ֱ

Trump pledges to ‘expose’ his enemies in political speech at Justice Department

Trump pledges to ‘expose’ his enemies in political speech at Justice Department
US President Donald Trump speaks during his visit to the Department of Justice to address its workers in Washington, D.C., on March 14, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 15 March 2025

Trump pledges to ‘expose’ his enemies in political speech at Justice Department

Trump pledges to ‘expose’ his enemies in political speech at Justice Department
  • He promised to target his perceived enemies even as he claimed to be ending what he called the weaponization of the department
  • Trump’s address amounted to an extraordinary display of partisan politics and personal grievance inside an institution that is meant to be blind to both

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump pledged to “expose” his enemies during a norm-breaking political speech Friday at the Justice Department in which he aired a litany of grievances about the criminal cases he faced and vowed retribution for what he described as the “lies and abuses that have occurred within these walls.”
The speech was meant to rally support for Trump administration policies on violent crime, drugs and illegal immigration. But it also functioned as a triumphant forum for the president to boast about having emerged legally and politically unscathed from two federal prosecutions that one year ago had threatened to torpedo his presidential prospects but were dismissed after his election win last fall.
Though other presidents have spoken from the Justice Department’s ceremonial Great Hall, Trump’s address amounted to an extraordinary display of partisan politics and personal grievance inside an institution that is meant to be blind to both. Casting himself as the country’s “chief law enforcement officer,” a title ordinarily reserved for the attorney general, he promised to target his perceived enemies even as he claimed to be ending what he called the weaponization of the department.
The speech marked the latest manifestation of Trump’s unparalleled takeover of the department and came amid a brazen campaign of retribution already undertaken under his watch, including the firing of prosecutors who investigated him during the Biden administration and the scrutiny of thousands of FBI agents who investigated the president’s supporters who stormed the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
“Our predecessors turned this Department of Justice into the Department of Injustice. But I stand before you today to declare that those days are over, and they are never going to come back and never coming back,” Trump said to cheers from a crowd that included local law enforcement officials, political allies and FBI

Director Kash Patel. “So now, as the chief law enforcement officer in our country, I will insist upon and demand full and complete accountability for the wrongs and abuses that have occurred.”
The visit to the Justice Department, the first by Trump and the first by any president in a decade, brought him into the belly of an institution he has disparaged in searing terms for years but one that he has sought to reshape by installing loyalists and members of his personal defense team in top leadership positions.
The event was reminiscent of a campaign rally, with upbeat music blaring from loudspeakers before Trump entered the Great Hall. Justice Department and White House officials mingled while members of the crowd posed for selfies. The podium was flanked by large signs that read “Fighting Fentanyl in America.” Also on the stage was a cardboard box that read “DEA evidence.”
Trump’s unique status as a onetime criminal defendant indicted by the department he was now addressing hung over the speech as he vented, in profane and personal terms, about investigations as far back as the Russian election interference investigation to the more recent inquiries into his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and the hoarding of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.
He mentioned by name prosecutors who investigated him, calling them “scum,” and called the classified documents case against him “bulls— -.” He claimed that “a corrupt group of hacks and radicals within the ranks of the American government obliterated the trust and goodwill built up over generations,” and said that before the department could turn the page, “we must be honest about the lies and abuses that have occurred within these walls,“
“We will expel the rogue actors and corrupt forces from our government. We will expose, very much expose their egregious crimes and severe misconduct,” Trump said in a wide-ranging speech that touched on everything from Russia’s war against Ukraine, the 2020 election to the price of eggs.
“It’s going to be legendary. And going to also be legendary for the people that are able to seek it out and bring justice. We will restore the scales of justice in America, and we will ensure that such abuses never happen again in our country.”
His claim that the Justice Department had been weaponized during the Biden administration overlooked that there were investigations during that time into Biden’s mishandling of classified information and into the firearms and tax affairs of his son Hunter. And his recounting of the recent investigations into him did not mention that prosecutors had amassed what they said was substantial evidence, including that he had sought to obstruct the classified documents inquiry.
When it comes to setting its agenda, the Justice Department historically takes a cue from the White House but looks to maintain its independence on individual criminal investigations.
Trump has upended such norms.
He encouraged specific investigations during his first term and tried to engineer the firing of Robert Mueller, the special counsel assigned to investigate ties between Russia and Trump’s 2016 campaign. He also endured difficult relationships with his first two handpicked attorneys general — Jeff Sessions was fired immediately after the 2018 midterm election, and William Barr resigned weeks after publicly disputing Trump’s bogus claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election.
Arriving for a second term in January fresh off a landmark Supreme Court opinion that reaffirmed a president’s unshakable control of the Justice Department, Trump has appeared determined to clear from his path any potential obstacles, including by appointing Pam Bondi — a former Florida attorney general who was part of Trump’s defense team at his first impeachment trial — and Patel, another close ally, to serve as FBI director.
“We all work for the greatest president in the history of our country,” Bondi said Friday in introducing Trump. “We are so proud to work at the directive of Donald Trump. He will never stop fighting for us and we will never stop fighting for him and for our country.”
Even before Bondi had been confirmed, the Justice Department fired department employees who served on special counsel Jack Smith’s team, which brought the election interference and classified documents cases against Trump. Both cases were dismissed last November in line with longstanding Justice Department policy against indicting sitting presidents.
Senior Justice Department officials also demanded from the FBI lists of thousands of employees who worked on investigations into the Jan 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol, when a mob of Trump’s supporters stormed the building in an effort to halt the certification of the electoral vote, and fired prosecutors who had participated in the cases. And they’ve ordered the dismissal of a criminal case against New York Mayor Eric Adams by saying the charges had handicapped the Democrat’s ability to partner in the Republican administration’s fight against illegal immigration.


