ֱ

Mexico’s president calls march against mass tourism ‘xenophobic.’ Critics blame government failures

Mexico’s president calls march against mass tourism ‘xenophobic.’ Critics blame government failures
Demonstrators gather to protest against gentrification in Condesa neighborhood in Mexico City, Mexico. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 08 July 2025

Mexico’s president calls march against mass tourism ‘xenophobic.’ Critics blame government failures

Mexico’s president calls march against mass tourism ‘xenophobic.’ Critics blame government failures
  • The Mexico City Anti Gentrification Front, one of the organizations behind the protest said said this was a result of years of failures by the local government to address the root of the problems

MEXICO CITY: A fierce protest in Mexico City railing against gentrification and mass tourism was fueled by government failures and active promotion to attract digital nomads, according to experts, who said tension had been mounting for years.
The criticism comes after Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum alleged that Friday’s protest was marked by xenophobia, reviving a debate over an influx of Americans in the city.
Many Mexicans say they’ve been priced out of their neighborhoods — in part because of a move made by Sheinbaum in 2022, when she was the Mexico City mayor and signed an agreement with Airbnb and UNESCO to boost tourism and attract digital nomads despite concern over the impact short-term rentals could have.
‘Gringo: Stop stealing our home’
On Friday, that came to a head. A largely peaceful protest of hundreds of demonstrators marched through tourism centers of the city with signs reading “Gringo: Stop stealing our home” and “Housing regulations now!”
Near the end of the march, a group of protesters turned violent, breaking the windows of storefronts and looting a number of businesses. In one case, a protester slammed a butter knife against the window of a restaurant where people were hiding, and another person painted “kill a gringo” on a nearby wall.
“The xenophobic displays seen at that protest have to be condemned. No one should be able to say ‘any nationality get out of our country’ even over a legitimate problem like gentrification,” Sheinbaum said Monday. “We’ve always been open, fraternal.”
The frustrations were built upon years of mass tourism and rising rent prices in large swathes of the city. The influx of foreigners began around 2020, when Americans flooded into the Mexico City to work remotely, dodge coronavirus restrictions and take advantage of cheaper living costs.
In the years since, choice neighborhoods like Roma and Condesa, lush central areas dotted with cafes and markets, have grown increasingly populated by foreign tourists and the remote workers known as digital nomads, and there are more temporary housing units rented through companies like Airbnb that cater to tourists.
As they have, rent and living prices have soared and English has been increasingly common on the streets of those areas. Some groups have described the phenomenon as a sort of “neo-colonialism.”
Mounting tensions
The Mexico City Anti-Gentrification Front, one of the organizations behind the protest, it was “completely against” any acts of physical violence and denied that the protests were xenophobic. Instead, the organization said the protest was a result of years of failures by the local government to address the root of the problems.
“Gentrification isn’t just foreigners’ fault, it’s the fault of the government and these companies that prioritize the money foreigners bring,” the organization said in a statement. Meanwhile “young people and the working class can’t afford to live here.”
In its list of demands, the organization called for greater rent controls, mandates that locals have a voice in larger development projects in their area, stricter laws making it harder for landlords to throw out residents and prioritizing Mexican renters over foreigners.
Mexico’s protest comes on the back of a wave of similar protests across Europe railing against mass tourism. Tensions in Mexico have also been compounded by wider inequalities and the Trump administration targeting Latino communities in the US as it ramps up deportations.
The US Department of Homeland Security took a jab at protesters Sunday, writing in a post on the social media platform X: “If you are in the United States illegally and wish to join the next protest in Mexico City, use the CBP Home app to facilitate your departure.”
Government failures
Protesters’ cries against government failures were echoed by experts, who said that surging gentrification is a product of both shortage of affordable housing in the city and longtime government failures to regulate the housing market.
Antonio Azuela, lawyer and sociologist and others said that they do see the protest as a xenophobic backlash, and around 2020 the core of the problem was the influx of “digital nomads” in the city, but it grew out of hand because of lax housing laws.
“What has made this explode is lack of regulation in the market,” Azuela said.
Mexico City’s government over the course of decades has made a few efforts to control development and create affordable housing.
Legislators estimated there are about 2.7 million houses and apartments in the city, but it needs about 800,000 more. But such affordable housing developments that have popped up often are pushed off to the fringes of the city, said Luis Salinas, a researcher at National Autonomous University of Mexico who has studied gentrification in Mexico City for years.
Taking advantage of ‘insufficient’ laws
Controls, meanwhile, have been marked by lack of enforcement, which developers travel services companies like Airbnb take advantage of, he said.
Today, more than 26,000 properties in Mexico City are currently listed on Airbnb, according to the Inside Airbnb, an advocacy organization that tracks the company’s impact on residential communities through data. That’s compared to 36,000 properties in New York City and 19,000 in Barcelona, where protests have also broken out.
“The government has treated housing like it’s merchandise,” Salinas said. The actions the government is taking “are completely insufficient. The federal government needs to be intervening far more nowadays.”
Airbnb said it helped contribute more than a billion dollars in “economic impact” to Mexico City last year and that spending by guests has supported 46,000 jobs in the city. “What’s needed is regulation based not on prohibitions, but on respect for rights and transparency of obligations,” it said in a statement.
Last year, Mexico City’s government approved the most ambitious rent control law since the 1940s in an effort to control prices and also set caps on short-term rentals to 180 nights a year, but Salinas said that enforcement of short-term rental legislation has been put on pause until after the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
And even then, the country’s government will have to take far greater actions to get the situation under control, said Azuela.
“This isn’t going to end by just reigning in Airbnb,” he said. “They’re going to have to do a whole lot more.”


