ֱ

UN backs peaceful dispute resolution as Pakistan slams India over water treaty suspension 

UN backs peaceful dispute resolution as Pakistan slams India over water treaty suspension 
Diplomats participate in a United Nations (UN) meeting of the UN Security Council (UNSC) on July 22, 2025, in New York City. (UNSC/ X)
Short Url
Updated 22 July 2025

UN backs peaceful dispute resolution as Pakistan slams India over water treaty suspension 

UN backs peaceful dispute resolution as Pakistan slams India over water treaty suspension 
  • Pakistan’s deputy PM criticizes India for “illegally” suspending 65-year-old water-sharing treaty
  • UN Security Council unanimously adopts resolution on mechanisms to resolve global conflicts

ISLAMABAD: The United Nations Security Council on Tuesday unanimously adopted a resolution calling on member states to use peaceful means, including negotiation, mediation and judicial settlement, to resolve disputes, as Pakistan accused India of undermining a landmark water-sharing agreement.

Signed in 1960 with World Bank mediation, the Indus Waters Treaty governs the distribution of the Indus River and its tributaries between India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed neighbors with a history of conflict. Despite strained bilateral relations over the decades, the treaty has been regarded as one of the most resilient diplomatic frameworks in South Asia.

Speaking at the UNSC’s open debate, Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said the 65-year-old Indus Waters Treaty remained a “noteworthy example of dialog and diplomacy working for peacefully arriving at a water-sharing arrangement between two neighbors.”

“The treaty has withstood periods of trials and tribulations in bilateral relations,” Dar said.

“It is most unfortunate and regrettable that India has chosen to illegally and unilaterally hold this treaty in abeyance on baseless grounds with the intention of withholding the flow of water to 240 million people of Pakistan, who rely on it for their livelihood and survival.”

Dar’s remarks came as the Security Council adopted a resolution reaffirming the importance of peaceful dispute resolution mechanisms, with all 15 of the Council’s members voting in favor.

The resolution encourages states to make full use of existing mechanisms such as “negotiation, mediation, arbitration, judicial settlement or other peaceful means,” in accordance with the UN Charter.

India decided to hold the IWT treaty “in abeyance” after a militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir killed 26 people in April. New Delhi blamed Pakistan for being behind the attack and announced a slew of punitive measures, including suspending the water sharing pact. 

Pakistan denies involvement in the assault and has called for an independent international investigation.

The IWT ensures water supply for 80 percent of Pakistani farms. Pakistan has previously warned that the treaty contains no provision for unilateral withdrawal and any attempt to block or stop river water flowing into the country would be considered “an act of war.”

In May, weeks after the April attack, the most intense India–Pakistan military confrontation in decades ensued, involving a series of drone, artillery and missile strikes before a ceasefire was brokered by the US on May 10.


Islamabad accuses Kabul of ‘instigating Pashtunism’ in Pakistan amid heightened tensions

Islamabad accuses Kabul of ‘instigating Pashtunism’ in Pakistan amid heightened tensions
Updated 10 sec ago

Islamabad accuses Kabul of ‘instigating Pashtunism’ in Pakistan amid heightened tensions

Islamabad accuses Kabul of ‘instigating Pashtunism’ in Pakistan amid heightened tensions
  • Tensions have been high between Pakistan and Afghanistan in recent years, with Islamabad accusing Kabul of harboring militant groups
  • Clashes erupted between the neighbors on Oct. 11 after Pakistan conducted airstrikes in Afghanistan against what it called militant targets

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad on Friday accused the Afghan Taliban government of “instigating Pashtunism” in Pakistan, amid heightened tensions between the neighbors over a surge in militancy in Pakistan.

Tensions have been high between Pakistan and Afghanistan in recent years, with Islamabad accusing Kabul of harboring militant groups like the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). Kabul has consistently denied this.

Clashes erupted between the neighbors on Oct. 11 after Pakistan conducted airstrikes in Afghanistan against what it said were TTP-linked targets. The two sides reached a ceasefire in Doha on Oct. 19, but two subsequent rounds of talks in Istanbul failed to firm up the truce.

Speaking at a weekly press briefing in Islamabad, Pakistani foreign office spokesman Tahir Andrabi said some elements within the Afghan Taliban have made an attempt to “instigate” Pashtun sentiment in Pakistan. He did not offer any evidence, while Kabul did not immediately respond to the comment.

“It is a historical fact that Pashtuns in Pakistan are a vibrant part of our society and the state, holding leadership position across the spectrum of public life and civil society. More number of Pashtuns live in Pakistan than in Afghanistan,” Andrabi told reporters on Friday.

“Therefore, instead of instigating Pashtunism in Pakistan, it would be wise for Taliban regime to look into its own credentials of inclusivity across all segments of this population in its governance structure.”

Pashtunism, often framed in political discourse as Pashtun nationalism, refers to the idea of uniting Pashtun-speaking communities under a shared ethnic, cultural or political identity. While Pashtuns constitute one of the largest ethnic groups in both Pakistan and Afghanistan, they have been divided by the 2,600-kilometer border, known as Durand Line, named after British diplomat Sir Mortimer Durand who drew the boundary in the late 19th century with the agreement of Afghan authorities of the day.

The Taliban government, like many previous Afghan administrations, does not recognize the border known as the Durand Line and describes it as “imaginary.” Pakistani officials maintain that Kabul’s rhetoric on Pashtun unity have occasionally been deployed to stir sentiment within Pakistan, particularly during periods of strained bilateral relations.

The Pakistani foreign office spokesman once again blamed the rise in militancy in Pakistan on Afghanistan-based militant groups.

“With evidence-based and well-documented sharp rise in terrorism emanating from Afghanistan into Pakistan after August 2021, the Taliban regime can neither deny the reality nor absolve itself of this responsibility,” Andrabi said.

He, however, reiterated Pakistan’s commitment to resolution of bilateral differences through dialogue: “Pakistan’s core concerns, that is terrorism emanating from Afghanistan, need to be addressed first and foremost.”