ֱ

Night vision goggles may have hampered helicopter pilots before crash with jet, experts tell NTSB

Night vision goggles may have hampered helicopter pilots before crash with jet, experts tell NTSB
Members of the technical panel watch a video of an overview of the crash during the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Midair Collision Investigative Hearing on July 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Getty Images via AFP)
Short Url
Updated 02 August 2025

Night vision goggles may have hampered helicopter pilots before crash with jet, experts tell NTSB

Night vision goggles may have hampered helicopter pilots before crash with jet, experts tell NTSB
  • The Army goggles would have made it difficult to see the plane’s colored lights, which might have helped the Black Hawk determine the plane’s direction
  • The goggles also limited the pilots’ peripheral vision as they flew near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport

The pilots of a US Army helicopter that collided with a passenger jet over Washington in January would’ve had difficulty spotting the plane while wearing night vision goggles, experts told the National Transportation Safety Board on Friday.

The Army goggles would have made it difficult to see the plane’s colored lights, which might have helped the Black Hawk determine the plane’s direction. The goggles also limited the pilots’ peripheral vision as they flew near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

The challenges posed by night-vision goggles were among the topics discussed at the NTSB’s third and final day of public testimony over the fatal midair crash, which killed all 67 people aboard both aircrafts.

Experts said another challenge that evening was distinguishing the plane from lights on the ground while the two aircraft were on a collision course. Plus, the helicopter pilots may not have known where to look for a plane that was landing on a secondary runway that most planes didn’t use.

“Knowing where to look. That’s key,” said Stephen Casner, an expert in human factors who used to work at NASA.

Two previous days of testimony underscored a number of factors that likely contributed to the collision, sparking Board Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy to urge the Federal Aviation Administration to “do better” as she pointed to warnings the agency had ignored years earlier.

Some of the major issues that have emerged so far include the Black Hawk helicopter flying above prescribed levels near the airport as well as the warnings to FAA officials for years about the hazards related to the heavy chopper traffic there.

It’s too early for the board to identify what exactly caused the crash. A final report from the board won’t come until next year.

But it became clear this week how small a margin of error there was for helicopters flying the route the Black Hawk took the night of the nation’s deadliest plane crash since November 2001.

Army Col. Andrew DeForest told the NTSB that “flights along the D.C. helicopter routes were considered relatively safe,” but some pilots in the 12th Battalion that flew alongside the crew that crashed told investigators they regularly talked about the possibility of a collision because of the congested and complicated airspace.

The American Airlines jet arrived from Wichita, Kansas, carrying, among others, a group of elite young figure skaters, their parents and coaches, and four union steamfitters from the Washington area.

The collision was the first in a string of crashes and near misses this year that have alarmed officials and the traveling public, despite statistics that still show flying remains the safest form of transportation.

‘Significant frustration’

NTSB members scolded FAA officials during Friday’s hearing, accusing them of saying the right things about safety in public while failing to cooperate in private. They said the FAA has repeatedly refused to provide information requested by investigators.

Board member Todd Inman said there was “significant frustration between what’s actually occurring” and “what’s being said for public consumption.”

Frank McIntosh, the head of the FAA’s air traffic control organization, said he would start working immediately to make sure the agency complies with the investigation. McIntosh also acknowledged problems with the culture in the tower at Reagan National, despite past efforts to improve compliance with safety standards.

“I think there were some things that we missed, to be quite honest with you, not intentionally, but I was talking about how certain facilities can drift,” McIntosh said.

Homendy told McIntosh she believes agency leaders are sincere about wanting to improve safety, but the solution must be more than just sending a top-down message of safety and also actually listening to controllers in the field.

Questions over lack of alcohol testing

Tim Lilley, an aviation expert whose son Sam was a pilot on the passenger jet, said he’s optimistic the tragic accident will ultimately lead to some positive changes.

“But we’ve got a long way to go,” he said.

Lilley said he was particularly struck by the FAA’s lack of alcohol testing for air traffic controllers after the crash.

“And they made a bunch of excuses why they didn’t do it,” Lilley said. “None of them were valid. It goes back to a whole system that was complacent and was normalizing deviation.”

Homendy said during Thursday’s hearings that alcohol testing is most effective within two hours of a crash and can be administered within eight hours.

Nick Fuller, the FAA’s acting deputy chief operating officer of operations, testified that the controllers weren’t tested because the agency did not immediately believe the crash was fatal. The FAA then decided to forgo it because the optimum two-hour window had passed.

Controller didn’t warn the jet

FAA officials testified this week that an air traffic controller should have warned the passenger jet of the Army helicopter’s presence.

The controller had asked the Black Hawk pilots to confirm they had the airplane in sight because an alarm sounded in the tower about their proximity. The controller could see from a window that the helicopter was too close, but the controller did not alert the jetliner.

