ֱ

Trump slams Ukraine’s President Zelensky for refusing to cede Crimea to Russia

Update Trump slams Ukraine’s President Zelensky for refusing to cede Crimea to Russia
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday said a deal on halting the Ukraine war was "very close," but slammed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky over his refusal to formally cede Crimea to Russia. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 24 April 2025

Trump slams Ukraine’s President Zelensky for refusing to cede Crimea to Russia

Trump slams Ukraine’s President Zelensky for refusing to cede Crimea to Russia
  • Trump wants Ukraine to give up the territory, seized by Russiain in 2014, as part of a potential peace plan
  • Backed by the EU, Zelensky pushed back, saying Crimea is Ukrainian land and he is not authorized to cede it
  • Russia had earlier rejected a US proposal for an immediate ceasefire by imposing far-reaching conditions

KYIV, Ukraine: President Donald Trump on Wednesday lashed out at Ukraine’s president, saying Volodymyr Zelensky is prolonging the “killing field” after pushing back on ceding Crimea to Russia as part of a potential peace plan.
Zelensky on Tuesday ruled out ceding territory to Russia in any deal before talks set for Wednesday in London among US, European and Ukrainian officials. “There is nothing to talk about. It is our land, the land of the Ukrainian people,” Zelensky said.
During similar talks last week in Paris, US officials presented a proposal that included allowing Russia to keep control of occupied Ukrainian territory as part of a deal, according to a European official familiar with the matter who was not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
Trump called Zelenkyy’s pushback “very harmful” to talks.
“Nobody is asking Zelensky to recognize Crimea as Russian Territory but, if he wants Crimea, why didn’t they fight for it eleven years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired?” he wrote on social media.
Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 after sending troops to overrun it. Weeks later, Moscow-backed separatists launched an uprising in eastern Ukraine, battling Kyiv’s forces.
Trump also asserted they were close to a deal and that Ukraine’s leader can have peace or “he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country,” adding that Zelensky’s statement “will do nothing but prolong the ‘killing field,’ and nobody wants that!“

‘A very fair proposal’
Wednesday’s meeting was pared back at the last minute, while Vice President JD Vance said negotiations are reaching a moment of truth.
“We’ve issued a very explicit proposal to both the Russians and the Ukrainians, and it’s time for them to either say ‘yes’ or for the United States to walk away from this process,” Vance told reporters during a visit to India.
He said it was “a very fair proposal” that would “freeze the territorial lines at some level close to where they are today,” with both sides having to give up some territory they currently hold. He did not provide details.
Trump, who is set to travel to Rome for Pope Francis’s funeral on Saturday, told reporters later on Wednesday that he did not know if he would meet with Zelensky or other European leaders to discuss the war while in Italy. He also said that has found dealing with Zelensky harder than dealing with the Russians.
Trump who is set to travel to the Middle East next month said it was “possible” that he could meet with Putin while in ֱ, but that it is more likely he will meet with the Russian leader soon after that trip.
A senior European official familiar with the ongoing talks involving the American team said a proposal the United States calls “final” was initially presented last week in Paris, where it was described as “just ideas” — and that they could be changed.
When those “ideas” surfaced in media reports, Ukrainian officials were surprised to find that Washington portrayed them as final, according to the official, who was not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
Zelensky said Wednesday that Ukraine is ready for any format of negotiations that might bring a ceasefire and open the door to full peace negotiations, as he mourned nine civilians killed when a Russian drone struck a bus earlier in the day.
“We insist on an immediate, complete and unconditional ceasefire,” Zelensky wrote on social media, in accordance with a proposal he said the US tabled six weeks ago.
Ukraine and some Western European governments have accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of dragging his feet on that proposal as his army tries to capture more Ukrainian land. Western analysts say Moscow is in no rush to conclude peace talks because it has battlefield momentum.
Doubts over negotiations
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the talks in London to find an end to the more than three-year war would involve only lower-ranking officials, after the US State Department said Tuesday that Secretary of State Marco Rubio was unable to attend because of a scheduling issue.
Rubio’s abrupt cancelation raised doubts about the direction of negotiations. He had indicated that Wednesday’s meeting could be decisive in determining whether the Trump administration remains engaged.
Commenting on those attending the talks, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that “as far as we understand, they so far have failed to bring their positions closer on some issues.” He said the Kremlin was still in consultations with American officials but wouldn’t publicly discuss details.
US special envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to visit Moscow again later this week, according to Russian officials.
Even achieving a limited, 30-day ceasefire has been beyond the reach of negotiators, as both sides continue to attack each other along the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line and launch long-range strikes.
A Russian drone struck a bus carrying workers in Marganets, in eastern Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region on Wednesday morning, killing eight women and one man, regional head Serhii Lysak wrote on social media. More than 40 people were injured, he said.
Lysak published photos of a bus with windows blown out and shards of glass mixed with blood spattered on its floor.
A Ukrainian delegation in London
Trump has pushed for an end to the war and said last week that negotiations were “coming to a head.” That comment came after Rubio suggested the US might soon back away from negotiations if they don’t progress.
Those still attending Wednesday’s meeting include retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, Trump’s envoy for Ukraine and Russia.
Andrii Yermak, the head of Ukraine’s presidential office, said on social media that a delegation including him, Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha and Defense Minister Rustem Umerov had arrived in London for the talks despite the alterations.
“The path to peace is not easy, but Ukraine has been and remains committed to peaceful efforts,” Yermak said. Officials would “discuss ways to achieve a full and unconditional ceasefire as the first step toward a comprehensive settlement and the achievement of a just and lasting peace.”
Several hours later, Yermak said that he, Sybiha and Umerov met with national security and foreign policy advisers from the countries “participating in the coalition of the willing” and “emphasized our commitment” to the US president’s peace efforts.
He asserted on social media that “Russia continues to reject an unconditional ceasefire, dragging out the process and trying to manipulate negotiations.”
Trump frustrated with both sides
Trump said repeatedly during his election campaign last year that he would be able to end the war “in 24 hours” upon taking office. But he has expressed frustration with Zelensky and Putin. Russia has effectively rejected a US proposal for an immediate and full 30-day halt in the fighting by imposing far-reaching conditions.
Some European allies are wary of the American proposal for Ukraine to exchange land for peace. But an official said there’s also acknowledgment by some allies that Russia is firmly entrenched wholly or partially in five regions of Ukraine: Crimea, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson.
If the goal is to obtain a ceasefire immediately, “it should be based on the line of contact as it is,” said the senior French official, who spoke on condition of anonymity in line with French presidential policy.


Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital

Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital
Updated 40 sec ago

Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital

Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital
  • Militants destroyed more than 4,000 manuscripts after they seized Timbuktu in 2012
  • Mali has long battled an insurgency by armed militants, including allies of Al-Qaeda and Daesh group

BAMAKO: The Malian military government on Monday started returning home the historic manuscripts of Timbuktu, which were spirited out of their fabled northern city when it was occupied by Al-Qaeda-linked militants more than a decade ago.
Islamic radicals destroyed more than 4,000 manuscripts, some dating back to the 13th century, after they seized Timbuktu in 2012, according to the findings of a United Nations expert mission. They also destroyed nine mausoleums and a mosque’s door — all but one of the buildings on the UNESCO World Heritage list.
The majority of the documents dating back to the 13th century — more than 27,000 — were saved by the devotion of the Timbuktu library’s Malian custodians, who carried them out of the occupied city in rice sacks, on donkey carts, by motorcycle, by boat and four-wheel drive vehicles.
The first batch of the manuscripts were brought to Timbuktu by plane from the capital of Bamako, authorities said, adding that the return was necessary to protect them from the threats of Bamako’s humidity.
The shipment consisted of more than 200 crates and weighed some 5.5 tons. The rest would be shipped in the coming days, officials said.
About 706 kilometers (439 miles) from Bamako, Timbuktu sits on the edge of the Sahara desert and has a dry climate. For years, the local municipal and religious authorities have asked for the return of the manuscripts.
Diahara Touré, Timbuktu’s deputy mayor, said the famous documents are important to the local people as they “reflect our civilization and spiritual and intellectual heritage.”
“This is the first stage” of the return, said Bilal Mahamane Traoré, a local official.
In February, the military government made a commitment to return the manuscripts, according to Bouréma Kansaye, the Malian Minister of Higher Education. He described them as as a “legacy that bears witness to the intellectual greatness and crossroads of civilization” of the city of Timbuktu — “a bridge between the past and the future.”
“We now have a responsibility to protect, digitize, study, and promote these treasures so that they continue to enlighten Mali, Africa, and the world,” Kansaye said during Monday’s return ceremony.
The manuscripts, which UNESCO has designated as part of the World Cultural Heritage, cover a myriad subjects, from Islamic theology and jurisprudence, astronomy, medicine, mathematics, history, and geography. They are a testimony to the rich cultural heritage of the Mali and Songhai empires in West Africa.
Mali, along with neighboring Burkina Faso and Niger, has long battled an insurgency by armed militants, including some allied with Al-Qaeda and the Daesh group. Following two military coups, the ruling junta expelled French troops and instead turned to Russia for security assistance.
Still, 13 years after the occupation of Timbuktu, the security situation in Mali remains precarious and analysts say it has worsened in recent months. Although the city is back under government control, militants continue attacking its surroundings, including as recently as last month.


EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza

EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza
Updated 22 min 30 sec ago

EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza

EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza
  • EU foreign policy chief also called on Israel to allow more aid into the Gaza Strip

BRUSSELS: The European Union condemned the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in an Israeli strike in the Gaza Strip, the bloc’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday.
“The EU condemns the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in an (Israeli military) airstrike outside Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, including the Al Jazeera correspondent Anas Al-Sharif,” she said after EU foreign ministers discussed the war in virtual talks.
An Israeli military statement accused Sharif of heading a Hamas “terrorist cell” and being “responsible for advancing rocket attacks” against Israelis.
The EU took note of Israel’s allegation, Kallas said, “but there is a need in these cases to provide clear evidence, in the respect of rule of law, to avoid targeting of journalists.”
The 27-country bloc has struggled to take action over the conflict in Gaza as it is divided between staunch supporters of Israel and those who defend the Palestinians.
The EU struck a deal last month to increase aid access to Gaza, but senior officials have said the agreement has been only partially implemented.
Kallas called on Israel to allow more aid into the territory.
“Whereas there is more aid coming in, the needs are still much greater. We urge Israel to allow more trucks and a better distribution of aid,” she said.


UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London
Updated 47 min 58 sec ago

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London
  • 532 people were arrested during Saturday’s demonstration in Parliament Square, 522 of them for displaying support for the proscribed group, and 348 of them were age 50 or over
  • Palestine Action was designated a terrorist organization last month but critics say ‘inappropriate use of terror laws’ exacerbates social divisions and is ‘conflating protest with terrorism’
  • Protesters ‘were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate, to the point of absurdity, to be treating them as terrorists,’ says Amnesty International chief

LONDON: British prime minister Keir Starmer faces mounting criticism after hundreds of people were detained during a demonstration in Parliament Square in London at the weekend against the government’s decision to ban Palestine Action.

The Metropolitan Police said officers arrested 532 people on Saturday, 522 of them for displaying items in support of the proscribed group. A breakdown of the arrest figures released on Sunday revealed that 348 of those apprehended were age 50 or over, .

The protest, organized by Defend Our Juries, an organization that “supports collective action to expose this corruption of democracy and the rule of law,” took place after ministers warned they would take action against anyone who showed public support for Palestine Action, which was designated a terrorist organization last month.

Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones defended the crackdown, saying: “The right to peacefully protest in this country is a cornerstone of our democracy, and of course we respect that. But with regards to Palestine Action, they are a proscribed terrorist organization and their actions have not been peaceful.

“They have violently carried out criminal damage to RAF aircraft. We have credible reports of them targeting Jewish-owned businesses here in the United Kingdom, and there are other reasons which we can’t disclose because of national security.

“But they are a proscribed terrorist organization and anyone showing support for that terrorist organization will feel the full force of the law.”

The prime minister’s office also defended the proscription, saying it followed “strong security advice” and citing attacks said to be linked to the group involving violence, injury and criminal damage.

Officials said the UK’s Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had linked the group to three separate acts of terrorism.

However, the move drew sharp criticism from across the political spectrum.

Baroness Shami Chakrabarti, a member of Starmer’s ruling Labour Party and of the House of Lords, warned that the ban risked deepening social divisions.

“The proscription of Palestine Action is in danger of becoming a mistake of poll tax proportions,” she told The Independent, referring to a highly unpopular taxation policy of former prime minister Margaret Thatcher’s government that led to violent protests in the early 1990s across the UK.

“The courts have already found an arguable case that it breaches fundamental rights and more, not less, people are coming out to protest against both atrocities in Gaza and inappropriate use of terror laws at home.

“The notable presence of so many older people highlights the strength of genuine feeling. Criminal damage at air force bases can be prosecuted, but sweeping guilt by association only exacerbates community tensions and creates a bigger headache for the police.”

