ֱ

Israel hits Gaza with new airstrikes that kill at least 200 after truce talks stall

Israel hits Gaza with new airstrikes that kill at least 200 after truce talks stall
A mourner reacts next to the bodies of Palestinians, killed in an Israeli strike, according to medics, at Al-Aqsa Martyrs hospital in Deir Al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on March 17, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 18 March 2025

Israel hits Gaza with new airstrikes that kill at least 200 after truce talks stall

Israel hits Gaza with new airstrikes that kill at least 200 after truce talks stall
  • Netanyahu says he ordered strikes because of lack of progress in talks to extend ceasefire
  • Hamas accuses Netanyahu of upending ceasefire, exposing hostages to "an unknown fate”

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip: Israel launched a wave of airstrikes across the Gaza Strip early Tuesday, saying it was striking dozens of Hamas targets in its heaviest assault in the territory since a ceasefire took effect in January. Palestinian officials reported at least 200 deaths.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he ordered the strikes because of a lack of progress in talks to extend the ceasefire. Officials said the operation was open-ended and was expected to expand. The White House said it had been consulted and voiced support for Israel’s actions.

“Israel will, from now on, act against Hamas with increasing military strength,” Netanyahu’s office said.

The surprise attack shattered a period of relative calm during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan and raised the prospect of a full return to fighting in a 17-month war that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians and caused widespread destruction across Gaza. It also raised questions about the fate of the roughly two dozen Israeli hostages held by Hamas who are believed to still be alive.

Hamas accused Netanyahu of upending the ceasefire agreement and exposing the hostages “to an unknown fate.” In a statement, it called on mediators to hold Israel “fully responsible for violating and overturning the agreement.”

In the southern city of Khan Younis, Associated Press reporters saw explosions and plumes of smoke. Ambulances brought wounded people to Nasser Hospital, where patients lay on the floor, some screaming. A young boy sat with a bandage around his head as a health worker checked for more injuries, a young girl cried as her bloody arm was bandaged.

Many Palestinians said they had expected a return to war when talks over the second phase of the ceasefire did not begin as scheduled in early February. Israel instead embraced an alternative proposal and cut off all shipments of food, fuel and other aid to the territory’s 2 million Palestinians to try to pressure Hamas to accept it.

“Nobody wants to fight,” Palestinian resident Nidal Alzaanin said by phone from Gaza City. “Everyone is still suffering from the previous months,” he said.

US backs Israel and blames Hamas

The White House sought to blame Hamas for the renewed fighting. National Security Council spokesman Brian Hughes said the militant group “could have released hostages to extend the ceasefire but instead chose refusal and war.”

US envoy Steve Witkoff, who has been leading mediation efforts along with Egypt and Qatar, had earlier warned that Hamas must release living hostages immediately “or pay a severe price.”

An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the unfolding operation, said Israel was striking Hamas’ military, leaders and infrastructure and planned to expand the operation beyond air attacks. The official accused Hamas of attempting to rebuild and plan new attacks. Hamas militants and security forces quickly returned to the streets in recent weeks after the ceasefire went into effect.

Israel’s defense minister, Israel Katz, said the “gates of hell will open in Gaza” if the hostages aren’t released. “We will not stop fighting until all of our hostages are home and we have achieved all of the war goals,” he said.

Explosions could be heard throughout Gaza. Khalil Degran, a spokesman for the Health Ministry based at the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in central Gaza, said at least 200 people had been killed. The territory’s civil defense agency said its crews were having a difficult time carrying out rescue efforts because various areas were being targeted simultaneously.

Talks on a second phase of the ceasefire had stalled

The strikes came two months after a ceasefire was reached to pause the war. Over six weeks, Hamas released 25 Israeli hostages and the bodies of eight more in exchange for nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners in a first phase of the ceasefire.

But since that ceasefire ended two weeks ago, the sides have not been able to agree on a way forward with a second phase aimed at releasing the 59 remaining hostages, 35 of whom are believed to be dead, and ending the war altogether.

Hamas has demanded an end to the war and full withdrawal of Israeli troops in exchange for the release of the remaining hostages. Israel says it will not end the war until it destroys Hamas’ governing and military capabilities and frees all hostages.

Netanyahu has repeatedly threatened to resume the war.

“This comes after Hamas repeatedly refused to release our hostages and rejected all offers it received from the US presidential envoy, Steve Witkoff, and from the mediators,” Netanyahu’s office said early Tuesday.