In a transcript released this week, the unidentified controller said in a post-crash interview they weren’t sure that would have changed the outcome.

Additionally, the pilots of the helicopter did not fully hear the controller’s instructions before the collision. When the controller told the helicopter’s pilots to “pass behind” the jet, the crew didn’t hear it because the Black Hawk’s microphone key was pressed at that moment.

‘Layer after layer of deficiencies’

Jeff Guzzetti, a former NTSB and FAA crash investigator, told the AP that a combination of factors produced this tragedy, like “holes that line up in the Swiss cheese.”

Any number of things, had they been different, could have prevented the collision, he said. They include the Black Hawks having more accurate altimeters, as well as a key piece of locating equipment, known as ADS-B Out, turned on or working. In turn, air traffic control could have seen the problem earlier.

Just a few feet could have made a difference, Guzzetti said.

“It just goes to show you that an accident isn’t caused by one single thing,” Guzzetti said. “It isn’t caused by ‘pilot error’ or ‘controller staffing.’ This accident was caused by layer after layer of deficiencies that piled up at just the right moment.”

Ex-official: FAA and Army share blame

Mary Schiavo, a former US Department of Transportation Inspector General, told the AP that both the Army and the FAA appear to share significant blame.

The Black Hawks’ altimeters could be off by as much as 100 feet and were still considered acceptable, she said. The crew was flying an outdated model that struggled to maintain altitude, while the helicopter pilots’ flying was “loose” and under “loose” supervision.

“It’s on the individuals, God rest their souls, but it’s also on the military,” Schiavo said. “I mean, they just seem to have no urgency of anything.”

Schiavo was also struck by the air traffic controllers’ lack of maps of the military helicopter routes on their display screens, which forced them to look out the window.

“And so everything about the military helicopter operation was not up to the standards of commercial aviation ... it’s a shocking lack of attention to precision all the way around,” she said.

Schiavo also faulted the FAA for not coming off as terribly responsive to problems.

“I called the Federal Aviation Administration, the Tombstone Agency, because they would only make change after people die,” Schiavo said. “And sadly, 30 years later, that seems to still be the case.”


Lawsuit targets militant groups as complicit in deaths of US citizens in Hamas attack

Updated 3 sec ago

Lawsuit targets militant groups as complicit in deaths of US citizens in Hamas attack

Lawsuit targets militant groups as complicit in deaths of US citizens in Hamas attack
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court in Washington, also names Iran, Syria and North Korea, which are already facing legal action in the US for the Oct. 7 assault
There are more than 140 plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which seeks at least $7 billion

WASHINGTON: Lawyers for US victims of the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel are suing various groups that have been designated by the federal government as terrorist organizations, alleging they participated, aided or provided material support for the assault.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court in Washington, also names Iran, Syria and North Korea, which are already facing legal action in the US for the Oct. 7 assault, which led to the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas.
“Our son’s life was senselessly cut short,” David and Hazel Brief said in a statement released by the Anti-Defamation League. “We believe it is critical that those responsible for the horrific terror inflicted that day are held accountable in a court of law, to ensure the record is clear as to who helped support, plan and carry out the violence that day.”
There are more than 140 plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which seeks at least $7 billion. They’re US citizens who died or were wounded or their American family members, the ADL and law firm Crowell & Moring said.
Iran, Syria and North Korea have not formally responded to a similar lawsuit filed by others in 2024. The US has deemed them to be state sponsors of terrorism, and Washington has designated Hamas as what’s known as a specially designated global terrorist group. The lawsuit also names the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and other groups.
The lawsuit cites the findings of a report published by the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry.
Under federal law, foreign governments can be held liable, in some circumstances, for deaths or injuries caused by acts of terrorism or by providing material support or resources for them.
The plaintiffs, if successful, might qualify for payments from a fund created by Congress that allows American victims of terrorism to receive payouts. The money comes from seized assets, fines or other penalties leveled against those that do business with a state sponsor of terrorism.
The war in Gaza began in 2023 when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251 others. Forty-eight hostages remain in Gaza, around 20 of them believed by Israel to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefires or other deals.
The Palestinian death toll in the Israel-Hamas war has surpassed 65,000, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government. It does not say how many were civilians or combatants but says women and children make up nearly half the dead.
The Justice Department last year filed criminal charges against Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar and other senior militants, saying they conspired to murder US nationals in the Oct. 7 attack. Sinwar was killed by Israeli forces in October 2024.
Hamas, which does not accept Israel’s existence, says it is waging an armed struggle for Palestinian rights and is not at war with the United States.

