ֱ

Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests

Update Federal agents executed search warrants at three locations, including a warehouse in the fashion district of Los Angeles.  (AP)
1 / 3
Federal agents executed search warrants at three locations, including a warehouse in the fashion district of Los Angeles. (AP)
Update Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests
2 / 3
Los Angeles Sheriff Department officers arrive to help after the US Border Patrol and protesters clash after a raid was conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement near a Home Depot on June 7, 2025 in Paramount, California. (Getty Images via AFP)
Update Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests
3 / 3
Los Angeles Sheriff Department officers arrive to help after the US Border Patrol and protesters clash after a raid was conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement near a Home Depot on June 7, 2025 in Paramount, California. (Getty Images via AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 June 2025

Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests

Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests
  • White House deploys 2,000 National Guard troops to the streets of Los Angeles to quell ‘lawlessness’
  • The National Guard is frequently used in natural disasters, like in the aftermath of the LA fires

LOS ANGELES, United States: Donald Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to the streets of Los Angeles on Saturday in what the White House said was an effort to quell “lawlessness” after sometimes-violent protests erupted over immigration enforcement raids.

The US president took federal control of California’s state military to push soldiers into the country’s second-biggest city, where they could face off against demonstrators. It is a rare move that Governor Gavin Newsom said was “purposefully inflammatory.”

The development came after two days of confrontations that had seen federal agents shoot flash-bang grenades and tear gas toward crowds angry at the arrests of dozens of migrants in a city with a large Latino population.

Footage showed a car that had been set alight at a busy intersection, while in video circulating on social media a man in a motorbike helmet can be seen throwing rocks at speeding federal vehicles.

In other scenes, demonstrators threw fireworks at lines of local law enforcement who had been called in to try to keep the peace.

“President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, blaming what she called California’s “feckless” Democratic leaders.

“The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs.”

The National Guard — a reserve military — is frequently used in natural disasters, like in the aftermath of the LA fires, and occasionally in instances of civil unrest, but almost always with the consent of local politicians.

That was not the case Saturday.

Newsom, a frequent foil for Trump and a long-time foe of the Republican, took to social media to decry Saturday’s White House order.

“That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions,” he wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

“The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles — not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle. Don’t give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully.”

US Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli said guardsmen would be in place “within the next 24 hours.”

Trump’s Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to ramp up tensions further, warning that nearby regular military forces could get involved.

“If violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert,” he wrote on social media.

Law professor Jessica Levinson said Hegseth’s intervention appeared symbolic because of the general legal restriction on the use of the US military as a domestic policing force in the absence of an insurrection.

“At this moment, it’s not using the Insurrection Act,” she said, rather Trump was relying on what is known as Title 10.

“The National Guard will be able to do (no) more than provide logistical (and) personnel support.”

Since taking office in January, Trump has delivered on a promise to crack down hard on the entry and presence of undocumented migrants — who he has likened to “monsters” and “animals.”

The Department for Homeland Security said Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Los Angeles this week had resulted in the arrest of “118 aliens, including five gang members.”

Saturday’s standoff took place in the suburb of Paramount, where demonstrators converged on a reported federal facility, which the local mayor said was being used as a staging post by agents.

On Friday, masked and armed immigration agents carried out high-profile workplace raids in separate parts of Los Angeles, attracting angry crowds and setting off hours-long standoffs.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass acknowledged that some city residents were “feeling fear” following the federal immigration enforcement actions.

“Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable,” she said on X.

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said multiple arrests had been made following Friday’s clashes.

“You bring chaos, and we’ll bring handcuffs. Law and order will prevail,” he said on X.

On Saturday, amid chants for ICE agents to get out, some protesters waved Mexican flags while others set a US flag on fire, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Cement blocks and overturned shopping carts served as crude roadblocks.

The White House has taken a hard line against the protests, with deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller calling them “an insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States.”