EU says Russia ‘gambling with war’ with airspace violations

Updated 2 sec ago

EU says Russia ‘gambling with war’ with airspace violations

EU says Russia ‘gambling with war’ with airspace violations
KYIV: The European Union’s top diplomat Kaja Kallas said Monday that Russia was “gambling with war,” after a spate of Russian drones and military jets crossing into the bloc’s airspace.
NATO has boosted its defenses along its eastern borders as it accused Moscow of testing the alliance’s air defenses with drone incursions into several members and by flying military jets in Estonian airspace.
“Every time a Russian drone or plane violates our airspace, there is a risk of escalation, unintended or not. Russia is gambling with war,” Kallas said during a visit to Kyiv.
“To keep war at bay, we must translate the economic power of Europe into military deterrence,” she added.
Kallas was in Kyiv for talks on military and financial support for Ukraine, and especially its energy infrastructure, as Russia has resumed attacks on power plants ahead of winter.
Ukraine on Monday was forced to introduce power cuts across seven central and eastern regions as a result of the attacks, which Kyiv has called “cynical.”
“The enemy wants to affect the spirit and mood of our population,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga said during a joint press conference with Kallas.
“This is especially cynical on the eve of winter,” he added.
Ukraine retaliates by targeting Russian oil refineries, aiming to hamper funding of its war machine.
It has launched more than 30 strikes on Russian energy sites since the beginning of August, also triggering a spike in petrol prices inside Russia.
An oil depot was struck overnight in Russian-occupied Crimea, sparking a large fire, according to the region’s Moscow-installed governor and a source in Ukraine’s security services.
Meanwhile, a Russian drone struck a car carrying a married couple in Ukraine’s southern Zaporizhzhia region, killing them both, local authorities said.
Kallas also indicated that Brussels backed the delivery of US long-range Tomahawk missile supplies to Ukraine.
“We welcome all tools that make Ukraine stronger and Russia weaker,” she said.
US President Donald Trump said Sunday he may warn Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin that Ukraine could get the cruise missiles if Moscow does not end its invasion.
Moscow has warned against supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks, saying it would be a major escalation.

