ֱ

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from barring foreign student enrollment at Harvard

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from barring foreign student enrollment at Harvard
A student gives a walking tour of the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, on May 23, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 24 May 2025

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from barring foreign student enrollment at Harvard

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from barring foreign student enrollment at Harvard
  • The ruling from US District Judge Allison Burroughs puts the sanction against Harvard on hold, pending a lawsuit lodged by the university
  • Harvard enrolls almost 6,800 foreign students at its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Most are graduate students from more than 100 countries

WASHINGTON: A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration from cutting off Harvard’s enrollment of foreign students, an action the Ivy League school decried as unconstitutional retaliation for defying the White House’s political demands.
In its lawsuit filed earlier Friday in federal court in Boston, Harvard said the government’s action violates the First Amendment and will have an “immediate and devastating effect for Harvard and more than 7,000 visa holders.”
“With the stroke of a pen, the government has sought to erase a quarter of Harvard’s student body, international students who contribute significantly to the University and its mission,” Harvard said in its suit. “Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard.”
The ruling from US District Judge Allison Burroughs puts the sanction against Harvard on hold, pending the lawsuit.
The Trump administration move has thrown campus into disarray days before graduation, Harvard said in the suit. International students who run labs, teach courses, assist professors and participate in Harvard sports are now left deciding whether to transfer or risk losing legal status to stay in the country, according to the filing.

The impact would be heaviest at graduate schools such as the Harvard Kennedy School, where about half the student body comes from abroad, and Harvard Business School, which is about one-third international. Along with the impact on current students, the move would block thousands of students who were planning to come for summer and fall classes.
Harvard said it immediately puts the school at a disadvantage as it competes for the world’s top students. Even if it regains the ability to host students, “future applicants may shy away from applying out of fear of further reprisals from the government,” the suit said.
If the government’s action stands, Harvard said, the university would be unable to offer admission to new international students for at least the next two academic years. Schools that have that certification withdrawn by the federal government are ineligible to reapply until one year afterward, Harvard said.
Harvard enrolls almost 6,800 foreign students at its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Most are graduate students, and they come from more than 100 countries.
The Department of Homeland Security announced the action Thursday, accusing Harvard of creating an unsafe campus environment by allowing “anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators” to assault Jewish students on campus. It also accused Harvard of coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party, contending the school had hosted and trained members of a Chinese paramilitary group as recently as 2024.

Harvard President Alan Garber earlier this month said the university has made changes to its governance over the past year and a half, including a broad strategy to combat antisemitism. He said Harvard would not budge on its “its core, legally-protected principles” over fears of retaliation. Harvard has said it will respond at a later time to allegations first raised by House Republicans about coordination with the Chinese Communist Party.
Lawrence Summers, a former Harvard president and US treasury secretary, wrote on X that the decision would mean losing key people, “some small fraction of whom are going to go on to be Prime Ministers of countries who’ve now been turned into enemies of the United States.” He said the administration’s action “is madness.”
The threat to Harvard’s international enrollment stems from an April 16 request from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who demanded that Harvard provide information about foreign students that might implicate them in violence or protests that could lead to their deportation.
Harvard says it provided “thousands of data points” in response to Noem’s April 16 demand. Her letter on Thursday said Harvard failed to satisfy her request, but the school said she failed to provide any further explanation.
“It makes generalized statements about campus environment and ‘anti-Americanism,’ again without articulating any rational link between those statements and the decision to retaliate against international students,” the suit said.
Harvard’s lawsuit said the administration violated the government’s own regulations for withdrawing a school’s certification.
The government can and does remove colleges from the Student Exchange and Visitor Program, making them ineligible to host foreign students on their campus. However, it’s usually for administrative reasons outlined in law, such as failing to maintain accreditation, lacking proper facilities for classes, or failing to employ qualified professional personnel.
Noem said Harvard can regain its ability to host foreign students if it produces a trove of records on foreign students within 72 hours. Her updated request demands all records, including audio or video footage, of foreign students participating in protests or dangerous activity on campus.
The lawsuit is separate from the university’s earlier one challenging more than $2 billion in federal cuts imposed by the Republican administration.


