ֱ

Frankly Speaking: An American view on Middle East conflicts

Short Url
Updated 23 March 2025

Frankly Speaking: An American view on Middle East conflicts

Frankly Speaking: An American view on Middle East conflicts
  • Former US intelligence official Norman Roule explains how President Trump’s actions may impact Middle East and whether US can be convinced to back Arab plan to rebuild Gaza
  • Suggests regional actors like ֱ should take on greater responsibility in fostering stability and resolving conflicts from Syria to Ukraine, Yemen to Lebanon

RIYADH: Norman Roule, a former senior US intelligence official and Middle East expert, says pundits ought to take the “glass-half-full” view of President Donald Trump’s efforts to resolve regional conflicts since taking office in January.

Appearing on Arab News’ current affairs program “Frankly Speaking,” he spoke on a wide range of issues, including what Trump’s actions mean for US foreign policy, how they may impact the changes underway in the Middle East, whether Washington can be convinced to back the Arab world’s plan to rebuild Gaza, and whether a Trump-Putin summit in ֱ is on the horizon.

Acknowledging both the Trump administration’s achievements so far and the challenges ahead, Roule said: “We have a president of the United States in the earliest days of his administration who is showing that he is interested in the Middle East, interested in the Palestinian issue, and has devoted his senior most advisers to working that issue. I’m going to take that as a good start.

“The second issue is, he is consulting routinely with regional partners to include ֱ, and that’s always a wise move. He is also speaking with the Jordanians, the Egyptians, and that’s also a smart step.”

Reinforcing the “glass-half-full” argument, Roule said: “We have multiple Arab countries who are showing wise and consistent leadership and are focusing resources and political attention on the political and humanitarian future of the Palestinian people. That should be applauded and it should be endorsed and it deserves international applause and resources.”




Norman Roule, a former senior US intelligence official, spoke to “Frankly Speaking” host Katie Jensen on the possible impact of President Trump’s actions in the Middle East among a number of other topics. (AN Photo)

Earlier this month, the Trump administration broke with longstanding US policy by engaging Hamas, designated a terrorist organization since 1997, to secure the release of American hostages in Gaza.

The US president issued stern warnings to Hamas, demanding immediate hostage release and return of bodies. He threatened severe consequences, stating he was “sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job.”

Roule lauded Trump’s willingness to engage with the various parties in the Israel-Hamas conflict to reach a solution. “I think that it’s a sign that there is a consistency to the Trump administration’s statements,” he told Katie Jensen, the host of “Frankly Speaking.”

“The administration stated as follows: We will speak with anybody for a diplomatic arrangement. We won’t speak endlessly. We will look for alternatives such as moving people to other countries, offering an extension of a ceasefire, doing what’s necessary. We want hostages back. We want peace. We will see where this leads, but we’re not going to tolerate endless, endless violence and endless militancy.”

On March 18, Israel broke the fragile ceasefire, which had been in effect since Jan. 19, and launched a bombardment of the Palestinian enclave, killing at least 400 people within hours, according to Gaza’s health ministry.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Hamas of repeatedly refusing to release the remaining 59 hostages — 24 of whom are believed to be alive — taken on Oct. 7, 2023, during a deadly attack in southern Israel that prompted Israel's widescale bombing campaign in Gaza.

Hamas denied rejecting a proposal from US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and accused Netanyahu of resuming attacks on Gaza to sabotage a ceasefire agreement.

“The challenges that the president and Steve Witkoff have looked at the scale of the devastation in Gaza, and it is extraordinary,” Roule said. “And truth be told, there has never been a reconstruction in the history of the world where 1.5 million people, which include thousands of militant armed gunmen, have stayed in place while reconstruction has occurred.

“It’s just never happened. And their position is these people need to be moved to a place where they can have normal lives while that reconstruction takes place.”

When asked if Netanyahu would dare defy the US president the way he did when Joe Biden and Barack Obama were in office, Roule pointed out that over more than four decades, Israeli politics and Israeli relations with the US “have been complicated.”“We’ve had periods where Israeli leaders who have had very close relations with Washington have had very difficult relations and periods of defiance with Washington,” he said.

“And we’ve also had periods where American presidents who have vowed the strongest support of Israel have cut off financial support and weapons support for Israel out of anger over Israeli actions. … There is turbulence almost inevitably as part of our US-Israeli relationship.”




