ֱ

Trump blames Zelensky for ‘millions’ of deaths in Russian invasion

Trump blames Zelensky for ‘millions’ of deaths in Russian invasion
“Let’s say Putin number one, but let’s say Biden, who had no idea what the hell he was doing, number two, and Zelensky,” Trump said during a meeting with the visiting president of El Salvador. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 15 April 2025

Trump blames Zelensky for ‘millions’ of deaths in Russian invasion

Trump blames Zelensky for ‘millions’ of deaths in Russian invasion
  • Donald Trump: ‘Let’s say Putin number one, but let’s say Biden, who had no idea what the hell he was doing, number two, and Zelensky’
  • Trump: ‘You don’t start a war against somebody that’s 20 times your size, and then hope that people give you some missiles’

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump resumed his attempts Monday to blame Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky for Russia’s invasion, falsely accusing him of responsibility for “millions” of deaths.
Trump — who had a blazing public row in the Oval Office with Zelensky six weeks ago — said the Ukranian shared the blame with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who ordered the February 2022 invasion, and then-US president Joe Biden.
The Republican told reporters that there were “millions of people dead because of three people.”
“Let’s say Putin number one, but let’s say Biden, who had no idea what the hell he was doing, number two, and Zelensky,” Trump said during a meeting with the visiting president of El Salvador.
Trump then doubled down on his attack on Zelensky.
“He’s always looking to purchase missiles,” he said dismissively of the Ukrainian leader’s attempts to maintain his country’s defense against the Russian invasion.
“When you start a war, you got to know that you can win the war,” Trump said. “You don’t start a war against somebody that’s 20 times your size, and then hope that people give you some missiles.”
Relations between Trump and Zelensky have been tense ever since the US president stunned the world by opening talks with Russia in February.
In the run-up to their televised row on February 28 Trump repeatedly echoed Moscow’s talking points — blaming Ukraine for the war and calling Zelensky a “dictator without elections.”
Zelensky has since tried to patch things up, including sending a delegation to Washington last week to discuss a mineral deal Trump has called for, that would give the US preferential access to Ukrainian natural resources.
But the US leader has stepped up his rhetoric in the last few days.
Trump however insisted a deal to end the Ukraine war was possible, despite Ukrainian accusations that Moscow is stalling.
“I want to stop the killing, and I think we’re doing well in that regard. I think you’ll have some very good proposals very soon,” Trump said.
Trump’s comments came despite a deadly Russian strike on the Ukrainian city of Sumy on Sunday that killed at least 35 people, one of the deadliest attacks of the war.
The US president said on Sunday that the attack was a “mistake” but did not elaborate. Russia insisted Monday that its missiles hit a meeting of Ukrainian army commanders.
Zelensky urged US counterpart Donald Trump in a CBS interview broadcast Sunday to visit his country to better understand the devastation wrought by Russia’s invasion.


Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital

Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital
Updated 40 sec ago

Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital

Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital
  • Militants destroyed more than 4,000 manuscripts after they seized Timbuktu in 2012
  • Mali has long battled an insurgency by armed militants, including allies of Al-Qaeda and Daesh group

BAMAKO: The Malian military government on Monday started returning home the historic manuscripts of Timbuktu, which were spirited out of their fabled northern city when it was occupied by Al-Qaeda-linked militants more than a decade ago.
Islamic radicals destroyed more than 4,000 manuscripts, some dating back to the 13th century, after they seized Timbuktu in 2012, according to the findings of a United Nations expert mission. They also destroyed nine mausoleums and a mosque’s door — all but one of the buildings on the UNESCO World Heritage list.
The majority of the documents dating back to the 13th century — more than 27,000 — were saved by the devotion of the Timbuktu library’s Malian custodians, who carried them out of the occupied city in rice sacks, on donkey carts, by motorcycle, by boat and four-wheel drive vehicles.
The first batch of the manuscripts were brought to Timbuktu by plane from the capital of Bamako, authorities said, adding that the return was necessary to protect them from the threats of Bamako’s humidity.
The shipment consisted of more than 200 crates and weighed some 5.5 tons. The rest would be shipped in the coming days, officials said.
About 706 kilometers (439 miles) from Bamako, Timbuktu sits on the edge of the Sahara desert and has a dry climate. For years, the local municipal and religious authorities have asked for the return of the manuscripts.
Diahara Touré, Timbuktu’s deputy mayor, said the famous documents are important to the local people as they “reflect our civilization and spiritual and intellectual heritage.”
“This is the first stage” of the return, said Bilal Mahamane Traoré, a local official.
In February, the military government made a commitment to return the manuscripts, according to Bouréma Kansaye, the Malian Minister of Higher Education. He described them as as a “legacy that bears witness to the intellectual greatness and crossroads of civilization” of the city of Timbuktu — “a bridge between the past and the future.”
“We now have a responsibility to protect, digitize, study, and promote these treasures so that they continue to enlighten Mali, Africa, and the world,” Kansaye said during Monday’s return ceremony.
The manuscripts, which UNESCO has designated as part of the World Cultural Heritage, cover a myriad subjects, from Islamic theology and jurisprudence, astronomy, medicine, mathematics, history, and geography. They are a testimony to the rich cultural heritage of the Mali and Songhai empires in West Africa.
Mali, along with neighboring Burkina Faso and Niger, has long battled an insurgency by armed militants, including some allied with Al-Qaeda and the Daesh group. Following two military coups, the ruling junta expelled French troops and instead turned to Russia for security assistance.
Still, 13 years after the occupation of Timbuktu, the security situation in Mali remains precarious and analysts say it has worsened in recent months. Although the city is back under government control, militants continue attacking its surroundings, including as recently as last month.


EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza

EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza
Updated 22 min 30 sec ago

EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza

EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza
  • EU foreign policy chief also called on Israel to allow more aid into the Gaza Strip

BRUSSELS: The European Union condemned the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in an Israeli strike in the Gaza Strip, the bloc’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday.
“The EU condemns the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in an (Israeli military) airstrike outside Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, including the Al Jazeera correspondent Anas Al-Sharif,” she said after EU foreign ministers discussed the war in virtual talks.
An Israeli military statement accused Sharif of heading a Hamas “terrorist cell” and being “responsible for advancing rocket attacks” against Israelis.
The EU took note of Israel’s allegation, Kallas said, “but there is a need in these cases to provide clear evidence, in the respect of rule of law, to avoid targeting of journalists.”
The 27-country bloc has struggled to take action over the conflict in Gaza as it is divided between staunch supporters of Israel and those who defend the Palestinians.
The EU struck a deal last month to increase aid access to Gaza, but senior officials have said the agreement has been only partially implemented.
Kallas called on Israel to allow more aid into the territory.
“Whereas there is more aid coming in, the needs are still much greater. We urge Israel to allow more trucks and a better distribution of aid,” she said.


UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London
Updated 47 min 58 sec ago

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London
  • 532 people were arrested during Saturday’s demonstration in Parliament Square, 522 of them for displaying support for the proscribed group, and 348 of them were age 50 or over
  • Palestine Action was designated a terrorist organization last month but critics say ‘inappropriate use of terror laws’ exacerbates social divisions and is ‘conflating protest with terrorism’
  • Protesters ‘were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate, to the point of absurdity, to be treating them as terrorists,’ says Amnesty International chief

LONDON: British prime minister Keir Starmer faces mounting criticism after hundreds of people were detained during a demonstration in Parliament Square in London at the weekend against the government’s decision to ban Palestine Action.

The Metropolitan Police said officers arrested 532 people on Saturday, 522 of them for displaying items in support of the proscribed group. A breakdown of the arrest figures released on Sunday revealed that 348 of those apprehended were age 50 or over, .

The protest, organized by Defend Our Juries, an organization that “supports collective action to expose this corruption of democracy and the rule of law,” took place after ministers warned they would take action against anyone who showed public support for Palestine Action, which was designated a terrorist organization last month.

Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones defended the crackdown, saying: “The right to peacefully protest in this country is a cornerstone of our democracy, and of course we respect that. But with regards to Palestine Action, they are a proscribed terrorist organization and their actions have not been peaceful.

“They have violently carried out criminal damage to RAF aircraft. We have credible reports of them targeting Jewish-owned businesses here in the United Kingdom, and there are other reasons which we can’t disclose because of national security.

“But they are a proscribed terrorist organization and anyone showing support for that terrorist organization will feel the full force of the law.”

The prime minister’s office also defended the proscription, saying it followed “strong security advice” and citing attacks said to be linked to the group involving violence, injury and criminal damage.

Officials said the UK’s Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had linked the group to three separate acts of terrorism.

However, the move drew sharp criticism from across the political spectrum.

Baroness Shami Chakrabarti, a member of Starmer’s ruling Labour Party and of the House of Lords, warned that the ban risked deepening social divisions.

“The proscription of Palestine Action is in danger of becoming a mistake of poll tax proportions,” she told The Independent, referring to a highly unpopular taxation policy of former prime minister Margaret Thatcher’s government that led to violent protests in the early 1990s across the UK.