Japanese Prime Minister looking for further upgrade of ties with Kuwait

Japanese Prime Minister looking for further upgrade of ties with Kuwait
Updated 24 September 2025

Japanese Prime Minister looking for further upgrade of ties with Kuwait

Japanese Prime Minister looking for further upgrade of ties with Kuwait
  • Ishiba met with the Crown Prince in New York
  • He expressed gratitude for Kuwait’s long-standing stable supply of crude oil

TOKYO: Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru told Sheikh Sabah Khalid Al-Hamad Al-Sabah, the Crown Prince of Kuwait, on Tuesday that he plans to further upgrade bilateral relations between the two countries based on their Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, Japan’s Foreign Ministry reported.
Ishiba met with the Crown Prince in New York and said Kuwait, with its strong commitment to multilateralism, including at the United Nations, is a “reliable partner” in international forums and that he wished for the two countries to work closely together.
Ishiba also expressed gratitude for Kuwait’s long-standing stable supply of crude oil, and both sides agreed to promote energy cooperation, including clean energy. They also welcomed the lifting of a ban on imports of Japanese beef into Kuwait, scheduled for September 25.
The pair exchanged views on recent developments in the Middle East and confirmed their close coordination toward achieving a “two-state solution” for the Israeli Palestinian conflict, as well as agreeing to strengthen cooperation in various fields in Asia and Africa.


Japan urges Iran to resume talks with IAEA over nuclear issue

Japan urges Iran to resume talks with IAEA over nuclear issue
Updated 24 September 2025

Japan urges Iran to resume talks with IAEA over nuclear issue

Japan urges Iran to resume talks with IAEA over nuclear issue
  • Iwaya said Japan is hoping for a resolution of the nuclear issue through dialogue
  • He also urged Iran to take swift and positive action toward an agreement with the E3

TOKYO: In a meeting with Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in New York on Tuesday, Japanese Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi urged Iran to resume cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, Japan’s Foreign Ministry said.
Iwaya said Japan is hoping for a resolution of the nuclear issue through dialogue and urged Iran to immediately resume full cooperation with the IAEA, as well as talks with the United States, as early as possible.
He also urged Iran to take swift and positive action toward an agreement with the E3 (the United Kingdom, France, and Germany) and said Japan will continue to make maximum diplomatic efforts for a peaceful resolution of the issue.
In response, Foreign Minister Araghchi explained the position and efforts of Iran, and the two ministers agreed to continue close communication to work toward peace and stability in the Middle East.


