ֱ

Harvard files legal challenge over Trump’s ban on foreign students. Overseas, admitted students wait

Harvard files legal challenge over Trump’s ban on foreign students. Overseas, admitted students wait
Harvard’s court challenge a day later attacked Trump’s legal justification for the action. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 06 June 2025

Harvard files legal challenge over Trump’s ban on foreign students. Overseas, admitted students wait

Harvard files legal challenge over Trump’s ban on foreign students. Overseas, admitted students wait

Winning admission to Harvard University fulfilled a longtime goal for Yonas Nuguse, a student in Ethiopia who endured a war in the country’s Tigray region, Internet and phone shutdowns, and the COVID-19 pandemic — all of which made it impossible to finish high school on time.
Now, it’s unclear if he will make it this fall to the Ivy League campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He and other admitted students around the world are anxiously tracking the school’s feud with the Trump administration, which is seeking to keep it from enrolling international students.
On Thursday, Harvard challenged President Donald Trump’s latest move to bar foreign students from entering the US to attend the college, calling it illegal retaliation for Harvard’s rejection of White House demands. In an amended lawsuit filed Thursday, Harvard said the president was attempting an end-run around a previous court order. Last month, a federal judge blocked the Department of Homeland Security from revoking Harvard’s certification to host foreign students.
Admission to Harvard, then months of uncertainty
Increasingly, the nation’s oldest and best-known university has attracted some of the brightest minds from around the world, with international students accounting for one-quarter of its enrollment. As Harvard’s fight with the administration plays out, foreign students can only wait to find out if they’ll be able to attend the school at all. Some are weighing other options.
For Nuguse, 21, the war in Ethiopia forced schools to close in many parts of the province. After schooling resumed, he then took a gap year to study and save money to pay for his TOEFL English proficiency test in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia’s capital.
“The war affected me a great deal and when I found out the news that I was accepted to Harvard, I was ecstatic. I knew it was a proud moment for my family, teachers, mentors and friends, who were instrumental in my achievement,” he said.
The following months have been filled with uncertainty. On Wednesday, Trump signed a directive seeking to block US entry for Harvard’s international students, which would block thousands who are scheduled to come to the campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for summer and fall terms.
Harvard’s court challenge a day later attacked Trump’s legal justification for the action — a federal law allowing him to block a “class of aliens” deemed detrimental to the nation’s interests. Targeting only those who are coming to the US to study at Harvard doesn’t qualify as a “class of aliens,” Harvard said in its filing.
“The President’s actions thus are not undertaken to protect the ‘interests of the United States,’ but instead to pursue a government vendetta against Harvard,” the university wrote.
In the meantime, Harvard is making contingency plans so students and visiting scholars can continue their work at the university, President Alan Garber said in a message to the campus and alumni.
“Each of us is part of a truly global university community,” Garber said Thursday. “We know that the benefits of bringing talented people together from around the world are unique and irreplaceable.”
Crackdown on international students affects interest in the US
The standoff with Harvard comes as the administration has been tightening scrutiny of student visas nationwide. Thousands of students around the country abruptly lost permission to be in the US this spring before the administration reversed itself, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced last week the US would “aggressively revoke” visas for students from China.
While many admitted students say they’re waiting to find out if they can come to the US, prospective students still in high school are starting to look elsewhere, said Mike Henniger, CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services.
“It is one blow after another,” said Henniger, who works with colleges in the US, Canada and Europe to recruit international students. “At this point, international student interest in the US has basically dropped to nil.”
The future of Harvard’s roughly 7,000 international students has been hanging in the balance since the Department of Homeland Security first moved to block its foreign enrollment on May 22.
For many, the twists and turns have been exhausting. Jing, a 23-year-old master’s student, is currently completing an internship in China this summer, and unsure if he can reenter the US for the fall semester.
“It is tiring, we all feel numb now. Trump just makes big news headlines once every few days since he got back to the White House,” said Jing, who agreed to speak under his family name out of concern about retaliation from the Trump administration.
Jing said he is going to watch and see what happens for now, in case the move against international students is a negotiating tactic that does not stick.
The possibility that Trump could block foreign enrollment at other colleges only raises the uncertainty for students planning to pursue their education overseas, said Craig Riggs, who has been working in international education for about 30 years and is the editor of ICEF Monitor. He said he urges families to consult carefully with advisers and not to overreact to the day’s headlines.
“The rules under which students would make this huge decision to devote years of their lives and quite a bit of money to studying at Harvard have been shown to change quite quickly,” Riggs said.
An aspiring economist, Nuguse was the only student accepted to Harvard this year from Kalamino Special High School, which caters to gifted students from underprivileged backgrounds from across Tigray.
After receiving acceptances also to Columbia University and Amherst College, Nuguse chose Harvard, which he had long dreamed of attending. He said he hopes it will work out to attend Harvard.
Nuguse was granted a visa to study at Harvard, and he worries it might be too late to reverse his decision and attend another university anyway. He received an email from Harvard last week, telling him to proceed with his registration and highlighting a judge’s order in Harvard’s favor in the dispute over foreign enrollment.
“I hope the situation is temporary and I can enroll on time to go on and realize my dream far from reality in Ethiopia,” he said.


