ֱ

Turkiye, PKK must both change for peace: former militant

Turkiye, PKK must both change for peace: former militant
Yuksel Genc, a 50-year-old former fighter with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, said that “when you try and explain peace to people, there is a very serious lack of trust.” (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 May 2025

Turkiye, PKK must both change for peace: former militant

Turkiye, PKK must both change for peace: former militant
  • For years, Yuksel Genc was a fighter with the Kurdish rebel group
  • Genc herself joined the militants in 1995 when she was a 20-year-old university student in Istanbul

DIYARBAKIR, Turkiye: “When you try and explain peace to people, there is a very serious lack of trust,” said Yuksel Genc, a former fighter with the PKK, which recently ended its decades-long armed struggle against the Turkish state.
Talking over a glass of tea in a square in Diyarbakir, the biggest city in Turkiye’s Kurdish-dominated southeast, this 50-year-old former fighter with long auburn curls is worried about how the nascent rapprochement between Ankara and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) will play out.
“The guerillas are sincere, but they don’t think the state is,” said Genc, her words briefly interrupted by the roar of a fighter jet flying overhead.
“They think the government does not trust them.”
For years, she was a fighter with the Kurdish rebel group, which on May 12 said it would disarm and disband, ending a four-decade armed struggle against the Turkish state that cost more than 40,000 lives.
The historic move came in response to an appeal by its jailed founder Abdullah Ocalan, arrested in 1999 and serving life in solitary ever since on a prison island near Istanbul.
Genc herself joined the militants in 1995 when she was a 20-year-old university student in Istanbul.
“At that time, many Kurdish villages were being burnt down, and we were constantly hearing about villages being evacuated, people being displaced and unsolved murders,” she said.
She described it as “a time of terrible repression.”
“You felt trapped, as if there was no other way than to join the guerrillas,” she said.
Four years later, after years in exile, Ocalan was snatched by Turkish commandos in a Hollywood-style operation in Nairobi.
“Ocalan’s capture provoked a deep sense of rage among the guerrillas, who feared it would mean the Kurdish cause would be destroyed,” she said.
But it was Ocalan himself who called for calm and insisted it was time for the Kurdish question to be resolved democratically. He urged his followers to go to Turkiye, hand over their weapons and seek dialogue.
“He thought our arrival would symbolize (the PKK’s) goodwill, and persuade the state to negotiate.”
Genc was part of the first so-called “groups for peace and a democratic solution” — a group of three women and five men who arrived in Turkiye on October 1, 1999 on what they knew would be a “sacrificial” mission.
After a long march through the mountains, they arrived in the southeastern village of Semdinli under the watchful eye of “thousands” of Turkish soldiers huddled behind rocks.
Handing over their weapons, they were transferred to the city of Van 200 kilometers (140 miles) to the north where they were arrested.
Genc spent the next nearly six years behind bars.
“For us, these peace groups were a mission,” she said. “The solution had to come through dialogue.”
After getting out, she continued to struggle for Kurdish rights, swapping her gun for a pen to become a journalist and researcher for the Sosyo Politik think tank.
Even so, her writing earned her another three-and-a-half years behind bars.
“Working for peace in Turkiye has a cost,” she said with a shrug.
When Recep Tayyip Erdogan became prime minister in 2003, there was hope for a new breakthrough. But several attempts to reach an agreement went nowhere — until now.
“Like in 1999, the PKK is moving toward a non-violent struggle,” she said.
“But laying down arms is not the end of the story. It is preparing to become a political organization.”
Resolving the decades-long conflict requires a change on both sides however, said Genc.
“It essentially involves a mutual transformation,” she argued.
“It is impossible for the state to stick with its old ways without transforming, while trying to resolve a problem as old and divisive as the Kurdish question.”
Despite the recent opening, Genc does not speak of hope.
“Life has taught us to be realistic: years of experience have generated an ocean of insecurity,” she said.
“(PKK fighters) have shown their courage by saying they will lay down their weapons without being defeated. But they haven’t seen any concrete results.”
So far, the government, which initiated the process last autumn, has not taken any steps nor made any promises, she pointed out.
“Why haven’t the sick prisoners been released? And those who have served their sentences — why aren’t they benefiting from the climate of peace?“
And Ocalan, she said, was still being held in solitary despite promises of a change in his situation.
The number of people jailed for being PKK members or close to the group has never been revealed by the Turkish authorities.
“The fact that Ocalan is still not in a position to be able to lead this process toward a democratic solution is a major drawback from the militants’ point of view,” she said.
“Even our daily life remains totally shaped by security constraints across the region with the presence of the army, the roadblocks — all that has to change.”