Russia’s Medvedev says supplying US Tomahawks to Ukraine could end badly for all, especially Trump

Russia’s Medvedev says supplying US Tomahawks to Ukraine could end badly for all, especially Trump
Updated 8 min 28 sec ago

Russia’s Medvedev says supplying US Tomahawks to Ukraine could end badly for all, especially Trump

Russia’s Medvedev says supplying US Tomahawks to Ukraine could end badly for all, especially Trump
  • Warning followed Russia's attack on Ukraine’s power grid overnight, part of a campaign to cripple Ukrainian energy infrastructure before winter
  • Putin said earlier this month that any supply of such missiles to Ukraine would trigger a “qualitatively new stage of escalation”

MOSCOW: Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev said on Monday that supplying US Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine could end badly for everyone, especially US President Donald Trump.

Medvedev, an arch-hawk who has repeatedly goaded Trump on social media, said it is impossible to distinguish between Tomahawk missiles carrying nuclear warheads and conventional ones after they are launched – a point that President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman has also made.

“How should Russia respond? Exactly!” Medvedev said on Telegram, appearing to hint that Moscow’s response would be nuclear.

Trump said again on Sunday that he may offer long-range Tomahawk missiles that could be used by Kyiv if Putin does not end the war in Ukraine.

“Yeah, I might tell him (Putin), if the war is not settled, we may very well do it,” Trump said. “We may not, but we may do it... Do they want to have Tomahawks going in their direction? I don’t think so.”

Medvedev wrote: “One can only hope that this is another empty threat … Like sending nuclear submarines closer to Russia.”

He was alluding to Trump’s statement in August that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia in response to what he called “highly provocative” comments from Medvedev about the risk of war.

Putin has said supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks – which have a range of 2,500km and could therefore strike anywhere within European Russia, including Moscow – would destroy relations between the United States and Russia.


I know it’s immoral: Child workers still common in Pakistan

I know it’s immoral: Child workers still common in Pakistan
Updated 13 October 2025

I know it’s immoral: Child workers still common in Pakistan

I know it’s immoral: Child workers still common in Pakistan
  • One in four households in a country of 255 million people employs a child as a domestic worker, mostly girls aged 10 to 14, according to a 2022 report by the International Labour Organization
  • In Sindh province, employing a child as a domestic maid can lead to a maximum of one year in jail or a fine of up to 50,000 rupees ($177) however, few are prosecuted

KARACHI: From the age of 10, Amina has been scrubbing, sweeping and cooking in a middle-class home in Pakistan’s megacity of Karachi.
Like millions of Pakistani children, she is a household helper, an illegal but common practice that brings grief to families often too poor to seek justice.
“Alongside my mother, I cut vegetables, wash dishes, sweep the floor and mop. I hate working for this family,” said the 13-year-old, who leaves her slum neighborhood in Karachi at 7 am and often returns after dark.
“Sometimes we work on Sundays even though it’s supposed to be our only day off, and that’s really unfair.”
One in four households in a country of 255 million people employs a child as a domestic worker, mostly girls aged 10 to 14, according to a 2022 report by the International Labour Organization (ILO).
Sania, 13, earns $15 a month helping her mother maintain a sprawling luxury home in the city, where she has been explicitly forbidden to speak to her employer’s children or touch their toys.
AFP is not publishing the full names of children and parents interviewed to protect their identities.
Sania gets half the salary of her mother for the same hours, together earning $46 — far below the minimum wage of 40,000 rupees ($140).
“I dreamed of finishing school and becoming a doctor,” said the eldest of five siblings who, according to the law, should be in school until the age of 16.