Former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain described the arrests as “madness,” and said Palestine Action was “not equivalent” to terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda or Daesh, adding that this was why he had voted against its ban.

Independent MP Diane Abbott said: “The government is in danger of making itself look both draconian and foolish.”

Left-wing Labour MP Nadia Whittome, who also opposed the ban, accused ministers of “conflating protest with terrorism.” In a message posted on social media platform X, she said: “Last month, I warned that proscribing Palestine Action would result in the mass criminalization of people who are not even members of the group. Now, more than 500 people have been arrested. I voted against the proscription; we shouldn’t be conflating protest with terrorism.”

Former chief prosecutor Nazir Afzal warned that the mass arrests would clog the justice system: “These would probably be jury trials as each of them would be advised to plead not guilty and expect a trial in 2027 at the earliest. I also suspect that no jury would convict anyhow.”

Amnesty International described the level of policing as “disproportionate to the point of absurdity.”

Its chief executive, Sacha Deshmukh, said: “Peaceful protest is a fundamental right. People are understandably outraged by the ongoing genocide being committed in Gaza and are entitled under international human rights law to express their horror.

“The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate, to the point of absurdity, to be treating them as terrorists. We have long criticized UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded, and a threat to freedom of expression. These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.”

Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori said the protest would “go down in our country’s history as a momentous act of collective defiance of an unprecedented attack on our fundamental freedoms.”

She argued that the large number of people granted street bail showed the law was “unenforceable.” Street bail is a process under which arrested individuals can be granted bail before they are taken to a police station.

Under the UK’s Terrorism Act 2000, membership of or support for a proscribed organization carries a maximum prison term of 14 years. In some cases, prosecutions require approval from both the Crown Prosecution Service and the Attorney General.


How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis
Updated 11 August 2025

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis
  • Few Afghans are heading back to their crisis-wracked homeland by choice or with a destination in mind
  • Women and children face particular risks, with restricted rights, food insecurity, and a lack of documentation

DUBAI: Afghan refugees are returning in their thousands — few of them by choice or with a destination in mind. Many of the youngest have never set foot in Afghanistan before. Others are returning to find their homes and livelihoods no longer exist.

What were once considered places of refuge from the unrelenting turmoil back home, neighboring states are now expelling Afghans in waves of forced returns that are pushing crisis-wracked Afghanistan to the brink.

According to Babar Baloch, global spokesperson for the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone, including 1.6 million from Iran and more than 352,000 from Pakistan.

Sami Fakhouri, head of delegation for Afghanistan at the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, witnessed the impact first-hand.

“We are anticipating that an additional 1 million people, possibly more, may return from Iran to Afghanistan by the end of this year,” he told a briefing in Geneva. “The majority didn’t have a say in coming back. They were put on buses and driven to the border.”

Fakhouri said he had seen busloads of families being dropped off at the Islam Qala border in Herat province in recent days, many with no idea where to go. He also sounded the alarm over a critical funding shortfall.

On July 4 alone, more than 50,000 people crossed into Afghanistan from Iran — a dramatic increase from the daily average of 5,000 between January and June. (AFP/File)

The IFRC’s $31.4 million appeal to support returnees is only 10 percent funded. “Whether we can maintain support at this pace is a real concern,” he said.

At the same time, Afghanistan is in no position to absorb the influx of people after four decades of war, occupation, civil unrest and economic crisis have left the country extremely fragile.

The US military withdrawal and the return of the Taliban government in 2021 led to Afghanistan’s global isolation, a freeze on foreign aid and assets, and the near-collapse of public services.

Compounding these challenges is one of the worst droughts Afghanistan has seen in decades, which has devastated crops, depleted water sources, and crippled rural livelihoods.

With more than half the population reliant on agriculture, many returnees have little to go back to in their home villages — forcing them to remain in transit areas or drift toward overcrowded cities.

Aid agencies warn that without climate-resilient recovery plans, the drought will deepen food insecurity and drive even more internal displacement.

UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone

Baloch described the expulsions as “a broader, worrying regional trend,” adding that “refugee-hosting countries have issued return orders with deadlines for Afghans to depart, or face deportation.”

Since those announcements, the situation for Afghans in both Iran and Pakistan has deteriorated rapidly.

These mass returns follow a shift in regional policy, beginning in March when Iran issued a deadline for undocumented Afghans to leave or face arrest.

In June, Pakistan launched its second phase of deportations targeting unregistered Afghans. Both countries cited national security concerns and internal pressure to expel large refugee populations.

