ֱ

Ex-British Army head urged Palestine Action crackdown at behest of US company: Report

Ex-British Army head urged Palestine Action crackdown at behest of US company: Report
Protesters are escorted away by police officers at a demonstration in support of the proscribed group Palestine Action calling for the recently imposed ban to be lifted, in Parliament Square, central London, on July 19, 2025. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 05 August 2025

Ex-British Army head urged Palestine Action crackdown at behest of US company: Report

Ex-British Army head urged Palestine Action crackdown at behest of US company: Report
  • Lord Dannatt has served as paid adviser to military firm Teledyne since 2022
  • After activists damaged its factory, he allegedly sought to influence criminal investigation

LONDON: The former head of the British Army and a House of Lords peer, Richard Dannatt, urged government ministers to crack down on Palestine Action at the behest of a US arms company that employs him as an adviser, The Guardian reported on Tuesday.

He wrote privately to two Home Office ministers, requesting that they confront the “threat” posed by the activist group, the newspaper reported.

It came after Palestine Action in 2022 targeted a factory operated by Teledyne, a US multinational that sells military technologies, and which has employed Dannatt as a paid adviser since the year of the demonstration.

Four of the group’s activists broke into the Welsh factory to protest the sale of arms to Israel. Two years ago, they were convicted of conspiring to damage the factory.

Palestine Action was listed as a terrorist organization in the UK last month after it carried out a demonstration on a British airbase, damaging Royal Air Force aircraft.

A court case that involved one of the four activists involved in the 2022 protest heard allegations that Dannatt was “seeking to influence” the criminal investigation into Palestine Action.

According to court information, the chief police officer leading the probe told Teledyne executives: “It would not be wise to have a member of the House of Lords poking around in a live criminal case.”

Dannatt said the allegations were “baseless” and he was unaware of the exchanges mentioned in court.

Separately, the life peer is under investigation over two sets of allegations relating to alleged lobbying, which Parliament expressly forbids.

Ten days after the 2022 factory protest, Sgt. Alex Stuart of Dyfed-Powys police, head of the resultant criminal investigation, sent an email to four of his superiors.

He had already spoken to the factory’s general manager, who had told him that a senior US-based Teledyne executive had “spoken to Lord Richard Dannatt about Palestine Action.”

Stuart wrote: “Lord Dannatt was chief of the army general staff. He’s now a life peer. He has an invested interest (sic) in this aspect of UK trade and investment, particularly military projects.

“Essentially, there have been an indication that he wants this case to be explained, and he wants to have some input on it.

“They haven’t explained exactly what he wants, however I have told them that it would not be wise to have a member of the House of Lords poking around in a live criminal case.”

Later that year, Dannatt held an online call with the factory’s general manager and a senior member of Teledyne.

He told The Guardian that the multinational had “contacted me to seek my assistance in raising concerns by the company to the government with regard to attacks on their premises.

“They briefed me on the Palestine Action attacks, and I then agreed to write to the home secretary.”

The former army chief sent a letter to then-Home Secretary Suella Braverman, which declared his advisory role “at the outset.”

In the letter, he said: “The threat from Palestine Action has more widespread implications for security and the economy within the UK.

“The slow pace at which the British legal system has been working to take action against those involved in the trespass and criminal damage resulting from such ‘direct action’ has served to embolden Palestine Action and their continued recruitment drive for individuals who are prepared to commit arrestable offences.”

Last year, he again contacted the government to address new “attacks” on Teledyne facilities in the UK.

Company officials had again requested that he raise their concerns to the British government, he told The Guardian.

In a letter to Security Minister Dan Jarvis, Dannatt said he would be “very grateful to receive assurance from the current government that the threat posed by Palestine Action continues to be fully recognized by our security services and that appropriate action is being taken.”