Smoke rises from a burning building in North Gaza, as seen from the Israel-Gaza border, March 23, 2025. (Reuters)

Turning to Yemen, Roule described the Red Sea crisis as a global concern that requires international cooperation. He argued that the US is effectively waging a war on behalf of the world to protect maritime security and ensure the stability of vital trade routes.

Beginning March 15, the US launched a series of large-scale air and naval attacks against Houthi militant targets in Yemen, marking the most significant American military action in the Middle East since Trump began his second term.

Trump cited the Houthis’ “relentless campaign of piracy, violence, and terrorism” in the Red Sea as the rationale for the strikes, which are part of a broader strategy to restore security in the region and pressure Iran, the Houthis’ main backer.

Since November 2023, the Houthis have launched over 100 attacks on ships in the Red Sea and surrounding waters, claiming they were aimed at supporting Palestinians in Gaza. Targets have included commercial vessels, warships, and Israel-linked ships.

“There are now more than 14 Iranian missile systems being operated in Yemen and more than a dozen, approximately a dozen, drone systems operating from Yemen as well,” Roule said.

He added: “Now that logistics system has been cut because of the naval presence in the area, but Iran can restore this at any time and interdict global trade and indeed provide capabilities that extend that introduction into the Indian Ocean and have greater impact on the world's economy.

“The US is saying that is over. And that means that Iranian Quds Force personnel in Yemen … are now at risk if they are standing near Houthi ballistic missiles, explosive boats or offensive drone systems.”

Roule said that the economic toll of instability in Yemen extends beyond its borders, affecting Sudanese workers, Palestinian laborers in Jordan, and Egypt’s Suez Canal operations.

“We have some significant regional impact,” he said. “Egypt has lost $7 billion in 2024. Palestinian workers in Jordan who take care of thousands of containers of shipping have been unemployed. Sudanese humanitarian aid has been severely diminished because of Red Sea activity.”

When asked about the cost-effectiveness of using advanced fighter jets flying from Qatar and Bahrain against primitive weapons deployed by Yemeni forces, Roule emphasized the need to balance financial considerations with strategic objectives.“This is a serious freedom of navigation issue that does have economic and political consequences and the US playing its role in part because we’re the only world actor with naval capabilities that can do this,” he said.




Beginning March 15, the US launched a series of large-scale air and naval attacks against Houthi militant targets in Yemen. (X/@CENTCOM/Reuters)

“Europe doesn’t have the same level of ships with anti-missile capabilities as the United States. We’ve got to do what we are capable of doing.”

Offering his cost-benefit analysis of the decision to counter Houthi attacks, Roule said: “Sometimes people say it’s a $4 million missile bringing down a $100,000 drone, that’s true. But the actual way of looking at that is, it’s a $4 million missile preventing a $100,000 drone from hitting a $1 billion ship.”

Roule also suggested that Arab powers should take on greater responsibility in resolving Yemen’s conflict.“There is very little likelihood there will be negotiations with the Houthis. The Trump administration will, and should, leave the Yemen issue to regional partners to work,” he said, stressing that it is “a regional issue, not an American issue.”

Moving on to Syria, Roule noted with satisfaction the new government’s “strong actions against Iranian proxies” and the fact that “Hezbollah’s relationship with Syria has indeed been cut.” “Likewise, we’ve got Syria not allowing massive Russian bases in the region. And this isn’t a world where we should have massive Russian bases in that part of the world from the American standpoint,” he said.

“We have seen some very promising developments between the Syrian Democratic Forces, how Kurds are handled between the new Syrian government and the Kurds. And in some ways, this is again where Saudi diplomats, where Arab diplomats, where Syrian diplomats, need to push this case with Congress, with the American media. … The challenge remains.”

Does Roule think that the sanctions, which were imposed essentially on the Bashar Assad regime, should be lifted?

“The answer is yes, but at the same time, the new regime, which is led by people with dark backgrounds, needs to prove itself,” he said. “It is attempting to do so. It is not a monolith in terms of its organization or its structure.”

Asked how a local solution, even if it is from Arab governments, can be found if US sanctions remain in place, he said: “Sanctions waivers should be provided, should be watched carefully across the board.

“Syrians should be encouraged to come home and provide it with financial relief so that they can return with resources to start businesses, to enable their families to thrive and build communities. And the West can be part of that. And your show and other voices should be encouraging that.”

