ֱ

Black student dragged from his car and punched by Florida officers says he was scared and confused

Black student dragged from his car and punched by Florida officers says he was scared and confused
This combination image of video grabs shows Florida cops pulling out 22-year-old Black college student William McNeil Jr.frim his car, punching him in the body and neck and wrestling him to the ground. (AP Video)
Short Url
Updated 10 sec ago

Black student dragged from his car and punched by Florida officers says he was scared and confused

Black student dragged from his car and punched by Florida officers says he was scared and confused
  • William McNeil Jr. 's encounter with teh abusive cops happened in February, but the arrest didn’t capture much attention until the video from McNeil’s car-mounted camera went viral over the weekend

A Black college student shown on video being punched and dragged from his car by Florida law officers during a traffic stop faces a long recovery from injuries that include a concussion and a broken tooth that pierced his lip and led to several stiches, his lawyers said Wednesday.
At a news conference in Jacksonville, 22-year-old William McNeil Jr. spoke softly as he made a few brief comments with his family and civil rights attorneys by his side.
“That day I just really wanted to know why I was getting pulled over and why I needed to step out of the car,” he said. “I knew I didn’t do nothing wrong. I was really just scared.”
McNeil is a biology major who played in the marching band at Livingstone College, a historically Black Christian college in Salisbury, North Carolina, Livingstone President Anthony Davis said.
The encounter with law enforcement happened in February, but the arrest didn’t capture much attention until the video from McNeil’s car-mounted camera went viral over the weekend. That’s when the sheriff said he became aware of it and opened an internal investigation, which is ongoing. The sheriff said a separate probe by the State Attorney’s Office cleared the officers of any criminal wrongdoing — a finding fiercely criticized by McNeil’s lawyers.
Video from inside the car captures him being punched
Footage of the violent arrest has sparked nationwide outrage, with civil rights lawyers accusing authorities of fabricating their arrest report.
The video filmed by McNeil’s camera shows him sitting in the driver’s seat, asking to speak to the Jacksonville officers’ supervisor, when they broke his window, punched him in the face, pulled him from the vehicle and punched him again. He was then knocked to the ground by an officer who delivered six closed-fist punches to the hamstring of his right thigh, police reports show.

Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis on Wednesday defended law enforcement officers and implied the video was posted to advance a “narrative” and generate attention on social media.
“That’s what happens in so many of these things,” DeSantis said. “There’s a rush to judgment. There’s a, there’s a desire to try to get views and clicks by creating division.”
DeSantis says he hasn’t seen the video, but backs law enforcement
DeSantis said he hasn’t reviewed the viral video but has “every confidence” in Jacksonville Sheriff T.K. Waters, who has urged the public not to cast judgment based on the footage alone.
“If people get out of line, he’s going to hold them accountable,” DeSantis said.
Body camera footage of the encounter shows McNeil had been repeatedly told to exit the vehicle. And, though he earlier had his car door open while talking with an officer, he later closed it and appeared to keep it locked for about three minutes before the officers forcibly removed him, the video shows. The vantage point of the body camera footage that was released makes it difficult to see the punches.
The cellphone footage from the Feb. 19 arrest shows that seconds before being dragged outside, McNeil had his hands up and did not appear to be resisting as he asked, “What is your reason?” He had pulled over and had been accused of not having his headlights on, even though it was daytime, his lawyers said.
On Wednesday, civil rights lawyer Ben Crump said his client had every right to ask why he was being pulled over and to ask for a supervisor.
Report that McNeil reached toward a knife is disputed
A point of contention in the police report is a claim that McNeil reached toward an area of the car where deputies found a knife when they searched the vehicle after taking him into custody.
“The suspect was reaching for the floorboard of the vehicle where a large knife was sitting,” Officer D. Bowers wrote in his report.
Crump called that police report a “fabrication,” saying McNeil “never reaches for anything.” A second officer observed that McNeil kept his hands up as Bowers smashed the window.
“After Ofc. Bowers opened the door, the subject refused to exit the vehicle, but kept his hands up,” the second officer wrote.
Sheriff says officers have been cleared of committing any crimes
The State Attorney’s Office determined that the officers did not violate any criminal laws, the sheriff said. No one from the State Attorney’s Office ever interviewed McNeil, Crump said.
Daniels called their investigation “a whitewashing.”
“But for that video, we would not be here,” Daniels said. “And we thank God Mr. McNeil had the courage to record.”
Asked about the criticism of the State Attorney’s review, a spokesperson for the office said Wednesday that “a memo to McNeil’s file will be finalized in the coming days that will serve as our comment.”
Shortly after his arrest, McNeil pleaded guilty to charges of resisting an officer without violence and driving with a suspended license, Waters said.
Civil rights attorneys call for accountability
“America, we’re better than this, we’re at a crossroads,” Crump said. “We are a Democracy, we believe in the Constitution. We are not a police state where the police can do anything they want to citizens without any accountability.”
Crump said his client remained calm while the officers who are trained to deescalate tense situations were the ones escalating violence. He said the case harkened back to the Civil Rights movement, when Black people were often attacked when they tried to assert their rights.
“What he exhibited was a 21st century Rosa Parks moment where an African American had the audacity to say ‘I deserve equal justice under the law. I deserve to be treated like a human being with all the respect that a human being is entitled to.’”
The sheriff has pushed back on some of the claims by Crump and lawyer Harry Daniels, saying the cellphone camera footage from inside the car “does not comprehensively capture the circumstances surrounding the incident.”
“Part of that stems from the distance and perspective of the recording cell phone camera,” the sheriff said in a statement, adding that the video did not capture events that occurred before officers decided to arrest McNeil.
Cameras “can only capture what can be seen and heard,” the sheriff added. “So much context and depth are absent from recorded footage because a camera simply cannot capture what is known to the people depicted in it.”
Many of the speakers at Wednesday’s news conference said they hope the Florida case results in accountability so that what happened to McNeil doesn’t happen to others.
“It’s incumbent upon everyone to understand that this could have been us, this could have been me, this could have been you,” civil rights lawyer Gerald Griggs said.


Columbia University agrees to pay more than $220 million in deal with Trump administration to restore federal funding

Columbia University agrees to pay more than $220 million in deal with Trump administration to restore federal funding
Updated 7 sec ago

Columbia University agrees to pay more than $220 million in deal with Trump administration to restore federal funding

Columbia University agrees to pay more than $220 million in deal with Trump administration to restore federal funding

NEW YORK: Columbia University agrees to pay more than $220 million in deal with Trump administration to restore federal funding.


State Department approves $322 million in proposed weapons sales to Ukraine

State Department approves $322 million in proposed weapons sales to Ukraine
Updated 8 min 6 sec ago

State Department approves $322 million in proposed weapons sales to Ukraine

State Department approves $322 million in proposed weapons sales to Ukraine
  • The approvals come weeks after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed a pause on other weapons shipments to Ukraine to allow the Pentagon to assess its weapons stockpiles

The State Department said Wednesday that it has approved $322 million in proposed weapons sales to Ukraine to enhance its air defense capabilities and provide armored combat vehicles, coming as the country works to fend off escalating Russian attacks.
The potential sales, which the department said were notified to Congress, include $150 million for the supply, maintenance, repair and overhaul of US armored vehicles, and $172 million for surface-to-air missile systems.
The approvals come weeks after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed a pause on other weapons shipments to Ukraine to allow the Pentagon to assess its weapons stockpiles, in a move that caught the White House by surprise. President Donald Trump then made an abrupt change in posture, pledging publicly earlier this month to continue to send weapons to Ukraine.
“We have to,” Trump said. “They have to be able to defend themselves. They’re getting hit very hard now. We’re going to send some more weapons — defensive weapons primarily.”
Trump recently endorsed a plan to have European allies buy US military equipment that can then be transferred to Ukraine. It was not immediately clear how the latest proposed sales related to that arrangement.
Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the US has provided more than $67 billion in weapons and security assistance to Kyiv.
Since Trump came back into office, his administration has gone back and forth about providing more military aid to Ukraine, with political pressure to stop US funding of foreign wars coming from the isolationists inside the Trump administration and on Capitol Hill.
Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defense systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia.


