ֱ

France’s top court annuls arrest warrant against Syria’s Assad

France’s top court annuls arrest warrant against Syria’s Assad
France's highest court Friday annulled a French arrest warrant against Syria's ex-president Bashar al-Assad -- issued before his ouster -- over 2013 deadly chemical attacks. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 25 July 2025

France’s top court annuls arrest warrant against Syria’s Assad

France’s top court annuls arrest warrant against Syria’s Assad
  • The Court of Cassation ruled there were no exceptions to presidential immunity, even for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity
  • Judge Soulard, added that, as Assad was no longer president after an Islamist-led group toppled him in December, “new arrest warrants can have been, or can be, issued against him“

PARIS: France’s highest court Friday annulled a French arrest warrant against Syria’s ex-president Bashar Assad — issued before his ouster — over 2013 deadly chemical attacks.

The Court of Cassation ruled there were no exceptions to presidential immunity, even for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.

But its presiding judge, Christophe Soulard, added that, as Assad was no longer president after an Islamist-led group toppled him in December, “new arrest warrants can have been, or can be, issued against him” and as such the investigation into the case could continue.

Human rights advocates had hoped the court would rule that immunity did not apply because of the severity of the allegations, which would have set a major precedent in international law toward holding accused war criminals to account.

French authorities issued the warrant against Assad in November 2023 over his alleged role in the chain of command for a sarin gas attack that killed more than 1,000 people, according to US intelligence, on August 4 and 5, 2013 in Adra and Douma outside Damascus.

Assad is accused of complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity in the case. Syrian authorities at the time denied involvement and blamed rebels.

The French judiciary tackled the case under the principle of universal jurisdiction, whereby a court may prosecute individuals for serious crimes committed in other countries.

An investigation — based on testimonies of survivors and military defectors, as well as photos and video footage — led to warrants for the arrest of Assad, his brother Maher who headed an elite army unit, and two generals.

Public prosecutors approved three of the warrants, but issued an appeal against the one targeting Assad, arguing he should have immunity as a head of state.

The Paris Court of Appeal in June last year however upheld it, and prosecutors again appealed.

But in December, Assad’s circumstances changed.

He and his family fled to Russia, according to Russian authorities, after he was ousted by advancing rebels.

In January, French investigating magistrates issued a second arrest warrant against Assad for suspected complicity in war crimes for a bombing in the Syrian city of Daraa in 2017 that killed a French-Syrian civilian.

The Court of Cassation said Assad’s so called “personal immunity,” granted because of his office, meant he could not be targeted by arrest warrants until his ouster.

But it ruled that “functional immunity,” which is granted to people who perform certain functions of state, could be lifted in the case of accusations of severe crimes.

Thus it upheld the French judiciary’s indictment in another case of ex-governor of the Central Bank of Syria and former finance minister, Adib Mayaleh, for complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity over alleged funding of the Assad government during the civil war.

Mayaleh obtained French nationality in 1993, and goes by the name Andre Mayard on his French passport.

Syria’s war has killed more than half a million people and displaced millions from their homes since its eruption in 2011 with the then-government’s brutal crackdown on anti-Assad protests.

Assad’s fall on December 8, 2024 ended his family’s five-decade rule.


Siege of Sarajevo drew wealthy foreigners to shoot at civilians, say Italian prosectors 

Siege of Sarajevo drew wealthy foreigners to shoot at civilians, say Italian prosectors 
Updated 8 sec ago

Siege of Sarajevo drew wealthy foreigners to shoot at civilians, say Italian prosectors 

Siege of Sarajevo drew wealthy foreigners to shoot at civilians, say Italian prosectors 
  • Journalist says he has identified people involved with ‘tourist shooters’ who paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to kill people
  • Specialist Italian police unit investigating claims after case filed by former mayor of Sarajevo

LONDON: Allegations that wealthy foreigners paid to shoot civilians during the siege of Sarajevo are being investigated by Italian prosecutors.

The claims, made by investigative journalist Ezio Gavazzeni, add that people from the US, UK, Russia and elsewhere paid Serbian forces the equivalent of up to €100,000 ($115,900) to fire at inhabitants of the Bosnian city in the 1990s.

It was supposedly organized by troops loyal to Radovan Karadzic, who was later convicted of genocide.

Gavazzeni told La Repubblica: “(There was) a price tag for these killings; children cost more, then men, preferably in uniform and armed, women, and finally old people, who could be killed for free.”

He added: “They departed Trieste (in northeast Italy) for a manhunt. And then they came home and continued their normal lives. They were respectable in the opinion of those who knew them.”

Gavazzeni continued: “There were Germans, French, English … people from all Western countries who paid large sums of money to be taken there to shoot civilians.”

“There were no political or religious motivations. They were rich people who went there for fun and personal satisfaction. We are talking about people who love guns who perhaps go to shooting ranges or on safari in Africa.”

Italian prosecutors are working with the specialist Carabinieri anti-terror and organized crime unit, the Raggruppamento Operativo Speciale, to identify those possibly involved in Italy after a case was filed by the former mayor of Sarajevo, Benjamina Karic.

She told Italy’s ANSA news agency: “An entire team of tireless people are fighting to have this complaint heard.”

Gavazzeni said that he had spoken to a Bosnian intelligence officer who claimed to have knowledge of the macabre practice from a captured Serbian soldier, and that he had also identified a number of Italians involved.

Nicola Brigida, a lawyer working with Gavazzeni, told the Guardian: “The evidence accumulated after a long investigation is well substantiated and could lead to serious investigation to identify the culprits. There is also the report from the former Sarajevo mayor.”

It is not the first time such allegations have been made. In 2007 a former US marine, John Jordan, told the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia that he knew of “tourist shooters” who came to Sarajevo “to take pot shots at civilians for their own gratification.”

He noted that one man had turned up with a rifle “more suited to wild boar than to urban combat.”

The city, surrounded by hills to use as vantage points, became notorious for sniper shootings during the siege, which was the longest of any city in modern European history, and saw about 11,500 people killed.

Italian intelligence agency SISMI also said during the tribunal that “weekend snipers” had taken part in killings in Sarajevo during the siege. At least one case, involving Russian nationalist Eduard Limonov, is known to have taken place, after he was filmed in 1992 firing at the city alongside Karadzic.

British journalist Tim Judah, who was based in the area, told the Telegraph: “It is possible that there were people willing to pay to do this. But I don’t think the numbers would have been very large.”

A spokesperson for the Bosnian consulate in Milan said: “We are impatient to discover the truth about such a cruel matter in order to close a chapter of history. I am in possession of certain information I will be sharing with the investigators.”