Roule reiterated his point that regional actors ought to play a more prominent role in Syria’s conflict resolution.“This is an Arab issue,” he said. “This is an example where we’ve watched ֱ and others, but ֱ, since we’re speaking about the Kingdom, play an important and profound role in shaping regional events.”

He emphasized that the US and the West “need not to lead what happens with Syria, but to partner and to follow behind the leadership of the Kingdom so that we are enabling the region to, in essence, build itself.”

“Now, we can help, the United States can help in making sure Israel doesn't complicate things,” he said. “We can help and make sure that Western banks help Syria as needed.”

Despite widespread instability in the region, Roule expressed optimism about Lebanon’s future, describing the country as a potential “bright spot” for 2025. According to him, President Joseph Aoun has been saying and doing “all of the right things,” including how his government has been handling security, pushing back on Hezbollah, and “preventing Iran from bringing in cash.”

“It’s all positive,” he said. “I think Lebanon is going to be one of the bright spots of 2025.”

Roule praised Morgan Ortagus, the deputy US special envoy to the Middle East, for her contribution, describing her as “a very smart, capable, sober person” who has been achieving “considerable progress.”

Ortagus’ involvement in Lebanon has centered on addressing the aftermath of the Israel-Hezbollah conflict — which started on Oct. 8, 2023, and escalated since September 2024 — and on fostering regional stability.

“She’s tireless in her focus on bringing Lebanon to the attention of policymakers and making sure that they get what they need from Congress and elsewhere,” he said.




Appearing on Arab News’ current affairs program “Frankly Speaking,” Roule spoke on a wide range of issues, including what Trump’s actions mean for US foreign policy, how they may impact the changes underway in the Middle East. (AN Photo)

Roule also highlighted ֱ’s growing influence as a mediator in international diplomacy. The Kingdom has successfully brokered deals between Russia and Ukraine and facilitated prisoner exchanges — roles traditionally played by Switzerland or European nations. This shift has earned ֱ significant respect on the global stage.

According to him, ֱ’s stature in the international community “has dramatically changed in recent years.”

“It is impossible not to recognize that ֱ is a meeting place for every globally important issue,” Roule said. “Caribbean leaders, Central Asian leaders, meetings that at one time would take place in Geneva, Paris, Berlin, Washington, now take place in Riyadh or Jeddah.”

He pointed to the upcoming March 24 meeting between Ukrainian and Russian technical teams in Jeddah as an example of this transformation. “That’s the sort of thing you used to see in Europe,” he remarked, emphasizing how ֱ has positioned itself as a mediator in high-stakes international conflicts.

Roule said ֱ’s “global stature is significantly greater” owing to the leadership of King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Once viewed, both regionally and globally, primarily through the lens of Islam or energy, ֱ now plays a bigger role in shaping international events, he said.

Turning to broader geopolitical dynamics, Roule addressed speculation about an imminent Trump-Putin summit. Differing views on ceasefire terms among the US, Ukraine and Russia highlight the complexities of reaching a lasting resolution. Led by top officials from the US, Russia and Ukraine, negotiations to end the conflict in Europe reflect broader efforts to de-escalate tensions.

Despite recent agreements, including Russia’s temporary halt on strikes against Ukrainian energy infrastructure, challenges remain. While acknowledging the momentum toward such a meeting, Roule cautioned that unresolved issues must be addressed first.

“I think President Trump and President Putin will each want some sort of broader agreement, some sort of progress to take place,” he said, referring to recent discussions aimed at halting energy-related attacks between Russia and Ukraine.

He explained that while initial agreements have led to some steps — such as Russia halting attacks on Ukrainian energy sites — implementation remains uneven. Pointing to reports of Russian drone strikes during negotiations, he noted that Russia claimed to have recalled or intercepted its own drones to prevent further escalation.

Lauding the mediation of ֱ and the UAE, he said: “We’re watching again the region play a bigger role in bringing together not only Ukraine and Russia but also freeing prisoners between the countries. ֱ has brought home prisoners to the US from Russia, but also Ukrainian and Russian prisoners.

“Riyadh has done a number of remarkable things. We need we need a broader set of agreements to take place. Steve Witkoff and a number of Russian advisers, I believe, are in quiet communications behind the scenes. This is going to need to percolate for a while.”

Alluding to Ukraine-Russia talks set for the week of March 24 in ֱ, expected to focus on securing safe shipping in the Black Sea and a potential interim ceasefire, Roule said: “We’ll see where this goes. I’d watch the technical discussions that take place in Jeddah. There is a momentum that’s building here. That is clear.”


