ֱ

India’s cup overflows after New Zealand win, but dominance could breed antipathy

India’s cup overflows after New Zealand win, but dominance could breed antipathy
Understandably, the Indian team, officials, management and millions of fervent supporters were overjoyed. (FILE/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 13 March 2025

India’s cup overflows after New Zealand win, but dominance could breed antipathy

India’s cup overflows after New Zealand win, but dominance could breed antipathy
  • The Champions Trophy joins the T20 World Cup, earned in June 2024 when they beat South Africa by just 7 runs

When previewing the International Cricket Council’s 2025 Champions Trophy for Arab News, Azeem Rafiq felt that India started as slight favorites. As the tournament progressed, it became apparent that several factors underlined that initial assessment. India’s superiority and team cohesion was sufficient to achieve an unbeaten route to the final in which a tenacious New Zealand was narrowly beaten.

Understandably, the Indian team, officials, management and millions of fervent supporters were overjoyed. Their delight is enhanced as the Champions Trophy is now added to the T20 World Cup, secured in June 2024 when South Africa was beaten by the narrow margin of seven runs.

No doubt Indian eyes will now turn to planning victory in the 2026 T20 World Cup, to be hosted jointly by India and Sri Lanka from mid-February to mid-March. If it had not been for an inspired performance by Australia in the final of the 2023 ODI World Cup, the Indian men’s team would hold a full set of ICC trophies in the short formats.

It is difficult to escape the conclusion that India and its supporters want to win every tournament, befitting their status as cricket’s powerhouse in terms of revenue generation and levels of support. Dominance by one team in any sport tends to breed ennui and antipathy — just ask supporters of other English Premier League teams their views on the dominance displayed by the two Manchester clubs and Liverpool at various times. These feelings are exacerbated if accompanied by a sense of injustice or bias and there is a danger India’s most recent success could fall into that category.

The resurrection of the Champions Trophy by the ICC and its choosing Pakistan as hosts was designed to provide a boost for cricket in the country. It certainly provided grounds for optimism and, as Rafiq noted, Pakistan’s message to the world was: “We are back.” However, the vibes were dampened by disappointing cricket from the hosts, by three matches lost to rain and by the geo-politically induced decision to split the tournament between Pakistan and Dubai.

Much has been made of India playing all their matches in Dubai, of being based there and not having to travel, of being familiar with the pitches and tailoring team selection to include four spinners to take advantage of them. Naturally, the Indians have downplayed these alleged benefits, one coach saying that “you (still) have to play good cricket every day when you turn up.” Whilst this is self-evidently true and they were the best team, India avoided the farcical situation in which Australia and South Africa found themselves.

Having completed their group stage matches and qualified for the semifinals, both teams had to fly from Pakistan to Dubai where the result of the final group stage match between India and New Zealand would determine the semifinal pairings. India won, which meant Australia remained in Dubai and the South Africans ended an 18-hour stay by rushing back to Lahore to play New Zealand. The reason given for this bizarre decision was to allow the team playing the semifinal in Dubai maximum time to prepare. This feels like a tacit admission of the need to balance out India’s perceived advantage.

Pakistan’s disappointment in failing to reach the semifinal stage, thereby depriving the country of the global exposure which it craved, was made worse by losing the opportunity to host the final, because India reached it. Events at the presentation ceremony will not have eased Pakistan’s pain.

Legendary former Pakistan players Wasim Akram and Shoaib Akhtar were incredulous there was no representative from the Pakistan Cricket Board on the stage, which was populated by Indians. The president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India, Roger Binny, presented jackets to the Indian players and the former BCCI secretary, now ICC chair Jay Shah, presented the trophy to India’s captain.

It is understood the PCB’s chair, Mohsin Naqvi, could not attend the occasion due to prior commitments, but both the tournament director and PCB COO, Sumair Ahmed Syed, and Director of International Cricket Usman Wahla represented him at the match. Looking at the stage in Dubai, it was hard to believe the PCB was the tournament’s official host. The PCB interpreted this lack of representation as a deliberate snub and lodged an official complaint, which is unlikely to do more than further inflame tensions. The official line is that protocol allows only elected members or directors of a board to be on the podium.

The 2025 Champions Trophy provided a significant opportunity for Pakistan to re-establish itself as a viable host for future ICC events. This was partially achieved. The PCB’s investment in stadiums has gone largely unrewarded in terms of spectator numbers. Despite Naqvi’s fulsome praise for “the commitment and collective efforts of those who ensured the tournament’s seamless execution,” other factors dogged their efforts. India’s late decision not to travel cast a long shadow not only over the cricket but also the tournament’s organization. The schedule was released just eight weeks before the opening match and tickets were available only days beforehand.

None of this will matter to either the ICC, BCCI or India. The ICC continues to make money but is dependent upon India’s participation in its tournaments and on India v Pakistan to protect broadcasting rights. International cricket is over a barrel. No national board is prepared to take the risk of challenging the insanely rich BCCI — look what happened when Pakistan tried. Market forces have been allowed to dictate the future of the game, whilst the BCCI, hand in glove with the ICC, now seems to be able to influence schedules for its own benefit.

The Champions Trophy 2025 has pulled back the curtain on the future of international cricket, in which India looks set to dominate not only off the field, but on it as well, at least in the short formats. It has taken eight years since the last Champions Trophy in 2017, when Pakistan handsomely beat India at the Oval, for this possibility to become reality.


An unexpected aspect of cricket’s growing appeal

An unexpected aspect of cricket’s growing appeal
Updated 06 November 2025

An unexpected aspect of cricket’s growing appeal

An unexpected aspect of cricket’s growing appeal
  • There is growing demand for blades made of premium willow to maintain cricket’s evocative sound of bat on leather

One of the most evocative sounds associated with cricket is the sound of ball on bat or, more precisely, that of leather on willow. Quite when willow came to be chosen as the most suitable wood is not clear.