In Sudan, ‘never again’ has proved untrue: UNHCR chief

In Sudan, ‘never again’ has proved untrue: UNHCR chief
Updated 22 September 2025

In Sudan, ‘never again’ has proved untrue: UNHCR chief

In Sudan, ‘never again’ has proved untrue: UNHCR chief
  • The International Criminal Court is investigating allegations that Al-Bashir, who is still at large, committed genocide and crimes against humanity, among other charges, in Darfur between 2003 and 2008

THE UNITED NATIONS, United States: After the bloody civil war in Sudan’s Darfur region 20 years ago, the world said “never again.”
And yet it is happening again, UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi told AFP in a sobering interview.
Since April 2023, a war between the Sudanese army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has left tens of thousands of people dead and created the world’s largest hunger and displacement crises.
The violence, with its “ethnic connotations,” is reminiscent of what happened 20 years ago in Darfur, Grandi says. Women have been raped, children forcibly recruited, and there is gruesome violence against people who resist.
In 2003, dictator Omar Al-Bashir unleashed the Janjaweed militias on non-Arab communities in Darfur. An estimated 300,000 people were killed and close to 2.5 million people were displaced.
The International Criminal Court is investigating allegations that Al-Bashir, who is still at large, committed genocide and crimes against humanity, among other charges, in Darfur between 2003 and 2008.
RSF leader General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo is the most notorious member of the Janjaweed. The new conflict has already left tens of thousands dead.
“It is the biggest humanitarian crisis in the world,” with an “appalling” 12 million people displaced and one-third of those forced to seek refuge in “fragile” neighboring countries, Grandi says.
Has the world forgotten about Sudan’s current crisis?
“Let’s be frank, I’m not sure the world is forgetting because it has never paid much attention to it,” Grandi says. He is not optimistic that will change at the annual UN General Assembly in New York this week.
The situation in North Darfur’s El-Fasher, the last major city in the region still under army control, is “catastrophic,” Grandi said, with hundreds of thousands of people trapped amid an 18-month siege by RSF.
“Not only they’re inside, hungry and desperate, but they’re not even allowed to leave the city to seek help somewhere else, so they flee at night, at great risk. I’m sure that many do not make it,” Grandi said.

- Crisis fatigue? -

“Compared to 20 years ago... the international attention is much less. Is it fatigue? Is it competition of other crises? Is it a sense that these crises never get solved? Difficult to tell, but people are suffering in the same way,” he said.
Non-profits and UN agencies have fewer and fewer resources to address the problem, due to steep cuts in foreign aid from the United States and Europe.
“My message to European donors, European countries in particular, is that it is a huge strategic mistake,” Grandi said.
Slashing humanitarian aid to people “in this belt around Europe that is so full of crisis, is a recipe for seeing more people moving on toward Europe,” he said.
On another continent, another raging conflict is not receiving much international attention: the deadly civil war in Myanmar between rebel groups and the army, which has been in power since a 2021 coup.
Grandi, who just returned from Myanmar, called it “a very harsh, brutal conflict” that targets civilian communities and has uprooted about three million people — “probably more, in my opinion.”
The plight of Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslim minority, of whom more than a million are living as refugees in neighboring Bangladesh, will be discussed at a high-level UN meeting in New York on September 30.
“It’s true that there is little political attention for these very complicated conflicts in a world where no conflict seems to find a solution, even the big ones like Ukraine, like Gaza,” he said.
But, he added, “we have to be careful not to generalize too much” about indifference.
“There are also a lot of people that do care, that do care when you tell them the story. When you explain about suffering.
“It’s constant work that we have to do in that respect.”