Netanyahu ordered drone attacks on Gaza-bound aid boats off Tunisia last month, CBS News reports

Netanyahu ordered drone attacks on Gaza-bound aid boats off Tunisia last month, CBS News reports
Updated 04 October 2025

Netanyahu ordered drone attacks on Gaza-bound aid boats off Tunisia last month, CBS News reports

Netanyahu ordered drone attacks on Gaza-bound aid boats off Tunisia last month, CBS News reports
  • Israeli forces on September 8 and 9 launched drones from a submarine and dropped incendiary devices onto the boats that were moored outside the Tunisian port of Sidi Bou Said

JERUSALEM: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu directly approved military operations on two vessels last month that were part of the Gaza-bound Global Sumud Flotilla carrying aid and pro-Palestinian supporters, CBS News reported on Friday, citing two U.S. intelligence officials.
Israeli forces on September 8 and 9 launched drones from a submarine and dropped incendiary devices onto the boats that were moored outside the Tunisian port of Sidi Bou Said, causing a fire, according to the report.

 


A court in Tunisia sentenced a man to death for Facebook posts seen as insulting to the president

A court in Tunisia sentenced a man to death for Facebook posts seen as insulting to the president
Updated 04 October 2025

A court in Tunisia sentenced a man to death for Facebook posts seen as insulting to the president

A court in Tunisia sentenced a man to death for Facebook posts seen as insulting to the president
  • The ruling is the first of its kind in Tunisia, where dozens have been handed heavy prison sentences over similar charges since Saied seized power over all branches of government in July 2021

TUNIS, Tunisia: A court in Tunisia has sentenced a 51-year-old man to death over Facebook posts deemed offensive to President Kais Saied and a threat to state security, his lawyer said Friday.
Saber Chouchen was convicted on Wednesday of three charges: attempting to overthrow the state, insulting the president and spreading false information online. Judges said the posts incited violence and chaos and violated Tunisia’s penal code as well as the controversial 2022 cybercrime law, Decree 54.
The ruling is the first of its kind in Tunisia, where dozens have been handed heavy prison sentences over similar charges since Saied seized power over all branches of government in July 2021.
Although capital punishment remains in Tunisia’s penal code and civilian courts occasionally issue death sentences, none have been carried out since the execution of a serial killer in 1991.
In a statement on Facebook, lawyer Oussama Bouthelja said his client had been in pretrial detention since January 2024. He said he was a father of three and an occasional day laborer who suffers from a permanent disability caused by a workplace accident.
Bouthelja described him as socially vulnerable and of a limited educational background, with little influence online.
“Most of the content he shared was copied from other pages, and some posts received no engagement at all,” Bouthelja wrote. “In court, he said his intent was to draw authorities’ attention to his difficult living conditions, not to incite unrest.”
The ruling is the latest to use Decree 54, a law that makes it illegal “to produce, spread, disseminate, send or write false news ... with the aim of infringing the rights of others, harming public safety or national defense or sowing terror among the population.” Since its passage in 2022, journalists and human rights groups have condemned the law as a key tool used by authorities to curb freedom of expression in Tunisia.
Tunisia, the birthplace of the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings, was long seen as the last beacon of hope for democracy in the Middle East and North Africa. However, since Saied suspended parliament and consolidated his own power in 2021, political freedoms have shrunk. Saied continues to rule by decree and his most well-known critics are either in prison or abroad.
Rights advocates in Tunisia warned that applying the death penalty for online speech sets a dangerous precedent.

 


Trump orders Israel to stop bombing Gaza after Hamas partially accepts his peace plan

Trump orders Israel to stop bombing Gaza after Hamas partially accepts his peace plan
Updated 04 October 2025

Trump orders Israel to stop bombing Gaza after Hamas partially accepts his peace plan

Trump orders Israel to stop bombing Gaza after Hamas partially accepts his peace plan
  • Hamas statement says it agrees to release hostages and hand over administration of the territory
  • Group says it is immediately ready to enter negotiations to discuss details