Venezuela says foiled ‘false flag’ plot targeting US embassy

Venezuela says foiled ‘false flag’ plot targeting US embassy
Updated 17 sec ago

Venezuela says foiled ‘false flag’ plot targeting US embassy

Venezuela says foiled ‘false flag’ plot targeting US embassy
  • The South American nation’s socialist government often accuses the opposition of plots

CARACAS: President Nicolas Maduro said Monday that Venezuela foiled a false flag operation by what he called local terrorists to plant explosives at the US embassy in Caracas and exacerbate a dispute between the two countries over drug trafficking.
Speaking on his weekly TV program, Maduro said two sources which he did not name “agreed on the possibility that a local terrorist group placed an explosive device at the US embassy in Caracas” in order to aggravate the dispute with Washington.
Jorge Rodriguez, head of Venezuela’s delegation for dialogue with its arch-foe, said earlier that Caracas had warned Washington of “a serious threat” from alleged extremists who “attempted to plant lethal explosives at the US embassy.”
“We have reinforced security measures at this diplomatic mission,” added Rodriguez.
The South American nation’s socialist government often accuses the opposition of plots.
Caracas and Washington severed diplomatic ties in 2019, and the US embassy has been deserted, barring a few local employees.
Maduro said Monday night, “it is an embassy which is protected, despite all the differences we have had with the governments of the United States.”
Washington has made Venezuela the focal point of its fight against drug trafficking, even though most of the illegal drugs entering the United States originate in, or are shipped through, Mexico.
President Donald Trump’s administration has sent warships and planes to the Caribbean region and bombed several small boats off the coast of Venezuela, which it says were carrying drugs bound for the United States.
At least 21 people have been killed in the strikes, which Trump claims are halting the flow of drugs across the Caribbean.
“We’re stopping drugs at a level that nobody’s ever seen,” he told an audience of US Navy sailors in Virginia on Sunday.
Maduro says Trump’s true goal is regime change.
Caracas has responded to the “threats” by deploying thousands of troops along Venezuela’s land and sea borders and signing up thousands of members to a civilian militia.
The United States did not recognize Maduro’s 2024 re-election, rejected by the Venezuelan opposition and much of the world as a stolen vote.
During his first term, Trump tried to dislodge Maduro by recognizing an opposition leader as interim president and imposing sanctions on Venezuela’s all-important oil sector.
But Maduro clung to power, with the support of the military.

For weeks rumors have circulated on social networks that Venezuela’s current opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, in hiding since last year’s election, is sheltering at the US embassy.
Her whereabouts have not been confirmed by AFP.
Washington has recognized a candidate backed by Machado, former senator Eduardo Gonzalez Urrutia, as Venezuela’s rightful president.
The opposition’s tally of ballots from last year’s election showed Gonzalez Urrutia, who had been the favorite to win the vote, easily defeating the unpopular Maduro.
Threatened with arrest over his victory claim, Gonzalez Urrutia went into exile in Spain late last year.
In a video last month, he and Machado backed the US military pressure on the Maduro regime as a “necessary measure” toward the “restoration of popular sovereignty in Venezuela.”
 


Illinois sues to stop National Guard deployment as Trump escalates clash with states

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker speaks at a news conference October 06, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. (AFP)
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker speaks at a news conference October 06, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. (AFP)
Updated 1 min 20 sec ago

Illinois sues to stop National Guard deployment as Trump escalates clash with states

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker speaks at a news conference October 06, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. (AFP)
  • Today, Democratic-led states and cities are pushing back against Trump’s attempt to deploy military forces into cities, which the White House says are needed to protect federal government employees from “violent riots” and “lawlessness”
  • The Illinois dispute came after a federal judge in Oregon on Sunday temporarily blocked Trump’s administration from sending any National Guard troops to police the state’s largest city, Portland