 


What would wider recognition of Palestine mean for Palestinians and Israel?

What would wider recognition of Palestine mean for Palestinians and Israel?
Updated 22 September 2025

What would wider recognition of Palestine mean for Palestinians and Israel?

What would wider recognition of Palestine mean for Palestinians and Israel?
  • Israel’s main ally, the United States, has long said it supports the goal of a Palestinian state, but only after the Palestinians agree with Israel on a two-state solution
  • No matter how many countries recognize Palestinian independence, full UN membership would require approval by the Security Council, where Washington has a veto

LONDON: Britain, Canada and Australia all recognized a Palestinian state on Sunday, with other countries expected to follow suit this week at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
What would that mean for the Palestinians and Israel?
WHAT IS THE STATUS OF PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD NOW?
The Palestine Liberation Organization declared an independent Palestinian state in 1988, and most of the global South quickly recognized it. Today, about 150 of the 193 UN member states have done so.
Israel’s main ally, the United States, has long said it supports the goal of a Palestinian state, but only after the Palestinians agree with Israel on a two-state solution. Until recent weeks, the major European powers shared this position.
However, no such negotiations have been held since 2014, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has now said there will never be a Palestinian state.
A delegation representing the State of Palestine has observer status at the United Nations — but no voting rights. No matter how many countries recognize Palestinian independence, full UN membership would require approval by the Security Council, where Washington has a veto.
Palestinian diplomatic missions worldwide are controlled by the Palestinian Authority, which is recognized internationally as representing the Palestinian people.
The PA, led by President Mahmoud Abbas, exercises limited self-rule in parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank under agreements with Israel. It issues Palestinian passports and runs the Palestinian health and education systems.
The Gaza Strip has been administered by the Hamas militant group since 2007, when it drove out Abbas’s Fatah movement after a brief civil war.
Most major powers, with the exception of the US since President Donald Trump moved its embassy to Jerusalem, have their main diplomatic missions in Tel Aviv because they do not recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.
However, about 40 have consular offices in Ramallah in the West Bank, or in East Jerusalem — an area whose annexation by Israel is not internationally recognized and which the Palestinians want as their capital.
They include China, Russia, Japan, Germany, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, Jordan, Tunisia and South Africa.
Countries planning to recognize a Palestinian state have not said what difference that would make to their diplomatic representation.

WHAT IS THE AIM OF RECOGNISING A PALESTINIAN STATE?
Britain, Canada and Australia have recognized a Palestinian state ahead of the UN General Assembly this month. Other countries, including France and Belgium, said they would follow suit.
Countries such as Britain say recognition of a Palestinian state is intended to put pressure on Israel to end its devastating assault on Gaza, curtail the building of new Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank and recommit to a peace process with the Palestinians.
French President Emmanuel Macron, the first leader of a major Western power to endorse recognition, said the move would be accompanied by a commitment by the PA to enact reforms, which would improve Palestinian governance and make it a more credible partner for the post-war administration of Gaza.
WHAT HAS RECOGNITION MEANT IN PRACTICE?
Those who see recognition as a mere gesture point to the limited influence in the conflict of countries such as China, India, Russia and many Arab states that recognized Palestinian independence decades ago.
Without a full seat at the UN or control of its own borders, the PA has only limited ability to conduct bilateral relations.
Israel restricts access for goods, investment and educational or cultural exchanges. There are no Palestinian airports. The landlocked West Bank can be reached only through Israel or through the Israeli-controlled border with Jordan, and Israel controls all access to the Gaza Strip.
Still, countries planning recognition and the PA itself say it would be more than an empty gesture.
Husam Zomlot, head of the Palestinian mission to the UK, said it could lead to partnerships between entities on an equal footing.
It might also force countries to review aspects of their relationships with Israel, said Vincent Fean, a former British diplomat in Jerusalem.
In Britain’s case, this might result in banning products that come from Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories, he said, even though the practical impact on the Israeli economy would be minimal.