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip: US President Donald Trump on Friday ordered Israel to stop bombing the Gaza Strip after Hamas said it had accepted some elements of his plan to end the nearly two-year war and return all the remaining hostages taken in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack.
Hamas said it was willing to release the hostages and hand over power to other Palestinians, but that other aspects of the plan require further consultations among Palestinians. Senior Hamas officials suggested there were still major disagreements that required further negotiations.
There was no immediate response from Israel, which is largely shut down for the Jewish Sabbath, and Hamas’ response fell short of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s demands that the group surrender and disarm.
But Trump welcomed Hamas’ response, saying: “I believe they are ready for a lasting PEACE.”
“Israel must immediately stop the bombing of Gaza, so that we can get the Hostages out safely and quickly! Right now, it’s far too dangerous to do that. We are already in discussions on details to be worked out,” he wrote on social media.
Hamas said aspects of the proposal touching on the future of the Gaza Strip and Palestinian rights should be decided on the basis of a “unanimous Palestinian stance” reached with other factions and based on international law.
The statement also made no mention of Hamas disarming, a key Israeli demand included in Trump’s proposal.
Trump’s plan would end the fighting and return hostages
Trump appears keen to deliver on pledges to end the war and return dozens of hostages ahead of the second anniversary of the attack on Tuesday. His peace plan has been accepted by Israel and welcomed internationally, but key mediators Egypt and Qatar have said some elements need further negotiation.
Egypt welcomed the Hamas statement, saying that it shows that the Palestinians want to “end a dark period in the history of the region,” and pave the way for a future state, something Israel opposes.
Earlier, Trump had warned that Hamas must agree to the deal by Sunday evening, threatening an even greater military onslaught.
“If this LAST CHANCE agreement is not reached, all HELL, like no one has ever seen before, will break out against Hamas,” Trump wrote Friday on social media. “THERE WILL BE PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.”
Under the plan, which Trump unveiled earlier this week alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Hamas would immediately release the remaining 48 hostages — around 20 of them believed to be alive. It would also give up power and disarm.
In return, Israel would halt its offensive and withdraw from much of the territory, release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and allow an influx of humanitarian aid and eventual reconstruction. Plans to relocate much of Gaza’s population to other countries would be shelved.
The territory of some 2 million Palestinians would be placed under international governance, with Trump himself and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair overseeing it. The plan provides no path for eventual reunification with the Israeli-occupied West Bank in a future Palestinian state.
Palestinians long for an end to the war, but many view this and previous US proposals as strongly favoring Israel.
Hamas officials air objections in TV interviews
Trump’s proposal “cannot be implemented without negotiations,” Mousa Abu Marzouk, a senior Hamas official based outside of Gaza, told the Al Jazeera network.
 


READ MORE

What new polling reveals about Palestinian pessimism and fading support for HamasWhat could derail Trump’s 20-point Gaza peace plan?


The Hamas statement said it was willing to return all remaining hostages according to the plan’s “formula,” likely referring to the release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners in exchange. It also reiterated its longstanding openness to handing power over to a politically independent Palestinian body.
But Abu Marzouk said it might be difficult for Hamas to release all the hostages within 72 hours as the proposal dictates, because it could take days or weeks to locate the remains of some of the captives.
He said Hamas was willing to hand over its weapons to a future Palestinian body that runs Gaza, but there was no mention of that in the official statement.
Another Hamas official, Osama Hamdan, told Al Araby television that Hamas would refuse foreign administration of the Gaza Strip and that the entry of foreign forces would be “unacceptable.”
US and Israel seek to pressure Hamas
Israel has sought to ramp up pressure on Hamas since ending an earlier ceasefire in March. It sealed the territory off from food, medicine and other goods for 2 1/2 months and has seized, flattened and largely depopulated large areas.
Experts determined that Gaza City had slid into famine shortly before Israel launched a major offensive aimed at occupying it. An estimated 400,000 people have fled the city in recent weeks, but hundreds of thousands more have stayed behind.
Olga Cherevko, a spokesperson for the UN humanitarian office, said she saw several displaced families staying in the parking lot of Shifa Hospital during a visit on Thursday.
“They are not able to move south because they just cannot afford it,” Cherevko told The Associated Press. “One of the families had three children and the woman was pregnant with her fourth. And there were many other vulnerable cases there, including elderly people and people with disabilities.”
Most of Hamas’ top leaders in Gaza and thousands of its fighters have already been killed, but it still has influence in areas not controlled by the Israeli military and launches sporadic attacks.