Kosovo calls for international pressure on Serbia over deadly 2023 gunfight

Kosovo calls for international pressure on Serbia over deadly 2023 gunfight
Updated 24 September 2025

Kosovo calls for international pressure on Serbia over deadly 2023 gunfight

Kosovo calls for international pressure on Serbia over deadly 2023 gunfight
  • Kosovo has accused Serbia of involvement, a claim that Belgrade has denied
  • Prosecutors have charged 45 people, alleging they were trying to break away the Serb-majority municipalities in the northern part of Kosovo and join Serbia proper

PRISTINA: Kosovo’s acting prime minister on Wednesday called on the international community not to consider Serbia a normal state until it hands over those responsible for a deadly incursion by heavily armed Serb gunmen in 2023.
Albin Kurti visited the grave of Afrim Bunjaku, a police officer shot dead in the gunfight in Banjska. The attack also left three Serb gunmen dead.
Kosovo has accused Serbia of involvement, a claim that Belgrade has denied.
Kurti said the incursion was an “aggressive and terrorist attack” funded and supported by Belgrade officials and President Aleksandar Vucic.
“We call on the international actors not to consider Serbia a normal state as long as it doesn’t hand over its criminals,” he said.
Prosecutors have charged 45 people, alleging they were trying to break away the Serb-majority municipalities in the northern part of Kosovo and join Serbia proper.
Only three Serb defendants were arrested and were present at the trial that started last year. They pleaded not guilty to charges of violating constitutional and legal order, terror activities, funding terrorism and money laundering.
If convicted, they face a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Among those charged in absentia was Milan Radoicic, a politician and wealthy businessman with ties to Serbia’s ruling populist party and Vucic.
Serbia briefly detained Radoicic, who had fled back there after the shooting. Radoicic denied charges of criminal conspiracy, unlawful possession of weapons and explosives and grave acts against public safety, but admitted he was part of the paramilitary group involved in the gunfight. He was released.
Radoicic is under US and British sanctions for his alleged criminal activity. Serbia said that Radoicic and his group acted on their own.
Serbia’s independent media have reported that Radoicic’s men were deployed to intimidate anti-government protesters at almost daily rallies challenging Vucic’s firm rule in the country.
In Belgrade, right-wing supporters displayed nationalist banners and torches at a vigil on Tuesday evening honoring the three Serb paramilitaries who were killed in the clash in Banjska, and calling them “heroes.” Similar vigils were held in other towns.
European Union and US officials have demanded that Serbia bring the perpetrators to justice.
On Wednesday the British and German embassies urged Serbian authorities to act on the matter as soon as possible.
Relations between Serbia and its former breakaway province remain tense. Talks facilitated by Brussels seem to have stalled while Belgrade is confronted with continuous anti-government protests. In Kosovo, the Parliament’s political deadlock has hampered the creation of a new Cabinet.
Kosovo was a Serbian province until NATO’s 78-day bombing campaign in 1999 ended a war between Serbian government forces and ethnic Albanian separatists in Kosovo, which left about 13,000 dead, mainly ethnic Albanians, and pushed Serbian forces out. Kosovo proclaimed independence in 2008. It is recognized by most countries but not by Serbia and its close allies, Russia and China.


Behind bullish comments, some see Trump walking away from Ukraine

Behind bullish comments, some see Trump walking away from Ukraine
Updated 24 September 2025

Behind bullish comments, some see Trump walking away from Ukraine

Behind bullish comments, some see Trump walking away from Ukraine
  • “I think people are taking heart because it does suggest... that his understanding of the conflict has shifted,” Neil Melvin, Director, International Security at RUSI, said
  • Germany’s Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul welcomed Trump’s comments but said it was time for Europe to step up

LONDON/BERLIN/BRUSSELS: Donald Trump’s comments backing Kyiv to regain all of its territory from Russia have sparked a mixture of relief and suspicion that the US president is ready to leave Europe more to its own devices in supporting Ukraine.
Trump’s remarks on Truth Social marked an abrupt and major rhetorical shift for the US leader who had previously nudged Ukraine to give up territory to end the war and rolled out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin in Alaska only last month.
But it was not immediately clear whether he would back up his words with a shift in US policy, an ambiguity that could keep the onus on Europe to meet more of Ukraine’s needs through weapons and financing as Washington’s role recedes.
“I think people are taking heart because it does suggest... that his understanding of the conflict has shifted,” Neil Melvin, Director, International Security at RUSI, told Reuters about Trump’s comments.
“He has acknowledged that the conflict is more complicated, and he’s clearly frustrated with Putin, so that I think it is perhaps a success for Ukrainian and European diplomacy that that explanation has got through.”
However, Trump is maintaining a strategic ambiguity around the conflict, encouraging Ukraine without committing US support, Melvin said.
“So, the narrative around what he is saying has shifted but he still seems to be making it about distancing the US from leading on the conflict. He’s putting it back onto Europe all the time.”
STEPPING UP WILL NOT BE EASY FOR EUROPE
Germany’s Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul welcomed Trump’s comments but said it was time for Europe to step up.
“We have to become more sovereign,” Wadephul told Germany’s Deutschlandfunk radio.
“We can achieve much more; not all European states have delivered what they promised Ukraine. We have to look at what other financial and military options we have,” he said, adding it would not be easy for Europe to beef up its security efforts.
Two officials, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, also cautioned that Trump may be signalling that it was up to Europe to help Ukraine now.
“He seems to be saying his goodbyes, no? But that can change tomorrow. In any case: the cards are clear for us. We know what we should be doing,” a Western European official said.
A senior Eastern European diplomat said Trump’s Ukraine comments aimed to show “that he is starting to disengage by sending a message that it is Europe’s question.”
European defense stocks rose in morning trade on Wednesday after Trump’s comments, but Ukraine’s international bonds fell.
“Donald Trump’s comments on the Ukraine war are contradictory,” said Josef Janning, senior associate fellow at the German Council on Foreign Relations.
“In my view, this is just talk. As I see it, ever since the meeting in Alaska, Trump is walking away from his engagement and ending this war,” Janning said.

