ֱ

Appeals court to hear cases of 2 university students, one detained, the other recently released

Appeals court to hear cases of 2 university students, one detained, the other recently released
People gather for a rally in support of Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk and Columbia University student activist Mohsen Mahdawi in Foley Square on May 6, 2025 in New York City. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 06 May 2025

Appeals court to hear cases of 2 university students, one detained, the other recently released

Appeals court to hear cases of 2 university students, one detained, the other recently released
  • Immigration court proceedings for Ozturk and Mahdawi are being conducted separately
  • The appeals court paused that order last week in order to consider the government’s motion

NEW YORK: A federal appeals court is scheduled to hear arguments Tuesday in the cases of a Turkish Tufts University student who has been detained by immigration authorities for six weeks and a Palestinian student at Columbia University who was recently released from detention.
A three-judge panel of the US 2nd Circurt Court of Appeals, based in New York, is expected to hear motions filed by the US Justice Department regarding Rumeysa Ozturk and Mohsen Mahdawi. The department is appealing decisions made by two federal judges in Vermont. It also wants to consolidate the students’ cases, saying they present similar legal questions.
Immigration court proceedings for Ozturk and Mahdawi are being conducted separately.
A district court judge in Vermont had ordered that Ozturk, a 30-year-old doctoral student, be brought to the state from a Louisiana immigration detention center by May 1 for hearings to determine whether she was illegally detained. Ozturk’s lawyers say her detention violates her constitutional rights, including free speech and due process.
The appeals court paused that order last week in order to consider the government’s motion.
Congress limited federal-court jurisdiction over immigration matters, the Justice Department said. It said an immigration court in Louisiana has jurisdiction over Ozturk’s case.
Immigration officials surrounded Ozturk as she walked along a street in a Boston suburb March 25 and drove her to New Hampshire and Vermont before putting her on a plane to the detention center in Basile, Louisiana.
Ozturk was one of four students who wrote an op-ed in the campus newspaper, The Tufts Daily, last year criticizing the university’s response to student activists demanding that Tufts “acknowledge the Palestinian genocide,” disclose its investments and divest from companies with ties to Israel.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in March, without providing evidence, that investigations found that Ozturk engaged in activities in support of Hamas, a US-designated terrorist group.
The government is also challenging another judge’s decision to release Mahdawi from detention in Vermont on April 30. Mahdawi led protests at Columbia University against Israel’s war in Gaza. He was arrested by immigration officials during an interview about finalizing his US citizenship.
Mahdawi, 34, has been a legal permanent resident for 10 years. He was in a Vermont state prison since April 14. In his release order, US District Judge Geoffrey Crawford said Mahdawi has raised a “substantial claim that the government arrested him to stifle speech with which it disagrees.”
Mahdawi’s release allows him to travel outside his home state of Vermont and attend graduation next month in New York. He recently completed coursework at Columbia and planned to begin a master’s degree program there in the fall.


Anger over Gaza could unseat top UK ministers: Pollsters

Anger over Gaza could unseat top UK ministers: Pollsters
Updated 11 sec ago

Anger over Gaza could unseat top UK ministers: Pollsters

Anger over Gaza could unseat top UK ministers: Pollsters
  • Pro-Palestine candidates will challenge Labour MPs at next election
  • Muslim voters could feel they are ‘taken for granted, ignored, left behind’ by governing party 

LONDON: Pro-Palestine election candidates in the UK could unseat top government ministers at the next general election, leading pollsters have said.

Figures including Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood will likely face major battles to keep their seats despite Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s decision to potentially recognize a Palestinian state, The Independent reported on Saturday.

At the last election in 2024, a pro-Palestine candidate unseated a key member of Starmer’s team, Jonathan Ashworth. Streeting retained his seat but with a tiny majority of 528, down from 5,198 in 2019.

Mounting public anger over Britain’s response to the Gaza war could cause major embarrassment for the government at the next election, pollsters say.

Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader and now independent MP, has announced a new party that could also take a chunk of votes from the government by highlighting the Gaza crisis.

John Curtice, the country’s top pollster, told The Independent that Starmer’s pledge to recognize a Palestinian state in September — should Israel fail to meet key conditions — “may not be sufficient” for voters.

Both Streeting and Mahmood are in significant danger of losing their seats at the next election, while other ministers and MPs could also fall if anger continues to grow over Gaza.

Starmer had also “lost out” on votes in his own constituency last year because of concerns over Gaza, Curtice said.

However, the prime minister’s majority is substantially larger than some of his Cabinet ministers.

“Here is somebody (Starmer) who spent a great deal of time and effort trying to reconnect with the Jewish community, and now he’s finding himself having to spend a great deal of effort trying to reconnect with the Muslim community. It is very difficult to keep himself on board with both groups at the moment,” Curtice said.

When Corbyn launched his party last week, he said its members would campaign heavily on Palestine, as well as Britain’s response to Israel’s war on Gaza.

Luke Tryl of polling firm More in Common said events in Gaza and government policy toward the war have revealed “deeper” problems within the ruling Labour Party.