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

Hamas has long insisted it will only release the remaining hostages — its sole bargaining chip and potential human shields — in exchange for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal. Netanyahu has rejected those terms, saying Hamas must surrender and disarm.
Second anniversary approaches
Thousands of Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, attacking army bases, farming communities and an outdoor music festival, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians. They abducted 251 others, most of them since released in ceasefires or other deals.
Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed more than 66,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not say how many were civilians or combatants. It says women and children make up around half the dead.
The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government, and the UN and many independent experts consider its figures to be the most reliable estimate of wartime casualties.
The offensive has displaced around 90 percent of Gaza’s population, often multiple times, and left much of the territory uninhabitable.
Both the Biden and Trump administrations have tried to end the fighting and bring back the hostages while providing extensive military and diplomatic support to Israel.


Do Gaza aid flotillas symbolize futile protest — or a real strategy to confront Israel’s blockade?

Do Gaza aid flotillas symbolize futile protest — or a real strategy to confront Israel’s blockade?
Updated 03 October 2025

Do Gaza aid flotillas symbolize futile protest — or a real strategy to confront Israel’s blockade?

Do Gaza aid flotillas symbolize futile protest — or a real strategy to confront Israel’s blockade?
  • The Sumud flotilla’s fate mirrors every Gaza convoy since 2008 — stopped at sea, yet sparking solidarity ashore
  • Though more symbolic than material, experts say such nonviolent direct action keeps Palestine in the public eye

LONDON: Just after sundown on Oct. 1, Israeli naval forces surrounded the largest activist flotilla yet to challenge the blockade of the Gaza Strip. Within hours, most of the 44 boats carrying more than 450 activists and journalists — along with a symbolic shipment of aid — went silent, cut off from the outside world.

The nighttime raid drew swift condemnation from governments and rights groups, while protests erupted from Istanbul and Athens to Buenos Aires and Berlin.

By the following midday, Israel confirmed what organizers had long anticipated: nearly the entire Global Sumud Flotilla had been stopped in international waters, its passengers detained, and its journey halted off Gaza’s shores.

The Israeli military announced in a post on X that “all but one” of the flotilla’s ships had been taken. The final vessel, it said, “remains at a distance.”

Israeli navy soldiers aboard one of the flotilla's vessels. (Global Sumud Flotilla/AP)

Organizers denounced the interception as “an illegal attack” on humanitarians. Israeli officials claimed the activists were “not interested in aid, but in provocation.”

Israel’s Foreign Ministry released photos of crew members, including Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, saying they were “making their way safely and peacefully to Israel, where their deportation procedures to Europe will begin.” It added that “the passengers are safe and in good health.”

The Sumud flotilla, which set sail from Spain on Aug. 31, was billed as the largest coordinated maritime effort aimed at Gaza, with more than 50 ships and delegations from at least 44 countries. Some vessels were forced to turn back earlier due to technical problems, according to The Associated Press.

Yet despite its unprecedented scale, the mission’s fate was similar to that of previous attempts. It was the fourth flotilla launched this year — following the Conscience, Madleen and Handala initiatives — and, like every effort since 2008, it ended in interception.

The record reignites a longstanding debate: Are these flotillas meaningful acts of resistance that generate political and diplomatic pressure on Israel, or largely symbolic protests at sea?

Chris Doyle, director of the London-based Council for Arab-British Understanding, said the flotillas carry weight precisely because they highlight public discontent.

“These flotillas are far more than symbolic,” he told Arab News. “They are a manifestation of massive public outcry against what is happening in Gaza.”

He added that the efforts underscore a gulf between public opinion and government policy. “They are representative of the chasm that exists between public opinion in Europe and, indeed, in much of the rest of the world and the positions of their government,” Doyle said.

Still, he acknowledged their limits. “Can they actually achieve anything in terms of delivering humanitarian aid? Barely, of course. But they do raise awareness about the situation,” he said. “It helps to keep the plight of Palestinians in Gaza in the news and that does matter.”

Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg (C) and Brazilian activist Thiago Avila (R), along with other activists. (Israeli Foreign Ministry/AFP)

Indeed, the flotilla made global headlines even before Israel’s raid. And the interception — coupled with the detention of all crew members — fueled a new wave of international condemnation.

Amnesty International called Israel’s actions “a brazen assault against solidarity activists carrying out an entirely peaceful humanitarian mission.” In a statement on Oct. 2, the rights monitor said the flotilla had faced “weeks of threats and incitement by Israeli officials” as well as “several attempts to sabotage some of its ships.”

It described the seizures as “a calculated act of intimidation intended to punish and silence critics of Israel’s genocide and its unlawful blockade on Gaza.”