Taher Nunu, a Hamas official, criticized the Israeli attacks. “The international community faces a moral test: either it allows the return of the crimes committed by the occupation army or it enforces a commitment to ending the aggression and war against innocent people in Gaza,” he said.

Gaza already in a humanitarian crisis

The war erupted when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages. Most have been released in ceasefires or other deals, with Israeli forces rescuing only eight and recovering dozens of bodies.

Israel responded with a military offensive that killed over 48,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials, and displaced an estimated 90 percent of Gaza’s population. The territory’s Health Ministry doesn’t differentiate between civilians and militants, but says over half of the dead have been women and children.

The ceasefire had brought some relief to Gaza and allowed hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians to resume to what remained of their homes.

A renewed Israeli ground offensive could also be especially deadly now that so many Palestinian civilians have returned home. Before the ceasefire, civilians were largely concentrated in tent camps meant to provide relative safety from the fighting.

The return to fighting could also worsen deep internal fissures inside Israel over the fate of the remaining hostages. Many of the hostages released by Hamas returned emaciated and malnourished, putting heavy pressure on the government to extend the ceasefire.

The released hostages have repeatedly implored the government to press ahead with the ceasefire to return all remaining hostages, and tens of thousands of Israelis have taken part in mass demonstrations calling for a ceasefire and return of all hostages.


UN Security Council backs Morocco plan for Western Sahara autonomy

UN Security Council backs Morocco plan for Western Sahara autonomy
Updated 01 November 2025

UN Security Council backs Morocco plan for Western Sahara autonomy

UN Security Council backs Morocco plan for Western Sahara autonomy
  • Resolution says autonomy for Western Sahara under Moroccan sovereignty may be the basis for future negotiations to resolve the 50-year-old conflict
  • Morocco’s King Mohammed VI lauds vote as “historic” and “opening a new and victorious chapter in the process of enshrining the Moroccan character of the Sahara”

UNITED NATIONS: The UN Security Council voted Friday in favor of a resolution brought forward by the United States backing Morocco’s autonomy plan for Western Sahara as the “most feasible” solution for the disputed territory, angering Algeria.
The Western Sahara is a vast mineral-rich former Spanish colony that is largely controlled by Morocco but has been claimed for decades by the pro-independence Polisario Front, which is supported by Algeria.
The Security Council had previously urged Morocco, the Polisario Front, Algeria and Mauritania to resume talks to reach a broad agreement.
But, at the initiative of Donald Trump’s administration, the council shifted to support a plan, initially presented by Rabat in 2007, in which Western Sahara would enjoy autonomy under Morocco’s sole sovereignty.
The resolution, adopted by 11 votes with none against and three abstentions — with Algeria refusing to participate — said autonomy for Western Sahara under Moroccan sovereignty may be the basis for future negotiations to resolve the 50-year-old conflict.
“Genuine autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty could constitute a most feasible solution,” the UNSC resolution said.
Morocco’s King Mohammed VI lauded the vote as “historic,” saying “we are opening a new and victorious chapter in the process of enshrining the Moroccan character of the Sahara.”
Trump, during his first term in office, in 2020 recognized Morocco’s claim to Western Sahara after Morocco normalized relations with Israel — achieving top diplomatic objectives for both Rabat and Washington.
Spain, France, Britain and Germany have since expressed support for Morocco’s sovereignty over the territory.

US-led resolution

The United Nations envoy on Western Sahara, Staffan de Mistura, has welcomed US efforts to solve the issue but raised concerns about lack of detail in Morocco’s plan.
Algerian Ambassador Amar Bendjama said the text “does not faithfully or sufficiently reflect the UN doctrine on decolonization.”
It “fell short of the expectations and legitimate aspirations of the people of Western Sahara, represented by the Polisario Front (who) have been resisting for over 50 years to have, as the sole party, a say in their own destiny,” he added.
The resolution adopted Friday calls on UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and de Mistura to conduct negotiations on the basis of the plan to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.
It also extends the UN peacekeeping mission in Western Sahara for another year.
 