“The courts have already found an arguable case that it breaches fundamental rights and more, not less, people are coming out to protest against both atrocities in Gaza and inappropriate use of terror laws at home.

“The notable presence of so many older people highlights the strength of genuine feeling. Criminal damage at air force bases can be prosecuted, but sweeping guilt by association only exacerbates community tensions and creates a bigger headache for the police.”

Former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain described the arrests as “madness,” and said Palestine Action was “not equivalent” to terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda or Daesh, adding that this was why he had voted against its ban.

Independent MP Diane Abbott said: “The government is in danger of making itself look both draconian and foolish.”

Left-wing Labour MP Nadia Whittome, who also opposed the ban, accused ministers of “conflating protest with terrorism.” In a message posted on social media platform X, she said: “Last month, I warned that proscribing Palestine Action would result in the mass criminalization of people who are not even members of the group. Now, more than 500 people have been arrested. I voted against the proscription; we shouldn’t be conflating protest with terrorism.”

Former chief prosecutor Nazir Afzal warned that the mass arrests would clog the justice system: “These would probably be jury trials as each of them would be advised to plead not guilty and expect a trial in 2027 at the earliest. I also suspect that no jury would convict anyhow.”

Amnesty International described the level of policing as “disproportionate to the point of absurdity.”

Its chief executive, Sacha Deshmukh, said: “Peaceful protest is a fundamental right. People are understandably outraged by the ongoing genocide being committed in Gaza and are entitled under international human rights law to express their horror.

“The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate, to the point of absurdity, to be treating them as terrorists. We have long criticized UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded, and a threat to freedom of expression. These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.”

Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori said the protest would “go down in our country’s history as a momentous act of collective defiance of an unprecedented attack on our fundamental freedoms.”

She argued that the large number of people granted street bail showed the law was “unenforceable.” Street bail is a process under which arrested individuals can be granted bail before they are taken to a police station.

Under the UK’s Terrorism Act 2000, membership of or support for a proscribed organization carries a maximum prison term of 14 years. In some cases, prosecutions require approval from both the Crown Prosecution Service and the Attorney General.


How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis
Updated 11 August 2025

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis
  • Few Afghans are heading back to their crisis-wracked homeland by choice or with a destination in mind
  • Women and children face particular risks, with restricted rights, food insecurity, and a lack of documentation

DUBAI: Afghan refugees are returning in their thousands — few of them by choice or with a destination in mind. Many of the youngest have never set foot in Afghanistan before. Others are returning to find their homes and livelihoods no longer exist.

What were once considered places of refuge from the unrelenting turmoil back home, neighboring states are now expelling Afghans in waves of forced returns that are pushing crisis-wracked Afghanistan to the brink.

According to Babar Baloch, global spokesperson for the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone, including 1.6 million from Iran and more than 352,000 from Pakistan.

Sami Fakhouri, head of delegation for Afghanistan at the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, witnessed the impact first-hand.

“We are anticipating that an additional 1 million people, possibly more, may return from Iran to Afghanistan by the end of this year,” he told a briefing in Geneva. “The majority didn’t have a say in coming back. They were put on buses and driven to the border.”

Fakhouri said he had seen busloads of families being dropped off at the Islam Qala border in Herat province in recent days, many with no idea where to go. He also sounded the alarm over a critical funding shortfall.

On July 4 alone, more than 50,000 people crossed into Afghanistan from Iran — a dramatic increase from the daily average of 5,000 between January and June. (AFP/File)

The IFRC’s $31.4 million appeal to support returnees is only 10 percent funded. “Whether we can maintain support at this pace is a real concern,” he said.

At the same time, Afghanistan is in no position to absorb the influx of people after four decades of war, occupation, civil unrest and economic crisis have left the country extremely fragile.

The US military withdrawal and the return of the Taliban government in 2021 led to Afghanistan’s global isolation, a freeze on foreign aid and assets, and the near-collapse of public services.

Compounding these challenges is one of the worst droughts Afghanistan has seen in decades, which has devastated crops, depleted water sources, and crippled rural livelihoods.

With more than half the population reliant on agriculture, many returnees have little to go back to in their home villages — forcing them to remain in transit areas or drift toward overcrowded cities.

Aid agencies warn that without climate-resilient recovery plans, the drought will deepen food insecurity and drive even more internal displacement.

UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone

Baloch described the expulsions as “a broader, worrying regional trend,” adding that “refugee-hosting countries have issued return orders with deadlines for Afghans to depart, or face deportation.”