Israel had previously maintained it would take all measures necessary to stop the Gaza-bound flotilla, claiming the volunteers were trying to “breach a lawful naval blockade.”

The blockade, imposed in 2007 after Hamas won power in Gaza, has been further tightened since the group attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, triggering Israel’s massive military retaliation, which has now ground on for two years.

By March this year, the enclave faced its harshest restrictions yet, with aid deliveries almost entirely cut off, fueling what rights groups called a man-made humanitarian catastrophe and famine. Israel said the move was intended to prevent aid being siphoned off by Hamas.

Legal experts, human rights organizations, and UN agencies widely consider the blockade unlawful under international humanitarian law, deeming it a collective punishment aimed at Gaza’s civilian population.

For Greenpeace International, the Sumud effort fits into a broader strategy of nonviolent resistance.

“Flotillas, such as Sumud, operate on multiple levels,” spokesperson Mike Townsley told Arab News. “They provide a movement platform for mass participation that demonstrates broad support for justice and the ability to express the right to peaceful protest.

“But this is more than protest. It is nonviolent direct action. A direct challenge to an illegal blockade.”

Members of the group of ships of the Global Sumud Flotilla to Gaza are seen moored at the small island of Koufonisi, south of the island of Crete. (AFP)

The strategy is not new. Since 2008, convoys organized by the Free Gaza Movement and allied groups have repeatedly attempted to breach Israel’s naval cordon. Only five of the 31 vessels deployed between 2008 and 2016 succeeded. Most were intercepted in international waters.

There are hazards involved, however. In 2010, Israeli commandos raided the Mavi Marmara, killing 10 of the more than 600 activists on board and wounding dozens. Israel apologized in 2013 for what it called “operational mistakes,” though a compensation deal with Turkiye has yet to be finalized.

Subsequent attempts fared little better.

Freedom Flotilla II in 2011 was largely prevented from sailing, with only one vessel, the French-flagged Dignite, making it to sea before it was intercepted and diverted to Ashdod. In 2015, the Swedish-flagged Marianne of Gothenburg was seized 185 km off Gaza’s coast.

In 2018, Al-Awda and Freedom were both captured in international waters. And in May 2025, Conscience was reportedly struck by drones off Malta, injuring four and severely damaging its hull.

Mads Christensen, executive director of Greenpeace International, said the Sumud mission underscored principles of maritime freedom. “The right of free passage in international waters and to deliver humanitarian aid where it is needed should be sacrosanct,” he wrote in a LinkedIn post on Oct. 2.

 Israeli forces intercepting ‘Marinette’. (Global Sumud Flotilla/AP)

“No siege, seizure and deportation can hide the atrocity of the Israeli government’s ongoing genocide and manmade famine in Gaza,” Christensen wrote, demanding that the flotilla’s crews be “returned to their vessels and allowed to proceed to Gaza unmolested.”

According to a recent UN commission of inquiry, Amnesty International, and other rights monitors, Israel’s conduct in Gaza since Oct. 7, 2023, meets the criteria of genocide set out in the Genocide Convention.

As of September this year, Gaza’s health authority estimated that more than 64,000 Palestinians had been killed. Some 90 percent of the enclave’s population has been displaced and essential services have collapsed, rendering much of the territory uninhabitable.

The humanitarian toll has been compounded by hunger. In August, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification system declared famine in Gaza City and the wider governorate, where more than half a million people face extreme hunger and preventable death.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, created by Israel and the US to distribute aid in place of the UN-led mission, has drawn international condemnation for alleged politicization, links to covert military agendas, and deadly violence at its militarized distribution sites.

Aid agencies blame Israel’s blockade of food, water, fuel, and medicine for compounding the humanitarian emergency unfolding in Gaza, made worse by the ever-escalating military response, ongoing bombardments, and the destruction of civilian infrastructure.

Israeli officials have dismissed the allegations as false and politically motivated.

People take part in a protest outside the Foreign Office in central London. (AFP)

Christensen urged governments to act. “In the face of the courage of their citizens trying to do what they should have done long ago — break the humanitarian siege of Gaza — governments around the world must seize this moment to restore their humanity and bring all possible pressure to stop the genocide,” he wrote.

Several governments issued statements in response to the raid. Belgium’s Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot urged Israel to respect international law, saying his priority was to guarantee the rights and safety of Belgian nationals aboard and ensure their quick return.