Pakistan has defended its forced expulsions, with Talal Chaudhry, an adviser to Islamabad’s Interior Ministry, stating in April that the policy targets only “illegal foreigners.”

The situation for Afghans in both Iran and Pakistan has deteriorated rapidly. (AFP/File)

In February, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan rejected claims that Afghan nationals were being mistreated during the repatriation process.

“In this connection, we also extensively engaged the Afghan side to ensure the smooth repatriation of Afghan nationals,” he told Voice of America.

Iran, meanwhile, has justified its expulsions as a response to national security and economic pressures, particularly following its recent conflict with Israel. Rhetoric on social media has increasingly blamed Afghans for shortages and social issues.

Abdul Rahman Rashid, the Taliban government’s deputy minister for refugees and repatriation, has rebuked host countries for the mass expulsions. And described the removal of Afghans as a “serious violation of international norms, humanitarian principles, and Islamic values.”

“The scale and manner in which Afghan refugees have been forced to return to their homeland is something Afghanistan has never before experienced in its history,” Rashid said in Kabul on July 31.

For the hundreds of thousands now crossing back into Afghanistan each month, the journey does not end at the border. Many are stepping into a future marked by uncertainty, deprivation and loss, without hope, safety or dignity.

Even so, the pace of returns has surged in recent weeks.

On July 4 alone, more than 50,000 people crossed into Afghanistan from Iran — a dramatic increase from the daily average of 5,000 between January and June.

From July 10 to 16, the average was more than 29,000 per day. Inevitably, the scale of arrivals has overwhelmed aid operations at border crossings.

“Our teams are at the borders, receiving and assisting streams of exhausted, hungry, and scared people every day,” Baloch told Arab News.

Afghanistan “is not a safe country for returnees, given the constantly deteriorating human rights situation since the Taliban seized control,” said Richard Bennett. (AFP/File)

“Staff and structures are absolutely inundated,” he said, adding that the UN agency has deployed additional personnel and is distributing essential relief items, hot meals, and emergency financial assistance to meet immediate needs.

“But amid funding constraints, and given the scale and pace of returns, we will not be able to sustain support for more than a few weeks,” said Baloch.

In addition to the operational burden, the nature of these returns has raised serious concerns. Many of those arriving say they had little choice.

Baloch described the situation as “a complex protection crisis,” noting that returns are taking place under difficult and often involuntary conditions.

He said many Afghans felt forced to leave after seeing others deported, and “returnees who arrived in the country in recent months have been sharing concerning stories of increased restrictions, harassment and discrimination.”

Once back, many find themselves in provinces that lack even the most basic services, forcing thousands into temporary transit sites, informal settlements, or already strained households. Many arrive without identity papers, making access to support even more difficult.

“Immense challenges lie ahead for returnees — from accessing documentation, housing, healthcare and education, to rebuilding their lives in a country they do not know,” said Baloch.

Those challenges are already visible. Shelter is scarce, and schools and clinics are either closed or inaccessible to women and girls. Meanwhile, job opportunities are limited — especially for those who have spent years or decades abroad.

UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone. (AFP/File)

“For women and girls in particular, life in Afghanistan brings extreme restrictions,” said Baloch.

Under the Taliban government, most secondary schools and universities remain closed to girls. Women are banned from most forms of employment, including in the nongovernmental organization sector. For many returnee women, it means a life of near-total invisibility.

Even female aid workers have been forced into the shadows. One Afghan humanitarian worker, speaking anonymously to a UN publication, described living in fear while continuing to serve her community.

“I feel depressed,” she said. “As an aid worker, I don’t feel safe, and I am afraid for my life… I am worried that I might be targeted because of my job.”

She described being stopped at checkpoints, harassed for not having a male guardian, and being unable to access work or support systems freely.

“It is so unfair to be deprived of your rights because of your gender. Working is not only my dream or a human right, it is also the way I support my family. Women are half of a country … Let us work, let us learn, let us live.”

Aid workers have also reported a growing number of unaccompanied or separated children among recent returnees — some born abroad and unable to navigate legal systems or school enrolment.

Data for June published by UNICEF, the UN children’s fund, indicates that more than 5,000 unaccompanied or separated Afghan children returned from Iran, many arriving without guardians or legal identity.

The lack of functioning child protection mechanisms places these vulnerable children at risk of exploitation, statelessness, and abuse at a critical stage in their lives.

