ֱ

India strikes Pakistan in aftermath of Kashmir tourist killings

India strikes Pakistan in aftermath of Kashmir tourist killings
A city view of Muzaffarabad in Pakistan-administrated Kashmir after explosions were heard from Indian missiles fired toward the area. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 07 May 2025

India strikes Pakistan in aftermath of Kashmir tourist killings

India strikes Pakistan in aftermath of Kashmir tourist killings
  • Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said Islamabad was responding

MUZAFFARABAD/NEW DELHI: India attacked nine sites in Pakistan and Pakistani Kashmir on Wednesday with at least three deaths reported, and Pakistan said it was mounting a response as the worst fighting in years erupted between the longstanding enemies.
Armies of the nuclear-armed neighbors exchanged intense shelling and heavy gunfire across their frontier in disputed Kashmir in at least three places, police and witnesses told Reuters.
India’s offensive occurred amid heightened tensions in the aftermath of an attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir last month. Islamist assailants killed 26 men in the April 22 attack, the worst such violence targeted at civilians in India in nearly two decades.
Pakistan said India launched missiles at three places, but an Indian government statement did not detail the nature of the strikes. India said it struck “terrorist infrastructure” where attacks against it were planned and directed.
Indian TV channels showed video of explosions, fire, large plumes of smoke in the night sky and people fleeing in several places in Pakistan and Pakistani Kashmir. Reuters could not independently verify the footage.
Witnesses and one police officer at two sites on the frontier in Indian Kashmir said they heard loud explosions and intense artillery shelling as well as jets in the air.
Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said Islamabad was responding to the Indian attacks but did not provide details. US President Donald Trump called the situation “a shame” and added, “I hope it ends quickly.”
An emergency was declared in Pakistan’s populous province of Punjab, its chief minister said, and hospitals and emergency services were on high alert.
“A little while ago, the Indian armed forces launched ‘OPERATION SINDOOR’, hitting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir from where terrorist attacks against India have been planned and directed,” the Indian statement said.
“Our actions have been focused, measured and non-escalatory in nature. No Pakistani military facilities have been targeted. India has demonstrated considerable restraint in selection of targets and method of execution,” it said.

Pakistan says two mosques hit
A Pakistani military spokesman told broadcaster Geo that sites struck by India included two mosques and said there had been at least three deaths and 12 people injured.
Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif told Geo that all sites targeted by India were civilian and not militant camps.
He said India fired missiles from its own airspace and India’s claim of targeting “camps of terrorists is false.”
After India’s strikes, the Indian army said in a post on X on Wednesday: “Justice is served.”
News of the strikes hit India’s stock futures with the benchmark NSE Nifty 50 index falling 1.19 percent at the GIFT city financial center.
After the explosions, power was blacked out in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistani Kashmir, witnesses said.
India blamed Pakistan for the violence last month in which 26 men were killed and vowed to respond. Pakistan denied that it had anything to do with the killings and said that it had intelligence that India was planning to attack.
The name of India’s military operation, Sindoor, is an apparent reference to the women who lost their spouses in the attack on Hindu tourists in Pahalgam last month.
Sindoor is the Hindi for the traditional red vermilion worn by married Hindu women on their forehead symbolising protection and marital commitment. Women traditionally stop wearing it when they are widowed.


Palestinian-American author sues Oxford Union over censored speech on YouTube

Palestinian-American author sues Oxford Union over censored speech on YouTube
Updated 5 sec ago

Palestinian-American author sues Oxford Union over censored speech on YouTube

Palestinian-American author sues Oxford Union over censored speech on YouTube
  • Susan Abulhawa describes the edited version of her remarks as ‘politically motivated censorship’
  • She wants an apology, damages and for the union to restore the full version of her speech

LONDON: Palestinian American author Susan Abulhawa is suing the Oxford Union in the UK, seeking an apology and compensation for damages after parts of a speech she gave during a debate on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were removed from a video posted by the union on YouTube.

The Pennsylvania-based author of the best-selling book “Mornings in Jenin” was one of eight speakers who took part in the debate in November 2024. The Oxford Union uploaded her speech to YouTube but deleted it from the platform a week after the debate, then replaced it in December with an edited version that omitted remarks she made about Zionism and Israel’s actions in Lebanon.

The union said that it removed parts of Abulhawa’s speech because of “legal concerns” about certain aspects of it, The Times newspaper reported, including comments about Zionists encouraging “the most vile of human impulses,” and Israeli booby traps in Lebanon.

When contacted by Abulhawa’s legal team, the union argued that the cut remarks constituted racial hatred in violation of Section 17 of the UK’s Public Order Act 1986. The author uploaded the full version of her speech to her own YouTube channel in April.

In one part removed by the union, Abulhawa addresses Zionists directly, saying: “You don’t know how to live in the world without dominating others. You have crossed all lines and nurtured the most vile of human impulses.”

She also highlighted atrocities carried out by Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip, including the bombing of hospitals and schools, and the killing of women and children, which a number of UN and Western officials have described as amounting to genocide.

Israel’s military campaign in Gaza has resulted in the killing of more than 65,000 Palestinians since October 2023, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, and the displacement of the entire 2 million-strong population of the territory.

Abulhawa, whose family hails from the Mount of Olives, a Palestinian neighborhood overlooking the walled city of occupied East Jerusalem, described the edited version of her speech as “politically motivated censorship.”

She said: “They talk about freedom of expression, free discourse and free debate, exchange of thoughts, exchange of ideas, however uncomfortable, but when it comes to this one issue … there’s a different set of rules.”

Abulhawa said the actions of the Oxford Union, one of Britain’s oldest university unions, had damaged her reputation by implying her remarks were criminal, The Times reported. She wants an apology, damages, and for the union to restore the full version of her speech. She is suing the union on various legal grounds, including copyright infringement, discrimination and breach of contract.

“I prepared a speech that I labored over for quite a while and I chose my words carefully for content,” she said. “The suggestion was I said things that were unlawful, that were malicious or substandard. It was definitely disparaging to me.”

The debate resulted in approval of a motion that proposed “Israel is an apartheid state responsible for genocide.” The union did not comment on Abulhawa’s legal challenge.