Since those announcements, the situation for Afghans in both Iran and Pakistan has deteriorated rapidly.

These mass returns follow a shift in regional policy, beginning in March when Iran issued a deadline for undocumented Afghans to leave or face arrest.

In June, Pakistan launched its second phase of deportations targeting unregistered Afghans. Both countries cited national security concerns and internal pressure to expel large refugee populations.

Pakistan has defended its forced expulsions, with Talal Chaudhry, an adviser to Islamabad’s Interior Ministry, stating in April that the policy targets only “illegal foreigners.”

The situation for Afghans in both Iran and Pakistan has deteriorated rapidly. (AFP/File)

In February, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan rejected claims that Afghan nationals were being mistreated during the repatriation process.

“In this connection, we also extensively engaged the Afghan side to ensure the smooth repatriation of Afghan nationals,” he told Voice of America.

Iran, meanwhile, has justified its expulsions as a response to national security and economic pressures, particularly following its recent conflict with Israel. Rhetoric on social media has increasingly blamed Afghans for shortages and social issues.

Abdul Rahman Rashid, the Taliban government’s deputy minister for refugees and repatriation, has rebuked host countries for the mass expulsions. And described the removal of Afghans as a “serious violation of international norms, humanitarian principles, and Islamic values.”

“The scale and manner in which Afghan refugees have been forced to return to their homeland is something Afghanistan has never before experienced in its history,” Rashid said in Kabul on July 31.

For the hundreds of thousands now crossing back into Afghanistan each month, the journey does not end at the border. Many are stepping into a future marked by uncertainty, deprivation and loss, without hope, safety or dignity.

Even so, the pace of returns has surged in recent weeks.

On July 4 alone, more than 50,000 people crossed into Afghanistan from Iran — a dramatic increase from the daily average of 5,000 between January and June.

From July 10 to 16, the average was more than 29,000 per day. Inevitably, the scale of arrivals has overwhelmed aid operations at border crossings.

“Our teams are at the borders, receiving and assisting streams of exhausted, hungry, and scared people every day,” Baloch told Arab News.

Afghanistan “is not a safe country for returnees, given the constantly deteriorating human rights situation since the Taliban seized control,” said Richard Bennett. (AFP/File)

“Staff and structures are absolutely inundated,” he said, adding that the UN agency has deployed additional personnel and is distributing essential relief items, hot meals, and emergency financial assistance to meet immediate needs.

“But amid funding constraints, and given the scale and pace of returns, we will not be able to sustain support for more than a few weeks,” said Baloch.

In addition to the operational burden, the nature of these returns has raised serious concerns. Many of those arriving say they had little choice.

Baloch described the situation as “a complex protection crisis,” noting that returns are taking place under difficult and often involuntary conditions.

He said many Afghans felt forced to leave after seeing others deported, and “returnees who arrived in the country in recent months have been sharing concerning stories of increased restrictions, harassment and discrimination.”

Once back, many find themselves in provinces that lack even the most basic services, forcing thousands into temporary transit sites, informal settlements, or already strained households. Many arrive without identity papers, making access to support even more difficult.

“Immense challenges lie ahead for returnees — from accessing documentation, housing, healthcare and education, to rebuilding their lives in a country they do not know,” said Baloch.

Those challenges are already visible. Shelter is scarce, and schools and clinics are either closed or inaccessible to women and girls. Meanwhile, job opportunities are limited — especially for those who have spent years or decades abroad.

UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone. (AFP/File)

“For women and girls in particular, life in Afghanistan brings extreme restrictions,” said Baloch.

Under the Taliban government, most secondary schools and universities remain closed to girls. Women are banned from most forms of employment, including in the nongovernmental organization sector. For many returnee women, it means a life of near-total invisibility.

Even female aid workers have been forced into the shadows. One Afghan humanitarian worker, speaking anonymously to a UN publication, described living in fear while continuing to serve her community.

“I feel depressed,” she said. “As an aid worker, I don’t feel safe, and I am afraid for my life… I am worried that I might be targeted because of my job.”

She described being stopped at checkpoints, harassed for not having a male guardian, and being unable to access work or support systems freely.

“It is so unfair to be deprived of your rights because of your gender. Working is not only my dream or a human right, it is also the way I support my family. Women are half of a country … Let us work, let us learn, let us live.”

Aid workers have also reported a growing number of unaccompanied or separated children among recent returnees — some born abroad and unable to navigate legal systems or school enrolment.

Data for June published by UNICEF, the UN children’s fund, indicates that more than 5,000 unaccompanied or separated Afghan children returned from Iran, many arriving without guardians or legal identity.