Previous columns have traced the evolution of the cricket bat from one resembling a hockey stick to one with specific length and width dimensions.

These are specified in Law 5 of the Laws of Cricket as “not more than 38 in/96.52 cm in length, whilst the blade shall not exceed a width of 4.25 in/10.8 cm, a depth of 2.64 in/6.7 cm and edges of 1.56 in/4.0 cm.” The law also specifies that “the blade shall consist solely of wood.”

Willow is a wood which is light but strong, capable of absorbing the shock of a cricket ball’s force, without shattering. There are some 400 varieties of willow but only Salix alba var Caerulea, a deciduous tree, is fit for the purpose of cricket-bat blade production.

It is straight stemmed, growing up to 25 meters high, with an ability to hold a higher moisture content than other woods. This means it is fast-growing, maturing in 12 to 20 years. Trees are ready for harvesting when their circumference measures 147.5 centimeters at a height of 142.3 centimeters from the ground, ideally with a clean trunk of 213.5 centimeters.

The trees require well-draining, loamy soils and thrive in temperate climates with a healthy amount of direct sunlight. This helps develop a “diffuse porous” cell structure inimical to the creation of top-grade willow for cricket bats.

Trees need to be close to water and are often found on low-lying, wet, heavy soils which, otherwise, may be underproductive. They can also play a role in riverbank restoration and soil stabilization.

It is thought that the variety was first identified in Norfolk, eastern England, in the 1700s. Plantations still exist in the same area, as well as south in Kent, west in Oxfordshire and Bedfordshire, with one established to the north in Yorkshire.

Ideally, the trees need space away from other tree species. They are grown at 10-meter spacings along a ditch or riverbank, or in a plantation with a high-water table, at 12-meter spacing. This will provide around 100 trees per hectare.

Coastal locations are unsuitable because of exposure to heavy winds, storms and salty air. Damage to trees can be caused by deer, which use them to sharpen their antlers and squirrels, which eat the bark.

Once a tree has been harvested, the logs are split into “clefts” and then shaped into the rough bat shape or “blade,” both ends being waxed to prevent the wood drying out and splitting.

After that, the wood is air-dried for 12 months to achieve the correct moisture content, a process which is highly proprietorial. Once dried, the blades are graded from one to 20, according to grain, coloring and any small blemishes, such as specks.

Grade 1 is the highest quality, blemish-free wood, each sequential grade having more blemishes. Blades are traded between producers and bat makers, either on long-standing or ad-hoc contracts.

There is much more than meets the eye to producing high-quality willow for cricket bats. The faster a tree grows, the wider the grains will be on the finished blade, each grain representing one year’s growth. Industry experts say that the number of grains is not an indicator of quality.

Faster growth also means that the grower receives a faster return on an investment for which there is guaranteed buy-back. This situation has been enhanced in recent years by the upsurge in demand for bats, with certain producers harvesting trees before they reach optimum size.

At the same time, because of milder winters, the growing season has lengthened in recent years into November, leading to faster maturation and a premium placed on top-quality willow which has become rarer and more expensive.

Concern has been expressed about the sustainability of willow cultivation to the point where the Marylebone Cricket Club convened a meeting of willow suppliers, bat manufacturers and retailers from across the world in mid-October.

One press report of the event suggested that an emergency exists, caused by surging demand, largely from South Asia, which has inflated the prices of quality bats.

The largest cricket-bat willow producer in the world is JS Wright, based in Chelmsford, Essex, founded in 1894. On its website, the company states that around 75 percent of the world’s cricket bats are made from its willow production, an astonishing figure.

Its management also believes in investing for the future of the industry, not just maximizing short-term profits. Production is being increased year on year to meet future demand, based on a commitment to plant more trees than are harvested.

This year, the company planted up to 40,000 trees, four for every one that was felled. On average, each tree generates 40 blades. If 10,000 were felled, then 400,000 blades would be produced. Adding the balance of 25 percent from other English producers, the total annual production of English willow clefts approaches 600,000.

Various estimates of the size and value of the global cricket-bat market have been made by market research consultancies. Whilst there are inconsistencies between the estimates, they all agree that the market is set to grow by between 5 and 7 percent year on year up to 2034.

The way this demand will be satisfied in an unregulated marketplace is the challenge for all stakeholders. More bats need to be produced cost-effectively that perform at a level which maintains the current balance of bat against ball.

Apart from English willow, the other main sources for cricket bats are Kashmir and European willow. Although grown from the same seed, unfavorable growing conditions, mainly because of a lack of moisture, make the Kashmir willow denser and heavier, but cheaper.

Accordingly, it is mainly used in low grade junior and senior bats. Sadly, both it and European willow is being used in the counterfeit market, whereby bats sold as English willow are made from the cheaper alternatives.

Indian authorities have been clamping down on this illegal activity. Michael Blatherwick, managing director of the Nottingham-based B3 bat-making company, says that, in a growing market, there is a place for Kashmiri or European willow bats if they are honestly marketed and priced accordingly.

There have also been trials of alternative materials, such as Ethylene Vinyl Acetate, mainly for children and casual play. Blatherwick revealed that a few years ago they were engaged in a project to test alternative timbers from around the world. None came close to English willow.

One potential solution is lamination, with an English willow face backed by cheaper and lesser-performing Kashmir willow or other woods. This would lead to a reduced demand on English willow. Cricket’s laws already permit lamination for use in the junior game.

It could be extended to the recreational game, but the professional game will want to keep bats as pure as possible. Undoubtably, cricket lovers everywhere will resist the use of materials which eliminate the familiar sound of willow on leather.