ֱ

Trump tariffs threaten the survival of the centuries-old Kashmiri carpet industry

Mohammad Iqbal Bakshi, left, and Mohammad Rafiq Shah inspect a Kashmiri hand-knotted silk carpet inside a showroom in Srinagar, Indian controlled Kashmir, on April 14, 2025. (AP)
Mohammad Iqbal Bakshi, left, and Mohammad Rafiq Shah inspect a Kashmiri hand-knotted silk carpet inside a showroom in Srinagar, Indian controlled Kashmir, on April 14, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 17 April 2025

Trump tariffs threaten the survival of the centuries-old Kashmiri carpet industry

Trump tariffs threaten the survival of the centuries-old Kashmiri carpet industry
  • Carpet exports from India to the United States are valued at approximately $1.2 billion
  • The steep 28 percent tariff means these carpets will become more expensive in the US market

SRINAGAR: Mohammad Yousuf Dar and his wife, Shameema, sit cross-legged before their loom, deftly tying consecutive knots to create the floral patterns of the famed Kashmiri carpets that are now threatened by the Trump administration’s sweeping tariffs.
Genuine hand-knotted Kashmiri carpets are typically made from pure silk, and sometimes pure wool, which is more challenging. Generations of artisans have for centuries handed down the craft to ensure its survival, and while the carpets are sold for quite a sum, most craftspeople can barely make ends meet.
“I just help my husband so that we have a modicum of decent income to run our household,” Shameema, 43, said as she and Mohamad rhythmically plucked at the colorful silk threads in their dimly lit workshop in Indian-controlled Kashmir’s main city, Srinagar. They periodically glance at a yellowed scrap of paper, known as Taleem, or instructions, showcasing the pattern they are working on in an ancient shorthand of symbols and numbers and a cryptic color map.
Both learned the craft at the ages of 9 and 10, respectively.
The industry has survived decades of conflict over the disputed region between nuclear rivals India and Pakistan and withstood the fickleness of fashion to stay in demand, adorning mansions and museums alike.
However, Kashmiri traders say that US President Donald Trump’s tariffs on American imports can deal a hard blow to an already threatened business that is vying to survive amid mass-produced carpets, which are less costly, and artisans abandoning the industry.
Although the tariffs were primarily aimed at major exporters like China, they’ve inadvertently ensnared traditional handicraft industries from regions like Kashmir, which depend on US and European markets for survival.
Carpet exports from India to the US alone are valued at approximately $1.2 billion, out of a total global export value of $2 billion, according to official data.
Mohamad, 50, said he is the only weaver left out of over 100 who shifted to other jobs some two decades back in his neighborhood in Srinagar city’s old downtown.
“I spend months knotting a single rug,” he said, “but if there is no demand, our skills feel worthless,” he added.
Still, thousands of families in Kashmir rely on this craft for their livelihood and the steep 28 percent tariff imposed means the imported carpets will become significantly more expensive for American consumers and retailers.
“If these carpets are going to be more expensive in America, does that mean our wages will rise too?” Mohamad asked.
Not likely.
The increased cost to consumers in the US doesn’t translate into higher wages for weavers, experts say, but rather often leads to reduced orders, lower incomes, and growing uncertainty for the artisans.
This price hike could also push buyers toward cheaper, machine-made alternatives, leaving Kashmiri artisans in the lurch.
Insiders say that unless international trade policies shift to protect traditional industries, Kashmir’s hand-knotted legacy may continue to fray until it disappears.
Wilayat Ali, a Kashmiri carpet supplier, said his trading partner, who exports the carpets to the US, Germany and France, has already canceled at least a dozen orders already in the making.
“The exporter also returned some dozen carpets,” he said.
“It boils down to the hard arithmetic of profit and loss,” Ali explained. “They don’t see thousands of knots in a carpet that takes months to make.”