WASHINGTON: The state of Illinois and the city of Chicago sued President Donald Trump on Monday, seeking to block the deployment of federalized National Guard troops to Chicago, as hundreds of National Guard troops from Texas headed to the nation’s third-largest city.
Trump then escalated the widening clash with Democratic-led states and cities over the domestic use of military forces, threatening to invoke the Insurrection Act as a means to circumvent court restrictions on deploying troops where they are unwanted by local officials.
Illinois had sued in response to Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth’s orders over the weekend to bring 300 Illinois National Guard members under federal control and then to mobilize another 400 Texas National Guard members for deployment to Chicago.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Illinois lauches fourth legal challenge over federal use of National Guard in cities

• Courts in Oregon and California say Trump likely overstepped

• US government lawyers say Texas National Guard troops in transit to Chicago

• Trump threatens to use Insurrection Act to sidestep any court restrictions

While Illinois’ request for a temporary restraining order plays out, US lawyers told a court hearing on Monday that Texas National Guard troops were already in transit to Illinois. Trump then issued another memorandum calling up the Illinois National Guard, reinforcing Hegseth’s previous order.
US District Judge April Perry allowed the federal government to continue the deployment in Chicago while it responds to Illinois’ suit. She set a deadline of midnight Wednesday for the US to reply.
Shortly after that ruling, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office he might invoke the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent.
“I’d do it if it was necessary. So far, it hasn’t been necessary. But we have an Insurrection Act for a reason. If I had to enact it, I’d do that,” Trump said. “If people were being killed and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that.”
The law has been used sparingly, in extreme cases of unrest. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the trial of Los Angeles police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King.
Today, Democratic-led states and cities are pushing back against Trump’s attempt to deploy military forces into cities, which the White House says are needed to protect federal government employees from “violent riots” and “lawlessness.”
Democratic leaders counter that their cities are being illegally targeted and falsely portrayed as awash in crime.
The Illinois dispute came after a federal judge in Oregon on Sunday temporarily blocked Trump’s administration from sending any National Guard troops to police the state’s largest city, Portland.
Trump has expanded the use of the US military in his second term, which has included deploying troops along the US border and ordering them to kill suspected drug traffickers on boats off Venezuela without due process.
National Guard troops are state-based militia forces that answer to their governors except when called into federal service.
Trump has ordered them to Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, D.C. and Portland, prompting lawsuits from state and local leaders.
Chicago’s lawsuit is the fourth legal action opposing Trump’s unprecedented use of soldiers to police US cities. Courts have not yet reached a final decision in any of those cases, but judges in California and Oregon have made initial rulings that Trump likely overstepped his authority.
The Illinois lawsuit alleges the Republican president is deploying the military to Illinois based on a “flimsy pretext” that an ICE facility in a suburb of Chicago needs protection from protesters.
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, in a press conference, accused Trump of unnecessarily escalating tensions by attempting to add National Guard troops to heavily armed federal police from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other agencies already operating in Chicago.
Pritzker said those officers have fired tear gas and rubber bullets on peaceful protesters, with US citizens, including children, being “traumatized and detained.”
“Donald Trump is using our service members as political props and as pawns in his illegal effort to militarize our nation’s cities,” Pritzker said.
“Donald Trump’s deranged depiction of Chicago as a hellhole, a war zone and the worst and most dangerous city in the world was just complete BS,” Pritzker said.
Trump, responding to Pritzker, reiterated his contention that Chicago was “like a war zone,” saying Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson had lost control.
“It’s probably worse than almost any city in the world. You could go to Afghanistan, you can go to a lot of different places, and they probably marvel at how much crime we have,” Trump said.
The state argues the Trump administration has not met the legal conditions needed to allow it to federalize National Guard troops without Pritzker’s blessing and is violating the Posse Comitatus Act, a federal law limiting the use of the military for domestic enforcement.
The lawsuit also argues Trump’s actions violate the US Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which protects states’ rights, by usurping Pritzker’s role as the commander-in-chief of the National Guard in Illinois and by infringing on the state’s authority over local law enforcement. 