HOW HAVE ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES REACTED?
Israel, facing a global outcry over its conduct in the Gaza war, says recognition rewards Hamas for the attacks on Israel that precipitated the war in October 2023. “A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said.
The United States opposes the recognition moves by its European allies. It has imposed sanctions on Palestinian officials, including blocking Abbas and other PA figures from attending the UN General Assembly by denying and revoking visas. 

 


Netanyahu to expand settlements in the West Bank

Netanyahu to expand settlements in the West Bank
Updated 22 September 2025

Netanyahu to expand settlements in the West Bank

Netanyahu to expand settlements in the West Bank
  • Netanyahu added: “A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River”
  • Gaza and displacement of most of its population during nearly two years of conflict, which has seen more than 65,000 people killed in Gaza, displaced around 90 percent of the population and caused a catastrophic humanitarian crisis

JERUSALEM: Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed on Sunday to expand Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank after Britain, Canada and Australia recognized a Palestinian state.
"For years, I have prevented the creation of this terror state despite enormous pressure both domestically and internationally," he said in a statement.
"We have done so with determination and political wisdom. Moreover, we have doubled Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria and we will continue on this path," he said using the Biblical name for the West Bank.
Netanyahu on Sunday accused foreign leaders of giving a “prize” to Hamas.

 

 

He put out an angry statement after Britain and other Western allies said they were unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state in a step seen as a show of displeasure with Israel.
Netanyahu added: “A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River.”
Netanyahu said he would announce Israel’s response after a trip to the US, where he is to meet President Donald Trump at the White House.
He is set to give a speech to the General Assembly on Friday before heading to see Trump.
The UK has for decades supported an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, but insisted recognition must come as part of a peace plan to achieve a two-state solution.
However, the government has become increasingly worried that such a solution is becoming all but impossible – and not only because of the razing of Gaza and displacement of most of its population during nearly two years of conflict, which has seen more than 65,000 people killed in Gaza, displaced around 90 percent of the population and caused a catastrophic humanitarian crisis.

BACKGROUND

Last week, independent experts commissioned by the UN’s Human Rights Council concluded that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

Last week, independent experts commissioned by the UN’s Human Rights Council concluded that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
Also vexing the UK is Israel’s government has been aggressively expanding settlements in the West Bank, land Palestinians want for their future state. 
Much of the world regards Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, which is ostensibly run by the Palestinian Authority, as illegal.
“This move has symbolic and historic weight, makes clear the U.K.’s concerns about the survival of a two-state solution, and is intended to keep that goal relevant and alive,” said Olivia O’Sullivan, director of the UK in the World Programme at the London-based think tank, Chatham House.
For the Palestinians, President Mahmoud Abbas stressed that Sunday’s moves constituted an important and necessary step toward achieving a just peace in accordance with international law.
Husam Zomlot, the Palestinian head of mission in the UK, said that recognition would right a colonial-era wrong. 
“The issue today is ending the denial of our existence that started 108 years ago, in 1917,” he said. 
“And I think today, the British people should celebrate a day when history is being corrected, when wrongs are being righted, when recognition of the wrongs of the past are beginning to be corrected.”
A senior Hamas official hailed Britain, Canada and Australia's recognition of a Palestinian state, describing it as a victory for the rights of Palestinians.
"These developments represent a victory for Palestinian rights and the justice of our cause, and send a clear message: no matter how far the occupation goes in its crimes, it will never be able to erase our national rights," Mahmoud Mardawi said

 


France’s Macron says no embassy in Palestine until Gaza hostages freed

France’s President Emmanuel Macron reacts at The Elysee Presidential Palace in Paris on September 3, 2025. (File/AFP)
France’s President Emmanuel Macron reacts at The Elysee Presidential Palace in Paris on September 3, 2025. (File/AFP)
Updated 21 September 2025

France’s Macron says no embassy in Palestine until Gaza hostages freed

France’s President Emmanuel Macron reacts at The Elysee Presidential Palace in Paris on September 3, 2025. (File/AFP)
  • Portugal is set to recognize Palestinian statehood later Sunday, while France says it will do so along with other countries Monday at the UN