Tesla profit plunges in latest quarter as Musk’s turn to politics continues to keep buyers away

Tesla profit plunges in latest quarter as Musk’s turn to politics continues to keep buyers away
Updated 13 min 1 sec ago

Tesla profit plunges in latest quarter as Musk’s turn to politics continues to keep buyers away

Tesla profit plunges in latest quarter as Musk’s turn to politics continues to keep buyers away
  • Faced with boycotts for months, the car company’s profits slumped 16 percent in the three months through June
  • Musk also alienated many in the market for cars in Europe by embracing far-right candidates for office on the continent

NEW YORK: The fallout from Elon Musk’s plunge into politics a year ago is still hammering his Tesla business as both sales and profits dropped sharply again in the latest quarter.
The car company that has faced boycotts for months said Wednesday that revenue dropped 12 percent and profits slumped 16 percent in the three months through June as buyers continued to stay away.
“The perception of Elon Musk, its chief executive, has rubbed the sheen right out of what once was a darling and soaring automotive brand,” wrote Forrester analyst Dipanjan Chatterjee in an email. Tesla is “a toxic brand that is inseparable from its leader.”
Quarterly profits at the electric vehicle, battery and robotics company fell to $1.17 billion, or 33 cents a share, from $1.4 billion, or 40 cents a share. That was the third quarter in a row that profit dropped. On an adjusted basis, the company said it earned 40 cents a share, matching Wall Street estimates.
Revenue fell from $25.5 billion to $22.5 billion in the April through June period, slightly above Wall Street’s forecast.
Tesla shares were little changed in after-hours trading as investors wait to hear from Musk on the company’s earnings call later in the afternoon.
Musk, who helped elect President Donald Trump with a massive campaign donation and then headed his DOGE cost-cutting program, has been pinning the future of the company less on car sales and more on robotaxis, automated driving software and robotics. But those businesses are yet to take off, and the gap between promise and profits was apparent in the second quarter.
A big challenge is that potential buyers not just in the US but Europe are still balking at buying Teslas. Musk alienated many in the market for cars in Great Britain, France, Germany and elsewhere by embracing far-right candidates for office on the continent. And rival electric vehicle makers such as China’s BYD and German’s Volkswagen have pounced on the weakness, stealing market share.
Tesla began a rollout of its paid pickup robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, and hopes to introduce the driverless cabs in several other cities soon. Musk has said he expects to have hundreds of thousands of the cabs on US roads by the end of next year.
In a conference call after the results were announced, Musk said the service will be available to probably “half of the population of the US by the end of the year — that’s at least our goal, subject to regulatory approvals.”
He added, “We are being very cautious. We don’t want to take any chances.”
The test run in Austin has mostly gone off without a hitch, though there have been a few alarming incidents, such as when a robotaxi went down a lane meant for opposing traffic.
With driverless taxis, though, the billionaire who upended the space race and the EV manufacturing faces tough competition. The dominant provider now, Waymo, is already in several cities and recently logged its ten-millionth paid trip.
Meanwhile other threats loom. The new federal budget just passed by Congress eliminates a credit worth as much as $7,500 for buying an electric car. It also wipes out penalties for car makers to exceeding carbon emission standards. That threatens Tesla’s business of selling its “carbon credits” to traditional car companies that regularly fall short of emission standards.
Tesla generated $439 million from credit sales, down sharply from $890 million a year ago.
One way to boost sales that Musk has long promised: A cheaper model. The company now is planning to introduce that to the market in the last three months of the year. Tesla had previously said that was going to happen by June this year.
“It appears management’s focus will now shift to robotaxis and away from deliveries growth,” said Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein, referring to the car sales.
“If Tesla continues to execute well with vehicle autonomy and humanoid robot autonomy,” Musk said in his remarks, “it will be the most valuable company in the world.”
Musk also said he expected regulatory approval to introduce its so-called Full Self-Driving software in some parts of Europe by the end of the year. Musk had previously expected that to happen by March of this year. The feature, which is available in the US, is a misnomer because it is only a driver assistance feature.
Gross margins for the quarter, a measure of earnings for each dollar of revenue, fell to 17.2 percent from 18 percent a year earlier.
A highlight from the quarter was from something far removed from cars and robots: the company’s investment in bitcoin. That bet generated a $284 million paper gain, compared with a loss the previous quarter.