Trump says he will meet with Putin ‘very shortly’ to discuss the war in Ukraine

Trump says he will meet with Putin ‘very shortly’ to discuss the war in Ukraine
Updated 57 min 18 sec ago

Trump says he will meet with Putin ‘very shortly’ to discuss the war in Ukraine

Trump says he will meet with Putin ‘very shortly’ to discuss the war in Ukraine

DNIPROPETROVSK REGION, Ukraine: US President Donald Trump said Friday that he will meet “very shortly” with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the war in Ukraine and that he will announce the location soon.

“We’re going to be announcing later, and we’re going to have a meeting with Russia,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

Those comments came as Ukrainian soldiers on the battlefield expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war and Trump’s deadline arrived Friday for the Kremlin to make peace.

Exasperated that Putin did not heed his calls to stop bombing Ukrainian cities, Trump almost two weeks ago moved up his ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement.

Trump’s efforts to pressure Putin into stopping the fighting have so far delivered no progress. Russia’s bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armor while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace.

Ukrainian troops say they are ready to keep fighting

Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line that snakes from northeast to southeast Ukraine. The Pokrovsk area of the eastern Donetsk region is taking the brunt of punishment as Russia seeks to break out into the neighboring Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine has significant manpower shortages.

Intense fighting is also taking place in Ukraine’s northern Sumy border region, where Ukrainian forces are engaging Russian soldiers to prevent reinforcements being sent from there to Donetsk.

In the Pokrovsk area of Donetsk, a commander said he believes Moscow isn’t interested in peace.

“It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them,” Buda, a commander of a drone unit in the Spartan Brigade, told The Associated Press. He used only his call sign, in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military.

“I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that. It does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them,” he said.

In the southern Zaporizhzhia region, a howitzer commander using the call sign Warsaw, said troops are determined to thwart Russia’s invasion.

“We are on our land, we have no way out,” he said. “So we stand our ground, we have no choice.”

Putin makes a flurry of phone calls

The Kremlin said Friday that Putin had a phone call with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, during which the Russian leader informed Xi about the results of his meeting earlier this week with Trump envoy Steve Witkoff. Kremlin officials said Xi “expressed support for the settlement of the Ukrainian crisis on a long-term basis.”

Putin is due to visit China next month. China, along with North Korea and Iran, have provided military support for Russia’s war effort, the US says.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on X that he also had a call with Putin to speak about the latest Ukraine developments. Trump signed an executive order Wednesday to place an additional 25 percent tariff on India for its purchases of Russian oil, which the American president says is helping to finance Russia’s war.

Putin’s calls followed his phone conversations with the leaders of South Africa, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Belarus, the Kremlin said.

The calls suggested to at least one analyst that Putin perhaps wanted to brief Russia’s most important allies about a potential settlement that could be reached at a summit with Trump.

“It means that some sort of real peace agreement has been reached for the first time,” said Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin Moscow-based analyst.

Analysts say Putin is aiming to outlast the West

Trump said Thursday that he would meet with Putin even if the Russian leader will not meet with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. That stoked fears in Europe that Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent’s biggest conflict since World War II.

Trump’s comments followed a statement from Putin that he hoped to meet with Trump as early as next week, possibly in the United Arab Emirates. The White House said it was still working through the details of any potential meetings.

The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said in an assessment Thursday that “Putin remains uninterested in ending his war and is attempting to extract bilateral concessions from the United States without meaningfully engaging in a peace process.”

“Putin continues to believe that time is on Russia’s side and that Russia can outlast Ukraine and the West,” it said.


UN committee probes disappearance of Syrian man deported by Austria

Migrants pass by garbage bins as they walk towards the Austrian border from Hegyeshalom, Hungary , September 23, 2015. (Reuters
Migrants pass by garbage bins as they walk towards the Austrian border from Hegyeshalom, Hungary , September 23, 2015. (Reuters
Updated 08 August 2025

UN committee probes disappearance of Syrian man deported by Austria

Migrants pass by garbage bins as they walk towards the Austrian border from Hegyeshalom, Hungary , September 23, 2015. (Reuters
  • Millions of Syrians fled Assad’s bloody crackdown on opponents in the country’s 2011-24 civil war