Ex-Philippines president Duterte appeals ICC jurisdiction ruling, demands release

Updated 9 sec ago

Ex-Philippines president Duterte appeals ICC jurisdiction ruling, demands release

Ex-Philippines president Duterte appeals ICC jurisdiction ruling, demands release
THE HAGUE: Rodrigo Duterte, the former president of the Philippines, has appealed last week’s decision by the International Criminal Court to continue its case against him and is seeking his release, court documents showed on Wednesday.
Last week, ICC judges ruled that the court had jurisdiction over Duterte’s case despite his team’s contention that the court did not open a full-fledged investigation into alleged crimes in the Philippines until after the country had withdrawn from the ICC in 2019.
Duterte, president from 2016 to 2022, was arrested and taken to The Hague in March on an arrest warrant that linked him to murders committed during his war on drugs in the Philippines. During that campaign, thousands of alleged narcotics peddlers and users were killed. Duterte and his lawyers maintain his arrest was unlawful.

In their notice of appeal, Duterte’s lawyers asked the court to reverse a lower panel’s decision to continue the case and find there is no legal basis for it.

They also want the court to order Duterte’s immediate and unconditional release. The defense team has also filed another motion to stop the Duterte case because they said the 80-year-old is
unfit to stand trial due to a cognitive decline. A decision on how Duterte’s health will affect the proceedings is not expected until mid-November.

EU denounces ‘brutality’ of RSF forces in Sudan

EU denounces ‘brutality’ of RSF forces in Sudan
Updated 27 min 4 sec ago

EU denounces ‘brutality’ of RSF forces in Sudan

EU denounces ‘brutality’ of RSF forces in Sudan
  • The EU denounced what it said was the “brutality” of Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) which recently captured the key city of El-Fasher

BRUSSELS: The European Union on Wednesday denounced what it said was the “brutality” of Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary group, which recently captured the key city of El-Fasher.
The statement came as reports emerged of mass atrocities there and the killing of five Red Crescent volunteers in Kordofan.
“Civilians being targeted based on their ethnicity underscore the brutality of the Rapid Support Force,” said a statement by the EU’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas.
“The Rapid Support Forces bear responsibility for protecting civilians in areas under their control, including aid workers, local responders, and journalists,” said the statement, co-signed by the EU’s commissioner for crisis management, Hadja Lahbib.
“Humanitarian organizations must be granted immediate, safe and unconditional access to all those in need. Civilians wishing to leave the city must be allowed to do so safely.”
After an 18-month siege marked by starvation and bombardment, the city is now under the control of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) — descendants of the Janjaweed militias accused of genocide two decades ago.
The paramilitary group, locked in a brutal war with the army since April 2023, launched a final assault on the city in recent days, seizing the army’s last positions.
In the neighboring region of North Kordofan, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent said five Sudanese Red Crescent volunteers had been killed in Bara on Monday, and that three others were missing after the RSF took control of the town on Saturday.


Djibouti final vote on removing president age limit on Nov 2

Djibouti final vote on removing president age limit on Nov 2
Updated 29 October 2025

Djibouti final vote on removing president age limit on Nov 2

Djibouti final vote on removing president age limit on Nov 2
  • In a first vote at the weekend, Djibouti’s lawmakers unanimously approved a change to the constitution to remove a bar on running for president past the age of 75