Human rights experts have also warned of broader risks facing returnees.

Richard Bennett, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in Afghanistan, has said the nation “is not a safe country for returnees, given the constantly deteriorating human rights situation since the Taliban seized control.”

Rights groups have documented cases in which returnees — particularly those with foreign residency or links to international organizations — have faced interrogation or detention upon arrival, fueling fears of surveillance and reprisals.

Despite urgent warnings from aid agencies, the international response has fallen short. The UNHCR has appealed for $71 million to support returnees in the region over a nine-month period.

The IFRC and other aid actors have made separate appeals for immediate assistance at border crossings and for longer-term reintegration support. But donor interest remains weak, with many countries reducing their funding to Afghanistan over governance concerns and competing global crises.

Roza Otunbayeva, the UN secretary-general’s special representative for Afghanistan, called the mass returns “a test of our collective humanity,” warning of further displacement, famine, and instability without urgent action.

Neighboring states are now expelling Afghans in waves of forced returns that are pushing crisis-wracked Afghanistan to the brink. (AFP/File)

She called for an “integrated approach” that combines emergency aid with long-term support for return areas, and stressed that regional dialogue with Iran, Pakistan, and Central Asian states is essential to ensure returns remain voluntary, safe, and dignified.

Baloch echoed those concerns. “We are in touch with the authorities in Iran and Pakistan. UNHCR urges countries in the region to ensure protection for Afghans and that returns to Afghanistan are voluntary, safe, and dignified.”

“We are also calling on the international community to urgently and substantially increase funding — to meet both critical needs at the border upon arrival, and provide longer-term assistance to help returnees settle in Afghanistan,” he said.

 


Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters

Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters
Updated 11 August 2025

Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters

Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters
  • Since 2012, Mali has been wracked with crises on various fronts, with extremists linked to Al-Qaeda or Daesh carrying out violent attacks across the Sahel nation

BAMAKO: Mali’s junta has carried out arrests to quash an alleged plot to overthrow the government within the army’s ranks, sources said, but the circumstances of the detentions remain unexplained.
The junta, which itself came to power in back-to-back coups in 2020 and 2021, has made 55 arrests, mainly among the National Guard, the military branch from which Defense Minister General Sadio Camara hails.
The military-backed government has yet to officially comment on the crackdown, which comes as the army is locked in fighting with terrorists and separatists.
The arrests, which began last week and continued into early Monday, were carried out by the junta following what a security and military source said were “destabilization” attempts.
While Defense Minister Camara, a key figure within the ruling junta, has not been questioned, observers say several of those apprehended are believed to be officers close to him.
According to a Malian security source, civilians could also be questioned soon.
Two generals were among those detained, including Abass Dembele, a former governor of the central Mopti region and a respected military officer.
Gen. Nema Sagara, a rare woman to serve as brigadier general in the Malian Air Force, who also hailed from the center of the country, was the other.
“The situation is a bit complex,” one African diplomat stationed in Bamako said. 
“The government’s silence while arrests have been ongoing for at least four days deserves reflection.”
“Are we dealing with preventive arrests? Were the arrested soldiers in the phase of destabilizing the (junta), as we understand it?” the source asked.
Since 2012, Mali has been wracked with crises on various fronts, with extremists linked to Al-Qaeda or Daesh carrying out violent attacks across the Sahel nation.
Mali’s junta has ramped up repression of its critics in the face of the terrorist unrest.
For Malian sociologist Oumar Maiga, the spate of arrests within the army’s ranks was “proof that the officers are struggling to control the situation.”
When junta chief Gen. Assimi Goita took power after deposing President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita in 2020, he insisted he was committed to the fight against jihadist violence and initially pledged a return to civilian rule.
But the military ultimately reneged on its promise to cede power to elected civilians by the deadline it had set.
The junta announced in May the dissolution of all political parties and organizations, as well as a ban on meetings.
Then in July, Goita extended his military rule for at least five more years without an election.
Gen. Goita’s rule has marked a turning point in Mali’s relationship with the West. 
The country has broken ties with France and other former allies, pivoting toward Russia instead.
Mali and its junta-led neighbors Burkina Faso and Niger have teamed up to create their own confederation, the Alliance of Sahel States, or AES, and have announced the creation of a 5,000-strong force for joint military operations.
Meanwhile, the Malian army and its Russian mercenary allies, which are tasked in particular with tracking down extremists, are regularly accused of rights violations against civilians.