As Iraqi politicians gear up for election, public disillusion sets in again

As Iraqi politicians gear up for election, public disillusion sets in again
Updated 01 November 2025

As Iraqi politicians gear up for election, public disillusion sets in again

As Iraqi politicians gear up for election, public disillusion sets in again

BAGHDAD: Iraqis are bracing for yet another election they fear will change little, with many seeing the pro-reform campaign banners for the Nov. 11 vote as empty gestures from elites who have delivered little since the 2003 US-led invasion.
Years of corruption, high unemployment, and poor public services have blighted daily life since then, even as democratic elections have become standard following decades of repressive dictatorship under Saddam Hussein.
Iraqis complain that many of their leaders are too engaged in rivalry for sectarian power to tackle Iraq’s problems — despite its vast oil wealth.
Despite the election billboards and banners trumpeting change, for much of the public, the election outcome feels predetermined, serving merely to keep Iraq’s political balance in the hands of the same sectarian elites.
Said Hatem, a Baghdad resident, voiced skepticism about the prospects for change. 
“You see the advertisement on the streets ... but they have been ruling for 20–25 years. How do you make me trust you?” he said.
Iraq’s Independent High Electoral Commission has approved 7,768 candidates to run for parliament, including 2,248 women and 5,520 men. It said campaigning was authorized from Oct. 3 to Nov. 8.
The vote will test confidence in Iraq’s political system, which has failed to make good on pledges to improve basic services and fight graft in a country where Iraqis say vast oil revenues only benefit the political elite.

FASTFACT

The Independent High Electoral Commission has approved 7,768 candidates to run for Iraq’s parliament, including 2,248 women and 5,520 men.

Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani and his party will be competing mostly against other dominant, Shiite factions.
Frustration has been heightened by a resurgence in political tension, including the killing of parliamentary candidate Safa Al-Mashhadani, who had leveled criticism at everything from state corruption to militias he said were trying to take over his hometown.
Tabark Tariq Al-Azzawi, a candidate for the Iraqi Progress Party, said she had received threats and increasingly feared for her safety.
“I hope this phase will pass without any further losses or assassinations, whether of candidates or ordinary citizens. I hope that security and safety will prevail always,” she said.
Reuters could not independently verify the motive or details of Al-Mashhadani’s killing.
Authorities have since stepped up protection measures for candidates, with arrests made and investigations continuing, according to Iraq’s main security spokesman Gen. Saad Maan.
Many Iraqis believe that real change through elections is nearly impossible because the same powerful political groups continue to dominate the state and its vast energy resources.
These parties are often backed by armed factions close to Iran who control key institutions, government contracts, and public funds.
Voters say this allows ruling alliances to orchestrate election outcomes in their favor, and only their supporters get through a patronage system — allegations these parties deny.
An Iraqi tribal leader, Sheikh Abdul Jaber Hamoud, criticized what he described as the tendency to improve government outreach and public services only during election cycles while most Iraqis were neglected at other times.
“I believe the political process is no longer a democratic one; rather, it has become a political process manipulated in favor of specific groups from 2003 to this day,” said political analyst Qais Al-Zubaidi.
“Citizens strive for change, but this change is extremely difficult to achieve in the presence of uncontrolled weapons.”
Back in 2003, US officials thought that toppling Saddam would set Iraq on a path to the freedom and prosperity enjoyed by all communities in the country.
Instead, a pro-Saddam insurgency emerged, followed by militants and a sectarian civil war that gave rise to the more extremist Daesh terrorists.
Few politicians have raised hopes of a better life, even years after the sectarian bloodshed subsided.


UK reiterates support for UN mission in Libya at Security Council

UK reiterates support for UN mission in Libya at Security Council
Updated 31 October 2025

UK reiterates support for UN mission in Libya at Security Council

UK reiterates support for UN mission in Libya at Security Council

LONDON: The UK on Friday reaffirmed its full support for the UN Support Mission in Libya as the Security Council renewed its mandate for another year.

Delivering the UK’s explanation for its vote, James Kariuki, London’s charge d’affaires to the UN, welcomed the resolution and thanked UNSC members for their constructive engagement during negotiations.

“The mandate plays an important role in supporting the Libyan people to achieve the peace, stability, and democratic governance they deserve,” Kariuki said, emphasizing that UNSMIL’s work reinforces a Libyan-led and Libyan-owned political process.

Kariuki highlighted the roadmap announced by UN Special Representative Hanna Tetteh in August 2025, noting its three core pillars provide a clear framework for political progress.

He also called for the implementation of recommendations from UNSMIL’s Strategic Review to enhance the mission’s effectiveness.