- ‘I know it’s immoral’ -

A university professor who spoke to AFP on condition of anonymity employs a 10-year-old boy because children are “cheaper and more docile.”
“I know it’s immoral and illegal to employ a child, but at least he has a roof and is well fed here,” he said.
Hamza was sent by his parents to live with the professor in Karachi — a 450-kilometer (280-mile) journey from his impoverished village, to which he returns only a few times a year.
His monthly salary of $35 is paid directly to his father.
“In the village, his poor parents would likely have sent him to the fields without even being able to feed him,” the professor said, while also acknowledging that he feels “uneasy” when his own children go to school and Hamza stays behind to clean.
There is no unified definition of a child or child labor in Pakistan, although a federal law prohibits children under the age of 14 from working in unsafe and hazardous environments, such as factories.
In Sindh province, of which Karachi is the capital, employing a child as a domestic maid can lead to a maximum of one year in jail or a fine of up to 50,000 rupees ($177). However, few are prosecuted.
Kashif Mirza from the NGO Sparc, one of the leading child rights organizations, described it as a form of “modern slavery widely accepted in Pakistani society that makes them particularly vulnerable.”
“Society prefers to hire child domestic labor because they are cheap and more obedient, and employers make the argument that they are also safeguarding them, which is not true and illegal,” he told AFP.

- ‘I had no choice’ -

Iqra, a 13-year-old child worker, died in February from blows by her wealthy employers in Rawalpindi, Islamabad’s twin city, because chocolate had disappeared from their kitchen.
Her father, Sana, who said after her death that he would seek to prosecute the employers, instead told AFP that he forgave them.
Under Islamic law, which operates alongside common law in Pakistan, the family of a killed relative can accept financial compensation from the perpetrators in exchange for forgiveness, leaving them free from prosecution.
“I had no choice. Where would I have found the money to pay legal fees? I already have more than 600,000 rupees ($2,120) in debt,” he said.
“There was also some pressure from the family’s relatives to pardon them, and I eventually agreed,” he said.
He told AFP that he had not taken any money from the family, highly unusual under Islamic law.
He brought home his other two daughters and two sons after Iqra’s death.
“I stopped sending them because I cannot bear the thought of losing another child,” he said.

- Burned with an iron -

“The penalties are not strict enough,” for both employers and parents, said Mir Tariq Ali Talpur, the social affairs minister for rural and impoverished Sindh.
He told AFP that authorities regularly conduct checks and take charge of young children employed illegally, but the courts often return them to their parents after a small fine of around $3.50.
“That’s why these incidents keep happening again and again,” he said.
A Karachi couple accused of burning a 13-year-old domestic worker named Zainab with an iron was given bail for a fee of around $105 each in September.
“I don’t understand how they could be free. Doesn’t anyone see Zainab’s injuries?” said the teen’s mother Asia, pointing to severe burns on her daughter’s arms, legs, back and stomach.
Asia, who is pursuing the offenders legally, acknowledges that they are “rich and think they’re untouchable.”
“The poor like us have no power,” she said.


A nation pauses: Ukraine’s daily moment of remembrance endures through intensified Russian attacks

A nation pauses: Ukraine’s daily moment of remembrance endures through intensified Russian attacks
Updated 13 October 2025

A nation pauses: Ukraine’s daily moment of remembrance endures through intensified Russian attacks

A nation pauses: Ukraine’s daily moment of remembrance endures through intensified Russian attacks
  • Public demonstrations of solidarity continue even as Russian missile and drone attacks have intensified in recent weeks, striking power facilities and cities across the country
  • City officials have recently synchronized Kyiv’s traffic lights to turn red at 9 a.m., ensuring the capital joins the nationwide pause