 


UN refugee agency chief suggests that US deportation practices violate the law

UN refugee agency chief suggests that US deportation practices violate the law
Updated 21 min 14 sec ago

UN refugee agency chief suggests that US deportation practices violate the law

UN refugee agency chief suggests that US deportation practices violate the law
  • In the politically charged environment of today, Grandi said, “putting the (UN) Refugee Convention and the principle of asylum on the table would be a catastrophic error”
  • The Trump administration has said it has an obligation to remove the “worst of the worst”

GENEVA: The head of the UN refugee agency suggested Monday that President Donald Trump’s America has carried out deportation practices that violate international law, and criticized a wider “backlash” in some countries against migrants and refugees.
Filippo Grandi, the UN high commissioner for refugees, used a speech to lament that drastic funding cuts and shortages have forced his agency, UNHCR, to slash nearly 5,000 jobs this year, or nearly a quarter of its workforce. The cuts may not be finished, he said.
“This was certainly not an easy year for any of us,” Grandi told the opening of UNHCR’s executive committee. “But remember, please: There has never been an easy year to be a refugee — and there never will be.”
He did cite some bright spots and praised the Trump administration-led peace efforts in Congo, where conflict has displaced millions of people.
At the UN General Assembly last month, the Trump administration — which has slashed support this year for international humanitarian aid — pitched other countries on its view that the global system of seeking asylum has been abused and needs to be revamped, in part by cracking down on migration.
Other traditional donors have cut back their aid outlays for UNHCR this year.
In recent years, the agency has received roughly $5 billion a year — or half its budgetary requirements — even as conflict and repression in places like Afghanistan, Myanmar, Sudan, Venezuela and Ukraine have led the number of people fleeing their homes to roughly double over the last decade — to 122 million.
In the politically charged environment of today, Grandi said, “putting the (UN) Refugee Convention and the principle of asylum on the table would be a catastrophic error.” He insisted that “national sovereignty and the right to seek asylum ”are not incompatible. They are complementary.”
Grandi, whose term is up at the end of this year, decried an erosion of respect for international law in certain developed countries and noted that most refugees are taken in by poorer ones.
“I am worried that the current debate – in Europe, for example – and some current deportation practices – such as in the United States – address real challenges in manners not consistent with international law,” he said.
The Trump administration has said it has an obligation to remove the “worst of the worst.”
Grandi also cited some optimistic developments: More than 1 million refugees from Syria have now returned home. A “glimmer of hope” has emerged in the eastern Congo conflict between Rwanda-backed forces and Congo’s armed forces.
“Thanks to peace efforts spearheaded by the United States, instead of speaking only of more bloodshed, or more refugees, we can start to think – cautiously, but a little bit more optimistically — of stability and returns,” he said.

 


Pro-Palestinian demonstrators who occupied Stanford building are arraigned

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators who occupied Stanford building are arraigned
Updated 26 min 52 sec ago

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators who occupied Stanford building are arraigned

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators who occupied Stanford building are arraigned
  • Some protesters barricaded themselves inside the building, which houses the university president’s office

SAN JOSE, California: Eleven pro-Palestinian demonstrators who were arrested at Stanford University last year after they occupied the president’s office building pleaded not guilty Monday for the second time after they were indicted by a grand jury on felony vandalism charges.
The group of current and former Stanford students and activists were charged in April with felony vandalism and felony conspiracy to trespass. All pleaded not guilty during their arraignment the following month.
But after preliminary hearings were delayed for months due to defense attorneys being unavailable, prosecutors took the case to a grand jury, Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in court documents.
Last week’s grand jury indictment superseded the charges filed in April, allowing for the legal proceedings to skip preliminary hearings, which are held to determine if there is enough evidence for a trial.
“The PEOPLE are ready for trial at the soonest possible date,” Rosen wrote.
Attorneys for the group had requested a preliminary hearing and set a date for Nov. 3, which would have given them the opportunity to publicly challenge the evidence presented, defense attorney Jeff Wozniak said.
“Grand Juries are secret proceedings where no defendants or defense attorneys are present to ask questions or defend themselves,” Wozniak said. “By avoiding a preliminary hearing, they are making secret a fundamentally important step in the case.”
A judge on Monday set a trial date for Nov. 17.
The Stanford takeover began around dawn on June 5, 2024, the last day of spring classes at the university in California’s Silicon Valley. Some protesters barricaded themselves inside the building, which houses the university president’s office. Others linked arms outside, The Stanford Daily reported at the time. The group chanted “Palestine will be free, we will free Palestine.” The takeover ended three hours later when they were arrested.
Authorities arrested and charged 12 people but last month a 21-year-old man pleaded no contest under a deferred entry of judgment agreement available to young defendants. If he completes probation without further legal trouble, the case could be dismissed, the Mercury News reported. The man testified for the prosecution before the grand jury.
Prosecutors accuse the demonstrators of spray-painting on the building, breaking windows and furniture, disabling security cameras and splattering a red liquid described as fake blood on items throughout the building. Damages were estimated at hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to prosecutors.