“The ongoing political deadlock threatens Libya’s stability and continues to deny Libyans the democratic choice, economic opportunity, and security they deserve,” Kariuki said.

He urged all parties to engage constructively with the UN roadmap to deliver free, fair, transparent, and inclusive elections.

The UK also stressed the importance of adhering to international humanitarian and human rights law, describing these principles as vital to building lasting peace and preserving the integrity of Libya’s political process.


Militia attack on hospital in Darfur came in waves: WHO

Militia attack on hospital in Darfur came in waves: WHO
Updated 01 November 2025

Militia attack on hospital in Darfur came in waves: WHO

Militia attack on hospital in Darfur came in waves: WHO
  • Gunmen returned to the facility at least three times, Lindmeier told a UN press briefing in Geneva
  • At first, fighters came and abducted a number of doctors and nurses, and at least six still being held, he said

CAIRO: Groups of gunmen who reportedly killed at least 460 people at a hospital in Sudan attacked in several waves, abducting doctors and nurses, then gunning down staff, patients and people sheltering there, the World Health Organization said Friday.
The attack Tuesday in the country’s Darfur region was part of a reported rampage by the Rapid Support Forces, a powerful paramilitary group, as it captured the key city of el-Fasher after besieging it for 18 months.
Witnesses have reported fighters going house-to-house, killing civilians and committing sexual assaults.
Many details of the hospital attack and other violence in the city have been slow to emerge, and the total death toll remains unknown.
The fall of el-Fasher heralds a new phase of the brutal, two-year war between the RSF and the military in Africa’s third-largest country.
The war has killed more than 40,000 people, according to UN figures, but aid groups say that is an undercount and the true number could be many times higher. The war has displaced more than 14 million people and fueled outbreaks of diseases believed to have killed thousands. Famine has been declared in parts of Darfur, a region the size of Spain, and other parts of the country.
Escaping El-Fasher
Communications are down in el-Fasher, located deep in a semi-desert region some 800 kilometers (500 miles) southwest of Khartoum, the capital. Aid groups that had been operating there have largely been forced out.
Some survivors have staggered into a refugee camp about 40 miles away in the town of Tawila.
More than 62,000 people are believed to have fled el-Fasher between Sunday and Wednesday, the UN migration agency said. But far fewer have made it to Tawila. The Norwegian Refugee Council, which manages the camp, put the number at around 5,000 people, raising fears over the fate of tens of thousands.
Fatima Abdulrahim, 70, fled el-Fasher with her grandchildren a few days before it was captured to escape the siege. She described to The Associated Press a harrowing five-day journey to reach Tawila, hiding in trenches, dodging bullets and gunmen behind walls and empty buildings.
“We ran on the streets, hiding for ten minutes behind the berm, then charging out, running until we made it out,” she said, adding that she kept falling and getting up amid gunfire and shelling. Her companions carried her at times, she said.
“Thirst almost killed us,” she said, describing picking grass to eat from the side of the road.
Along the way, she said she also witnessed militiamen shoot and kill young men trying to bring food into the city.
“The people dead on the streets were countless,” she said. “I kept covering the eyes of the little ones so they don’t see. Some were injured and beaten and could not move. We pulled some to the paved road, hoping a car would come and take them.”
She said some fighters stopped her, and the group she was traveling with, and took all their belongings and beat the children.
At least 450 people have been admitted to the hospital in Tawila, some suffering from severe malnutrition and sexual violence, said Adam Rojal, spokesperson for a local group that works with displaced people in Darfur.
The Norwegian Refugee Council said people were arriving at the camp with broken limbs and other wounds, and some with injuries sustained months ago. Many children arrived at the camp who had lost their parents in the fighting.
Hospital attack
Christian Lindmeier, a WHO spokesman, provided new details about the killings at el-Fasher’s Saudi Hospital, which had been the only hospital in the city still providing limited services during the siege.
Gunmen returned to the facility at least three times, Lindmeier told a UN press briefing in Geneva. At first, the fighters came and abducted a number of doctors and nurses, and at least six are still being held, he said. They later returned and “started killing,” he said.
They came a third time and “finished off what was still standing, including other people sheltering in the hospital,” Lindmeier said, without specifying who the attackers were.
A number of grisly videos from the hospital have circulated online showing bodies and at least one fighter shooting a man. The Associated Press has not been able to independently verify the details of the assault.
The RSF denied committing killings at the hospital. On Thursday, it posted on social media a video filmed at the hospital, showing what it said were some patients at the facility. A person speaking in the video said RSF fighters were caring for the patients, offering them change of wounds and food. At least one wounded man spoke to the reporter.
It was not immediately clear when the video was filmed, although a timestamp stated it was Thursday.
Dr. Teresa Zakaria, WHO’s unit head for humanitarian operations, told the briefing that the hospital was offering “limited service” now. But he said that since el-Fasher’s seizure on Sunday, “there is no longer any humanitarian health presence in the city, and access has remained blocked.”
Militia accused of repeated mass killings
El-Fasher was the Sudanese military’s last stronghold in Darfur, and its fall secures the RSF’s hold over most of the large western region. That raises fears of a new split in Sudan, with the military holding Khartoum and the country’s north and east.
The RSF and its allied militias have been accused of repeated mass killings and rapes when it controlled the capital Khartoum, and as it has seized towns across Darfur and further south over the past two years – mostly targeting civilians of Central and East African ethnicities.
The RSF is largely made up of fighters from the Arab Janjaweed militia, which is accused of carrying out a government-backed genocidal campaign in Darfur in the 2000s in which some 300,000 people were killed.
The Janjaweed were initially recruited by the military to fight Darfur insurgents, who were rebelling against power concentrated in the north. The militia later were reorganized into the RSF as an official force.
The military and the RSF were briefly allied in ruling Sudan following popular protests that ousted longtime leader Omar Al-Bashir. They had a falling out in 2023 in a struggle for power.