Hegseth announces latest strike on boat near Venezuela he says was trafficking drugs

Hegseth announces latest strike on boat near Venezuela he says was trafficking drugs
Updated 04 October 2025

Hegseth announces latest strike on boat near Venezuela he says was trafficking drugs

Hegseth announces latest strike on boat near Venezuela he says was trafficking drugs

WASHINGTON: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Friday that he ordered another strike on a small boat he accused of carrying drugs in the waters off Venezuela, expanding what the Trump administration has declared is an “armed conflict” with cartels.
In a post on social media, Hegseth asserted that the “vessel was trafficking narcotics” and those aboard were “narco-terrorists.” He said the strike killed four men but offered no details on who they were or what group they belonged to, following the US designation of several Latin American cartels as foreign terrorist organizations.
President Donald Trump said in his own social media post that the boat was “loaded with enough drugs to kill 25 TO 50 THOUSAND PEOPLE” and implied it was “entering American Territory” while off the coast of Venezuela.
It is the fourth deadly strike in the Caribbean and the latest since revelations that Trump told lawmakers he was treating drug traffickers as unlawful combatants and military force was required to combat them. That assertion of presidential war powers sets the stage for expanded action and raises questions about how far the administration will go without sign-off from Congress.
“Blowing them up without knowing who’s on the boat is a terrible policy, and it should end,” said Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a consistent and harsh critic of the US strikes.
The Trump administration laid out its justification for the strikes in a memo obtained by The Associated Press this week.
“The President determined that the United States is in a non-international armed conflict with these designated terrorist organizations,” according to the memo sent to Congress. Trump directed the Pentagon to “conduct operations against them pursuant to the law of armed conflict,” the document says.
Sen. Jim Risch, Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the president had the authority to go after the cartels without further authorization from Congress under “his general powers under the Constitution as the commander in chief.”
“What could be a bigger defense of this country than keeping out this poison that’s killing thousands of Americans every year?” Risch said Friday.
Paul said only Congress has the authority to declare war and characterized the memo as “a way to pretend like” the administration is notifying lawmakers with a justification for the strikes.
“If they want to declare war, come to Congress and say they want to declare war,” he told the AP. “But you can’t just say it yourself and say, Oh, well, we sent them a note and now we’re at war with unnamed people who we won’t even identify before we kill.”
Hours after Hegseth announced the latest strike, Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez said the “warlike aggression” by the US affects the greater Caribbean, not just Venezuela.
“We see it and feel it, as they murder our countries’ citizens in summary extrajudicial executions,” she said during a conference in Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, focused on colonialism in the West.
Meanwhile, President Nicolás Maduro did not explicitly mention the strikes, but he told conference attendees that his country is ready to defend itself.
“Venezuela has the right to peace, to sovereignty, to existence, and no empire in this world can take it away,” he said. “And if it is necessary to move from an unarmed struggle to an armed struggle, this people will do so. … Colonialism no more.”
Colombian President Gustavo Petro, a leftist leader who has clashed with the Trump administration, accused the US of committing “murder” and urged the victims’ families to “join forces.”
“There are no narco-terrorists on the boats,” he posted on X after the strike was announced. “Drug traffickers live in the US, Europe and Dubai. On that boat are poor Caribbean youth.”
Video of Friday’s strike posted online showed a small boat moving in open water when it suddenly explodes, with water splashing all around it. As the smoke from the explosion clears, the boat is visible, consumed with flames, floating motionless on the water.
With it, at least three of the strikes have now been carried out on vessels that US officials said had originated from Venezuela. The strikes followed a buildup of US maritime forces in the Caribbean unlike any seen in recent times.
The Navy’s presence in the region — eight warships with over 5,000 sailors and Marines — has been pretty stable for weeks, according to two defense officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing operations.
In a post about the first strike last month, Trump claimed the vessel was carrying members of the Tren de Aragua gang. Posts about all the subsequent strikes, including Friday’s, have not provided any details about what organizations have been targeted. The four strikes have killed 21 people, the administration says.
Pentagon officials who briefed senators on the strikes this week could not provide a list of the designated terrorist organizations at the center of the conflict.
Officials in the Pentagon, when asked for more details about the strike, referred The Associated Press back to Hegseth’s post.