French president Macron sues influencer over claim France’s first lady was born male

French president Macron sues influencer over claim France’s first lady was born male
Updated 19 min 44 sec ago

French president Macron sues influencer over claim France’s first lady was born male

French president Macron sues influencer over claim France’s first lady was born male
  • Macrons allege ’relentless bullying on a worldwide scale’

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte filed a defamation lawsuit in the U.S. on Wednesday against right-wing influencer and podcaster Candace Owens, centered on her claim that France's first lady is male.
The Macrons said in a lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court that Owens has waged a lie-filled "campaign of global humiliation" to promote her podcast and expand her "frenzied" fan base.
The Macrons said the lies included that Brigitte Macron, 72, was born under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, the actual name of her older brother.
"Owens has dissected their appearance, their marriage, their friends, their family, and their personal history — twisting it all into a grotesque narrative designed to inflame and degrade," the complaint said.
"The result," the complaint added, "is relentless bullying on a worldwide scale."
In a statement, a spokesperson for Owens called the lawsuit itself an effort to bully her, after Brigitte Macron rejected Owens' repeated requests for an interview.
"Candace Owens is not shutting up," the spokesperson said. "This is a foreign government attacking the First Amendment rights of an American independent journalist."
In a joint statement released by their lawyers, the Macrons said they sued after Owens rejected three demands that she retract defamatory statements.
"Ms. Owens's campaign of defamation was plainly designed to harass and cause pain to us and our families and to garner attention and notoriety," the Macrons said. "We gave her every opportunity to back away from these claims, but she refused."

HIGH LEGAL STANDARD
Wednesday's lawsuit is a rare case of a world leader suing for defamation.
U.S. President Donald Trump has also turned to the courts, including in a $10 billion lawsuit accusing The Wall Street Journal of defaming him by claiming he created a lewd birthday greeting for disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein in 2003.
The Journal said it would defend against that case and had full confidence in its reporting.
In December, meanwhile, Trump reached a $15 million settlement with Walt Disney-owned ABC over an inaccurate claim that a jury found him liable for rape, rather than sexual assault, in a civil lawsuit.
To prevail in U.S. defamation cases, public figures must show defendants engaged in "actual malice," a tough legal standard requiring proof the defendants knew what they published was false or had reckless disregard for its truth.
Owens has more than 6.9 million followers on X and more than 4.5 million YouTube subscribers.
CARLSON, ROGAN
The Macrons' lawsuit focuses on the eight-part podcast "Becoming Brigitte," which has more than 2.3 million views on YouTube, and X posts linked to it.
According to the Macrons, the series spread "verifiably false and devastating lies," including that Brigitte Macron stole another person's identity and transitioned to female, and that the Macrons are blood relatives committing incest.
The complaint discusses circumstances under which the Macrons met, when the now 47-year-old president was a high school student and Brigitte was a teacher. It said their relationship "remained within the bounds of the law."
According to the complaint, baseless speculation about Brigitte Macron's gender began surfacing in 2021, and the topic has been discussed on popular podcasts hosted by Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, who have many conservative followers.
In September, Brigitte won a lawsuit in a French court against two women, including a self-described medium, who contributed to spreading rumors about her gender.
An appeals court overturned that decision this month, and Brigitte Macron has appealed to France's highest court.
The case is Macron et al v Owens et al, Delaware Superior Court, No. N25C-07-194. 