“When we have done focus groups with voters in Muslim areas, particularly some of those who backed or were thinking about backing pro-Gaza independent candidates, I compared it to speaking to voters in the red wall after Brexit,” he said.

“In the sense that Brexit was the thing which caused the split, but it actually brought to the fore much deeper resentments — that they have been taken from granted, ignored, left behind by Labour … I think we’re going to see exactly the same thing with Muslim voters.”


Scottish first minister calls Israel’s actions in Gaza a ‘genocide’

Scottish first minister calls Israel’s actions in Gaza a ‘genocide’
Updated 42 min 37 sec ago

Scottish first minister calls Israel’s actions in Gaza a ‘genocide’

Scottish first minister calls Israel’s actions in Gaza a ‘genocide’
  • Made comment at Edinburgh Fringe event repeatedly interrupted by pro-Palestinian protesters
  • Swinney’s statement follows similar language used last month by Northern Ireland First Minister O’Neill

LONDON: Scotland’s First Minister John Swinney has for the first time described Israel’s actions in Gaza as a “genocide,” becoming the second UK national leader to do so after Northern Ireland’s Michelle O’Neill, it was reported on Saturday.

Speaking at an Edinburgh Fringe event that was repeatedly interrupted by pro-Palestinian protesters, Swinney told reporters: “It’s quite clear that there is a genocide in Palestine, it can’t be disputed. I have seen reports of terrible atrocities which have the character of being genocide. I’ve expressed that and obviously it’s not reached all those individuals, but that’s my feeling.”

Swinney made his remarks following a disrupted appearance at the Stand Comedy Club in Edinburgh, where protesters stood up holding letters spelling “GENOCIDE” and chanted slogans including “Call it genocide.”

Security staff prevented demonstrators from approaching the stage as interruptions became increasingly forceful throughout the event.

His comments, , come amid mounting pro-Palestinian pressure from within the governing Scottish National Party, including from elected representatives in both Holyrood and Westminster.

Stephen Flynn, leader of the SNP’s nine MPs in the House of Commons in Westminster, recently urged the UK government to recognize the situation in Gaza as a genocide during a parliamentary exchange.

Israel has consistently denied committing genocide, maintaining that its military operations in Gaza are acts of self-defense in response to the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks led by Hamas that left almost 1,200 people dead in Israel, mostly civilians, and more than 250 kidnapped.

About 50 of those hostages remain in Gaza, with only 20 believed to be alive.

More than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed in the subsequent military action by Israel against Hamas, with a further 1,350 queuing for aid killed by Israeli troops since May, according to UN data published this week.

On Friday, at least 91 people were killed and hundreds more wounded in Gaza ahead of a visit by US envoy Steve Witkoff to Israel.

Two leading Israeli human rights organizations, B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, have also accused Israel of committing genocide, asserting that western allies have a legal and moral duty to act.

Swinney’s statement follows similar language used last month by Northern Ireland First Minister O’Neill, who said: “It is inhumanity, it is genocide, it is wrong.” She also described Israel’s actions as “state terrorism.”

The Scottish government has previously faced criticism over public money being used to support apprenticeships at firms involved in weapons manufacturing, though it does not directly fund the production of munitions.

Defending that policy, Swinney said Scottish Enterprise, the government’s commercial investment body, applies “the strictest assessments imaginable about the purpose and the use of public expenditure in companies who may be related to defense industries.”

Pressed on funding staff who could end up building munitions, he added: “We are trying to enable companies to diversify their activities, that’s the purpose. That’s why the due diligence checks are applied and they are applied unreservedly.”


Serbia rejects confirmation of Bosnian Serb leader’s jail sentence

Serbia rejects confirmation of Bosnian Serb leader’s jail sentence
Updated 59 min 3 sec ago

Serbia rejects confirmation of Bosnian Serb leader’s jail sentence

Serbia rejects confirmation of Bosnian Serb leader’s jail sentence
  • Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic said the court decision undermined security in the Balkan region
  • Speaking after an emergency meeting of Serbia’s National Security Council, Vucic said the rulings were “a destabilising factor“

BELGRADE: Serbia rejected on Saturday a Bosnian appeals court ruling upholding a prison sentence for Milorad Dodik, the leader of Bosnia’s ethnic Serb entity, the Republika Srpska (RS).

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic said the court decision undermined security in the Balkan region.

In February, a court in the Bosnian capital, Sarajevo, sentenced Dodik to one year behind bars for defying rulings by the international envoy overseeing Bosnia’s 1995 peace accords.

It also banned Dodik, who has not so far been arrested, from holding office for six years.

Bosnia’s appeals court said on Friday it had upheld the lower court ruling and no further appeal was allowed.

Speaking after an emergency meeting of Serbia’s National Security Council, Vucic said the rulings were “a destabilising factor.”

“The security situation in the region has been seriously undermined,” he alleged.

Since the end of Bosnia’s ethnic conflict in the 1990s, the country of 3.5 million has consisted of two autonomous halves — the Serb-dominated RS and a Muslim-Croat federation.