The lack of functioning child protection mechanisms places these vulnerable children at risk of exploitation, statelessness, and abuse at a critical stage in their lives.

Human rights experts have also warned of broader risks facing returnees.

Richard Bennett, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in Afghanistan, has said the nation “is not a safe country for returnees, given the constantly deteriorating human rights situation since the Taliban seized control.”

Rights groups have documented cases in which returnees — particularly those with foreign residency or links to international organizations — have faced interrogation or detention upon arrival, fueling fears of surveillance and reprisals.

Despite urgent warnings from aid agencies, the international response has fallen short. The UNHCR has appealed for $71 million to support returnees in the region over a nine-month period.

The IFRC and other aid actors have made separate appeals for immediate assistance at border crossings and for longer-term reintegration support. But donor interest remains weak, with many countries reducing their funding to Afghanistan over governance concerns and competing global crises.

Roza Otunbayeva, the UN secretary-general’s special representative for Afghanistan, called the mass returns “a test of our collective humanity,” warning of further displacement, famine, and instability without urgent action.

Neighboring states are now expelling Afghans in waves of forced returns that are pushing crisis-wracked Afghanistan to the brink. (AFP/File)

She called for an “integrated approach” that combines emergency aid with long-term support for return areas, and stressed that regional dialogue with Iran, Pakistan, and Central Asian states is essential to ensure returns remain voluntary, safe, and dignified.

Baloch echoed those concerns. “We are in touch with the authorities in Iran and Pakistan. UNHCR urges countries in the region to ensure protection for Afghans and that returns to Afghanistan are voluntary, safe, and dignified.”

“We are also calling on the international community to urgently and substantially increase funding — to meet both critical needs at the border upon arrival, and provide longer-term assistance to help returnees settle in Afghanistan,” he said.

 


Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters

Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters
Updated 11 August 2025

Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters

Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters
  • Since 2012, Mali has been wracked with crises on various fronts, with extremists linked to Al-Qaeda or Daesh carrying out violent attacks across the Sahel nation

BAMAKO: Mali’s junta has carried out arrests to quash an alleged plot to overthrow the government within the army’s ranks, sources said, but the circumstances of the detentions remain unexplained.
The junta, which itself came to power in back-to-back coups in 2020 and 2021, has made 55 arrests, mainly among the National Guard, the military branch from which Defense Minister General Sadio Camara hails.
The military-backed government has yet to officially comment on the crackdown, which comes as the army is locked in fighting with terrorists and separatists.
The arrests, which began last week and continued into early Monday, were carried out by the junta following what a security and military source said were “destabilization” attempts.
While Defense Minister Camara, a key figure within the ruling junta, has not been questioned, observers say several of those apprehended are believed to be officers close to him.
According to a Malian security source, civilians could also be questioned soon.
Two generals were among those detained, including Abass Dembele, a former governor of the central Mopti region and a respected military officer.
Gen. Nema Sagara, a rare woman to serve as brigadier general in the Malian Air Force, who also hailed from the center of the country, was the other.
“The situation is a bit complex,” one African diplomat stationed in Bamako said. 
“The government’s silence while arrests have been ongoing for at least four days deserves reflection.”
“Are we dealing with preventive arrests? Were the arrested soldiers in the phase of destabilizing the (junta), as we understand it?” the source asked.
Since 2012, Mali has been wracked with crises on various fronts, with extremists linked to Al-Qaeda or Daesh carrying out violent attacks across the Sahel nation.
Mali’s junta has ramped up repression of its critics in the face of the terrorist unrest.
For Malian sociologist Oumar Maiga, the spate of arrests within the army’s ranks was “proof that the officers are struggling to control the situation.”
When junta chief Gen. Assimi Goita took power after deposing President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita in 2020, he insisted he was committed to the fight against jihadist violence and initially pledged a return to civilian rule.
But the military ultimately reneged on its promise to cede power to elected civilians by the deadline it had set.
The junta announced in May the dissolution of all political parties and organizations, as well as a ban on meetings.
Then in July, Goita extended his military rule for at least five more years without an election.
Gen. Goita’s rule has marked a turning point in Mali’s relationship with the West. 
The country has broken ties with France and other former allies, pivoting toward Russia instead.
Mali and its junta-led neighbors Burkina Faso and Niger have teamed up to create their own confederation, the Alliance of Sahel States, or AES, and have announced the creation of a 5,000-strong force for joint military operations.
Meanwhile, the Malian army and its Russian mercenary allies, which are tasked in particular with tracking down extremists, are regularly accused of rights violations against civilians.