Trump’s AI plan prioritizes deregulation to boost US dominance

Trump’s AI plan prioritizes deregulation to boost US dominance
Updated 35 min 48 sec ago

Trump’s AI plan prioritizes deregulation to boost US dominance

Trump’s AI plan prioritizes deregulation to boost US dominance
  • The administration frames AI advancement as critical to maintaining economic and military supremacy

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump unveiled an aggressive, low-regulation strategy on Wednesday to boost big tech’s race to stay ahead of China on artificial intelligence and cement US dominance in the fast-expanding field.
Trump’s 25-page “America’s AI Action Plan” outlines three aims: accelerating innovation, building infrastructure, and leading internationally on AI.
The administration frames AI advancement as critical to maintaining economic and military supremacy. Environmental consequences are sidelined in the planning document.
“America is the country that started the AI race, and as president of the United States, I’m here today to declare that America is going to win it,” Trump told an AI event in Washington.
“Winning this competition will be a test of our capacities unlike anything since the dawn of the space age,” he said, before signing several executive orders to give components of the strategy additional legal weight.
In its collection of more than 90 government proposals, Trump’s plan calls for sweeping deregulation, with the administration promising to “remove red tape and onerous regulation” that could hinder private sector AI development.
In his wide-ranging speech, Trump insisted that “winning the AI race will demand a new spirit of patriotism and national loyalty in Silicon Valley and beyond.”
Trump complained that for too long “many of our largest tech companies have reaped the blessings of American freedom while building their factories in China, hiring workers in India and slashing profits in Ireland.”
The plan also asked federal agencies to find ways to legally stop US states from implementing their own AI regulations and threatened to rescind federal aid to states that did so.
“We have to have a single federal standard, not 50 different states, regulating this industry of the future,” Trump said.
The American Civil Liberties Union warned this would thwart “initiatives to uphold civil rights and shield communities from biased AI systems in areas like employment, education, health care, and policing.”
The Trump action plan also calls for AI systems to be “free from ideological bias” and designed to pursue objective truth rather than what the administration calls “social engineering agendas,” such as diversity and inclusion.
This criterion would apply to AI companies wanting to do business with the US government.
Trump also called for AI development to be broadly immune from copyright claims — currently the subject of legal battles — saying it was a “common sense” approach.
“You can’t be expected to have a successful AI program when every single article, book, or anything else that you’ve read or studied, you’re supposed to pay for,” he said.
A major focus in the plan involves building AI infrastructure, including streamlined permitting for data centers and energy facilities that would overlook environmental concerns to build as swiftly as possible.
The administration, which rejects international science showing a growing climate crisis, proposes creating new environmental review exemptions for data center construction and expanding access to federal lands for AI infrastructure development.
Trump also called for the swift construction of coal and nuclear plants to help provide the energy needed to power the data centers.
The strategy also calls for efforts to “counter Chinese influence in international governance bodies” and strengthen export controls on advanced AI computing technology.
At the same time, the strategy calls on the government to champion US technology in conquering overseas markets, a priority that was spelled out in an executive order.
These plans will help “ensure America sets the technological gold standard worldwide, and that the world continues to run on American technology,” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement.
Critics of the plan said the policies were a gift to US tech giants that were scaling back their goals for zero carbon emissions in order to meet the acute computing needs for AI.
“Trump’s plan reads like a twisted Gilded Age playbook that rewards the rich while punishing everyday Americans and the environment,” said Jean Su of the Center for Biological Diversity