ADDIS ABABA: Djibouti’s parliament will take a final vote on removing a presidential age limit on November 2, its speaker told AFP Wednesday, opening the way for leader Ismail Omar Guelleh to run for a sixth term.
Guelleh, 77, has held power since 1999 in the tiny Horn of Africa nation, a major port that hosts military bases for the United States, France, and China.
In a first vote at the weekend, Djibouti’s lawmakers unanimously approved a change to the constitution to remove a bar on running for president past the age of 75.
Guelleh approved the first vote, and the amendment will now pass for final approval on Sunday — opening the way for him to run in the next election in April 2026.
“There will be no problem, even the opposition supports us,” said speaker Dileita Mohamed Dileita.
Djibouti has a poor record on freedom of expression and the press.
But Dileita earlier told AFP the constitutional change was necessary to ensure “the stability of the small country, in a troubled region, the Horn of Africa, with Somalia, Ethiopia, and Eritrea.”
Guelleh won the last election in 2021 with 97 percent of the vote and his party, the Union for the Presidential Majority, holds the majority of parliamentary seats.
He succeeded Hassan Gouled Aptidon, the father of Djibouti’s independence, in 1999 after serving as his chief of staff for 22 years.
Djibouti has only around one million inhabitants but lies on the strategic trade route of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait on the Red Sea.


India to fly home 500 from Thailand after scam hub raid: Thai PM

India to fly home 500 from Thailand after scam hub raid: Thai PM
Updated 29 October 2025

India to fly home 500 from Thailand after scam hub raid: Thai PM

India to fly home 500 from Thailand after scam hub raid: Thai PM
  • More than 1,500 people from 28 countries had crossed into Thailand between the start of the crackdown on KK Park and Tuesday evening, according to the administration of the border province of Tak

BANGKOK: India was to repatriate 500 of its citizens from Thailand after a crackdown on a Myanmar scam hub led to workers fleeing over the border, the Thai prime minister said Wednesday.
Sprawling compounds where Internet tricksters target people with romance and business cons have thrived along Myanmar’s loosely governed border during its civil war, sparked by a 2021 coup.
Since last week one of the most notorious hubs — KK Park — has been roiled by apparent raids, with hundreds fleeing over the frontier river to the Thai town of Mae Sot.
The upheaval followed an AFP investigation which this month revealed rapid construction at border scam centers, despite a much-publicized crackdown in February.
More than 1,500 people from 28 countries had crossed into Thailand between the start of the crackdown on KK Park and Tuesday evening, according to the administration of the border province of Tak.
“Nearly 500 Indians are at Mae Sot,” Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul told reporters. “The Indian government will send a plane to take them back directly.”
Many people staffing the fraud factories say they were trafficked into the hubs, although analysts say workers also go willingly to secure attractive salary offers.
Anutin did not say whether the Indian nationals were being treated as criminals or victims, and the Indian embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Experts say Myanmar’s military has long turned a blind eye to scam centers which profit its militia allies who are crucial collaborators in their fight against rebels.
But the junta has also faced pressure to shut down scam operations from its military backer China, irked at its citizens both participating in and being targeted by the scams.
The February crackdown saw around 7,000 workers repatriated and Thailand enforce a cross-border Internet blockade in a bid to throttle off the fraud factories.


Pakistan says peace talks with Afghan Taliban collapse over Kabul’s refusal to act against militants

 Pakistan says peace talks with Afghan Taliban collapse over Kabul’s refusal to act against militants
Updated 29 October 2025

Pakistan says peace talks with Afghan Taliban collapse over Kabul’s refusal to act against militants

 Pakistan says peace talks with Afghan Taliban collapse over Kabul’s refusal to act against militants
  • Information Minister Attaullah Tarar says the Taliban want to drag Afghan people into a ‘needless war’
  • Security sources blame the breakdown on rifts within Afghanistan, Kabul’s efforts to ‘monetize’ militancy

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s information minister Attaullah Tarar said on Wednesday that talks with the Afghan Taliban failed to yield a “workable solution” despite multiple meetings in Türkiye, accusing Kabul of evading commitments to curb militants and thriving on a “war economy” that risks dragging Afghans into another conflict.

Pakistan and Afghanistan had been holding peace talks in Istanbul since Saturday after the two countries saw the worst fighting in decades, leaving dozens dead and several wounded earlier this month. Clashes erupted after Pakistan conducted airstrikes near Kabul as it went after Pakistani Taliban militants, which Islamabad says operate from sanctuaries in Afghanistan. The Taliban responded with attacks on Pakistani military posts along the length of the 2,600-km (1,600-mile) contested border.