Munich Airport shuts again after suspected drones in latest reported sightings in EU airspace

Munich Airport shuts again after suspected drones in latest reported sightings in EU airspace
Updated 04 October 2025

Munich Airport shuts again after suspected drones in latest reported sightings in EU airspace

Munich Airport shuts again after suspected drones in latest reported sightings in EU airspace
  • Germany’s air traffic control previously restricted flights at the airport shortly after 10 p.m. (2000 GMT) on Thursday and then halted them altogether, the airport said in a previous statement

MUNICH: Authorities shut down Munich Airport late Friday, the second closure in less than 24 hours after more suspected drone sightings, the airport said in a statement.
The closures are the latest after mysterious drone overflights in the airspace of European Union member countries.
The airport suspended flight operations Friday night until further notice “as a precautionary measure due to unconfirmed sightings,” the statement said.
Germany’s air traffic control previously restricted flights at the airport shortly after 10 p.m. (2000 GMT) on Thursday and then halted them altogether, the airport said in a previous statement. Seventeen flights were unable to take off, affecting almost 3,000 passengers, while 15 arriving flights were diverted to three other airports in Germany and one in Vienna, Austria.
Flights in and out of the airport then resumed at 5 a.m. (0300 GMT) on Friday, said Stefan Bayer, a spokesperson for Germany’s federal police at Munich airport.
Authorities were not immediately able to provide any information about who was responsible for the overflights.
The latest in a series of drone incidents in Europe
The incident was the latest in a series of incidents of mysterious drone sightings over airports as well as other critical infrastructure sites in several European Union member countries. Drones also were spotted overnight in Belgium above a military base.
A drone incident in Oslo, the capital of Norway, which is a NATO member but not part of the EU, also affected flights there late last month.
It wasn’t immediately clear who has been behind the flyovers. European authorities have expressed concerns that they’re being carried out by Russia, though some experts have noted that anybody with drones could be behind them. Russian authorities have rejected claims of involvement, including in recent drone incidents in Denmark.
Passengers stranded in Munich
The Munich Airport said in a statement early Friday that there had been “several drone sightings,” without elaborating. In a later statement, it clarified that “detection and defense against drones” falls to federal and state police.
Federal police are investigating the reported drone sightings, German news agency dpa reported Friday.
Bayer, the police spokesman, said early Friday it wasn’t immediately clear how many drones might have been involved. He said police, airline employees and “regular people around the airport” were among witnesses who reported the drone sightings.
After the closure of the runways early Friday, federal police deployed helicopters and other means to try to track down the drones, but no signs of them could be found, Bayer said.
Hundreds of stranded passengers spent the night in cots set up in terminals or were taken to hotels, and blankets, drinks and snacks were distributed to them, the German news agency dpa reported.
Alexander Dobrindt, Germany’s interior minister said he and some European counterparts would discuss the drone incursions, and a “drone detection and defense plan” at a meeting this weekend in Munich.
“We are in a race between drone threat and drone defense. We want to and must win this race,” he said in the western city of Saarbrücken, where he joined German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron at a ceremony to mark the 35th anniversary of Germany’s reunification.
Drones were spotted overnight in Belgium
In Belgium, several drones were spotted overnight Thursday into Friday above a military base near the German border, Defense Minister Theo Francken told Le Soir newspaper.
The minister did not confirm how many drones were flying in the vicinity of the Elsenborn military base — which serves mainly as an army training facility with a firing range – just after midnight. Belgian public broadcaster VRT said that 15 drones were spotted near the base, which is roughly 600 kilometers (about 375 miles) from Munich.
Francken underlined that the nature of the flights was “suspicious and unknown,” Le Soir said. A defense ministry investigation is ongoing.
‘Anybody’ could be behind the flyovers
Hans-Christian Mathiesen, vice president of defense programs at Sky-Watch, a Danish maker of a fixed-wing combat drone that is being used in Ukraine, said “it could be anybody” who could carry out a drone flyover like the one at Munich airport.
“If you have a drone, you can always fly it into restricted airspace and disrupt activity. So everything from boys not thinking about what they’re doing — just fooling around — to someone that is doing it with a purpose: Criminal organizations, state actors, you name it,” said Mathiesen, whose company is involved in the fast-evolving drone ecosystem.
A state actor could disrupt activities and examine responses “with a minimal level of effort,” he said.
Officials in Russia and close ally Belarus acknowledged last month that some drones used as part of Russia’s war in Ukraine had entered the territory of EU and NATO member Poland, prompting a scramble by Polish and NATO allies in which fighter jets were deployed to shoot them down.
The drone overflights were a major focus of a summit of EU and European leaders in Copenhagen, Denmark, this week. Authorities have vowed to step up measures to minimize and thwart the threat posed by drones.
A Russian tanker is back at sea
Separately, a Russia-linked oil tanker that authorities in France detained — which had been suspected of involvement in the drone incursions over Denmark — was back at sea on Friday. The ship-tracking website Marine Traffic showed the ship leaving the French Atlantic coast where it was detained and apparently bound for the Suez Canal.
A thorough search by French Navy commandos that boarded the ship found no drones, no drone-launching equipment and no evidence that drones had taken off from the vessel, according to an official with knowledge of the investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss it publicly.
The tanker’s name has changed several times and it’s now known as “Pushpa” or “Boracay.” Its route from a Russian oil terminal into the Atlantic took it past the coast of Denmark.

