryan, joined the chase and recorded cellphone video of Travis McMichael shooting Arbery at close range.
More than two months passed without arrests, until Bryan’s graphic video of the killing leaked online. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation took over the case from local police as outrage over Arbery’s death became part of a national outcry over racial injustice. Charges soon followed.
All three men were convicted of murder by a state court in late 2021. After a second trial in US District Court in early 2022, a jury found the trio guilty of hate crimes and attempted kidnapping.
Greg McMichael’s attorney in the hate crimes case, A.J. Balbo, declined to comment on the appellate ruling. Attorneys for Bryan and Travis McMichael did not immediately return phone and email messages.
Defense argued racist messages didn’t prove racism against Arbery
In their federal appeals, lawyers for Bryan and Greg McMichael criticized prosecutors’ use of more than two dozen social media posts and text messages, as well as witness testimony, that showed all three men using racist slurs or otherwise disparaging Black people.
Bryan’s attorney, Pete Theodocion, argued those statements were so repulsive that prosecutors were able to sway the jury without proving a racist intent to harm Arbery himself.
Balbo, Greg McMichael’s lawyer, insisted his client initiated the pursuit of Arbery because he mistakenly suspected him of being a fleeing criminal. The McMichaels had seen security camera videos in prior months that showed Arbery entering a neighboring home under construction.
The 11th Circuit judges rejected those arguments, noting there was no evidence Arbery had committed any crimes in the men’s neighborhood. He was unarmed and had no stolen property when he was killed.
In Travis McMichael’s appeal, attorney Amy Lee Copeland didn’t dispute the jury’s finding that he was motivated by racism. The social media evidence included a 2018 Facebook comment Travis McMichael made on a video of a Black man playing a prank on a white person. He used an expletive and a racial slur when writing he’d kill him.
Instead, Copeland based her appeal on legal technicalities. She said that prosecutors failed to prove the streets of the Satilla Shores subdivision where Arbery was killed were public roads, as stated in the indictment used to charge the men. The 11th Circuit rejected her argument.
The trial judge sentenced both McMichaels to life in prison for their hate crime convictions, plus additional time — 10 years for Travis McMichael and seven years for his father — for brandishing guns while committing violent crimes. Bryan received a lighter hate crime sentence of 35 years in prison, in part because he wasn’t armed and preserved the cellphone video that became crucial evidence.