Tunisia court jails prominent lawyer for five years after brief trial

Tunisia court jails prominent lawyer for five years after brief trial
Updated 31 October 2025

Tunisia court jails prominent lawyer for five years after brief trial

Tunisia court jails prominent lawyer for five years after brief trial
  • Defense lawyer Yosr Hamid said her client had received an additional three-year sentence of “administrative supervision”
  • Souab was arrested in April following criticism of the legal process in a trial of prominent figures

TUNIS: A Tunisian court on Friday jailed prominent lawyer Ahmed Souab for five years on anti-terror charges, his defense counsel said — the latest case in a crackdown on opposition figures in the North African country.
Defense lawyer Yosr Hamid said her client had received an additional three-year sentence of “administrative supervision” after a trial lasting just seven minutes.
Hundreds of opposition figures, lawyers, journalists, trade unionists and humanitarian workers in Tunisia are being prosecuted for “conspiracy” or in connection with a “fake news” decree by authorities.
That legislation, Decree Law 54, has been criticized by rights activists, who are concerned over its broad interpretation by some courts.
Souab was arrested in April following criticism of the legal process in a trial of prominent figures, including opposition leaders.
The 68-year-old former magistrate was not allowed to appear in court, declining to testify via video-link, according to Hamid.
His legal team refused to enter a plea under the conditions.
Souab faced a number of charges related to anti-terrorism legislation and the presidential decree on false information.
His defense team issued a statement condemning “a scandalous verdict after a seven-minute joke of a trial” and said it would “work for its annulment by all legal means.”
His team also called on “civil society to express their rejection of the manipulation of justice and to defend the independence of the judiciary.”
The defense lawyer, Hamid, told AFP earlier Friday that there was a “lack of fundamental grounds for a fair trial” and that the decision to sentence after a one-day trial set an unwelcome precedent.
Mongi Souab, the defendant’s brother, said authorities “prevented family members from entering” the court, criticizing the brevity of the trial.
Souab was arrested after criticizing the trial process for around 40 prominent figures, including opposition leaders, in a case related to “conspiracy against state security.”
He was one of the principal defense lawyers.
After a trial involving just three hearings, without closing arguments or defense pleas, Souab had accused authorities of putting “a knife to the throat of the judge who was to deliver the verdict.”
He mimicked the gesture, captured in a video of a rally in which he participated.
Heavy prison sentences of up to 74 years were handed down to those accused in the “conspiracy” mega-trial. The appeal related to that trial is scheduled to take place on November 17.
Several dozen people demonstrated outside the court on Friday, brandishing photos of Souab and chanting that the country was “under repression and tyranny.”
Several Tunisian and foreign NGOs have decried a rollback of rights and freedoms since President Kais Saied seized full powers in 2021 in what critics have called a coup.