Senate Democrats push White House to recognize Palestinian state

Senate Democrats push White House to recognize Palestinian state
Updated 20 min 49 sec ago

Senate Democrats push White House to recognize Palestinian state

Senate Democrats push White House to recognize Palestinian state
  • Non-binding legislation introduced calling for demilitarized Palestine, release of hostages
  • Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley: ‘Israel is no longer interested’ in reaching an agreement

LONDON: A resolution has been introduced by a group of Democratic senators in the US in a bid to get the White House to recognize a demilitarized Palestinian state.

The non-binding legislation proposed by Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley comes ahead of the UN General Assembly in New York on Sept. 23, where a number of states have indicated that they will recognize Palestine.

A similar piece of legislation has been proposed by California Democrat Ro Khanna in the House of Representatives.

Earlier this week, a UN commission said it believes there are reasonable grounds to suspect that Israel is responsible for genocide in Gaza.

The resolution calls on Hamas to lay down its arms and release all remaining hostages, while demanding that Israel halt its war in Gaza and settlement expansion in the West Bank.

Other signatories include Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, Tina Smith of Minnesota, and Vermont’s Peter Welch and Bernie Sanders.

Merkley told the New York Times: “We need to have an immediate ceasefire, the hostages returned and an inundation of aid. But we also need a vision for where we go so that 30 years from now, there is a peaceful and prosperous Middle East where we’re not caught in the grip of this conflict.”

He added: “I grew up with the framework of the best path to peace is to always stand with Israel, because they will feel the confidence to reach an agreement, but Israel is no longer interested. They’re interested in taking the West Bank. They’re interested in taking Gaza.”

Van Hollen said recent Israeli activity in Gaza was a “campaign of ethnic cleansing,” adding: “The best viable way forward that provides both security and dignity and self-determination for both Israelis and Palestinians alike is a two-state solution.”

The proposal is unlikely to pass the Republican-led Senate, with no senators from the governing party backing it at this time.


President Trump backs former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for Gaza transitional authority

President Trump backs former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for Gaza transitional authority
Updated 32 min 24 sec ago

President Trump backs former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for Gaza transitional authority

President Trump backs former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for Gaza transitional authority
  • Body would administer territory for several years

LONDON: US President Donald Trump has endorsed former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for a postwar plan in Gaza, giving him two weeks to rally international support for the initiative, .

The plan, drafted by the Tony Blair Institute, calls for the creation of a temporary governing body known as the Gaza International Transitional Authority.

The body, to be established under the auspices of the UN, would administer the territory for several years before transferring authority to a reformed Palestinian Authority.

According to The Times of Israel, the draft proposal describes the GITA as the “supreme political and legal authority for Gaza during the transitional period.” It would include at least one Palestinian representative, senior UN officials, prominent international business figures, and “strong representation of Muslim members.”

The blueprint rules out the forced displacement of Palestinians, instead proposing a Property Rights Preservation Unit to guarantee the rights of Palestinians in Gaza who voluntarily leave the territory, including a right of return.

It also calls for the disarmament of Hamas and the formation of an international force to assist Gaza’s civil police in preventing the group’s resurgence.

Blair has been working on what he terms the “day after” plan since the outbreak of the conflict in October 2023, meeting senior Trump officials and regional leaders to build support.

Trump formally endorsed the proposal during an Aug. 27 meeting at the White House, where his son-in-law Jared Kushner has played a leading role in shaping postwar options.

While Israel has rejected the Palestinian Authority taking on a direct role in Gaza, reports suggest it has engaged “constructively” with Blair’s proposal. However, renewed Israeli military operations in Gaza City and recent strikes on Hamas leaders in Qatar have raised questions over the viability of the plan.

Blair’s institute has declined to comment publicly on the proposal.


Starmer says UK protects free speech ‘jealously’ and ‘fiercely’

Starmer says UK protects free speech ‘jealously’ and ‘fiercely’
Updated 46 min 9 sec ago

Starmer says UK protects free speech ‘jealously’ and ‘fiercely’

Starmer says UK protects free speech ‘jealously’ and ‘fiercely’
  • The British leader said the killing of US conservative influencer Charlie Kirk last week was “shocking”
  • US Vice President JD Vance claimed free speech is “in retreat” across Europe