Cuba activists say detained on anniversary of 1994 anti-Castro protest

Updated 12 sec ago

Cuba activists say detained on anniversary of 1994 anti-Castro protest

Cuba activists say detained on anniversary of 1994 anti-Castro protest
HAVANA: Activists, journalists and relatives of jailed dissidents say they were briefly detained or prevented from leaving their homes by state security agents Tuesday on the anniversary of the “Maleconazo,” the largest protest Fidel Castro faced during his rule.
On August 5, 1994, hundreds of people took to the streets of Havana’s Malecon waterfront to protest, an event that triggered the rafter crisis during which many Cubans fled by sea to the United States.
The government attributed the protests to incitement by Radio Marti, a Washington-funded station that broadcasts news into Cuba.
Nearly five years after Castro’s death, historic protests shook the island on July 11, 2021, when thousands took to the streets, resulting in one death, dozens injured and hundreds arrested. Many protesters remain behind bars.
The government claims those marches were also orchestrated by Washington.
President Miguel Diaz-Canel said the “Maleconazo” anniversary was a reminder that “there will always be dark forces lurking against a genuine Revolution in difficult moments,” posting a photograph on X of Castro confronting protesters in 1994.
Tuesday saw “surveillance, house arrests, arbitrary detention, and selective Internet shutdowns,” according to Cubalex, a Miami-based NGO.
Manuel Cuesta Morua, a dissident who promotes democratic transition in Cuba, told AFP via WhatsApp that since early morning he had been “besieged by the police” in a “type of house arrest, without a court order.”
The government “activated its repressive apparatus” following the “police pattern” applied on sensitive dates, said Yoani Sanchez, director of independent newspaper 14ymedio.
She said her husband, Reinaldo Escobar, also a journalist for the outlet, “was detained for a couple of hours in Havana.”
Independent journalist Camila Acosta told AFP that a state security officer had been stationed at the entrance of her house early in the morning.
Among others in similar situations reported by Cubalex were representatives of the Ladies in White rights group and the father of a young man imprisoned for participating in the July 2021 protests.

UK regulator says no evidence of bullying at Prince Harry charity

UK regulator says no evidence of bullying at Prince Harry charity
Updated 11 sec ago

UK regulator says no evidence of bullying at Prince Harry charity

UK regulator says no evidence of bullying at Prince Harry charity

LONDON: Britain’s charity regulator said it had found no evidence of bullying at a charity set up by Prince Harry, but criticized all parties for allowing a dispute to become public.
Harry, the younger son of King Charles, co-founded the charity Sentebale in 2006 to help young people with HIV and AIDS in Lesotho and Botswana.
But he quit as a patron in March following a dispute with the chair of the board, Sophie Chandauka. She accused Harry and Sentebale’s trustees of bullying, misogyny and racism.
Harry had called the falling-out “devastating” and welcomed the commission’s inquiry which he said at the time would “unveil the truth.”
He had set up Sentebale, which means “forget-me-not” in the local language of Lesotho, in honor of his mother Princess Diana, who died in a Paris crash in 1997.
In its report published on Wednesday, the Charity Commission said it found no evidence of “widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny,” but it said there had been weak governance.
There was a lack of clarity about policies and roles and no proper process to deal with internal complaints, it added, and as such had issued Sentebale with a Regulatory Action Plan to address its concerns.
“Sentebale’s problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity’s reputation,” David Holdsworth, CEO of the Charity Commission, said.
Harry did not immediately respond to a request for comment, while the charity said that it welcomed the regulator’s findings.
“We are emerging not just grateful to have survived, but stronger: more focused, better governed, boldly ambitious and with our dignity intact,” Sentebale’s chair Chandauka said.
Harry, who lives in California with Meghan and their two children, stopped working as a member of the British royal family in 2020.