 


Italy-Libya migration pact under scrutiny as bullets fly

Italy-Libya migration pact under scrutiny as bullets fly
Updated 04 October 2025

Italy-Libya migration pact under scrutiny as bullets fly

Italy-Libya migration pact under scrutiny as bullets fly
  • The project is credited with sharply reducing the number of migrants reaching Italy via sea — a priority of Meloni’s far-right Brothers of Italy party

ROME: Years of criticism of an EU-backed migration pact between Italy and Libya are coming to a head as migrant rescuers say the Libyan coast guard has begun firing directly at them.
“Hundreds of bullets were fired during 20 terrifying minutes” in an attack “deliberately targeting crew members on the bridge... at head height,” said SOS Mediterranee, the charity running the Ocean Viking ship, in August.
Last week, German charity Sea-Watch said its rescue ship was also shot at by the Libyan coast guard using live ammunition.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s government and the European Union provide funding and training to the Libyan coast guard to intercept people attempting the crossing to Europe.
The project is credited with sharply reducing the number of migrants reaching Italy via sea — a priority of Meloni’s far-right Brothers of Italy party.
But the agreement, signed in 2017 by the then-center-left government, has been increasingly criticized amid numerous reports that EU-funded detention centers in Libya are run by human traffickers, who also collude with the coast guard.
Critics say that makes Italy and the EU complicit in human rights breaches by war-torn Libya, and opposition parties are calling for the deal to be scrapped before it automatically renews in February.
Italy would have to give notice on pulling out by next month — although there is no sign that Meloni’s government will do so.
“Libya holds at the moment quite an important leverage over Italy in the same way that Turkiye did over the EU in terms of threatening” to let millions of migrants leave for Europe, said Diana Volpe, a postdoctoral fellow at the Free University of Brussels and expert in Italy’s outsourcing of migration control.

- ‘Outsource dirty work’ -

Libyan patrol boats have long used aggressive tactics while attempting to stop charities picking up migrants, but the shift from warning shots to direct fire is alarming.
“It’s unacceptable that the Italian government and the EU allows criminal militia to fire on civilians,” said Sea-Watch spokeswoman Giorgia Linardi after last week’s incident.
Mediterranea Saving Humans, another rescue charity, last month also published photographs which it said showed a militia allied with the Libyan government trafficking people in the Mediterranean.
Some 42 civil society groups have written to the Eiuropean Commission to denounce the use of EU funds for “organizations that attack European citizens and people in distress at sea,” and to demand the Italy-Libya deal be axed.
The patrol boats involved were given to Libya by Italy as part of a deal to train and equip the coast guard, according to the charities and Italian investigative journalists.
Volpe said the accord was “specifically created” by Italy to get around the fact Libya is not considered by the UN to be a “place of safety,” so Rome cannot return migrants there itself.
Instead of Italy performing illegal “pushbacks” — the forced return of people to countries where they would be unsafe — Rome enabled Libya to perform its own “pullbacks.”
Those picked up by the Libyan coast guard are locked in detention centers that are regularly denounced by the UN for poor conditions.
Matteo Orfini, an opposition MP who campaigns against the Italy-Libya deal, told AFP it was “a tool through which we... outsource dirty work to Libyan armed gangs.”