Yolanda Diaz, Spain’s labor minister and deputy prime minister, called the interception “a crime against international law” and demanded that Israel immediately release those it had detained. Writing on the social platform Bluesky, she urged the EU to sever ties with Israel.

Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim condemned the interception as “intimidation and coercion” against unarmed civilians carrying life-saving supplies.

Colombia went further, expelling Israeli diplomats and ending its free trade agreement with Israel. In a post on X, President Gustavo Petro called the raid “a new international crime.”

But Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni took a different view, criticizing the flotilla’s mission.

“We will do everything we can to ensure these people can return to Italy as soon as possible,” she told reporters in Denmark. “I continue to believe that all of this brings no benefit to the people of Palestine.”

She added that “it will bring many inconveniences to the Italian people,” referring to a strike Italian unions called for Oct. 3 in solidarity with the flotilla.

Protesters hold a large Palestinian flag during a demonstration in Athens. (Reuters)

Italian media estimated 10,000 protesters marched in Rome on Oct. 2 in support of the flotilla, while in London, hundreds gathered across London and outside Downing Street. Protests were also reported in Brussels, Lisbon, Ankara, Athens, Madrid, Buenos Aires, and Berlin.

Townsley of Greenpeace said the flotilla’s impact lies in its global echo.

“The very real jeopardy faced by the Sumud’s peaceful participants and the courage on display is contagious, inspiring others to take action, perhaps even shaming their own governments to do what they should have done long ago: to force an end to the humanitarian blockade of Gaza,” he said.

“History is full of examples of flotillas being used to successfully challenge injustice, such as nuclear weapons testing or oil drilling,” he said.

“The courage, humanity and compassion of the Sumud flotilla are more than symbolic, they are a visceral reminder to all of us of our duty to stand up to injustice and to stand for the innocent.”

 


Egypt blames Ethiopia’s Nile dam for flooding

Egypt blames Ethiopia’s Nile dam for flooding
Updated 03 October 2025

Egypt blames Ethiopia’s Nile dam for flooding

Egypt blames Ethiopia’s Nile dam for flooding
  • Cairo says unusually high water levels are result of the east African country’s mismanagement of new controversial dam
  • Flooding also hit Sudan, which borders both Egypt and Ethiopia, prompting scores of villagers to evacuate

CAIRO: Egypt on Friday blamed Ethiopia for the rising Nile River waters and flooding this week in two of its northernmost provinces, claiming the unusually high water levels are due to the east African country’s mismanagement of its new controversial dam on the river.
The floods in Beheira and Menoufia provinces in the Nile Delta in Egypt have submerged farmland and flooded village homes, many built illegally on silt deposits and sediments along the canals crisscrossing the delta.
Videos posted online Friday show residents in Menoufia wading through waist-deep water and partially submerged homes. In Ashmoun, farmers and residents were urged to urgently leave their lands and homes.
The extend of the damage by the floods in Egypt was not immediately known and officials in Menoufia could not be reached for comment and information about the damage.
Earlier this week, flooding along the Nile in war-stricken Sudan, which borders both Egypt and Ethiopia, prompted scores of villagers there to evacuate their homes. The UN migration agency, the International Organization for Migration, said on Thursday that about 100 households in Khartoum were also flooded.
Egypt now says that it was forced to discharge waters from its High Aswan Dam on the Nile in the country’s south, because it could not hold back rising water levels coming in from Ethiopia, more than 2,000 kilometers (1,250 miles) away.
Ethiopia earlier this month inaugurated the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, Africa’s largest dam, to boost its economy. The nearly $5 billion dam, located on the Blue Nile — one of the two main tributaries of the Nile — near Ethiopia’s border with Sudan, is expected to double Ethiopia’s electricity generation capacity, according to officials.
But Egypt and Sudan say the dam in Ethiopia was in violation of an agreement — dating back to the colonial times — on how they should share Nile water resources.
On Friday, Egypt’s Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation said in a statement that it was “closely monitoring developments” linked to what it says is “reckless unilateral actions by Ethiopia in managing its illegal dam, which violates international law.”
Ethiopia’s actions pose a “direct threat to the lives and security of the peoples of downstream countries,” the statement said.
Ethiopia says it is not responsible for the floodings downstream and that its new dam on the Blue Nile has actually helped in “reducing the catastrophic effect” the floods could otherwise cause in neighboring Sudan.