CHEQUERS: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Thursday that Britain protects freedom of speech “jealously” and “fiercely” after US criticism and several cases have focused attention on British laws.
“Free speech, it’s one of the founding values of the United Kingdom, and we protect it jealously and fiercely and always will,” Starmer told a press conference with US President Donald Trump at the end of a state visit to the UK.
“We will bear down on any limits of free speech,” Starmer vowed, but warned that “I draw a limit between free speech and the speech of those that want to peddle paedophilia and suicide (on) social media to children.”
The British leader added the killing of US conservative influencer Charlie Kirk last week was “shocking ... to everybody who believes in free speech and in democracy.”
Free speech has recently hit the headlines in the UK over various cases, which have drawn criticism from US figures.
Debate also swirled around last year’s sentencing of a woman to 31 months in prison for writing on X “Set fire to all the... hotels (housing asylum seekers)... for all I care,” as anti-immigration, far-right riots spread across England.
US Vice President JD Vance has been particularly vocal about the issue, raising it with Starmer during a White House meeting in February.
Vance previously claimed free speech is “in retreat” across Europe, and doubled down on the remarks during Starmer’s visit, claiming that “infringements on free speech” had affected British people.
British politician and leader of the hard-right Reform party Nigel Farage asked before a US congressional committee: “At what point did we become North Korea?“
He was speaking after award-winning comedy writer Graham Linehan was arrested and charged earlier in September over three social media posts against a transgender person.
Tech billionaire and X owner Elon Musk has also accused Britain of being a “police state.”
When asked by a reporter whether the cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show over the comedian’s comments about Kirk on Wednesday was a case of free speech being threatened, Trump replied: “Jimmy Kimmel was fired because he had bad ratings... so you can call that free speech, or not, he was fired for lack of talent.”


Ukraine pushes back some Russian advances, Zelensky says

Ukraine pushes back some Russian advances, Zelensky says
Updated 10 min ago

Ukraine pushes back some Russian advances, Zelensky says

Ukraine pushes back some Russian advances, Zelensky says
  • Zelensky said his troops had reclaimed 160 square kilometers of land near the eastern coal mining town of Dobropillia
  • He did not say when Ukraine made the gains, but said Russia had “suffered thousands of losses“

KYIV: Ukrainian forces have pushed back some of the advances Russia made over the summer, President Volodymyr Zelensky said Thursday, calling the operation an “important success” after months of battlefield setbacks.

Zelensky said his troops had reclaimed 160 square kilometers (62 square miles) of land near the eastern coal mining town of Dobropillia, where Russia pierced Ukraine’s defenses in August.

US President Donald Trump, meanwhile, expressed mounting frustration at his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin for not halting the invasion.

Russia, which has been chipping away at Ukrainian territory for months, did not immediately comment on Ukraine’s claims but announced Thursday that more than 700,000 of its soldiers were fighting on the front line.

Diplomatic efforts to end the three-and-a-half year war have fallen apart in recent months, with Russia last week announcing peace talks were on “pause” and Zelensky warning Russia still wanted to occupy “all of Ukraine.”


Following a meeting with troops in the eastern Donetsk region on Thursday, Zelensky said his army was “achieving results” in an ongoing counteroffensive there.

“Since the start of the operation, our warriors have already liberated 160 square kilometers,” he said in a video address.

He said Ukrainian forces had “cleared” Russian troops from an additional 170 square kilometers of land, but had not yet formally taken the territory.

Zelensky did not say when Ukraine made the gains, but said Russia had “suffered thousands of losses.”

“Ukraine is quite rightly defending its positions, defending its land,” he added.

DeepState, an online battlefield tracker linked to the Ukrainian army, showed Russian troops made rapid advances near Dobropillia last month but that some of their gains had evaporated in recent weeks.

- Putin ‘let me down’ -

Ukraine and its Western allies say Russian troops are making huge losses for comparatively small territorial gains, while leaving towns and villages destroyed in their wake.

Trump, who has been seeking to broker an end to the war, said Thursday he was disappointed in Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin’s apparent refusal to accept a peace deal.

“He’s let me down. He’s really let me down,” Trump said at a press conference with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Britain.

Trump promised to end the war quickly after taking office in January, but has failed to extract concessions from the Kremlin, despite a landmark summit with Putin in Alaska in August.

Russia accuses European countries of frustrating the peace process, but Kyiv and its European allies say Putin is deliberately stalling to buy time and seize more Ukrainian territory.

Russia, which currently occupies around a fifth of Ukraine, accelerated its advances over the summer and has indicated it will achieve its war goals via military means if a peace deal is not possible.

Moscow claims five Ukrainian regions as its own, including Crimea, which it annexed in 2014.

Tens of thousands of people — including civilians — have been killed since Russia invaded, with towns and cities across the east and south of Ukraine left in ruins.

Millions of people have been forced to flee their homes in the biggest war in Europe since World War II.

A Russian air strike on the Donetsk region town of Kostiantynivka earlier Thursday killed five people, Ukrainian police said.

The town lies about eight kilometers (five miles) from the front line and is surrounded by Russian troops on three sides, according to DeepState.

Kyiv has been trying to hit back with long-range strikes on Russia’s vital oil sector, with the latest attack on Thursday morning triggering a fire at a refinery in the central Bashkortostan region, some 1,400 kilometers (870 miles) behind the front line.