PARIS: The UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances has launched an inquiry into the whereabouts and fate of a Syrian man who was deported by Austria in early July and has not been in contact with his legal team or family since.
Austria has been asked by the UN committee “to make formal diplomatic representations to the Syrian authorities to determine whether the (person) is alive, where he is being held, in what conditions, and (to) request diplomatic guarantees to ensure his safety and humane treatment,” according to a letter dated Aug. 6 from the UN Petitions Section. 
The 32-year-old man was the first Syrian national expelled from EU territory since the fall of President Bashar Assad. 
Millions of Syrians fled Assad’s bloody crackdown on opponents in the country’s 2011-24 civil war. 
EU countries took in many of the refugees, but some are now looking into repatriations, citing the changed political situation in the Syrian Arab Republic, though sectarian violence has continued in some areas.
Rights groups raised concerns at the time of the man’s deportation on July 3 that he risked inhumane treatment in his home country and that his case would set a dangerous precedent.
Now, the man’s legal team in Austria and his close family have not been able to make contact with him, said his Austrian legal adviser, Ruxandra Staicu.
“This shows what we said before: Nobody can say for sure what will happen after deportation to Syria, because the situation in Syria is not secure, not stable; it is still changing,” she said. 
The Austrian Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs confirmed that its office received the letter and “will now examine any further steps together with the ministries responsible.”

The man, who was granted asylum in Austria in 2014, lost his refugee status in 2019 after being convicted of an unspecified crime. 
He was deported while awaiting a decision on a new asylum application. That decision is still pending.

 


UK Foreign Office under pressure over unreleased Gaza genocide risk assessment

UK Foreign Office under pressure over unreleased Gaza genocide risk assessment
Updated 08 August 2025

UK Foreign Office under pressure over unreleased Gaza genocide risk assessment

UK Foreign Office under pressure over unreleased Gaza genocide risk assessment
  • British authorities fail to respond to freedom of information request from Amnesty International for a copy of the 2024 assessment, which reportedly found no serious risk of genocide
  • Government criticized for contradictions; ministers say only international courts can rule on genocide but recent court case heard UK officials decided Israel’s actions ‘did not create such a risk’

LONDON: The UK’s Foreign Office is under growing pressure after it emerged it failed to publish a 2024 internal assessment that reportedly found no serious risk of genocide in Gaza, and refused to say whether a new assessment has since been carried out.

Amnesty International filed a freedom of information request in June to obtain a copy the document and ask whether any reassessment has taken place amid the escalating violence in the territory.

After receiving no response within the specified time frame for such requests, Amnesty lodged a formal complaint with the Information Commissioner’s Office, .

The government has come under fire for what critics describe as a contradictory stance, and calls for transparency are mounting. While ministers have insisted that only international courts can determine whether or not genocide is taking place, they told a domestic court, during a recent case brought by human rights group Al-Haq, that officials had reviewed the issue and found “Israel’s actions and statements did not create such a risk.”

Extracts from the unpublished 2024 assessment were disclosed in court. One part stated: “No evidence has been seen that Israel is deliberately targeting civilian women or children. There is also evidence of Israel making efforts to limit incidental harm to civilians.”

Another said: “There is no evidence of a high-level strategic decision, passed down through military chains of command, like that which was in evidence for the massacre and deportations at Srebrenica that were found in the Bosnian genocide case to constitute genocide (the ICJ’s only finding of genocide to date),” referring to the International Court of Justice.

The document reportedly concluded that Israel’s conduct could be “reasonably explained as a legitimate military campaign waged as part of an intensive armed conflict in a densely populated urban area,” and also cited the use of human shields by Hamas.

However, Amnesty argued that parts of the assessment appear to be outdated, and said the government might have updated its conclusions without disclosing them.

Kristyan Benedict of Amnesty said: “The government’s refusal to engage with us on this raises the suspicion that the government has made a further genocide assessment, and it is likely to be different from the 2024 claim that there was no serious risk of a genocide.”

More than 60 MPs wrote to the Foreign Office in May urging it to publish any updated assessments regarding the risk of genocide in Gaza.

The debate comes amid growing international concern about developments in the territory, with some legal experts and Israeli nongovernmental organizations accusing Israeli authorities of showing genocidal intent.