- EU awaits probes -

Italian opposition parties say the accord has exposed the government to blackmail.
They linked Rome’s release in January of a Libyan war crimes suspect wanted by the International Criminal Court to a desire not to jeopardize the deal.
Osama Almasri Najim is accused of charges including murder, rape and torture relating to his management of Tripoli’s Mitiga detention center.
It is difficult to know how much money Rome and the EU have spent on the Libyan scheme.
The EU says it spent some 465 million euros ($545 million) on Libya in the area of migration between 2015 to 2021, while another 65 million euros was allocated for “protection and border management” in Libya from 2021 to 2027.
The bloc also provides assistance to the Libyan coast guard through two civilian and military missions.
After the shots were fired at the NGO boats, Commission spokesman Guillaume Mercier said Brussels would “await the developments of the investigations” taking place in Libya.
But Volpe was dismissive. “It’s been almost a decade now of videos of human rights abuses happening at sea and in the detention centers.”
Yet those have not stopped the EU or Italy retracting “their support, either financial or political.”
 

 


Taliban celebrates fourth anniversary of return to power

Taliban celebrates fourth anniversary of return to power
Updated 03 October 2025

Taliban celebrates fourth anniversary of return to power

Taliban celebrates fourth anniversary of return to power
  • This year’s anniversary celebrations were more muted than last year’s, when the Taliban staged a military parade at a US air base, drawing anger from President Donald Trump about the abandoned American hardware on display

ISLAMABAD: Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers celebrated the fourth anniversary of their return to power in August, with Defense Ministry helicopters scattering flowers from the air to crowds below.
Some 10,000 people gathered across the capital, Kabul, in six locations to watch the “flower shower.”
The Taliban seized controlof Afghanistan on Aug. 15, 2021, as the US and NATO withdrew their forces at the end of a two-decade war.
Since then, they have reimposed their interpretation of Islamic law on daily life, including sweeping restrictions on women and girls, based on edicts from their leader Hibatullah Akhundzada.
The anniversary program also comprised speeches from key Cabinet members. An outdoor sports performance, initially expected to feature Afghan athletes, did not take place.
Members of the United Afghan Women’s Movement for Freedom staged an indoor protest on Friday in northeast Takhar province against Taliban rule.
“This day marked the beginning of a black domination that excluded women from work, education, and social life,” the movement said in a statement shared with The Associated Press. “We, the protesting women, remember this day not as a memory, but as an open wound of history, a wound that has not yet healed. The fall of Afghanistan was not the fall of our will. We stand, even in the darkness.”
Rights groups, foreign governments, and the UN have condemned the Taliban for their treatment of women and girls, who are barred from education beyond sixth grade, many jobs, and some public spaces.
There was also an indoor protest in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad.
Afghan women held up signs that said, “Forgiving the Taliban is an act of enmity against humanity” and “August 15th is a dark day.”
Taliban leader warns God will punish the ungrateful
Earlier in the day, the Taliban leader warned God would severely punish Afghans who were ungrateful for Islamic rule in the country, according to a statement.
Akhundzada, who is seldom seen in public, said in a statement that Afghans had endured hardships and made sacrifices for almost 50 years so that Islamic law, or Sharia, could be established. Sharia had saved people from “corruption, oppression, usurpation, drugs, theft, robbery, and plunder.”
“These are great divine blessings that our people should not forget and, during the commemoration of Victory Day (Aug. 15), express great gratitude to Allah Almighty so that the blessings will increase,” said Akhundzada in comments shared on the social platform X.
“If, against God’s will, we fail to express gratitude for blessings and are ungrateful for them, we will be subjected to the severe punishment of Allah Almighty,” he said.
Cabinet members gave speeches listing the administration’s achievements and highlighting diplomatic progress. Those who spoke included Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi and Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani.
Earlier in August, at a Cabinet meeting in Kandahar, Akhundzada said the stability of the Taliban government lay in the acquisition of religious knowledge.
He urged the promotion of religious awareness, the discouragement of immoral conduct, the protection of citizens from harmful ideologies, and the instruction of Afghans in matters of faith and creed, according to a statement shared by government spokesman, Hamdullah Fitrat.
Akhundzada ordered the Kabul Municipality to build more mosques, and there was a general focus on identifying means to “further consolidate and fortify” the Islamic government, said Fitrat.
This year’s anniversary celebrations were more muted than last year’s, when the Taliban staged a military parade at a US air base, drawing anger from President Donald Trump about the abandoned American hardware on display.
The country is also gripped by a humanitarian crisis made worse by climate change, millions of Afghans expelled from Iran and Pakistan, and a sharp drop in donor funding.