The two sides had agreed to a ceasefire in Doha on Oct. 19, mediated by Türkiye and Qatar, and met again in Istanbul on Oct. 25 to discuss a lasting truce. Pakistan sought assurances that Afghan territory would not be used by militants, particularly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), to carry out cross-border attacks, while Kabul demanded that Islamabad respect its sovereignty and refrain from strikes inside its borders.

“Over the last four days of dialogue, the Afghan Taliban delegation repeatedly agreed to Pakistan's logical and legitimate demand for credible and decisive action against these organisations and terrorists,” Tarar said in a post on X, formerly Twitter. “Sufficient and irrefutable evidence was provided by Pakistan which was acknowledged by Afghan Taliban and the hosts.”

“However, regrettably, the Afghan side gave no assurances,” he added. “The Afghan side kept deviating from the core issue, evading the key point upon which the dialogue process was initiated. Instead of accepting any responsibility, the Afghan Taliban resorted to blame game, deflection and ruses. The dialogue thus failed to bring about any workable solution.”

Tarar said Pakistan has repeatedly engaged the Afghan Taliban since their return to power in August 2021, urging them to prevent militant groups from using Afghan soil to attack neighboring countries.

Those efforts, he noted, “proved futile due to Afghan Taliban Regime’s unabated support to anti-Pakistan terrorists.”

“Since the Taliban regime bears no responsibility towards the people of Afghanistan and thrives on war economy, it desires to drag and mire Afghan people into a needless war,” he said, adding that Pakistan had “held countless rounds of talks” in pursuit of peace, but Kabul remained indifferent to its losses.

The Pakistani minister thanked Türkiye and Qatar for facilitating the talks, saying Pakistan’s foremost priority remains the security of its people.

“We will continue to take all possible measures necessary to protect our people from the menace of terrorism,” he said, pledging to “decimate the terrorists, their sanctuaries, their abetters and supporters.”

BREAKDOWN OF TALKS

Pakistani officials said a day earlier the country was making a “last-ditch effort” to convince the Afghan Taliban to take decisive action against militants targeting its civilians and security forces. Explaining the breakdown, one of them attributed the outcome to “internal fractures and backstage power-play inside the Afghan regime.”

“From the very first session it became clear that the Afghan delegation was not negotiating with one voice,” the official said, requesting anonymity. “Three competing blocs — Kandahar, Kabul and Khost — were all feeding separate instructions to the delegates.”

When the talks reached the stage of written guarantees on TTP safe havens, he continued, the Kandahar faction signaled quiet willingness to proceed, but during the break, the Kabul group “staged a manufactured complication.”

“They suddenly insisted that no agreement can be signed unless the United States joins as a formal guarantor,” he said. “This was not part of the agenda, nor had it been raised in previous rounds.”

The official said the demand also caught mediators by surprise and appeared aimed not at security assurances but at “reopening a financial corridor through Washington.”

“Instead of countering TTP, they are trying to monetize TTP’s existence to revive a flow of dollars,” he added. “Until Kabul resolves its internal power struggle and stops trying to convert terrorism into political currency, no progress is possible.”

Pakistan and Afghanistan share a long, porous border that has long been a flashpoint, with both sides accusing each other of harboring militants and violating sovereignty. Relations have sharply deteriorated since the Taliban’s return to power in 2021, with Pakistan reporting a surge in cross-border attacks attributed to the TTP.

While the two sides engaged in talks in Istanbul, tensions remained high along the frontier, with weekend clashes leaving five Pakistani soldiers and 25 militants dead, according to Pakistan’s military.

Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif blamed India for the deadlock in the peace talks a day earlier, saying New Delhi wanted to engage Islamabad in a “low-intensity war” and that the Afghan authorities understood the plan.

“The government right now in Kabul, it has been penetrated by India and India has started a proxy war against Pakistan through Kabul,” he told a private news channel.

Pakistan has long accused India of backing militant groups, including the TTP, to launch attacks from Afghanistan, though New Delhi has consistently denied the allegation.