On Friday, Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey described Israel’s latest plan, to occupy Gaza City and displace tens of thousands of Palestinians, as “ethnic cleansing.”


British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police

British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police
Updated 08 August 2025

British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police

British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police
  • Laura Murton, 42, had held signs saying ‘Free Gaza’ and ‘Israel is committing genocide’
  • Armed police accused her of violating UK’s Terrorism Act, threatened her with arrest

LONDON: A pro-Palestine protester in the UK who was threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act is taking legal action against the police force involved in the incident, The Guardian reported on Friday.

Laura Murton, 42, had held up a Palestinian flag and signs saying “Free Gaza” and “Israel is committing genocide” at her demonstration in the city of Canterbury last month.

Armed police who responded to the protest told Murton that she had expressed support for Palestine Action, the group banned in July and listed as a terrorist organization.

Neither of Murton’s signs mentioned Palestine Action, she told officers, who asked if she supported any proscribed organizations. “I do not,” she responded.

Murton’s solicitors have issued a letter of claim to Kent police’s chief constable, in what is viewed as a reminder of police responsibilities ahead of major pro-Palestine protests this weekend across the UK.

Murton is seeking damages over the incident and will donate any compensation toward Palestinian causes.

She is also requesting an apology and an overview of details that police officers recorded about the incident.

Shamik Dutta of law firm Bhatt Murphy, which is representing Murton, said: “The legal challenge is being brought because as matters stand our client has neither received any apology nor any acknowledgment that Kent police conduct has been unlawful.

“She has had no indication that no further action will be taken against her in relation to her protest on July 14 or that no further action will be taken against her if she wishes to engage in a materially similar protest in the future.”

Murton filmed her encounter. One officer told her: “Mentioning freedom of Gaza, Israel, genocide, all of that all come under proscribed groups, which are terror groups that have been dictated by the government.” He then claimed that the phrase “free Gaza” indicated support for Palestine Action.

Murton reluctantly provided her name and address to the officers, who had threatened her with arrest unless she did so.

 


Xi tells Putin China glad to see improved US-Russia relations

Xi tells Putin China glad to see improved US-Russia relations
Updated 08 August 2025

Xi tells Putin China glad to see improved US-Russia relations

Xi tells Putin China glad to see improved US-Russia relations
  • Putin briefed Xi on the “situation of recent contact and communications” between the US and Russia, as well as the situation in Ukraine, it said

BEIJING: President Xi Jinping told his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in a phone call on Friday that China was pleased to see Moscow and Washington improving their relations, state media said.
Putin and US President Donald Trump are set to hold talks in a bid to end the war in Ukraine. Both sides have confirmed preparations for a summit are underway and have suggested that a meeting could take place next week, although no firm date or venue has been set.
Chinese state broadcaster CCTV reported that Xi had talked to Putin on Friday at the Russian leader’s request.
Putin briefed Xi on the “situation of recent contact and communications” between the US and Russia, as well as the situation in Ukraine, it said.
“China is glad to see Russia and the US maintain contact, improve their relations, and promote a political settlement of the Ukraine crisis,” state news agency Xinhua’s English service quoted Xi as telling Putin.

HIGHLIGHT

Putin and US President Donald Trump are set to hold talks in a bid to end the war in Ukraine.

Moscow and Beijing have deepened their ties since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
China has never denounced Russia’s war nor called for it to withdraw its troops, and many of Ukraine’s allies believe that Beijing has provided support to Moscow.
It insists it is a neutral party, regularly calling for an end to the fighting while also accusing Western countries of prolonging the conflict by arming Ukraine.
In the call on Friday, Xi “pointed out that complex issues have no simple solutions” and said “China will always... support making peace and promoting talks,” CCTV reported.
Putin is set to visit China on a trip beginning in late August.
He will attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, as well as celebrations to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II.
He will also hold talks with Xi.
China has been mentioned in media reports as a possible venue for the Putin-Trump summit, with speculation that Trump could join Putin there in early September. The Kremlin has not ruled out such a meeting.