25 years after landmark UN resolution, UN chief says women are too often absent from peace talks

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres speaks at the UN headquarters in New York City on September 24, 2025. (AFP)
UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres speaks at the UN headquarters in New York City on September 24, 2025. (AFP)
Updated 07 October 2025

25 years after landmark UN resolution, UN chief says women are too often absent from peace talks

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres speaks at the UN headquarters in New York City on September 24, 2025. (AFP)
  • “Around the globe, we see troubling trends in military spending, more armed conflicts, and more shocking brutality against women and girls,” Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told a UN Security Council meeting marking the anniversary

UNITED NATIONS: Twenty-five years after a landmark UN resolution demanded equal participation for women in all efforts to promote peace, the United Nations chief said Tuesday that far too often women remain absent.
At the same time, sexual violence against women and girls is on the rise and 676 million women live within 50 kilometers (30 miles) of deadly conflicts, which the head of the UN women’s agency says is the highest number since the 1990s.
“Around the globe, we see troubling trends in military spending, more armed conflicts, and more shocking brutality against women and girls,” Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told a UN Security Council meeting marking the anniversary.
Since the resolution’s adoption on Oct. 31, 2000, there has been some progress, he said. The number of women in uniform as UN peacekeepers has doubled, women have led local mediation, advanced justice for survivors of gender-based violence, and women’s organizations have been instrumental in promoting recovery from conflicts and reconciliation.
“But gains are fragile and – very worryingly – going in reverse,” Guterres said.
In no-nonsense language, Guterres said too often nations gather in rooms like the Security Council chamber “full of conviction and commitment,” but fall far short of the resolution’s demand for equal participation of women in peace negotiations — and protection of women and girls from rape and sexual abuse in conflicts.
Despite the horrors of war, UN Women Executive Director Sima Bahous also pointed to some progress. She said women have reduced community violence in the disputed Abyei region between Sudan and South Sudan and in the Central African Republic.
In Haiti, women have achieved near parity in the new provisional electoral council, and women’s representation in Chad’s National Assembly has doubled, she said. Syria’s interim constitution guarantees rights and protections for women, and in war-torn Ukraine women have succeeded in getting national relief efforts helping women codified into law.
But Bahous also said it’s lamentable that the world today is witnessing “renewed pushback against gender equality and multilateralism.” She said the situation is being exacerbated by what she called short-sighted funding cuts.
These cuts are undermining education opportunities for Afghan girls, curtailing life-saving medical care for tens of thousands of sexual violence survivors in Sudan, Haiti and beyond, and limiting access to food for malnourished women and children in Gaza, Mali, Somalia and elsewhere, Bahous said.
She stressed that change is possible.
“It is understandable that some might conclude that the rise and normalization of misogyny currently poisoning our politics and fueling conflict is unstoppable,” Bahous said. “It is not. Those who oppose equality do not own the future, we do.”
Guterres urged the UN’s 193 member nations to increase their commitment to women caught in conflict with new funding and by ensuring their participation in peace negotiations, accountability for sexual violence and their protection and economic security.