KYIV: Each morning at 9 o’clock, Kyiv stops for a minute.
Traffic lights turn red, and the steady beat of a metronome on loudspeakers signals 60 seconds of reflection. Cars idle in the middle of the street as drivers step out and stand with heads bowed.
Across Ukraine — in cafes, gyms, schools, on television and even on the front lines — people pause to remember those killed in Russia’s full-scale invasion.
Near a growing outdoor memorial at Kyiv’s Maidan Square, four friends gathered with cardboard signs that read, “Stop. Honor.” Around them, flags, photos and candles for fallen service members formed a dense mosaic of grief and pride.
The four are connected by Iryna Tsybukh, a 25-year-old combat medic killed by a land mine in eastern Ukraine last year. Her death sparked a national outpouring of grief and added momentum to the daily remembrance initiative.
“Memory is not about death,” said Kateryna Datsenko, a friend of the fallen medic and co-founder of Vshanuy, a civic group that promotes the daily observance. “It’s about life — what people loved, valued and thought about. Someone might have loved gardening, someone else a favorite poem. This is the kind of memory we try to preserve.”
The 9 a.m. ritual began in 2022, weeks after the invasion started, as a presidential decree from Volodymyr Zelensky. It has since evolved into a shared national practice.
Public demonstrations of solidarity continue even as Russian missile and drone attacks have intensified in recent weeks, striking power facilities and cities across the country. Despite the escalation, Ukrainians still gather each morning to honor those lost in the war.
Ihor Reva, deputy head of Kyiv’s military administration, said the ritual fulfills a deep social and personal need.
“This war has a price, and that price is terrible — human lives,” he said. “You disconnect from everyday thoughts and simply devote that minute to remembrance. That’s what I’d call it — a mindful keeping of time.”
City officials have recently synchronized Kyiv’s traffic lights to turn red at 9 a.m., ensuring the capital joins the nationwide pause.
“Better late than never,” Reva said. “We definitely won’t stop there.”
For activist and campaign supporter Daria Kolomiec, the moment feels both collective and personal.
“Every day we wake up — sometimes barely sleeping because of attacks — but every morning at 9 a.m. we gather to remember why we’re still here, and for whom we need to be thankful,” she said. “You’re not alone in this grief. There’s energy between us in that moment.”


Ex French President Nicolas Sarkozy to learn prison date and location Monday

Ex French President Nicolas Sarkozy to learn prison date and location Monday
Updated 13 October 2025

Ex French President Nicolas Sarkozy to learn prison date and location Monday

Ex French President Nicolas Sarkozy to learn prison date and location Monday
  • Sarkozy, 70, is to appear Monday at the National Financial Prosecutor’s office, which will set a date and location for his incarceration
  • The Paris court said the prison sentence was effective immediately instead of suspending it pending appeal, citing “the seriousness of the disruption to public order caused by the offense”

PARIS: Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy is set to learn Monday when and where he will serve time in prison for criminal conspiracy for a scheme to use funds from Libya to finance his winning 2007 campaign.
The first ex-president in modern French history to be imprisoned, Sarkozy maintains his innocence and has protested the decision to put him behind bars pending his appeal.
Sarkozy, 70, is to appear Monday at the National Financial Prosecutor’s office, which will set a date and location for his incarceration.
While long retired from active politics, Sarkozy remains an influential figure in conservative circles. He served as president from 2007 to 2012 and was previously convicted in another corruption case but hasn’t had to serve time.
For safety reasons, Sarkozy is expected to be incarcerated under conditions reserved for high-profile inmates, possibly in a special “VIP area” of La Santé prison, which is the only prison in Paris where some of France’s most notorious criminals have been imprisoned.
Once behind bars, Sarkozy will be able to file a release request to the appeals court. Judges will then have up to two months to process the request.
Sarkozy was handed a five-year sentence on Sept. 25 in a sprawling legal case after a decade of investigation. The Paris court said the prison sentence was effective immediately instead of suspending it pending appeal, citing “the seriousness of the disruption to public order caused by the offense.”
Sarkozy was given 18 days after the ruling to “organize his professional life” before Monday’s imprisonment decision.
The French justice ministry said in 2024 that 90 percent of adults convicted and sentenced to at least two years in prison are immediately incarcerated.
The court said Sarkozy, as a presidential candidate and interior minister, used his position “to prepare corruption at the highest level” from 2005 to 2007 to finance his presidential campaign with funds from Libya, then led by longtime ruler Muammar Qaddafi.
The court cleared Sarkozy of three other charges and said there is no evidence the money transferred from Libya to France ended up being used in Sarkozy’s 2007 campaign or for his “direct personal enrichment.”
Sarkozy consistently has said he is innocent and the victim of a plot by people linked to the Libyan government. He suggested the allegations were retaliation for his call in 2011 for Qaddafi’s removal. Qaddafi was toppled and killed amid Arab Spring pro-democracy protests that year.
An appeal trial will take place at a later date, possibly in the spring.