A wildfire in southern France has killed 1 and injured several and is still spreading

A wildfire in southern France has killed 1 and injured several and is still spreading
Updated 26 min 53 sec ago

A wildfire in southern France has killed 1 and injured several and is still spreading

A wildfire in southern France has killed 1 and injured several and is still spreading
  • Scientists warn that climate change is exacerbating the frequency and intensity of heat and dryness, making the region more vulnerable to wildfires

PARIS: A fast-moving wildfire in a Mediterranean region of France near the Spanish border has left one person dead, several others injured and was still spreading Wednesday after damaging a swath of land as big as Paris overnight, authorities said.
About 1,500 firefighters worked overnight to contain the blaze, which broke out Tuesday afternoon in the village of Ribaute in the Aude region. It remained ‘’very active” on Wednesday and weather conditions were unfavorable, the local administration said in a statement.
One person died in their home and nine others were injured, and at least one person was missing, the statement said.
It said the fire had spread for 12 hours over 11,000 hectares of land, which is roughly equivalent to the size of the French capital. That makes it the biggest wildfire in France so far this summer.
Southern Europe has seen multiple large fires this summer. Scientists warn that climate change is exacerbating the frequency and intensity of heat and dryness, making the region more vulnerable to wildfires.
Europe is the world’s fastest-warming continent, with temperatures increasing at twice the speed of the global average since the 1980s, according to the European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service.


Trump-backed Nawrocki assumes the Polish presidency and could steer a more nationalist course

Trump-backed Nawrocki assumes the Polish presidency and could steer a more nationalist course
Updated 35 min 15 sec ago

Trump-backed Nawrocki assumes the Polish presidency and could steer a more nationalist course

Trump-backed Nawrocki assumes the Polish presidency and could steer a more nationalist course
  • Conservative Karol Nawrocki will take office Wednesday as Poland’s new president
  • Most day-to-day power in Poland rests with the prime minister, but the president holds the power to influence foreign policy and veto laws

WARSAW: Conservative Karol Nawrocki will take office Wednesday as Poland ‘s new president, which could set the country on a more nationalist course — and cast doubt on the viability of the centrist government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk.
Most day-to-day power in Poland rests with the prime minister, chosen by the parliament. However, the president holds the power to influence foreign policy and veto laws.
Nawrocki, who was supported by US President Donald Trump ahead of a narrow victory in a runoff election in June, is a 42-year-old historian who had no political experience prior to campaigning. He was not even a political party member until being approached by the conservative Law and Justice party that governed Poland from 2015 to 2023.
Nawrocki’s supporters describe him as the embodiment of traditional, patriotic values. Many of them oppose abortion and LGBTQ+ visibility and say Nawrocki reflects the values they grew up with.
The American conservative group CPAC held its first meeting in Poland during the campaign to give him a boost. Kristi Noem, the US Homeland Security secretary and a Trump ally, praised Nawrocki and urged Poles to vote for him.
His campaign echoed themes popular on the US right. A common refrain from his supporters is that Nawrocki will restore “normality,” as they believe Trump has done. US flags appeared at his rallies.
Nawrocki’s quick political rise has not been without controversy, with reports linking him to underworld figures whom he met while boxing or working as a hotel security guard in the past.
Nawrocki has also been linked to a scandal involving the acquisition of a Gdansk apartment from a retiree. Allegations suggest Nawrocki promised to care for the man in return but failed to fulfill the commitment, leading the man to end up in a publicly funded retirement home.
Nawrocki’s shifting explanations raised questions about his transparency and credibility. After the scandal erupted, he donated the apartment to a charity.


Missed signals, lost deal: How India-US trade talks collapsed

Missed signals, lost deal: How India-US trade talks collapsed
Updated 06 August 2025

Missed signals, lost deal: How India-US trade talks collapsed

Missed signals, lost deal: How India-US trade talks collapsed
  • India took a hard line on agriculture and dairy, two politically sensitive sectors for the US
  • Trump’s remarks on India-Pakistan ceasefire added strain and widened diplomatic gaps

NEW DELHI/WASHINGTON: After five rounds of trade negotiations, Indian officials were so confident of securing a favorable deal with the United States that they even signalled to the media that tariffs could be capped at 15 percent.

Indian officials expected US President Donald Trump to announce the deal himself weeks before the August 1 deadline.

The announcement never came.

New Delhi is now left with the surprise imposition of a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods from Friday, along with unspecified penalties over oil imports from Russia, while Trump has closed larger deals with Japan and the EU, and even offered better terms to arch-rival Pakistan.