The two are linked by weak central institutions, while each has its own government and parliament.

Dodik has repeatedly threatened to pull the Serb statelet out of Bosnia’s central institutions — including its army, judiciary and tax system.

Asked on Saturday asked whether Dodik would be arrested if a warrant were issued and he entered Serbian territory, Vucic said he would not.

“All relevant state authorities are obliged to respect the decision of the National Security Council,” he said.

“Milorad Dodik is welcome on the territory of the Republic of Serbia. He is the legitimately, legally elected president of Republika Srpska.”

In its conclusions, which Vucic read out, the security council said the Bosnian appeal court ruling was undemocratic, immoral and “a serious attack on the Serbian people of Bosnia and Herzegovina.”

“The political and security situation in the region has been seriously destabilized,” the council continued.

“There is a tendency toward further deterioration and an incitement to ethnic conflict directly targeting the Serbian people,” it alleged.

The council “urged all actors in the region to remain calm and approach the situation rationally“

It added: “Such acts directly undermine the constitutional order of Bosnia and Herzegovina, established by the Dayton peace agreement.”

Vucic said Serbia would continue to insist on full respect for the 1995 Dayton accords and said the current situation was the most difficult for the country in many years.

Reacting on X, Dodik thanked Vucic and the security council.

“Serbia has always been committed to Republika Srpska and has never done anything against
Bosnia and Herzegovina,” he said.

Dodik’s conviction set off a crisis that many observers considered the worst since Bosnia’s 1992-95 war.

He has rejected the trial and his conviction as “political.”

In response, the RS parliament passed a law prohibiting Bosnia’s central police and judicial authorities from operating in the Serb entity.

Bosnia’s constitutional court annulled those laws in May.


Ukraine says it uncovers major drone procurement corruption scheme

Ukraine says it uncovers major drone procurement corruption scheme
Updated 02 August 2025

Ukraine says it uncovers major drone procurement corruption scheme

Ukraine says it uncovers major drone procurement corruption scheme
  • NABU and SAPO said they had caught a sitting lawmaker, two local officials and an unspecified number of national guard personnel taking bribes
  • None of them were identified in the statement

KYIV: Ukraine’s anti-corruption bodies said on Saturday they had uncovered a major graft scheme that procured military drones and signal jamming systems at inflated prices, two days after the agencies’ independence was restored following major protests.

The independence of Ukraine’s anti-graft investigators and prosecutors, NABU and SAPO, was reinstated by parliament on Thursday after a move to take it away resulted in the country’s biggest demonstrations since Russia’s invasion in 2022.

In a statement published by both agencies on social media, NABU and SAPO said they had caught a sitting lawmaker, two local officials and an unspecified number of national guard personnel taking bribes. None of them were identified in the statement.

“The essence of the scheme was to conclude state contracts with supplier companies at deliberately inflated prices,” it said, adding that the offenders had received kickbacks of up to 30 percent of a contract’s cost. Four people had been arrested.

“There can only be zero tolerance for corruption, clear teamwork to expose corruption and, as a result, a just sentence,” President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on Telegram.

Zelensky, who has far-reaching wartime presidential powers and still enjoys broad approval among Ukrainians, was forced into a rare political about-face when his attempt to bring NABU and SAPO under the control of his prosecutor-general sparked the first nationwide protests of the war.

Zelensky subsequently said that he had heard the people’s anger, and submitted a bill restoring the agencies’ former independence, which was voted through by parliament on Thursday.

Ukraine’s European allies praised the move, having voiced concerns about the original stripping of the agencies’ status.

Top European officials had told Zelensky that Ukraine was jeopardizing its bid for European Union membership by curbing the powers of its anti-graft authorities.

“It is important that anti-corruption institutions operate independently, and the law adopted on Thursday guarantees them every opportunity for a real fight against corruption,” Zelensky wrote on Saturday after meeting the heads of the agencies, who briefed him on the latest investigation.


Thai storm kills six

Thai storm kills six
Updated 02 August 2025

Thai storm kills six

Thai storm kills six
  • Since 21 July, heavy rains have inundated 12 provinces
  • Images on social media showed murky floodwaters, sandbags stacked outside homes

BANGKOK: Floods and landslides triggered by Tropical Storm Wipha since last month have killed six people and affected more than 230,000 people across Thailand, disaster management officials said Saturday.

Since 21 July, heavy rains have inundated 12 provinces, mostly in the northern and central regions, according to Thailand’s Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation.

“We are closely monitoring the impact of rainstorm Wipha and coordinating with affected provinces to assist those in need,” the agency said in a statement on its official Facebook page.

Images on social media showed murky floodwaters, sandbags stacked outside homes, and residents using plastic boats to navigate submerged streets.

However the kingdom’s meteorological department predicts rainfall will ease in the coming days.

While Thailand experiences annual monsoon rains between May and October, scientists say man-made climate change is causing more intense weather patterns that can make destructive floods more likely.

Widespread flooding across Thailand in 2011 killed more than 500 people and damaged millions of homes around the country.