 


Church of England names first female Archbishop of Canterbury

Church of England names first female Archbishop of Canterbury
Updated 03 October 2025

Church of England names first female Archbishop of Canterbury

Church of England names first female Archbishop of Canterbury
  • Conservative Anglican group condemns appointment of a woman
  • Mullally has been Bishop of London since 2018 and championed liberal causes

CANTERBURY, England: The Church of England named Sarah Mullally on Friday as the next Archbishop of Canterbury, the first woman to serve as ceremonial head of Anglican Christianity worldwide, prompting immediate criticism from conservative church leaders in Africa.
The 63-year-old bishop, who once served as England’s top nurse, will, like her predecessors, face a Communion divided between conservatives and more liberal Christians over the role of women in the Church and the acceptance of same-sex couples.
While the appointment was welcomed by many religious leaders in Britain, Laurent Mbanda, archbishop of Rwanda and chairman of a global grouping of conservative Anglican churches, told Reuters that Mullally would not unite the Communion.
A bishop in Nigeria said the choice was “very dangerous” because women should follow men. The Church of England’s evangelical wing also called for a halt to what it called a drift away from scripture.

Mullally has championed liberal causes

Bishop of London since 2018, Mullally has previously championed blessings for same-sex couples, a major source of contention in the global Anglican Communion. Homosexuality is outlawed in some African countries.
In an address in Canterbury Cathedral on Friday, she said she would seek to help every ministry to flourish, “whatever our tradition.”
On same-sex relationships, she told Reuters in an interview that the Church of England and the broader Anglican Communion had long wrestled with difficult issues.
“It may not be resolved quickly,” she added.
Mullally said she wanted the Church to tackle the misuse of power after sexual abuse scandals and safeguarding issues, and she condemned rising antisemitism following an attack on a synagogue in Manchester on Thursday which killed two men.
The Church of England, which broke away from Roman Catholicism in the 16th century, has allowed women to be ordained as priests for more than 30 years and to become bishops for more than a decade.
Those reforms have been rejected by many churches in Africa and Asia which fall under the Anglican Communion and consider the Archbishop of Canterbury as their ceremonial head but set their own rules.
“Christ is the head of the Church, man is the head of the family, and from creation God has never handed over the position of leadership to woman,” Nigeria’s Funkuro Godrules Victor Amgbare, Bishop of Northern Izon, told Reuters in Abuja.
The Vatican, which does not allow women to be ordained as priests, welcomed Mullally’s appointment in a statement, noting that the challenges facing the Anglican church were “considerable.”

Safeguarding improvements needed

Mullally will replace Justin Welby, who resigned over a child abuse cover-up scandal and who was criticized by some Anglicans for taking an activist role on social issues.
In Friday’s cathedral address she spoke of the difficulties of an age which “craves certainty and tribalism” and a country which is wrestling with complex moral and political questions.
She noted the “horrific violence” of the previous day’s synagogue attack, saying it revealed “hatred that rises up through fractures across our communities.”
Mullally, who as a bishop already holds a seat in the British parliament’s House of Lords, is also an outspoken opponent of legislation currently being debated to allow assisted dying.

'It's all about people'

Mullally is a former cancer nurse who worked as England’s Chief Nursing Officer in the early 2000s. She was ordained as a priest in 2002 and became one of the first women consecrated as a bishop in the Church of England in 2015.
The married mother of two adult children said there were similarities between nursing and Christian ministry.
“It’s all about people, and sitting with people during the most difficult times in their lives,” she once told a magazine.
Linda Woodhead, professor of theology and religious studies at King’s College London, said the Church needed Mullally’s strong management skills.
“Her emphasis on unity, gentleness and strength is exactly what the Church, and nation, needs right now,” she said.
Reflecting the Church’s status as England’s established faith, the appointment was announced by Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s office and given formal assent by King Charles. The monarch has been supreme governor of the Church of England for nearly 500 years since Henry VIII broke from the pope in Rome.
David Pestell, 74, who heads a tourist guide group in Canterbury, reflected on Mullally’s predecessors.
“Some of them have been very good, some of them have been pretty bad,” he said. “Some of them have been very contentious, and some of them ended up murdered. I hope it doesn’t happen to this one. It’s delightful.”