Interviews with four Indian government officials and two US government officials revealed previously undisclosed details of the proposed deal and an exclusive account of how negotiations collapsed despite technical agreements on most issues.

The officials on both sides said a mix of political misjudgment, missed signals and bitterness broke down the deal between the world’s biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over $190 billion.

The White House, the US Trade Representative office, and India’s Prime Minister’s Office, along with the External Affairs and Commerce ministries, did not respond to emailed requests for comment. India believed that after visits by Indian Trade Minister Piyush Goyal to Washington and US Vice President J.D. Vance to Delhi, it had made a series of deal-clinching concessions.

New Delhi was offering zero tariffs on industrial goods that formed about 40 percent of US exports to India, two Indian government officials told Reuters.

Despite domestic pressure, India would also gradually lower tariffs on US cars and alcohol with quotas and accede to Washington’s main demand of higher energy and defense imports from the US, the officials said.

“Most differences were resolved after the fifth round in Washington, raising hopes of a breakthrough,” one of the officials said, adding negotiators believed the US would accommodate India’s reluctance on duty-free farm imports and dairy products from the US It was a miscalculation. Trump saw the issue differently and wanted more concessions.

“A lot of progress was made on many fronts in India talks, but there was never a deal that we felt good about,” said one White House official.

“We never got to what amounted to a full deal — a deal that we were looking for.”

OVER-CONFIDENCE AND MISCALCULATION

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who visited Washington in February, agreed to target a deal by fall 2025, and more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030.

To bridge the $47 billion goods trade gap, India pledged to buy up to $25 billion in US energy and boost defense imports. But officials now admit India grew overconfident after Trump talked up a “big” imminent deal, taking it as a signal that a favorable agreement was in hand. New Delhi then hardened its stance, especially on agriculture and dairy, two highly sensitive areas for the Indian government.

“We are one of the fastest growing economies, and the US can’t ignore a market of 1.4 billion,” one Indian official involved in the negotiations said in mid-July.

Negotiators even pushed for relief from the 10 percent average US tariff announced in April, plus a rollback of steel, aluminum and auto duties.

Later, India scaled back expectations after the US signed trade deals with key partners, including Japan and the European Union, hoping it could secure a similar 15 percent tariff rate with fewer concessions.

That was unacceptable to the White House. “Trump wanted a headline-grabbing announcement with broader market access, investments, and large purchases,” said a Washington-based source familiar with the talks.

An Indian official acknowledged New Delhi wasn’t ready to match what others offered.

South Korea, for example, struck a deal just before Trump’s August 1 deadline, securing a 15 percent rate instead of 25 percent by offering $350 billion in investments, higher energy imports, and concessions on rice and beef.

COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN

“At one point, both sides were very close to signing the deal,” said Mark Linscott, a former US Trade Representative who now works for a lobby group that is close to the discussions between the two nations.

“The missing component was a direct line of communication between President Trump and Prime Minister Modi.”

A White House official strongly disputed this, noting other deals had been resolved without such intervention.

An Indian government official involved in the talks said Modi could not have called, fearing a one-sided conversation with Trump that could put him on the spot. However, the other three Indian officials said Trump’s repeated remarks about mediating the India-Pakistan conflict further strained negotiations and contributed to Modi not making a final call. “Trump’s remarks on Pakistan didn’t go down well,” one of them said. “Ideally,

India should have acknowledged the US role while making it clear the final call was ours.” A senior Indian government official blamed the collapse on poor judgment, saying top Indian advisers mishandled the process.

“We lacked the diplomatic support needed after the US struck better deals with Vietnam, Indonesia, Japan and the EU,” the official said.

“We’re now in a crisis that could have been avoided.”

Trump said on Tuesday he would increase the tariff on imports from India from the current rate of 25 percent “very substantially” over the next 24 hours and alleged that New Delhi’s purchases of Russian oil were “fueling the war” in Ukraine.

WAY FORWARD

Talks are ongoing, with a US delegation expected in Delhi later this month and Indian government officials still believe the deal can be salvaged from here.

“It’s still possible,” one White House official said.

The Indian government is re-examining areas within the farm and dairy sectors where concessions can be made, the fourth official said. On Russian oil, India could reduce some purchases in favor of US supplies if pricing is matched.

“It likely will require direct communication between the prime minister and the president,” said Linscott.

“Pick up the phone. Right now, we are in a lose-lose. But there is real potential for a win-win trade deal.”