WASHINGTON: France’s planned recognition of a Palestinian state will not include the opening of an embassy until Hamas frees the hostages it is holding in Gaza, President Emmanuel Macron said in an interview that aired Sunday.
“It will be, for us, a requirement very clearly before opening, for instance, an embassy in Palestine,” Macron told CBS News in an interview taped Thursday.
The interview was aired as Britain, Australia and Canada on Sunday recognized a Palestinian state in a coordinated, seismic shift from decades of Western foreign policy.
The move triggered swift anger from Israel, which finds itself under huge international pressure over its war against Hamas in Gaza and the dire humanitarian situation in the besieged territory.
Portugal was also set to recognize Palestinian statehood later Sunday, while France says it will do so along with other countries Monday at the United Nations.
Macron also spoke out strongly against any plans to displace Palestinians from Gaza — which they want to be part of a future sovereign state — when rebuilding the territory.
“But if the precondition of such a plan is to push them out, this is just a craziness,” Macron said on “Face the Nation.”
“We should not be — for the credibility of the United States, for the credibility of France — we cannot be implicitly or explicitly complacent with such a project.”


A Syrian president arrives in New York for UN General Assembly for the first time in nearly 60 years

A Syrian president arrives in New York for UN General Assembly for the first time in nearly 60 years
Updated 22 September 2025

A Syrian president arrives in New York for UN General Assembly for the first time in nearly 60 years

A Syrian president arrives in New York for UN General Assembly for the first time in nearly 60 years
  • Ahmed Al-Sharaa is the first Syrian leader to speak at the UN General Assembly in New York since 1967
  • He already met US President Donald Trump in Riyadh and French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris this year

DAMASCUS, Syria: Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa arrived in New York on Sunday to take part in the UN General Assembly, the first president of Syria to do so in nearly six decades.
The last time a Syrian head of state attended the General Assembly was in 1967. That was before the 50-year rule of the Assad family dynasty, which came to an end in December when then-President Bashar Assad was ousted in a lightning insurgent offensive led by Al-Sharaa. Assad’s fall also brought to an end nearly 14 years of civil war.
Since then, Al-Sharaa has sought to restore ties with Arab countries and the West, where officials were initially wary of his past ties with the Al-Qaeda militant group. The rebel group he formerly led, Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, was previously designated by the United States as a terrorist group.
Since assuming power, Al-Sharaa has preached coexistence and sought to reassure Syria’s minority communities, but the country’s fragile recovery has been threatened by outbreaks of sectarian violence. Fighters affiliated with the new government were also accused of killing hundreds of civilians from the Druze and Alawite religious minorities.
Along with his appearance at the UN General Assembly, Al-Sharaa is likely to use his visit to push for further sanctions relief for Syria as it attempts to rebuild its war-battered economy and infrastructure.
US President Donald Trump met with Al-Sharaa in ֱ in May and announced that he would lift decades of sanctions imposed on Syria under the Assads’ rule.
He followed through by ordering a large swathe of sanctions lifted or waived. However, the most stringent sanctions were imposed by Congress under the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act passed in 2019 and will require a congressional vote to permanently remove them.
Another topic that will loom large during Al-Sharaa’s visit is his country’s relations with US ally Israel. Since Assad’s fall, Israel has been suspicious of Al-Sharaa’s government and has seized a formerly UN-patrolled buffer zone in southern Syria and launched hundreds of airstrikes on Syrian military sites.
Negotiations have been underway for a security deal that Al-Sharaa has said he hopes will bring about a withdrawal of Israeli forces and return to a 1974 disengagement agreement. While Al-Sharaa said last week that a deal could be reached in a matter of days, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in remarks Sunday appeared to downplay the odds of a breakthrough.
“There is some progress” but the deal is “still a vision for the future,” he said.
Also on Sunday, Syrian elections officials announced that the country’s first parliamentary elections since the fall of Assad will take place on Oct. 5. The members of the People’s Assembly will not be chosen via a direct popular vote, however, but through an electoral college system with electoral bodies in each province voting for two-thirds of the seats, while Al-Sharaa will directly appoint one third.
Officials have said that holding direct elections at this stage would be too logistically challenging since many Syrians have lost personal documentation or are living as refugees abroad after the nearly 14-year civil war.