EUROPE ALREADY TAKING ON A GREATER ROLE
Before his return to the White House in January, Trump had boasted of being able to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours if re-elected. Following a disastrous meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the Oval Office in February, European leaders have made concerted efforts to bring Trump onside.
They have also sought to convince him that Moscow bears sole responsibility for the war, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.
The US has long been Ukraine’s biggest single backer and weapons supplier but since taking office Trump has insisted Europe take on a much greater share of its own defense burden. To some extent, that is already happened.
European members of the NATO alliance have raised their military spending and also supplied Ukraine with air defenses under a new system to give Kyiv weapons from US stocks using funds from NATO countries.
Despite European efforts, Melvin said, Trump’s rhetoric could shift again.
“I think we are always just one call to Putin away from a shift and that’s why I think fundamentally the first eight months have eroded trust in Europe in the Trump administration’s approach and this doesn’t restore trust.”


Right group urges Africa nations to reject US deportee deals

Right group urges Africa nations to reject US deportee deals
Updated 24 September 2025

Right group urges Africa nations to reject US deportee deals

Right group urges Africa nations to reject US deportee deals
  • Lawyers and civil society groups in Eswatini have gone to court to challenge the legality of the detentions
  • HRW urged African governments to refuse to accept US deportees and to terminate deals already in effect

JOHANNESBURG: US expulsions of detainees to African countries under “opaque deals,” some involving millions of dollars in financial assistance, violated global rights law and must be rejected, a rights watchdog said Tuesday.
Eswatini, Ghana, Rwanda and South Sudan have in recent months accepted US deportees as part of a scheme by President Donald Trump’s administration to expel undocumented migrants.
Human Rights Watch said a deal between the United States and the small African kingdom of Eswatini, which has not been made public, involved $5.1 million to build its border and migration management capacity.
In return, Eswatini agreed to accept up to 160 deportees, HRW said in a statement.
The kingdom in July accepted five nationals from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Vietnam and Yemen who had been convicted of crimes in the United States.
It jailed them at its maximum security Matsapha Correctional Center, which is notorious for holding political prisoners and for overcrowding.
A 62-year-old Jamaican national, who had reportedly completed a sentence for murder in the United States, was sent to Jamaica at the weekend, a government spokesman said.
Lawyers and civil society groups in Eswatini have gone to court to challenge the legality of the detentions and demand the government make public the terms of its deal with Washington.
HRW said it had also seen the deal with Rwanda, which had reportedly agreed to accept up to 250 deportees in exchange for roughly $7.5 million in US financial support.
“The opaque deals that facilitate these transfers, at least some of which include US financial assistance, are part of a US policy approach that violates international human rights law and is designed to instrumentalize human suffering as a deterrent to migration,” HRW said.
It urged African governments to refuse to accept US deportees and to terminate deals already in effect.
“These agreements make African governments partners in the Trump administration’s horrifying violations of immigrants’ human rights,” said advocacy director Allan Ngari.
The countries involved should “disclose their terms, allow access to independent monitors, refrain from detaining any deportees absent a clear legal basis,” it said.
And they should ensure that none are returned to their home country if there is evidence that they could be harmed, HRW said.